Wind-Driven Circulation in the Chesapeake Bay, Winter, 1975

Dong-Ping Wang Chesapeake Bay Institute, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore MD 21218

Search for other papers by Dong-Ping Wang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

Nontidal circulation in Chesapeake Bay was examined from one-month current records at 50 and 200 km from the entrance. The monthly mean flow was basically a two-layered circulation; in addition, there were large wind-driven velocity fluctuations at several-day time scales. Corresponding to velocity changes, the salinity distribution had large variations, comparable to its seasonal change.

Bay water responded to longitudinal (local) wind and coastal (nonlocal) Ekman flux. The response was barotropic in the lower Bay, and baroclinic (frictional) in the upper Bay. The difference in response characteristic appears to be due to the counter-effects of the near-surface windstress shear and the depth-independent surface slope. A frictional model accounts for most of the observed features.

Results of this study provide further evidence of large, atmospherically induced exchange between the estuary and coastal ocean. The importance of wind on upstream salt intrusions is also clearly demonstrated.

Abstract

Nontidal circulation in Chesapeake Bay was examined from one-month current records at 50 and 200 km from the entrance. The monthly mean flow was basically a two-layered circulation; in addition, there were large wind-driven velocity fluctuations at several-day time scales. Corresponding to velocity changes, the salinity distribution had large variations, comparable to its seasonal change.

Bay water responded to longitudinal (local) wind and coastal (nonlocal) Ekman flux. The response was barotropic in the lower Bay, and baroclinic (frictional) in the upper Bay. The difference in response characteristic appears to be due to the counter-effects of the near-surface windstress shear and the depth-independent surface slope. A frictional model accounts for most of the observed features.

Results of this study provide further evidence of large, atmospherically induced exchange between the estuary and coastal ocean. The importance of wind on upstream salt intrusions is also clearly demonstrated.

Save