The Influence of Lateral Advection on the Residual Estuarine Circulation: A Numerical Modeling Study of the Hudson River Estuary

Malcolm E. Scully Center for Coastal Physical Oceanography, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia

Search for other papers by Malcolm E. Scully in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
W. Rockwell Geyer Applied Ocean Physics and Engineering, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts

Search for other papers by W. Rockwell Geyer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
James A. Lerczak College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon

Search for other papers by James A. Lerczak in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

In most estuarine systems it is assumed that the dominant along-channel momentum balance is between the integrated pressure gradient and bed stress. Scaling the amplitude of the estuarine circulation based on this balance has been shown to have predictive skill. However, a number of authors recently highlighted important nonlinear processes that contribute to the subtidal dynamics at leading order. In this study, a previously validated numerical model of the Hudson River estuary is used to examine the forces driving the residual estuarine circulation and to test the predictive skill of two linear scaling relationships. Results demonstrate that the nonlinear advective acceleration terms contribute to the subtidal along-channel momentum balance at leading order. The contribution of these nonlinear terms is driven largely by secondary lateral flows. Under a range of forcing conditions in the model runs, the advective acceleration terms nearly always act in concert with the baroclinic pressure gradient, reinforcing the residual circulation. Despite the strong contribution of the nonlinear advective terms to the subtidal dynamical balance, a linear scaling accurately predicts the strength of the observed residual circulation in the model. However, this result is largely fortuitous, as this scaling does not account for two processes that are fundamental to the estuarine circulation. The skill of this scaling results because of the compensatory relationship between the contribution of the advective acceleration terms and the suppression of turbulence due to density stratification. Both of these processes, neither of which is accounted for in the linear scaling, increase the residual estuarine circulation but have an opposite dependence on tidal amplitude and, consequently, strength of stratification.

Corresponding author address: Malcolm E. Scully, 4111 Monarch Way, Norfolk, VA 23508. Email: mscully@odu.edu

Abstract

In most estuarine systems it is assumed that the dominant along-channel momentum balance is between the integrated pressure gradient and bed stress. Scaling the amplitude of the estuarine circulation based on this balance has been shown to have predictive skill. However, a number of authors recently highlighted important nonlinear processes that contribute to the subtidal dynamics at leading order. In this study, a previously validated numerical model of the Hudson River estuary is used to examine the forces driving the residual estuarine circulation and to test the predictive skill of two linear scaling relationships. Results demonstrate that the nonlinear advective acceleration terms contribute to the subtidal along-channel momentum balance at leading order. The contribution of these nonlinear terms is driven largely by secondary lateral flows. Under a range of forcing conditions in the model runs, the advective acceleration terms nearly always act in concert with the baroclinic pressure gradient, reinforcing the residual circulation. Despite the strong contribution of the nonlinear advective terms to the subtidal dynamical balance, a linear scaling accurately predicts the strength of the observed residual circulation in the model. However, this result is largely fortuitous, as this scaling does not account for two processes that are fundamental to the estuarine circulation. The skill of this scaling results because of the compensatory relationship between the contribution of the advective acceleration terms and the suppression of turbulence due to density stratification. Both of these processes, neither of which is accounted for in the linear scaling, increase the residual estuarine circulation but have an opposite dependence on tidal amplitude and, consequently, strength of stratification.

Corresponding author address: Malcolm E. Scully, 4111 Monarch Way, Norfolk, VA 23508. Email: mscully@odu.edu

Save
  • Chatwin, P. C., 1976: Some remarks on the maintenance of the salinity distribution in estuaries. Estuarine Coastal Mar. Sci., 4 , 555–566.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Geyer, W. R., J. H. Trowbridge, and M. M. Bowen, 2000: The dynamics of a partially mixed estuary. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 30 , 2035–2048.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Godfrey, J. S., 1980: A numerical model of the James River estuary, Virginia, U.S.A. Estuarine Coastal Mar. Sci., 11 , 295–310.

  • Hansen, D. V., and M. Rattray, 1965: Gravitational circulation in straits and estuaries. J. Mar. Res., 23 , 104–122.

  • Huijts, K. M. H., H. M. Schuttelaars, H. E. de Swart, and C. T. Friedrichs, 2008: Analytical study of the transverse distribution of along-channel and transverse residual flows in tidal estuaries. Cont. Shelf Res., in press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jay, D. A., and J. D. Musiak, 1994: Internal tidal asymmetry in channel flows: Origins and consequences. Mixing in Estuaries and Coastal Seas, C. Pattiaratchi, Ed., Vol. 50, Coastal and Estuarine Studies, Amer. Geophys. Union, 211–249.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kantha, L. H., and C. A. Clayson, 1994: An improved mixed layer model for geophysical application. J. Geophys. Res., 99 , 25 235–25 266.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lerczak, J. A., and W. R. Geyer, 2004: Modeling the lateral circulation in straight, stratified estuaries. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 34 , 1410–1428.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lerczak, J. A., W. R. Geyer, and R. J. Chant, 2006: Mechanisms driving the time-dependent salt flux in a partially stratified estuary. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 36 , 2296–2311.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MacCready, P., 2007: Estuarine adjustment. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 37 , 2133–2145.

  • Monismith, S. G., W. Kimmerer, J. R. Burau, and M. T. Stacey, 2002: Structure and flow-induced variability of the subtidal salinity field in northern San Francisco Bay. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 32 , 3003–3019.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nunes, R. A., and J. H. Simpson, 1985: Axial convergence in a well-mixed estuary. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci., 20 , 637–649.

  • Pritchard, D. W., 1952: Estuarine hydrography. Advances in Geophysics, Vol. 1, Academic Press, 243–280.

  • Pritchard, D. W., 1954: A study of the salt balance in a coastal plain estuary. J. Mar. Res., 13 , 133–144.

  • Pritchard, D. W., 1956: The dynamic structure of a coastal plain estuary. J. Mar. Res., 15 , 33–42.

  • Ralston, D. K., W. R. Geyer, and J. A. Lerczak, 2008: Subtidal salinity and velocity in the Hudson River estuary: Observations and modeling. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 38 , 753–770.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scully, M. E., 2005: The interaction between stratification, circulation, and sediment transport in a partially mixed estuary. Ph.D. dissertation, School of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, 148 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scully, M. E., and C. T. Friedrichs, 2003: The influence of asymmetries in overlying stratification on near bed turbulence and sediment suspension in a partially mixed estuary. Ocean Dyn., 53 , 208–219.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scully, M. E., and C. T. Friedrichs, 2007: The importance of tidal and lateral asymmetries in stratification to residual circulation in partially mixed estuaries. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 37 , 1496–1511.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scully, M. E., C. T. Friedrichs, and J. M. Brubaker, 2005: Control of estuarine stratification and mixing by wind-induced straining of the estuarine density field. Estuaries, 28 , 321–326.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stacey, M. T., S. G. Monismith, and J. R. Burau, 1999: Observations of turbulence in a partially stratified estuary. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 29 , 1950–1970.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stacey, M. T., J. R. Burau, and S. G. Monismith, 2001: Creation of residual flows in a partially stratified estuary. J. Geophys. Res., 106 , 17 013–17 037.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Trowbridge, J. H., W. R. Geyer, M. M. Bowen, and A. J. Williams, 1999: Near-bottom turbulence measurements in a partially mixed estuary: Turbulent energy balance, velocity structure, and along-channel momentum balance. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 29 , 3056–3072.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Uncles, R. J., and J. A. Stephens, 1990: The structure of vertical current profiles in a macrotidal, partially-mixed estuary. Estuaries, 13 , 349–361.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Warner, J. C., W. R. Geyer, and J. A. Lerczak, 2005: Numerical modeling of an estuary: A comprehensive skill assessment. J. Geophys. Res., 110 , C05001. doi:10.1029/2004JC002691.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilmott, C. J., 1981: On the validation of models. Phys. Geogr., 2 , 184–194.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1733 930 46
PDF Downloads 623 113 5