Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Are Rogue Waves Really Unexpected?

Francesco Fedele School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, and School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia

Search for other papers by Francesco Fedele in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 May 2016
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-15-0137.1
Page(s):
1495–1508
Restricted access

Abstract

An unexpected wave is defined by Gemmrich and Garrett as a wave that is much taller than a set of neighboring waves. Their definition of “unexpected” refers to a wave that is not anticipated by a casual observer. Clearly, unexpected waves defined in this way are predictable in a statistical sense. They can occur relatively often with a small or moderate crest height, but large unexpected waves that are rogue are rare. Here, this concept is elaborated and statistically described based on a third-order nonlinear model. In particular, the conditional return period of an unexpected wave whose crest exceeds a given threshold is developed. This definition leads to greater return periods or on average less frequent occurrences of unexpected waves than those implied by the conventional return periods not conditioned on a reference threshold. Ultimately, it appears that a rogue wave that is also unexpected would have a lower occurrence frequency than that of a usual rogue wave. As specific applications, the Andrea and Wave Crest Sensor Intercomparison Study (WACSIS) rogue wave events are examined in detail. Both waves appeared without warning and their crests were nearly 2 times larger than the surrounding O(10) wave crests and thus unexpected. The two crest heights are nearly the same as the threshold ~ 1.6Hs exceeded on average once every 0.3 × 106 waves, where Hs is the significant wave height. In contrast, the Andrea and WACSIS events, as both rogue and unexpected, would occur slightly less often and on average once every 3 × 106 and 0.6 × 106 waves, respectively.

Corresponding author address: Francesco Fedele, Georgia Institute of Technology, 790 Atlantic Drive NW, Atlanta, GA 30332. E-mail: fedele@gatech.edu

Abstract

An unexpected wave is defined by Gemmrich and Garrett as a wave that is much taller than a set of neighboring waves. Their definition of “unexpected” refers to a wave that is not anticipated by a casual observer. Clearly, unexpected waves defined in this way are predictable in a statistical sense. They can occur relatively often with a small or moderate crest height, but large unexpected waves that are rogue are rare. Here, this concept is elaborated and statistically described based on a third-order nonlinear model. In particular, the conditional return period of an unexpected wave whose crest exceeds a given threshold is developed. This definition leads to greater return periods or on average less frequent occurrences of unexpected waves than those implied by the conventional return periods not conditioned on a reference threshold. Ultimately, it appears that a rogue wave that is also unexpected would have a lower occurrence frequency than that of a usual rogue wave. As specific applications, the Andrea and Wave Crest Sensor Intercomparison Study (WACSIS) rogue wave events are examined in detail. Both waves appeared without warning and their crests were nearly 2 times larger than the surrounding O(10) wave crests and thus unexpected. The two crest heights are nearly the same as the threshold ~ 1.6Hs exceeded on average once every 0.3 × 106 waves, where Hs is the significant wave height. In contrast, the Andrea and WACSIS events, as both rogue and unexpected, would occur slightly less often and on average once every 3 × 106 and 0.6 × 106 waves, respectively.

Corresponding author address: Francesco Fedele, Georgia Institute of Technology, 790 Atlantic Drive NW, Atlanta, GA 30332. E-mail: fedele@gatech.edu
Save
Cover Journal of Physical Oceanography
Journal of Physical Oceanography

  • Alkhalidi, M. A., and M. A. Tayfun, 2013: Generalized Boccotti distribution for nonlinear wave heights. Ocean Eng., 74, 101–106, doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.09.014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Annenkov, S. Y., and V. I. Shrira, 2014: Evaluation of skewness and kurtosis of wind waves parameterized by JONSWAP spectra. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 44, 1582–1594, doi:10.1175/JPO-D-13-0218.1.

  • Bitner-Gregersen, E. M., L. Fernandez, J. M. Lefèvre, J. Monbaliu, and A. Toffoli, 2014: The North Sea Andrea storm and numerical simulations. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1407–1415, doi:10.5194/nhess-14-1407-2014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Boccotti, P., 2000: Wave Mechanics for Ocean Engineering. Elsevier, 496 pp.

  • Borgman, L. E., 1970: Maximum wave height probabilities for a random number of random intensity storms. Proc.12th Conf. on Coastal Engineering, Vol. 12, Washington, D.C., ASCE, 53–64. [Available online at https://journals.tdl.org/icce/index.php/icce/article/view/2608.]

  • Dias, F., J. Brennan, S. Ponce de Leon, C. Clancy, and J. Dudley, 2015: Local analysis of wave fields produced from hindcasted rogue wave sea states. ASME 2015 34th Int. Conf. on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, OMAE2015-41458, doi:10.1115/OMAE2015-41458.

  • Dysthe, K. B., H. E. Krogstad, and P. Muller, 2008: Oceanic rogue waves. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 40, 287–310, doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.102203.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Fedele, F., 2005: Successive wave crests in Gaussian Seas. Probab. Eng. Mech., 20, 355–363, doi:10.1016/j.probengmech.2004.05.008.

  • Fedele, F., 2012: Space–time extremes in short-crested storm seas. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 42, 1601–1615, doi:10.1175/JPO-D-11-0179.1.

  • Fedele, F., 2015: On the kurtosis of ocean waves in deep water. J. Fluid Mech., 782, 25–36, doi:10.1017/jfm.2015.538.

  • Fedele, F., and M. A. Tayfun, 2009: On nonlinear wave groups and crest statistics. J. Fluid Mech., 620, 221–239, doi:10.1017/S0022112008004424.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Forristall, G. Z., 2000: Wave crest distributions: Observations and second-order theory. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 30, 1931–1943, doi:10.1175/1520-0485(2000)030<1931:WCDOAS>2.0.CO;2.

  • Forristall, G. Z., S. F. Barstow, H. E. Krogstad, M. Prevosto, P. H. Taylor, and P. S. Tromans, 2004: Wave crest sensor intercomparison study: An overview of WACSIS. J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 126, 26–34, doi:10.1115/1.1641388.

  • Gemmrich, J., and C. Garrett, 2008: Unexpected waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 38, 2330–2336, doi:10.1175/2008JPO3960.1.

  • Gemmrich, J., and C. Garrett, 2010: Unexpected waves: Intermediate depth simulations and comparison with observations. Ocean Eng., 37, 262–267, doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2009.10.007.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Haver, S., 2001: Evidences of the existence of freak waves. Proc. Rogue Waves 2000, Brest, France, Ifremer, 129–140.

  • Haver, S., 2004: A possible freak wave event measured at the Draupner jacket January 1 1995. Proc. Rogue Waves 2004, Brest, France, Ifremer, 1–8. [Available online at http://www.ifremer.fr/web-com/stw2004/rw/fullpapers/walk_on_haver.pdf.]

  • Magnusson, K. A., and M. A. Donelan, 2013: The Andrea wave characteristics of a measured North Sea rogue wave. J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 135, 031108, doi:10.1115/1.4023800.

  • Mori, N., and P. A. E. M. Janssen, 2006: On kurtosis and occurrence probability of freak waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 36, 1471–1483, doi:10.1175/JPO2922.1.

  • Osborne, A. R., 1995: The numerical inverse scattering transform: Nonlinear Fourier analysis and nonlinear filtering of oceanic surface waves. Chaos Solitons Fractals, 5, 2623–2637, doi:10.1016/0960-0779(94)E0118-9.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Prevosto, M., and B. Bouffandeau, 2002: Probability of occurrence of a “giant” wave crest. ASME 2002 21st Int. Conf. on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Oslo, Norway, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 483–490, doi:10.1115/OMAE2002-28446.

  • Tayfun, M. A., 1980: Narrow-band nonlinear sea waves. J. Geophys. Res., 85, 1548–1552, doi:10.1029/JC085iC03p01548.

  • Tayfun, M. A., 2006: Statistics of nonlinear wave crests and groups. Ocean Eng., 33, 1589–1622, doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2005.10.007.

  • Tayfun, M. A., and J. Lo, 1990: Nonlinear effects on wave envelope and phase. J. Waterw. Port Coastal Ocean Eng., 116, 79–100, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1990)116:1(79).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Tayfun, M. A., and F. Fedele, 2007: Wave-height distributions and nonlinear effects. Ocean Eng., 34, 1631–1649, doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2006.11.006.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Watson, G. S., 1954: Extreme values in samples from m-dependent stationary stochastic processes. Ann. Math. Stat., 25, 798–800, doi:10.1214/aoms/1177728670.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 340 150 2
PDF Downloads 239 101 2