Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Measurement of Tidal Form Drag Using Seafloor Pressure Sensors

Sally J. Warner School of Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by Sally J. Warner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Parker MacCready School of Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by Parker MacCready in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
James N. Moum College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon

Search for other papers by James N. Moum in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Jonathan D. Nash College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon

Search for other papers by Jonathan D. Nash in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Jun 2013
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-12-0163.1
Page(s):
1150–1172
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

As currents flow over rough topography, the pressure difference between the up- and downstream sides results in form drag—a force that opposes the flow. Measuring form drag is valuable because it can be used to estimate the loss of energy from currents as they interact with topography. An array of bottom pressure sensors was used to measure the tidal form drag on a sloping ridge in 200 m of water that forms a 1-km headland at the surface in Puget Sound, Washington. The form drag per unit length of the ridge reached 1 × 104 N m−1 during peak flood tides. The tidally averaged power removed from the tidal currents by form drag was 0.2 W m−2, which is 30 times larger than power losses to friction. Form drag is best parameterized by a linear wave drag law as opposed to a bluff body drag law because the flow is stratified and both internal waves and eddies are generated on the sloping topography. Maximum turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rates of 5 × 10−5 W kg−1 were measured with a microstructure profiler and are estimated to account for 25%–50% of energy lost from the tides. This study is among the first to measure form drag directly using bottom pressure sensors. The measurement and analysis techniques presented here are suitable for periodically reversing flows because they require the removal of a time-mean signal. The advantage of this technique is that it delivers a continuous record of form drag and is much less ship intensive compared to previous methods for estimation of the bottom pressure field.

Corresponding author address: Sally J. Warner, College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, 104 CEOAS Administration Building, Corvallis, OR 97331-5503. E-mail: swarner@coas.oregonstate.edu

Abstract

As currents flow over rough topography, the pressure difference between the up- and downstream sides results in form drag—a force that opposes the flow. Measuring form drag is valuable because it can be used to estimate the loss of energy from currents as they interact with topography. An array of bottom pressure sensors was used to measure the tidal form drag on a sloping ridge in 200 m of water that forms a 1-km headland at the surface in Puget Sound, Washington. The form drag per unit length of the ridge reached 1 × 104 N m−1 during peak flood tides. The tidally averaged power removed from the tidal currents by form drag was 0.2 W m−2, which is 30 times larger than power losses to friction. Form drag is best parameterized by a linear wave drag law as opposed to a bluff body drag law because the flow is stratified and both internal waves and eddies are generated on the sloping topography. Maximum turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rates of 5 × 10−5 W kg−1 were measured with a microstructure profiler and are estimated to account for 25%–50% of energy lost from the tides. This study is among the first to measure form drag directly using bottom pressure sensors. The measurement and analysis techniques presented here are suitable for periodically reversing flows because they require the removal of a time-mean signal. The advantage of this technique is that it delivers a continuous record of form drag and is much less ship intensive compared to previous methods for estimation of the bottom pressure field.

Corresponding author address: Sally J. Warner, College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, 104 CEOAS Administration Building, Corvallis, OR 97331-5503. E-mail: swarner@coas.oregonstate.edu
Save
Cover Journal of Physical Oceanography
Journal of Physical Oceanography

  • Armi, L., 1986: The hydraulics of two flowing layers with different densities. J. Fluid Mech., 163, 27–58.

  • Baines, P. G., 1995: Topographic Effects in Stratified Flows. Cambridge University Press, 500 pp.

  • Balmforth, N. J., G. R. Ierley, and W. R. Young, 2002: Tidal conversion by subcritical topography. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 32, 2900–2914.

  • Bell, T. H., 1975a: Lee waves in stratified flows with simple harmonic time dependence. J. Fluid Mech., 67, 705–722.

  • Bell, T. H., 1975b: Topographically generated internal waves in the open ocean. J. Geophys. Res., 80, 320–327.

  • Bougeault, P., and Coauthors, 1993: The atmospheric momentum budget over a major mountain range: First results of the Pyrex field program. Ann. Geophys., 11, 395–418.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bretschneider, D. E., G. A. Cannon, J. R. Holbrook, and D. J. Pashinski, 1985: Variability of subtidal current structure in a fjord estuary: Puget Sound, Washington. J. Geophys. Res., 90 (C6), 11 949–11 958.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Canals, M., G. Pawlak, and P. MacCready, 2009: Tilted baroclinic tidal vortices. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 39, 333–350.

  • Dean, R. G., and R. A. Dalrymple, 1984: Water Wave Mechanics for Engineers and Scientists. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 353 pp.

  • Edwards, K. A., P. MacCready, J. N. Moum, G. Pawlak, J. Klymak, and A. Perlin, 2004: Form drag and mixing due to tidal flow past a sharp point. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 34, 1297–1312.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Emery, W. J., and R. E. Thomson, 2004: Data Analysis Methods in Physical Oceanography. 2nd ed., Elsevier Inc, 634 pp.

  • Farmer, D., and L. Armi, 1999: The generation and trapping of solitary waves over topography. Science, 283, 188–190.

  • Fox, R. W., and A. T. McDonald, 1998: Introduction to Fluid Mechanics. 5th ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 512 pp.

  • Garrett, C., and E. Kunze, 2007: Internal tide generation in the deep ocean. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 39, 57–87.

  • Gill, A. E., 1982: Atmosphere–Ocean Dynamics. Academic Press, 662 pp.

  • Inall, M., T. Rippeth, C. Griffiths, and P. Wiles, 2005: Evolution and distribution of TKE production and dissipation within stratified flow over topography. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32 L08607, doi:10.1029/2004GL022289.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jayne, S. R., and L. C. St. Laurent, 2001: Parameterizing tidal dissipation over rough topography. Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 811–814.

  • Kelly, S. M., J. D. Nash, and E. Kunze, 2010: Internal-tide energy over topography. J. Geophys. Res., 115, C06014, doi:10.1029/2009JC005618.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Khatiwala, S., 2003: Generation of internal tides in an ocean of finite depth: Analytical and numerical calculations. Deep-Sea Res. I, 50, 3–21.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kim, Y.-J., S. D. Eckermann, and H.-Y. Chun, 2003: An overview of the past, present and future of gravity-wave drag parameterization for numerical climate and weather prediction models: Survey article. Atmos.–Ocean, 41, 65–98.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Klymak, J. M., and M. C. Gregg, 2004: Tidally generated turbulence over the knight inlet sill. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 34, 1135–1151.

  • Lavelle, J. W., H. O. Mofjeld, E. Lempriere-Doggett, G. A. Cannon, D. J. Pashinski, E. D. Cokelet, L. Lytle, and S. Gill, 1988: A multiply-connected channel model of tides and tidal currents in Puget Sound, Washington and a comparison with updated observations. NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory Tech. Rep. ERL PMEL-84, 103 pp.

  • Legg, S., and K. M. H. Huijts, 2006: Preliminary simulations of internal waves and mixing generated by finite amplitude tidal flow over isolated topography. Deep-Sea Res. II, 53, 140–156.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Llewellyn Smith, S. G., and W. R. Young, 2003: Tidal conversion at a very steep ridge. J. Fluid Mech., 495, 175–191.

  • Lott, F., and M. J. Miller, 1997: A new subgrid-scale orographic drag parameterization: Its formulation and testing. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 123, 101–127.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • MacCready, P., and G. Pawlak, 2001: Stratified flow along a rough slope: Separation drag and wave drag. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 31, 2824–2839.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • MacCready, P., G. Pawlak, K. A. Edwards, and R. McCabe, 2003: Form drag on ocean flows. Near-Boundary Processes and Their Parameterization: Proc. 13th ’Aha Huliko’a Hawaiian Winter Workshop, Honolulu, HI, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 119–130.

  • McCabe, R., P. MacCready, and G. Pawlak, 2006: Form drag due to flow separation at a headland. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 36, 2136–2152.

  • Moum, J. N., and J. D. Nash, 2000: Topographically induced drag and mixing at a small bank on the continental shelf. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 30, 2049–2054.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Moum, J. N., and W. D. Smyth, 2006: The pressure disturbance of a nonlinear internal wave train. J. Fluid Mech., 558, 153–177, doi:10.1017/S0022112006000036.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Moum, J. N., and J. D. Nash, 2008: Seafloor pressure measurements of nonlinear internal waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 38, 481–491.

  • Moum, J. N., M. C. Gregg, R. C. Lien, and M. E. Carr, 1995: Comparison of turbulence kinetic energy dissipation rate estimates from two ocean microstructure profilers. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 12, 346–366.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nakamura, T., T. Awaji, T. Hatayama, K. Akitomo, and T. Takizawa, 2000: The generation of large-amplitude unsteady lee waves by subinertial K1 tidal flow: A possible vertical mixing mechanism in the Kuril Straits. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 30, 1601–1621.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nash, J. D., and J. N. Moum, 2001: Internal hydraulic flows on the continental shelf: High drag states over a small bank. J. Geophys. Res., 106 (C3), 4592–4612.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nikurashin, M., and R. Ferrari, 2011: Global energy conversion rate from geostropic flows into internal lee waves in the deep ocean. Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L08610, doi:10.1029/2011GL046576.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Officer, C. B., 1976: Physical Oceanography of Estuaries (and Associated Coastal Waters). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 465 pp.

  • Oke, P. R., J. S. Allen, R. N. Miller, G. D. Egbert, and P. M. Kosro, 2002: Assimilation of surface velocity data into a primitive equation coastal ocean model. J. Geophys. Res., 107 (C9), 3122–3147.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Pawlak, G., P. MacCready, K. A. Edwards, and R. McCabe, 2003: Observations on the evolution of tidal vorticiy at a stratified deep water headland. Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 2234.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Pétrélis, F., S. G. Llewellyn Smith, and W. R. Young, 2006: Tidal conversion at a submarine ridge. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 36, 1053–1071.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Polzin, K. L., J. M. Toole, J. R. Ledwell, and R. W. Schmitt, 1997: Spatial variability of turbulent mixing in the abyssal ocean. Science, 276, 93–96.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rudnick, D. L., and Coauthors, 2003: From tides to mixing along the Hawaiian Ridge. Science, 301, 355–357.

  • St. Laurent, L., S. Stringer, C. Garrett, and D. Perrault-Joncas, 2003: The generation of internal tides at abrupt topography. Deep-Sea Res. I, 50, 987–1003.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Stöber, U., and J. N. Moum, 2011: On the potential for automated realtime detection of nonlinear internal waves from seafloor pressure measurements. Appl. Ocean Res., 33, 275–285.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Thorpe, S. A., 1992: The generation of internal waves by flow over the rough topography of a continental slope. Proc. Roy. Soc. Math. Sci., 439, 115–130.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Thorpe, S. A., 1996: The cross-slope transport of momentum by internal waves generated by alongshore currents over topography. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 26, 191–204.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Vallis, G. K., 2006: Atmospheric and Oceanic Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, 745 pp.

  • Warner, S. J., 2012: Using bottom pressure to quantify tidal form drag on a sloping headland. Ph.D. thesis, University of Washington, 131 pp.

  • Warner, S. J., and P. MacCready, 2009: Dissecting the pressure field in tidal flow past a headland: When is form drag “real”? J. Phys. Oceanogr., 39, 2971–2984.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wood, N., A. R. Brown, and F. E. Hewer, 2001: Parameterizing the effects of orography on the boundary layer: An alternative to effective roughness lengths. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 127, 759–777.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 727 319 129
PDF Downloads 353 87 3