Two Regimes of Laboratory Whitecap Foam Decay: Bubble-Plume Controlled and Surfactant Stabilized

Adrian H. Callaghan Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, and School of Physics and Ryan Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland

Search for other papers by Adrian H. Callaghan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Grant B. Deane Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Dieg, La Jolla, California

Search for other papers by Grant B. Deane in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
M. Dale Stokes Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Dieg, La Jolla, California

Search for other papers by M. Dale Stokes in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

A laboratory experiment to quantify whitecap foam decay time in the presence or absence of surface active material is presented. The investigation was carried out in the glass seawater channel at the Hydraulics Facility of Scripps Institution of Oceanography. Whitecaps were generated with focused, breaking wave packets in filtered seawater pumped from La Jolla Shores Beach with and without the addition of the surfactant Triton X-100. Concentrations of Triton X-100 (204 μg L−1) were chosen to correspond to ocean conditions of medium productivity. Whitecap foam and subsurface bubble-plume decay times were determined from digital images for a range of wave scales and wave slopes. The experiment showed that foam lifetime is variable and controlled by subsurface bubble-plume-degassing times, which are a function of wave scale and breaking wave slope. This is true whether or not surfactants are present. However, in the presence of surfactants, whitecap foam is stabilized and persists for roughly a factor of 3 times its clean seawater value. The range of foam decay times observed in the laboratory study lie within the range of values observed in an oceanic dataset obtained off Martha’s Vineyard in 2008.

Corresponding author address: Adrian H. Callaghan, UCSD, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Code 0238, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0238. E-mail: callaghan.adrian@gmail.com

Abstract

A laboratory experiment to quantify whitecap foam decay time in the presence or absence of surface active material is presented. The investigation was carried out in the glass seawater channel at the Hydraulics Facility of Scripps Institution of Oceanography. Whitecaps were generated with focused, breaking wave packets in filtered seawater pumped from La Jolla Shores Beach with and without the addition of the surfactant Triton X-100. Concentrations of Triton X-100 (204 μg L−1) were chosen to correspond to ocean conditions of medium productivity. Whitecap foam and subsurface bubble-plume decay times were determined from digital images for a range of wave scales and wave slopes. The experiment showed that foam lifetime is variable and controlled by subsurface bubble-plume-degassing times, which are a function of wave scale and breaking wave slope. This is true whether or not surfactants are present. However, in the presence of surfactants, whitecap foam is stabilized and persists for roughly a factor of 3 times its clean seawater value. The range of foam decay times observed in the laboratory study lie within the range of values observed in an oceanic dataset obtained off Martha’s Vineyard in 2008.

Corresponding author address: Adrian H. Callaghan, UCSD, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Code 0238, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0238. E-mail: callaghan.adrian@gmail.com
Save
  • Anguelova, M. D., and F. Webster, 2006: Whitecap coverage from satellite measurements: A first step towards modeling the variability of oceanic whitecaps. J. Geophys. Res., 111, C03017, doi:10.1029/2005JC003158.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anguelova, M. D., and P. W. Gaiser, 2011: Skin depth at microwave frequencies of sea foam layers with vertical profile of void fraction. J. Geophys. Res., 116, C11002, doi:10.1029/2011JC007372.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anguelova, M. D., and P. W. Gaiser, 2012: Dielectric and radiative properties of sea foam at microwave frequencies: Conceptual understanding of foam emissivity. Remote Sens., 4, 11621189, doi:10.3390/rs4051162.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barger, W. R., W. H. Daniel, and W. D. Garrett, 1974: Surface chemical properties of banded sea slicks. Deep-Sea Res., 22, 8389.

  • Bondur, V. G., and E. A. Sharkov, 1982: Statistical properties of whitecaps on a rough sea. Oceanology (Moscow), 22, 274279.

  • Bouguet, J. Y., cited 2006: Camera calibration toolbox for Matlab. [Available online at http://www.vision.caltech.edu/bouguetj/calib_doc/.]

  • Callaghan, A. H., G. Deane, and M. D. Stokes, 2008: Observed physical and environmental causes of scatter in whitecap coverage values in a fetch limited coastal zone. J. Geophys. Res., 113, C05022, doi:10.1029/2007JC004453.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Callaghan, A. H., G. B. Deane, M. D. Stokes, and B. Ward, 2012: Observed variation in the decay time of oceanic whitecap foam. J. Geophys. Res., 117, C09015, doi:10.1029/2012JC008147.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Deane, G. B., and M. D. Stokes, 2002: Scale dependence of bubble creation mechanisms in breaking waves. Nature, 418, 839844.

  • Fan, L. S., and K. Tsuchiya, 1990: Bubble Wake Dynamics in Liquids and Liquid-Solid Suspensions. Butterworth-Heinemann Series in Chemical Engineering, Butterworth-Heinemann, 363 pp.

  • Frouin, R., M. Schwindling, and P.-Y. Deschamps, 1996: Spectral reflectance of sea foam in the visible and near-infrared: In situ measurements and remote sensing implications. J. Geophys. Res., 101 (C6), 14 36114 371.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Garrett, W. D., 1967: Stabilization of air bubble at the air-sea interface by surface active material. Deep-Sea Res., 14, 661672.

  • Goddijn-Murphy, L., D. K. Woolf, and A. H. Callaghan, 2011: Parameterizations and algorithms for oceanic whitecap coverage. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 41, 742756.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Henry, C. L., 2010: Bubbles, thin films and ion specificity. Ph.D. thesis, The Australian National University, 220 pp.

  • Hwang, P. A., and M. A. Sletten, 2008: Energy dissipation of wind-generated waves and whitecap coverage. J. Geophys. Res., 113, C02012, doi:10.1029/2007JC004277.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kleiss, J. M., and W. K. Melville, 2010: Observations of wave-breaking kinematics in fetch-limited seas. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 40, 25752604.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kleiss, J. M., and W. K. Melville, 2011: The analysis of sea surface imagery for whitecap kinematics. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 28, 219243.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lamarre, E., and W. K. Melville, 1991: Air entrainment and dissipation in breaking waves. Nature, 351, 469472.

  • Lewis, E. R., and S. E. Schwartz, 2004: Sea Salt Aerosol Production: Mechanisms, Methods, Measurements and Models—A Critical Review, Geophys. Monogr., Vol. 152, Amer. Geophys. Union, 412 pp.

  • Lippmann, T. C., and R. A. Holman, 1989: Quantification of sand bar morphology: A video technique based on wave dissipation. J. Geophys. Res., 94 (C1), 9951011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Longuet-Higgins, M. S., 1974: Breaking waves—In deep or shallow water. Proc. 10th Conf. on Naval Hydrodynamics, Cambridge, MA, MIT, 597–605.

  • Manev, E. D., and A. V. Nguyen, 2005: Critical thickness of microscopic thin liquid films. Adv. Coll. Inter. Sci., 114–115, 133146.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Melville, W. K., 1996: The role of surface wave breaking in air-sea interaction. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 28, 279321.

  • Monahan, E. C., 1971: Oceanic whitecaps. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 1, 139144.

  • Monahan, E. C., and M. Lu, 1990: Acoustically relevant bubble assemblages and their dependence on meteorological parameters. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 15, 340349.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Monahan, E. C., K. L. Davidson, and D. E. Spiel, 1982: Whitecap aerosol productivity deduced from simulation tank measurements. J. Geophys. Res., 87 (C11), 88988904.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Monahan, E. C., D. E. Spiel, and K. L. Davidson, 1986: A model of marine aerosol generation via whitecaps and wave disruption. Oceanic Whitecaps and Their Role in Air-Sea Exchange Processes, E. C. Monahan and G. MacNiochaill, Eds., Springer, 167–174.

  • Nolan, P. F., 1988: Decay characteristics of individual whitecaps. Oceanic Whitecaps and the Fluxes of Droplets from, Bubbles to, and Gases through, The Sea Surface, E. C. Monahan et al., Eds., University of Connecticut, 41–56.

  • Rapp, R. J., and W. K. Melville, 1990: Laboratory measurements of deep-water breaking waves. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, A331, 735800.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Romero, L., W. Melville, and J. Kleiss, 2012: Spectral energy dissipation due to surface-wave breaking. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 42, 14211444.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sharkov, E. A., 2007: Breaking Ocean Waves: Geometry, Structure and Remote Sensing. Springer, 278 pp.

  • Woolf, D. K., 1997: Bubbles and their role in gas exchange. The Sea Surface and Global Change, P. S. Liss and R. A. Duce, Eds., Cambridge University Press, 173–206.

  • Wurl, O., E. Wurl, L. Miller, K. Johnson, and S. Vagle, 2011: Formation and distribution of sea-surface microlayers. Biogeosciences, 8, 121135.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 721 320 52
PDF Downloads 390 66 13