Friction, Frontogenesis, and the Stratification of the Surface Mixed Layer

Leif Thomas Department of Physical Oceanography, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts

Search for other papers by Leif Thomas in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Raffaele Ferrari Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, Massachusetts

Search for other papers by Raffaele Ferrari in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The generation and destruction of stratification in the surface mixed layer of the ocean is understood to result from vertical turbulent transport of buoyancy and momentum driven by air–sea fluxes and stresses. In this paper, it is shown that the magnitude and penetration of vertical fluxes are strongly modified by horizontal gradients in buoyancy and momentum. A classic example is the strong restratification resulting from frontogenesis in regions of confluent flow. Frictional forces acting on a baroclinic current either imposed externally by a wind stress or caused by the spindown of the current itself also modify the stratification by driving Ekman flows that differentially advect density. Ekman flow induced during spindown always tends to restratify the fluid, while wind-driven Ekman currents will restratify or destratify the mixed layer if the wind stress has a component up or down front (i.e., directed against or with the geostrophic shear), respectively. Scalings are constructed for the relative importance of friction versus frontogenesis in the restratification of the mixed layer and are tested using numerical experiments of mixed layer fronts forced by both winds and a strain field. The scalings suggest and the numerical experiments confirm that for wind stress magnitudes, mixed layer depths, and cross-front density gradients typical of the ocean, wind-induced friction often dominates frontogenesis in the modification of the stratification of the upper ocean. The experiments reveal that wind-induced destratification is weaker in magnitude than restratification because the stratification generated by up-front winds confines the turbulent stress to a depth shallower than the Ekman layer, which enhances the frictional force, Ekman flow, and differential advection of density. Frictional destratification is further reduced over restratification because the stress associated with the geostrophic shear at the surface tends to compensate a down-front wind stress.

* Current affiliation: Department of Environmental Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California

Corresponding author address: Raffaele Ferrari, Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, 54–1420, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Mass. Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139. Email: rferrari@mit.edu

Abstract

The generation and destruction of stratification in the surface mixed layer of the ocean is understood to result from vertical turbulent transport of buoyancy and momentum driven by air–sea fluxes and stresses. In this paper, it is shown that the magnitude and penetration of vertical fluxes are strongly modified by horizontal gradients in buoyancy and momentum. A classic example is the strong restratification resulting from frontogenesis in regions of confluent flow. Frictional forces acting on a baroclinic current either imposed externally by a wind stress or caused by the spindown of the current itself also modify the stratification by driving Ekman flows that differentially advect density. Ekman flow induced during spindown always tends to restratify the fluid, while wind-driven Ekman currents will restratify or destratify the mixed layer if the wind stress has a component up or down front (i.e., directed against or with the geostrophic shear), respectively. Scalings are constructed for the relative importance of friction versus frontogenesis in the restratification of the mixed layer and are tested using numerical experiments of mixed layer fronts forced by both winds and a strain field. The scalings suggest and the numerical experiments confirm that for wind stress magnitudes, mixed layer depths, and cross-front density gradients typical of the ocean, wind-induced friction often dominates frontogenesis in the modification of the stratification of the upper ocean. The experiments reveal that wind-induced destratification is weaker in magnitude than restratification because the stratification generated by up-front winds confines the turbulent stress to a depth shallower than the Ekman layer, which enhances the frictional force, Ekman flow, and differential advection of density. Frictional destratification is further reduced over restratification because the stress associated with the geostrophic shear at the surface tends to compensate a down-front wind stress.

* Current affiliation: Department of Environmental Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California

Corresponding author address: Raffaele Ferrari, Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, 54–1420, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Mass. Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139. Email: rferrari@mit.edu

Save
  • Adamson, D. S., S. E. Belcher, B. J. Hoskins, and R. S. Plant, 2006: Boundary layer friction in midlatitude cyclones. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 132 , 101124.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bishop, C. H., 1993: On the behaviour of baroclinic waves undergoing horizontal deformation. II: Error-bound amplification and rossby wave diagnostic. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 119 , 241267.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boccaletti, G., R. Ferrari, and B. Fox-Kemper, 2007: Mixed layer instabilities and restratification. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 37 , 22282250.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Capet, X., J. McWilliams, M. Molemaker, and A. Shchepetkin, 2008: Mesoscale to submesoscale transition in the California Current System. Part II: Frontal processes. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 38 , 4464.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Castelao, R. M., L. P. Mavor, J. A. Barth, and L. C. Breaker, 2006: Sea surface temperature fronts in the California Current System from geostationary satellite observations. Geophys. Res. Lett., 111 .C09026, doi:10.1029/2006JC003541.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cooper, I. M., A. J. Thorpe, and C. H. Bishop, 1992: The role of diffusive effects on potential vorticity in fronts. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 118 , 629647.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davis, C. A., M. T. Stoelinga, and Y. H. Kuo, 1993: The integrated effect of condensation in numerical simulations of extratropical cyclogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121 , 23092330.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fox-Kemper, B., R. Ferrari, and R. Hallberg, 2008: Parameterization of mixed layer eddies. I: Theory and diagnosis. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 38 , 11451165.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Garrett, C. J. R., and J. W. Loder, 1981: Dynamical aspects of shallow sea fronts. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London,, A302 , 563581.

  • Haine, T., and J. C. Marshall, 1998: Gravitational, symmetric, and baroclinic instability of the ocean mixed layer. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 28 , 634658.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoskins, B. J., and F. P. Bretherton, 1972: Atmospheric frontogenesis models: Mathematical formulation and solution. J. Atmos. Sci., 29 , 1137.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoskins, B. J., I. Draghici, and H. C. Davies, 1978: A new look at the ω-equation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 104 , 3138.

  • Lapeyre, G., P. Klein, and B. L. Hua, 2006: Oceanic restratification forced by surface frontogenesis. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 36 , 15771590.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Large, W. G., J. C. McWilliams, and S. C. Doney, 1994: Oceanic vertical mixing: A review and a model with a nonlocal boundary layer parameterization. Rev. Geophys., 32 , 363403.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marshall, J. C., and A. J. G. Nurser, 1992: Fluid dynamics of oceanic thermocline ventilation. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 22 , 583595.

  • Smolarkiewicz, P. K., and L. G. Margolin, 1998: Mpdata: A finite-difference solver for geophysical flows. J. Comput. Phys., 140 , 459480.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Spall, M., 1997: Baroclinic jets in confluent flow. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 27 , 381402.

  • Thomas, L. N., 2005: Destruction of potential vorticity by winds. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 35 , 24572466.

  • Thomas, L. N., 2007: Dynamical constraints on the extreme low values of the potential vorticity in the ocean. Proc. 15th ‘Aha Huliko ‘a Hawaiian Winter Workshop, Honolulu, HI, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 117–124.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thomas, L. N., 2008: Formation of intrathermocline eddies at ocean fronts by wind-driven destruction of potential vorticity. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans, 45 , 252273. doi:10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2008.02. 002.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thomas, L. N., and P. B. Rhines, 2002: Nonlinear stratified spin-up. J. Fluid Mech., 473 , 211244.

  • Thompson, L., 2000: Ekman layers and two-dimensional frontogenesis in the upper ocean. J. Geophys. Res., 105 , 64376451.

  • Wimbush, M., and W. Munk, 1970: The benthic boundary layer. The Sea, A. E. Maxwell, Ed., Vol. 4, Wiley Interscience, 731–758.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1923 747 196
PDF Downloads 1217 378 30