A Physical Interpretation of the Wind-Wave Instability as Interacting Waves

J. R. Carpenter Institute of Coastal Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Geesthacht, Germany

Search for other papers by J. R. Carpenter in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
A. Guha Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India

Search for other papers by A. Guha in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
E. Heifetz Department of Geosciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Search for other papers by E. Heifetz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

One mechanism for the growth of ocean surface waves by wind is through a shear instability that was first described by Miles in 1957. A physical interpretation of this wind-wave instability is provided in terms of the interaction of the surface gravity wave with perturbations of vorticity within the critical layer—a near-singularity in the airflow where the background flow speed matches that of the surface gravity wave. This physical interpretation relies on the fact that the vertical velocity field is slowly varying across the critical layer, whereas both the displacement and vorticity fields vary rapidly. Realizing this allows for the construction of a physically intuitive description of the critical layer vorticity perturbations that may be approximated by a simple vortex sheet model, the essence of the wind-wave instability can then be captured through the interaction of the critical layer vorticity with the surface gravity wave. This simple model is then extended to account for vorticity perturbations in the airflow profile outside of the critical layer and is found to lead to an exact description of the linear stability problem that is also computationally efficient. The interpretation allows, in general, for the incorporation of sheared critical layers into the “wave interaction theory” that is commonly used to provide a physical description and rationalization of results in the stability of stratified shear flows.

© 2017 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: J. R. Carpenter, jeff.carpenter@hzg.de

Abstract

One mechanism for the growth of ocean surface waves by wind is through a shear instability that was first described by Miles in 1957. A physical interpretation of this wind-wave instability is provided in terms of the interaction of the surface gravity wave with perturbations of vorticity within the critical layer—a near-singularity in the airflow where the background flow speed matches that of the surface gravity wave. This physical interpretation relies on the fact that the vertical velocity field is slowly varying across the critical layer, whereas both the displacement and vorticity fields vary rapidly. Realizing this allows for the construction of a physically intuitive description of the critical layer vorticity perturbations that may be approximated by a simple vortex sheet model, the essence of the wind-wave instability can then be captured through the interaction of the critical layer vorticity with the surface gravity wave. This simple model is then extended to account for vorticity perturbations in the airflow profile outside of the critical layer and is found to lead to an exact description of the linear stability problem that is also computationally efficient. The interpretation allows, in general, for the incorporation of sheared critical layers into the “wave interaction theory” that is commonly used to provide a physical description and rationalization of results in the stability of stratified shear flows.

© 2017 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: J. R. Carpenter, jeff.carpenter@hzg.de
Save
  • Alexakis, A., Y. Young, and R. Rosner, 2002: Shear instability of fluid interfaces: Stability analysis. Phys. Rev. E, 65, 026313, doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.65.026313.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Alexakis, A., Y. Young, and R. Rosner, 2004a: Weakly nonlinear analysis of wind-driven gravity waves. J. Fluid Mech., 503, 171200, doi:10.1017/S0022112003007699.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Alexakis, A., and Coauthors, 2004b: On the nonlinear evolution of wind-driven gravity waves. Phys. Fluids, 16, 3256, doi:10.1063/1.1771695.

  • Baines, P., and H. Mitsudera, 1994: On the mechanism of shear flow instabilities. J. Fluid Mech., 276, 327342, doi:10.1017/S0022112094002582.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Belcher, S., and J. Hunt, 1993: Turbulent shear flow over slowly moving waves. J. Fluid Mech., 251, 109148, doi:10.1017/S0022112093003350.

  • Belcher, S., and J. Hunt, 1998: Turbulent flow over hills and waves. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 30, 507538, doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.30.1.507.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Buckley, M., and F. Veron, 2016: Structure of the airflow above surface waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 46, 13771397, doi:10.1175/JPO-D-15-0135.1.

  • Bühler, O., 2009: Waves and Mean Flows. Cambridge University Press, 370 pp.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Carpenter, J., N. Balmforth, and G. Lawrence, 2010: Identifying unstable modes in stratified shear layers. Phys. Fluids, 22, 054104, doi:10.1063/1.3379845.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carpenter, J., E. Tedford, E. Heifetz, and G. Lawrence, 2013: Instability in stratified shear flow: Review of a physical interpretation based on interacting waves. Appl. Mech. Rev., 64, 060801, doi:10.1115/1.4007909.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Caulfield, C., 1994: Multiple linear instability of layered stratified shear flow. J. Fluid Mech., 258, 255285, doi:10.1017/S0022112094003320.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Drazin, P., and W. Reid, 1982: Hydrodynamic Stability. Cambridge University Press, 682 pp.

  • Grare, L., L. Lenain, and W. Melville, 2013: Wave-coherent airflow and critical layers over ocean waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 43, 21562172, doi:10.1175/JPO-D-13-056.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harnik, N., E. Heifetz, O. Umurhan, and F. Lott, 2008: A buoyancy-vorticity wave interaction approach to stratified shear flow. J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 26152630, doi:10.1175/2007JAS2610.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heifetz, E., and J. Mak, 2015: Stratified shear flow instabilities in the non-Boussinesq regime. Phys. Fluids, 27, 086601, doi:10.1063/1.4928738.

  • Heifetz, E., Y. Reuveni, A. Gelfgat, E. Kit, and J. Methven, 2006: Counterpropagating Rossby wave perspective on Kelvin Helmholtz instability as a limiting case of a Rayleigh shear layer with zero width. Phys. Fluids, 18, 018101, doi:10.1063/1.2166450.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heifetz, E., J. Mak, J. Nycander, and O. Umurhan, 2015: Interacting vorticity waves as an instability mechanism for MHD shear instabilities. J. Fluid Mech., 767, 199225, doi:10.1017/jfm.2015.47.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hristov, T. S., S. D. Miller, and C. A. Friehe, 2003: Dynamical coupling of wind and ocean waves through wave-induced air flow. Nature, 422, 5558, doi:10.1038/nature01382.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hughes, T., and W. Reid, 1965: On the stability of the asymptotic suction boundary-layer profile. J. Fluid Mech., 23, 715735, doi:10.1017/S0022112065001647.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Janssen, P., 2004: The Interaction of Ocean Waves and Wind. Cambridge University Press, 312 pp.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Jeffreys, H., 1925: On the formation of water waves by wind. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, A107, 189206, doi:10.1098/rspa.1925.0015.

  • Kelvin, W., 1871: Hydrokinetic solutions and observations. Philos. Mag., 42, 362377.

  • Kinsman, B., 1965: Wind Waves: Their Generation and Propagation on the Ocean Surface. Prentice-Hall, 676 pp.

  • Lighthill, M. J., 1962: Physical interpretation of the mathematical theory of wave generation by wind. J. Fluid Mech., 14, 385398, doi:10.1017/S0022112062001305.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Maslowe, S. A., 1986: Critical layers in shear flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 18, 405432, doi:10.1146/annurev.fl.18.010186.002201.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miles, J., 1957: On the generation of surface waves by shear flows. J. Fluid Mech., 3, 185204, doi:10.1017/S0022112057000567.

  • Morland, L., and P. Saffman, 1993: Effect of wind profile on the instability of wind blowing over water. J. Fluid Mech., 252, 383398, doi:10.1017/S0022112093003805.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Phillips, O., 1957: On the generation of waves by a turbulent wind. J. Fluid Mech., 2, 417445, doi:10.1017/S0022112057000233.

  • Rabinovich, A., O. Umurhan, N. Harnik, F. Lott, and E. Heifetz, 2011: Vorticity inversion and action-at-a-distance instability in stably stratified shear flow. J. Fluid Mech., 670, 301325, doi:10.1017/S002211201000529X.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Redekopp, L., 2001: Elements of instability theory for environmental flows. Environmental Stratified Flows, Kluwer, 223–281.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Sullivan, P., and J. McWilliams, 2010: Dynamics of winds and currents coupled to surface waves. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 42, 1942, doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-121108-145541.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Young, W., and C. Wolfe, 2014: Generation of surface waves by shear-flow instability. J. Fluid Mech., 739, 276307, doi:10.1017/jfm.2013.617.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 564 250 8
PDF Downloads 323 70 4