Understanding Key-Informant Experiences and Perceptions of the 2016 Drought and Wildfires in Western North Carolina

Lauren M. Andersen Department of Geography and Planning, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Lauren M. Andersen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Abie N. Bonevac Department of Geography and Planning, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Abie N. Bonevac in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Laura K. Thompson Department of Geography and Planning, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Laura K. Thompson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Kara E. Dempsey Department of Geography and Planning, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Kara E. Dempsey in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Elizabeth D. Shay Department of Geography and Planning, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Elizabeth D. Shay in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Margaret M. Sugg Department of Geography and Planning, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Margaret M. Sugg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

In 2016, an exceptional drought and subsequent wildfires devastated the southeastern United States. Western North Carolina (WNC), a socioeconomically growing region that is dependent on revenue from tourism and agriculture, was particularly impacted by the events. The Southeast is not typically considered to be water vulnerable, and few studies have explored drought and wildfire in WNC. However, the region is projected to experience elevated water vulnerability as a result of rapid population growth and increased climatic variability. The recent events highlight the need for better understanding of water-related experiences and perceptions to inform proactive policies for risk mitigation in WNC. To evaluate stakeholder experiences and perceptions relating to the events in 2016, the authors conducted telephone interviews with key informants from a variety of sectors in two counties (Buncombe and Watauga) and then subjected their responses to content analysis. Informants frequently discussed themes relating to the “Natural Resources and Environment” code group, with responses revealing concerns about the health effects of smoke exposure, as well as water quantity. Other common topics of discussion for informants include water management, public awareness, and disaster severity. The prevalence of other themes varied by county, demonstrating the importance of local context. Surprisingly, informants rarely discussed risk in the context of increasing population and development, suggesting that current policies may inadequately address future risks. Stakeholders across all sectors placed substantial emphasis on information dissemination both within agencies and to the public. With a better understanding of key-informant experiences and perceptions, policymakers will be better equipped to address policy shortcomings as well as to prepare for future hazards.

© 2019 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Elizabeth Shay, shayed@appstate.edu

Abstract

In 2016, an exceptional drought and subsequent wildfires devastated the southeastern United States. Western North Carolina (WNC), a socioeconomically growing region that is dependent on revenue from tourism and agriculture, was particularly impacted by the events. The Southeast is not typically considered to be water vulnerable, and few studies have explored drought and wildfire in WNC. However, the region is projected to experience elevated water vulnerability as a result of rapid population growth and increased climatic variability. The recent events highlight the need for better understanding of water-related experiences and perceptions to inform proactive policies for risk mitigation in WNC. To evaluate stakeholder experiences and perceptions relating to the events in 2016, the authors conducted telephone interviews with key informants from a variety of sectors in two counties (Buncombe and Watauga) and then subjected their responses to content analysis. Informants frequently discussed themes relating to the “Natural Resources and Environment” code group, with responses revealing concerns about the health effects of smoke exposure, as well as water quantity. Other common topics of discussion for informants include water management, public awareness, and disaster severity. The prevalence of other themes varied by county, demonstrating the importance of local context. Surprisingly, informants rarely discussed risk in the context of increasing population and development, suggesting that current policies may inadequately address future risks. Stakeholders across all sectors placed substantial emphasis on information dissemination both within agencies and to the public. With a better understanding of key-informant experiences and perceptions, policymakers will be better equipped to address policy shortcomings as well as to prepare for future hazards.

© 2019 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Elizabeth Shay, shayed@appstate.edu
Save
  • Archie, K. M., 2014: Mountain communities and climate change adaptation: Barriers to planning and hurdles to implementation in the Southern Rocky Mountain Region of North America. Mitigation Adapt. Strategies Global Change, 19, 569587, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-013-9449-z.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brody, S. D., S. Zahran, A. Vedlitz, and H. Grover, 2008: Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States. Environ. Behav., 40, 7295, https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506298800.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Burstein, P., 2010: Public opinion, public policy, and democracy. Handbook of Politics: State and Society in Global Perspective, K. T. Leicht and J. C. Jenkins, Eds., Springer, 63–79.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Cockerill, K., 2010: Communicating how water works: Results from a community water education program. J. Environ. Educ., 41, 151164, https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960903295266.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cockerill, K., 2014: The water supply is fine: Decision-maker perceptions of water quantity and supply-side management. Water Environ. J., 28, 242251, https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12029.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cockerill, K., C. Badurek, and R. Hale, 2014: Managing water in western North Carolina: Decision-maker perceptions and policy implementation. Environ. Pract., 16, 94101, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466046614000015.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Combs, T. S., E. Shay, D. Salvesen, C. Kolosna, and M. Madeley, 2016: Understanding the multiple dimensions of transportation disadvantage: The case of rural North Carolina. Case Stud. Transp. Policy, 4, 6877, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2016.02.004.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diggs, D., 1991: Drought experience and perception of climatic change among Great Plains farmers. Great Plains Res., 1, 114132.

  • Dow, K., R. E. O’ Connor, B. Yarnal, G. J. Carbone, and C. L. Jocoy, 2007: Why worry? Community water system managers’ perceptions of climate vulnerability. Global Environ. Change, 17, 228237, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.08.003.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Frei, A., R. L. Armstrong, M. P. Clark, and M. C. Serreze, 2002: Catskill Mountain water resources: Vulnerability, hydroclimatology, and climate-change sensitivity. Ann. Assoc. Amer. Geogr., 92, 203224, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.00287.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GeoMAC, 2018: GeoMAC services. U.S. Department of the Interior, accessed 1 June 2018, https://www.geomac.gov/services.shtml.

  • Hamilton, L. C., and B. D. Keim, 2009: Regional variation in perceptions about climate change. Int. J. Climatol., 29, 23482352, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1930.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • IPCC, 2013: Summary for policymakers. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. T. F. Stocker et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, 1–29.

  • Kenny, J. F., N. L. Barber, S. S. Hutson, K. S. Linsey, J. K. Lovelace, and M. A. Maupin, 2009: Estimated use of water in the United States in 2005. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1344, 52 pp., http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1344.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Konrad, C. E., and P. Knox, 2017: The southeastern drought and wildfires of 2016. NIDIS Rep., 85 pp., https://sercc.com/NIDISDroughtAssessmentFINAL.pdf.

  • Krippendorff, K., 2004: Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. SAGE Publications, 456 pp.

  • Manabe, S., R. T. Wetherald, P. C. D. Milly, T. L. Delworth, and R. J. Stouffer, 2004: Century-scale change in water availability: CO2-quadrupling experiment. Climatic Change, 64, 5976, https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CLIM.0000024674.37725.ca.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McNeeley, S. M., T. A. Beeton, and D. S. Ojima, 2016: Drought risk and adaptation in the interior United States: Understanding the importance of local context for resource management in times of drought. Wea. Climate Soc., 8, 147161, https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-15-0042.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NC Drought Management Advisory Council, 2018: Drought monitor archive: US drought monitor of North Carolina. North Carolina Drought Management Advisory Council, accessed 1 June 2018, http://www.ncdrought.org/archive/.

  • NCEI, 2017: Drought for annual 2016. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, accessed 1 June 2018, https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/drought/201613#se-sect.

  • NCEI, 2018a: Definition of drought. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/monitoring-references/dyk/drought-definition.

  • NCEI, 2018b: Billion-dollar weather and climate disasters: Summary stats. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, accessed 1 June 2018, https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/billions/summary-stats.

  • NC Office of State Budget and Management, 2017: County/state population projections. North Carolina State Office of State Budget and Management, accessed 1 June 2018, https://www.osbm.nc.gov/demog/county-projections.

  • NEMAC, 2016: Western North Carolina vitality index: Historical population trends. North Carolina State Office of State Budget and Management, accessed 1 June 2018, http://www.wncvitalityindex.org/population/historical-population-trends.

  • O’Gorman, P. A., and T. Schneider, 2009: The physical basis for increases in precipitation extremes in simulations of 21st-century climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 14 77314 777, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907610106.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PRISM Climate Group, 2018: 30-year normal precipitation: Annual. PRISM Climate Group, accessed 1 June 2018, http://www.prism.oregonstate.edu/normals/.

  • Responsive Management, 2003: Understanding the Georgia public’s perception of water issues and the motivational messages to which they will respond: Focus group findings. Responsive Management Rep., 17 pp., https://cfpub.epa.gov/npstbx/files/GAwaterFG.pdf.

  • Roy, S. B., L. Chen, E. H. Girvetz, E. P. Maurer, W. B. Mills, and T. M. Grieb, 2012: Projecting water withdrawal and supply for future decade in the U.S. under climate change scenarios. Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 25452556, https://doi.org/10.1021/es2030774.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Saarinen, T. F., 1966: Perception of the drought hazard on the Great Plains. University of Chicago Dept. of Geography Research Paper 106, 183 pp.

  • Seager, R., A. Tzanova, and J. Nakamura, 2009: Drought in the southeastern United States: Causes, variability over the last millennium, and the potential for future hydroclimate change. J. Climate, 22, 50215045, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2683.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Spence, A., W. Poortinga, C. Butler, and N. F. Pidgeon, 2011: Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nat. Climate Change, 1, 4649, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1059.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor, J. G., T. R. Stewart, and M. Downton, 1988: Perceptions of drought in the Ogallala Aquifer region. Environ. Behav., 20, 150175, https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916588202002.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • U.S. Census Bureau, 2000: Census 2000 summary file 1 (SF 1) 100-percent data, table P001: Total population. American FactFinder, accessed 1 June 2018, https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC_00_SF1_P001&prodType=table.

  • U.S. Census Bureau, 2010: 2010 Census summary file 1, table P001: Total population. American FactFinder, accessed 1 June 2018, https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC_00_SF1_P001&prodType=table

  • U.S. Census Bureau, 2017: QuickFacts: United States. U.S. Census Bureau, accessed 1 June 2018, https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/map.

  • USDHHS, 2010: National action plan to improve health literacy. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Rep., 73 pp., https://health.gov/communication/HLActionPlan/pdf/Health_Literacy_Action_Plan.pdf.

  • USFS, 2018: Fire terminology. National Park Service/USDA Forest Service, https://www.fs.fed.us/nwacfire/home/terminology.html.

  • USGCRP, 2016: The impacts of climate change of human health in the United States: A scientific assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program Rep., 312 pp., https://doi.org/10.7930/J0R49NQX.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Vörösmarty, C. J., P. Green, J. Salisbury, and R. B. Lammers, 2000: Global water resources: Vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science, 289, 284288, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5477.284.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Woudenberg, D., D. A. Wilhite, and M. Hayes, 2008: Perception of drought hazard and its sociological impacts in south-central Nebraska. Great Plains Res., 18, 93102.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1010 414 117
PDF Downloads 737 178 17