Thermodynamical Effects of Ocean Current Feedback in a Quasigeostrophic Coupled Model

Quentin Jamet aINRIA, ODYSSEY Group, Ifremer, Plouzané, France

Search for other papers by Quentin Jamet in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5596-0354
,
Alexandre Berger bUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, Grenoble INP, IGE, Grenoble, France

Search for other papers by Alexandre Berger in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Bruno Deremble bUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, Grenoble INP, IGE, Grenoble, France

Search for other papers by Bruno Deremble in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Thierry Penduff bUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, Grenoble INP, IGE, Grenoble, France

Search for other papers by Thierry Penduff in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Air–sea fluxes are the main drivers of ocean circulation, yet their representation in ocean-only models remains challenging. While a zeroth-order formulation accounting only for the state of the atmosphere is well adopted by the community, surface ocean feedback has gained attention over the last decades. In this paper, we focus on thermodynamical indirect feedback of surface ocean currents, which completes the “eddy killing” effect induced by the mechanical feedback. In this study, we quantify both the mechanical and thermodynamical contributions in the context of idealized, coupled quasigeostrophic simulations through sensitivity experiments on wind stress formulation. As compared to eddy killing which impacts kinetic energy levels, the indirect thermodynamical feedback induces significant changes in potential energy levels. The thermodynamical feedback also enhances by +27% the potential-to-kinetic turbulent energy conversion induced by relative wind stress formulation, as well as significant changes in both forward and inverse cascades of potential energy (PE). That is, accounting for ocean surface currents in the computation of wind stress significantly changes transfers of PE from the mean to the turbulent flow. These changes are mostly controlled by a reduced upscale energy flux rather than a more vigorous downscale flux, a process in line with results obtained for kinetic energy fluxes associated with the eddy killing effect.

© 2024 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Quentin Jamet, quentin.jamet@inria.fr

Abstract

Air–sea fluxes are the main drivers of ocean circulation, yet their representation in ocean-only models remains challenging. While a zeroth-order formulation accounting only for the state of the atmosphere is well adopted by the community, surface ocean feedback has gained attention over the last decades. In this paper, we focus on thermodynamical indirect feedback of surface ocean currents, which completes the “eddy killing” effect induced by the mechanical feedback. In this study, we quantify both the mechanical and thermodynamical contributions in the context of idealized, coupled quasigeostrophic simulations through sensitivity experiments on wind stress formulation. As compared to eddy killing which impacts kinetic energy levels, the indirect thermodynamical feedback induces significant changes in potential energy levels. The thermodynamical feedback also enhances by +27% the potential-to-kinetic turbulent energy conversion induced by relative wind stress formulation, as well as significant changes in both forward and inverse cascades of potential energy (PE). That is, accounting for ocean surface currents in the computation of wind stress significantly changes transfers of PE from the mean to the turbulent flow. These changes are mostly controlled by a reduced upscale energy flux rather than a more vigorous downscale flux, a process in line with results obtained for kinetic energy fluxes associated with the eddy killing effect.

© 2024 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Quentin Jamet, quentin.jamet@inria.fr
Save
  • Arbic, B. K., K. L. Polzin, R. B. Scott, J. G. Richman, and J. F. Shriver, 2013: On eddy viscosity, energy cascades, and the horizontal resolution of gridded satellite altimeter products. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 43, 283300, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-11-0240.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Capet, X., J. C. McWilliams, M. J. Molemaker, and A. F. Shchepetkin, 2008: Mesoscale to submesoscale transition in the California Current System. Part I: Flow structure, eddy flux, and observational tests. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 38, 2943, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JPO3671.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, R., G. R. Flierl, and C. Wunsch, 2014: A description of local and nonlocal eddy–mean flow interaction in a global eddy-permitting state estimate. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 44, 23362352, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-14-0009.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dawe, J. T., and L. Thompson, 2006: Effect of ocean surface currents on wind stress, heat flux, and wind power input to the ocean. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L09604, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL025784.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Deremble, B., T. Uchida, W. K. Dewar, and R. Samelson, 2023: Eddy-mean flow interaction with a multiple scale quasi geostrophic model. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 15, e2022MS003572, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003572.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dewar, W. K., and G. R. Flierl, 1987: Some effects of the wind on rings. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 17, 16531667, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1987)017<1653:SEOTWO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Duhaut, T. H. A., and D. N. Straub, 2006: Wind stress dependence on ocean surface velocity: Implications for mechanical energy input to ocean circulation. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 36, 202211, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO2842.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gaube, P., D. B. Chelton, R. M. Samelson, M. G. Schlax, and L. W. O’Neill, 2015: Satellite observations of mesoscale eddy-induced Ekman pumping. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 45, 104132, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-14-0032.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harrison, D. E., and A. R. Robinson, 1978: Energy analysis of open regions of turbulent flows—Mean eddy energetics of a numerical ocean circulation experiment. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans, 2, 185211, https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0265(78)90009-X.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hogg, A., J. Blundell, W. Dewar, and P. Killworth, 2014: Formulation and users’ guide for Q-GCM. http://q-gcm.org/downloads.html.

  • Hogg, A. M. C., W. K. Dewar, P. D. Killworth, and J. R. Blundell, 2006: Decadal variability of the midlatitude climate system driven by the ocean circulation. J. Climate, 19, 11491166, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3651.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jamet, Q., B. Deremble, N. Wienders, T. Uchida, and W. K. Dewar, 2021: On wind-driven energetics of subtropical gyres. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 13, e2020MS002329, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002329.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jamet, Q., S. Leroux, W. K. Dewar, T. Penduff, J. Le Sommer, J.-M. Molines, and J. Gula, 2022: Non-local eddy-mean kinetic energy transfers in submesoscale-permitting ensemble simulations. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 14, e2022MS003057, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003057.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jullien, S., S. Masson, V. Oerder, G. Samson, F. Colas, and L. Renault, 2020: Impact of ocean–atmosphere current feedback on ocean mesoscale activity: Regional variations and sensitivity to model resolution. J. Climate, 33, 25852602, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0484.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kang, D., and E. N. Curchitser, 2015: Energetics of eddy–mean flow interactions in the Gulf Stream region. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 45, 11031120, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-14-0200.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lorenz, E. N., 1955: Available potential energy and the maintenance of the general circulation. Tellus, 7A, 157167, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v7i2.8796.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ma, X., and Coauthors, 2016: Western boundary currents regulated by interaction between ocean eddies and the atmosphere. Nature, 535, 533537, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18640.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martin, P. E., B. K. Arbic, A. M. Hogg, A. E. Kiss, J. R. Munroe, and J. R. Blundell, 2020: Frequency-domain analysis of the energy budget in an idealized coupled ocean–atmosphere model. J. Climate, 33, 707726, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0118.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Matsuta, T., and Y. Masumoto, 2021: Modified view of energy budget diagram and its application to the Kuroshio extension region. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 51, 11631175, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-20-0124.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Matsuta, T., and Y. Masumoto, 2023: Energetics of the Antarctic circumpolar current. Part I: The Lorenz energy cycle and the vertical energy redistribution. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 53, 14671484, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-22-0133.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McCaffrey, K., B. Fox-Kemper, and G. Forget, 2015: Estimates of ocean macroturbulence: Structure function and spectral slope from Argo profiling floats. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 45, 17731793, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-14-0023.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Murakami, S., 2011: Atmospheric local energetics and energy interactions between mean and eddy fields. Part I: Theory. J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 760768, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3664.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Oort, A. H., L. A. Anderson, and J. P. Peixoto, 1994: Estimates of the energy cycle of the oceans. J. Geophys. Res., 99, 76657688, https://doi.org/10.1029/93JC03556.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pacanowski, R. C., 1987: Effect of equatorial currents on surface stress. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 17, 833838, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1987)017<0833:EOECOS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Renault, L., M. J. Molemaker, J. Gula, S. Masson, and J. C. McWilliams, 2016: Control and stabilization of the gulf stream by oceanic current interaction with the atmosphere. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 46, 34393453, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-16-0115.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Renault, L., P. Marchesiello, S. Masson, and J. C. Mcwilliams, 2019: Remarkable control of western boundary currents by Eddy Killing, a mechanical air-sea coupling process. Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 27432751, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081211.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roullet, G., J. C. Mcwilliams, X. Capet, and M. J. Molemaker, 2012: Properties of steady geostrophic turbulence with isopycnal outcropping. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 42, 1838, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-11-09.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Seo, H., and Coauthors, 2023: Ocean mesoscale and frontal-scale ocean–atmosphere interactions and influence on large-scale climate: A review. J. Climate, 36, 19812013, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0982.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Song, H., J. Marshall, D. J. McGillicuddy Jr., and H. Seo, 2020: Impact of current-wind interaction on vertical processes in the Southern Ocean. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 125, e2020JC016046, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016046.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Uchida, T., B. Deremble, and S. Popinet, 2022: Deterministic model of the eddy dynamics for a midlatitude ocean model. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 52, 11331154, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-21-0217.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vallis, G. K., 2006: Atmospheric and Oceanic Fluid Dynamics: Fundamentals and Large-Scale Circulation. Cambridge University Press, 745 pp.

  • Waterman, S., and S. R. Jayne, 2011: Eddy-mean flow interactions in the along-stream development of a western boundary current jet: An idealized model study. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 41, 682707, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JPO4477.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhai, X., and R. J. Greatbatch, 2007: Wind work in a model of the northwest Atlantic Ocean. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L04606, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028907.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhu, Y., Y. Li, Y. Yang, and F. Wang, 2023: The role of eddy-wind interaction in the eddy kinetic energy budget of the Agulhas retroflection region. Environ. Res. Lett., 18, 104032, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acfb9a.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 347 347 39
Full Text Views 93 93 17
PDF Downloads 138 138 26