Curved Density Fronts: Cyclogeostrophic Adjustment and Frontogenesis

Callum J. Shakespeare Research School of Earth Sciences, and ARC Centre of Excellence in Climate System Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

Search for other papers by Callum J. Shakespeare in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Curvature can play a significant role in the dynamics of density fronts at small scales and in low-latitude regions of the ocean. Fronts can be displaced from balance by rapid forcing and undergo an adjustment toward a more stable state or be strained and sharpened by surrounding flow in a process known as frontogenesis. This study investigates the role of curvature in adjustment and frontogenesis using the idealized configuration of an axisymmetric eddy and associated circular front. As a result of the curvature, the balanced state of this system is not geostrophic balance, where pressure and Coriolis forces exactly balance, but cyclogeostrophic balance, where pressure and Coriolis forces combine to supply a net inwards centripetal force on fluid parcels. The parameter range for which cyclogeostrophically balanced states exist for a given unbalanced initial condition is determined. This parameter range is smaller for anticyclonic fronts (i.e., fronts curved around a warm core), which have larger angular velocities than comparable straight fronts, implying they are more likely to break down during adjustment. The reverse is true for cyclonic fronts. A model for the sharpening of a curved front in a background strain flow, analogous to the Hoskins and Bretherton (1972) model for a straight front, is developed. Relative to a straight front subject to the same strain rate, vertical velocities are weaker for an anticyclonic front and stronger for a cyclonic front. Anticyclonic fronts collapse to a near discontinuity during frontogenesis far more rapidly than cyclonic fronts for the same strain rate.

Corresponding author address: Callum J. Shakespeare, Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, 142 Mills Rd., Acton 2601, ACT, Australia. E-mail: callum.shakespeare@anu.edu.au

Abstract

Curvature can play a significant role in the dynamics of density fronts at small scales and in low-latitude regions of the ocean. Fronts can be displaced from balance by rapid forcing and undergo an adjustment toward a more stable state or be strained and sharpened by surrounding flow in a process known as frontogenesis. This study investigates the role of curvature in adjustment and frontogenesis using the idealized configuration of an axisymmetric eddy and associated circular front. As a result of the curvature, the balanced state of this system is not geostrophic balance, where pressure and Coriolis forces exactly balance, but cyclogeostrophic balance, where pressure and Coriolis forces combine to supply a net inwards centripetal force on fluid parcels. The parameter range for which cyclogeostrophically balanced states exist for a given unbalanced initial condition is determined. This parameter range is smaller for anticyclonic fronts (i.e., fronts curved around a warm core), which have larger angular velocities than comparable straight fronts, implying they are more likely to break down during adjustment. The reverse is true for cyclonic fronts. A model for the sharpening of a curved front in a background strain flow, analogous to the Hoskins and Bretherton (1972) model for a straight front, is developed. Relative to a straight front subject to the same strain rate, vertical velocities are weaker for an anticyclonic front and stronger for a cyclonic front. Anticyclonic fronts collapse to a near discontinuity during frontogenesis far more rapidly than cyclonic fronts for the same strain rate.

Corresponding author address: Callum J. Shakespeare, Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, 142 Mills Rd., Acton 2601, ACT, Australia. E-mail: callum.shakespeare@anu.edu.au
Save
  • Blumen, W., and R. Wu, 1995: Geostrophic adjustment: Frontogenesis and energy conversion. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 25, 428–438, doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1995)025<0428:GAFAEC>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Capet, X., J. C. McWilliams, and A. F. Shchepetkin, 2008: Mesoscale to submesoscale transition in the California Current System. Part I: Flow structure, eddy flux, and observational tests. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 38, 29–43, doi:10.1175/2007JPO3671.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eliassen, A., 1962: On the vertical circulation in frontal zones. Geofys. Publ., 24, 147–160.

  • Ferrari, R., 2011: A frontal challenge for climate models. Science, 332, 316–317, doi:10.1126/science.1203632.

  • Flament, P. J., S. C. Kennan, R. A. Knox, P. P. Niiler, and R. L. Bernstein, 1996: The three-dimensional structure of an upper ocean vortex in the tropical Pacific Ocean. Nature, 383, 610–613, doi:10.1038/383610a0.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gula, J., M. J. Molemaker, and J. C. McWilliams, 2014: Submesoscale cold filaments in the Gulf Stream. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 44, 2617–2643, doi:10.1175/JPO-D-14-0029.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Holmes, R. M., L. N. Thomas, L. Thompson, and D. Darr, 2014: Potential vorticity dynamics of tropical instability vortices. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 44, 995–1011, doi:10.1175/JPO-D-13-0157.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Holton, J. R., and G. J. Hakim, 2013: An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology. International Geophysics Series, Vol. 88, Academic Press, 532 pp.

  • Hoskins, B. J., and F. P. Bretherton, 1972: Atmospheric frontogenesis models: Mathematical formulation and solution. J. Atmos. Sci., 29, 11–37, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1972)029<0011:AFMMFA>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, M., and T. Rossby, 1993: Observations of the velocity and vorticity structure of Gulf Stream meanders. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 23, 329–345, doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1993)023<0329:OOTVAV>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mahadevan, A., 2006: Modelling vertical motion at ocean fronts: Are nonhydrostatic effects relevant at submesoscales? Ocean Modell., 14, 222–240, doi:10.1016/j.ocemod.2006.05.005.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Niiler, P., N. Maximenko, G. Panteleev, T. Yamagata, and D. Olson, 2003: Near-surface dynamical structure of the Kuroshio extension. J. Geophys. Res., 108, 3193, doi:10.1029/2002JC001461.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ou, H. W., 1984: Geostrophic adjustment: A mechanism for frontogenesis. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 14, 994–1000, doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1984)014<0994:GAAMFF>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rossby, C. G., 1938: On the mutual adjustment of pressure and velocity distributions in certain simple current systems, II. J. Mar. Res., 1, 239–263.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rosso, I., A. M. Hogg, A. E. Kiss, and B. Gayen, 2015: Topographic influence on sub-mesoscale dynamics in the Southern Ocean. Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 1139–1147, doi:10.1002/2014GL062720.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rudnick, D. L., 2001: On the skewness of vorticity in the upper ocean. Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 2045–2048, doi:10.1029/2000GL012265.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sawyer, J. S., 1956: On the vertical circulation at meteorological fronts and its relation to frontogenesis. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, A234, 346–362, doi:10.1098/rspa.1956.0039.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shakespeare, C. J., and J. R. Taylor, 2013: A generalized mathematical model of geostrophic adjustment and frontogenesis: Uniform potential vorticity. J. Fluid Mech., 736, 366–413, doi:10.1017/jfm.2013.526.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shakespeare, C. J., and J. R. Taylor, 2014: The spontaneous generation of inertia-gravity waves during frontogenesis forced by large strain: Theory. J. Fluid Mech., 757, 817–853, doi:10.1017/jfm.2014.514.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shcherbina, A. Y., E. A. D’Asaro, C. M. Lee, J. M. Klymak, M. J. Molemaker, and J. C. McWilliams, 2013: Statistics of vertical vorticity, divergence, and strain in a developed submesoscale turbulence field. Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 4706–4711, doi:10.1002/grl.50919.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tandon, A., and C. Garrett, 1994: Mixed layer restratification due to a horizontal density gradient. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 24, 1419–1424, doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1994)024<1419:MLRDTA>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thomas, L. N., A. Tandon, and A. Mahadevan, 2008: Submesoscale processes and dynamics. Ocean Modeling in an Eddying Regime, Geophys. Monogr., Vol. 177, Amer. Geophys. Union, 17–38.

  • Williams, R. T., and J. Plotkin, 1968: Quasi-geostrophic frontogenesis. J. Atmos. Sci., 25, 201–206, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1968)025<0201:QGF>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1401 842 79
PDF Downloads 667 202 38