Measurement and Management of Value Chain Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Supermarket Retailing

Rattanawan Mungkung aCentre of Excellence on Environmental Strategy for Green Business, Faculty of Environment, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand
bDepartment of Environmental Technology and Management, Faculty of Environment, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand

Search for other papers by Rattanawan Mungkung in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Tananon Nudchanate aCentre of Excellence on Environmental Strategy for Green Business, Faculty of Environment, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand

Search for other papers by Tananon Nudchanate in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

This study quantified greenhouse gas emissions from indirect activities along the whole value chain of supermarket retailing to derive mitigation measures. Both direct and indirect greenhouse gas emission sources of a supermarket retailing value chain were identified and calculated using the national guidelines for estimating the carbon footprint for organizations, based on a total area of 13 248 m2 and operating 12 h per day. A scoring matrix was applied that considered the magnitude of emissions, the level of influence, and the risks or opportunities associated with business operations. The scoring results indicated a major contribution from value chain activities that should be included in any greenhouse gas analysis. The calculation revealed that the greenhouse gas emissions from the value chain activities were 33 784 t CO2 emitted yr−1 or 94% of total emissions. The key contributors were linked to the production of purchased goods and the management of food waste. Thus, value chain activities should not be overlooked in developing efficient greenhouse gas management strategies. Furthermore, purchased products and services carrying a carbon-reduction label should be given priority, and the application of artificial intelligence and innovation could be considered to reduce the amount of food waste from expired goods.

© 2023 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Rattanawan Mungkung, rattanawan.m@ku.th

Abstract

This study quantified greenhouse gas emissions from indirect activities along the whole value chain of supermarket retailing to derive mitigation measures. Both direct and indirect greenhouse gas emission sources of a supermarket retailing value chain were identified and calculated using the national guidelines for estimating the carbon footprint for organizations, based on a total area of 13 248 m2 and operating 12 h per day. A scoring matrix was applied that considered the magnitude of emissions, the level of influence, and the risks or opportunities associated with business operations. The scoring results indicated a major contribution from value chain activities that should be included in any greenhouse gas analysis. The calculation revealed that the greenhouse gas emissions from the value chain activities were 33 784 t CO2 emitted yr−1 or 94% of total emissions. The key contributors were linked to the production of purchased goods and the management of food waste. Thus, value chain activities should not be overlooked in developing efficient greenhouse gas management strategies. Furthermore, purchased products and services carrying a carbon-reduction label should be given priority, and the application of artificial intelligence and innovation could be considered to reduce the amount of food waste from expired goods.

© 2023 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Rattanawan Mungkung, rattanawan.m@ku.th
Save
  • Abeydeera, L. H. U. W., and G. Karunasena, 2019: Carbon emissions of hotels: The case of the Sri Lankan hotel industry. Buildings, 9, 227, https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9110227.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Almogbel, A., F. Alkasmoul, Z. Aldawsari, J. Alsulami, and A. Alsuwailem, 2020: Comparison of energy consumption between non-inverter and inverter-type air conditioner in Saudi Arabia. Energy Transitions, 4, 191197, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41825-020-00033-y.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Alvarez, S., and A. Rubicon, 2015: Carbon footprint in Green Public Procurement: A case study in the services sector. J. Cleaner Prod., 93, 159166, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.048.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • El Geneidy, S., S. Baumeister, V. M. Govigli, T. Orfanidou, and V. Wallius, 2021: The carbon footprint of a knowledge organization and emission scenarios for a post-COVID-19 world. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 91, 106645, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106645.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eriksson, M., and J. Spångberg, 2017: Carbon footprint and energy use of food waste management options for fresh fruit and vegetables from supermarkets. Waste Manage., 60, 786799, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.008.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eriksson, M., I. Strid, and P. A. Hansson, 2016: Food waste reduction in supermarkets—Net costs and benefits of reduced storage temperature. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 107, 7381, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.11.022.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fernández, J. C. R., and N. Roqueñí, 2018: Analysis of the potential of Spanish supermarkets to contribute to the mitigation of climate change. Sustainable Prod. Consumption, 14, 122128, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.02.003.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GHG Protocol and Carbon Trust Team, 2013: Technical guidance for calculating scope 3 emissions. World Business Council for Sustainable Development and World Resources Institute, 182 pp., https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/standards/Scope3_Calculation_Guidance_0.pdf.

  • Hopkins, I., L. P. Newman, H. Gill, and J. Danaher, 2021: The influence of food waste rearing substrates on black soldier fly larvae protein composition: A systematic review. Insects, 12, 608, https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12070608.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hu, A. H., C. Y. Huang, C. F. Chen, C. H. Kuo, and C. W. Hsu, 2015: Assessing carbon footprint in the life cycle of accommodation services: The case of an international tourist hotel. Int. J. Sustainable Dev. World Ecol., 22, 313323, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2015.1049674.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Organization for Standardization, 2018: ISO 14064-1:2018: Greenhouse gases—Part 1: Specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals. International Organization for Standardization, 47 pp., https://www.iso.org/standard/66453.html.

  • Marrucci, L., M. Marchi, and T. Daddi, 2020: Improving the carbon footprint of food and packaging waste management in a supermarket of the Italian retail sector. Waste Manage., 105, 594603, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.03.002.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Radonjič, G., and S. Tompa, 2018: Carbon footprint calculation in telecommunications companies—The importance and relevance of scope 3 greenhouse gases emissions. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 98, 361375, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.018.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rebedea, T., and V. Florea, 2020: Expiry date recognition using deep neural networks. Int. J. User-Syst. Interact., 13 (1), 117, https://doi.org/10.37789/ijusi.2020.13.1.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rico, A., J. Martínez-Blanco, M. Montlleo, G. Rodríguez, N. Tavares, A. Arias, and J. Oliver-Solà, 2019: Carbon footprint of tourism in Barcelona. Tourism Manage., 70, 491504, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.09.012.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roberts, S., B. Foran, C. Axon, and A. Stamp, 2021: Is the service industry really low-carbon? Energy, jobs and realistic country GHG emissions reductions. Appl. Energy, 292, 116878, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116878.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sakoda, G., H. Takayasu, and M. Takayasu, 2019: Data science solutions for retail strategy to reduce waste keeping high profit. Sustainable, 11, 3589, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133589.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scholz, K., M. Eriksson, and I. Strid, 2015: Carbon footprint of supermarket food waste. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 94, 5665, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.11.016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tennison, I., and Coauthors, 2021: Health care’s response to climate change: A carbon footprint assessment of the NHS in England. Lancet Planet. Health, 5, E84E 92, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30271-0.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thailand Greenhouse Gas Management Organization, 2022: EF CFP. Thailand Greenhouse Gas Management Organization, 63 pp., http://thaicarbonlabel.tgo.or.th/admin/uploadfiles/emission/ts_af09c20f4f.pdf.

  • Virgens, T. A. N., J. C. S. Andrade, and S. L. Hidalgo, 2020: Carbon footprint of public agencies: The case of Brazilian prosecution service. J. Cleaner Prod., 251, 119551, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119551.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 795 437 31
Full Text Views 75 60 0
PDF Downloads 63 38 3