• Brink, K. H., 1999: Island-trapped waves, with application to observations of Bermuda. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans, 29, 93118, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0265(99)00003-2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brink, K. H., 2021: Near-resonances of superinertial and tidal fluctuations at islands. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 51, 27212733, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-20-0298.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dale, A. C., J. M. Huthnance, and T. J. Sherwin, 2001: Coastal-trapped waves and tides at near-inertial frequencies. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 31, 29582970, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2001)031<2958:CTWATA>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • D’Asaro, E. A., 1989: The decay of wind-forced mixed layer inertial oscillations due to the β effect. J. Geophys. Res., 94, 20452056, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC094iC02p02045.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Durran, D. R., 1991: The third-order Adams-Bashforth method: An attractive alternative to leapfrog time differencing. Mon. Wea. Rev., 119, 702720, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1991)119<0702:TTOABM>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fontán, A., and B. Cornuelle, 2015: Anisotropic response of surface circulation to wind forcing, as inferred from high-frequency radar currents in the southeastern Bay of Biscay. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 120, 29452957, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010671.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kundu, P. K., S.-Y. Chao, and J. P. McCreary, 1983: Transient coastal currents and inertio-gravity waves. Deep-Sea Res., 30A, 10591082, https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(83)90061-4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Longuet-Higgins, M. S., 1969: On the trapping of long-period waves round islands. J. Fluid Mech., 37, 773784, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112069000875.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Longuet-Higgins, M. S., 1970: Steady currents induced by oscillations round islands. J. Fluid Mech., 42, 701720, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112070001568.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Merrifield, M. A., L. Yang, and D. S. Luther, 2002: Numerical simulations of a storm-generated island-trapped wave event at the Hawaiian Islands. J. Geophys. Res., 107, 3169, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JC001134.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pizarro, O., and G. Shaffer, 1998: Wind-driven, coastal-trapped waves off the island of Gotland, Baltic Sea. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 28, 21172129, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028<2117:WDCTWO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pollard, R. T., 1980: Properties of near-surface inertial oscillations. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 10, 385398, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1980)010<0385:PONSIO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pollard, R. T., and R. C. Millard, 1970: Comparison between observed and simulated wind-generated inertial oscillations. Deep-Sea Res. Oceanogr. Abstr., 17, 813821, https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-7471(70)90043-4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schahinger, R. B., 1988: Near-inertial motion on the South Australian shelf. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 18, 492504, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1988)018<0492:NIMOTS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shearman, R. K., 2005: Observations of near-inertial current variability on the New England shelf. J. Geophys. Res., 110, C02012, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JC002341.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Siegelman, M., and Coauthors, 2019: Observations of near-inertial surface currents at Palau. Oceanography, 32, 7483, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2019.413.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tintoré, J., D.-P. Wang, E. Garćia, and A. Viúdez, 1995: Near-inertial motions in the coastal ocean. J. Mar. Syst., 6, 301312, https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-7963(94)00030-F.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 450 450 43
Full Text Views 168 168 14
PDF Downloads 206 206 17

Near-Inertial Surface Currents around Islands

Mika N. SiegelmanaUniversity of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, Honolulu, Hawaii
bScripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California

Search for other papers by Mika N. Siegelman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5781-0061
,
Eric FiringaUniversity of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, Honolulu, Hawaii

Search for other papers by Eric Firing in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Mark A. MerrifieldbScripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California

Search for other papers by Mark A. Merrifield in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Janet M. BeckerbScripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California

Search for other papers by Janet M. Becker in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Ruth C. MusgravecDalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Search for other papers by Ruth C. Musgrave in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Motivated by observations of enhanced near-inertial currents at the island chain of Palau, the modification of wind-generated near-inertial oscillations (NIOs) by the presence of an island is examined using the analytic solutions of Longuet-Higgins and a linear, inviscid, 1.5-layer reduced-gravity model. The analytic solution for oscillations at the inertial frequency f provides insights into flow adjustment near the island but excludes wave dynamics. To account for wave motion, the numerical model initially is forced by a large-scale wind field rotating at f, where the forcing is increased then decreased to zero. Numerical simulations are carried out over a range of island radii and the ocean response detailed. Near the island, wind energy in the frequency band near f can excite subinertial island-trapped waves and superinertial Poincaré waves. In the small-island limit, both the Poincaré waves and the island-trapped waves are very near f, and their sum resembles the Longuet-Higgins analytic solution but with increased amplitude near the island. The flow field can be viewed as primarily a far-field NIO locally deflected by the island plus an island-trapped contribution, leading to enhanced near-inertial currents near the island, on the scale of the island radius. As the island size is increased, the island-trapped wave frequency deviates further from f and its amplitude depends strongly on the frequency bandwidth and wavenumber structure of the wind forcing. In the large-island limit, the island-trapped wave resembles a Kelvin wave, and the sum of incident and reflected Poincaré waves suppresses the near-inertial current amplitude near the island.

Significance Statement

Strong, impulsive winds over the ocean excite currents that rotate in the opposite direction to Earth’s rotation. This work examines how these wind-generated currents, known as near-inertial oscillations (NIOs), are modified by the presence of an island. Around small islands, the primary response is locally enhanced near-inertial currents. Alternatively, around large islands, near-inertial currents are weaker. Understanding how these currents behave should provide insight into the physical processes that drive current variability near islands and spur local mixing.

© 2023 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

This article is included in the Oceanic Flow–Topography Interations Special Collection.

Corresponding author: Mika Siegelman, msiegelm@hawaii.edu

Abstract

Motivated by observations of enhanced near-inertial currents at the island chain of Palau, the modification of wind-generated near-inertial oscillations (NIOs) by the presence of an island is examined using the analytic solutions of Longuet-Higgins and a linear, inviscid, 1.5-layer reduced-gravity model. The analytic solution for oscillations at the inertial frequency f provides insights into flow adjustment near the island but excludes wave dynamics. To account for wave motion, the numerical model initially is forced by a large-scale wind field rotating at f, where the forcing is increased then decreased to zero. Numerical simulations are carried out over a range of island radii and the ocean response detailed. Near the island, wind energy in the frequency band near f can excite subinertial island-trapped waves and superinertial Poincaré waves. In the small-island limit, both the Poincaré waves and the island-trapped waves are very near f, and their sum resembles the Longuet-Higgins analytic solution but with increased amplitude near the island. The flow field can be viewed as primarily a far-field NIO locally deflected by the island plus an island-trapped contribution, leading to enhanced near-inertial currents near the island, on the scale of the island radius. As the island size is increased, the island-trapped wave frequency deviates further from f and its amplitude depends strongly on the frequency bandwidth and wavenumber structure of the wind forcing. In the large-island limit, the island-trapped wave resembles a Kelvin wave, and the sum of incident and reflected Poincaré waves suppresses the near-inertial current amplitude near the island.

Significance Statement

Strong, impulsive winds over the ocean excite currents that rotate in the opposite direction to Earth’s rotation. This work examines how these wind-generated currents, known as near-inertial oscillations (NIOs), are modified by the presence of an island. Around small islands, the primary response is locally enhanced near-inertial currents. Alternatively, around large islands, near-inertial currents are weaker. Understanding how these currents behave should provide insight into the physical processes that drive current variability near islands and spur local mixing.

© 2023 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

This article is included in the Oceanic Flow–Topography Interations Special Collection.

Corresponding author: Mika Siegelman, msiegelm@hawaii.edu

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (PDF 1.22 MB)
Save