Combining Probabilistic Hazard Information Forecast Graphics with Wireless Emergency Alert Messages: An Exploratory, Qualitative Study

Hamilton Bean aUniversity of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado

Search for other papers by Hamilton Bean in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0987-4076
,
Kensuke Takenouchi bKagawa University, Kagawa, Japan

Search for other papers by Kensuke Takenouchi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Ana Maria Cruz cKyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

Search for other papers by Ana Maria Cruz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Since 2019, National Weather Service (NWS) offices have been able to issue 360-character Wireless Emergency Alert (“WEA360”) messages for tornadoes. NWS is now considering changing from a “deterministic” to a “probabilistic” warning paradigm. That change could possibly influence how WEA360 messages for tornado are issued in the future. Recent experimental studies have found that probabilistic hazard information (PHI) forecast graphics improve consumers’ risk perception for tornadoes, but findings from these studies concerning whether PHI forecast graphics improve people’s protective action decision-making are mixed. The present study therefore investigated how mock PHI-enhanced WEA360 messages might influence people’s risk perception and protective action decision-making. Analysis of qualitative data gathered from a combination of questionnaire and focus group interview methods conducted in collaboration with 31 community members in Denver, Colorado, indicated that inclusion of PHI forecast graphics within WEA360 messages elicited high levels of understanding and message believability but did not consistently lead to appropriate precautionary intent. Because warning response is a complex social phenomenon, PHI may not significantly improve protective action decision-making if PHI forecast graphics are eventually presented to consumers via the Wireless Emergency Alerts system. Factors that PHI stakeholders should consider before the adoption of PHI-enhanced WEA360 messages for consumers are discussed.

Significance Statement

This study examines how consumers respond to and talk about mock WEA360 messages for tornadoes that contain embedded PHI forecast graphics. As NWS considers moving to a probabilistic warning paradigm, stakeholders will need to determine how PHI forecast graphics might be communicated directly to consumers, if at all. Our findings suggest that combining WEA360 messages with PHI forecast graphics creates challenges and complexities related to consumers’ assessment of personal risk and protective action decision-making. Overall, the study suggests that any future PHI-enhanced WEA360 messages provided directly to consumers, if at all, must avoid discrepancies (even subtle) between the level of risk represented by the PHI forecast graphic and the protective action guidance included in the text of the messages.

© 2023 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Hamilton Bean, hamilton.bean@ucdenver.edu

Abstract

Since 2019, National Weather Service (NWS) offices have been able to issue 360-character Wireless Emergency Alert (“WEA360”) messages for tornadoes. NWS is now considering changing from a “deterministic” to a “probabilistic” warning paradigm. That change could possibly influence how WEA360 messages for tornado are issued in the future. Recent experimental studies have found that probabilistic hazard information (PHI) forecast graphics improve consumers’ risk perception for tornadoes, but findings from these studies concerning whether PHI forecast graphics improve people’s protective action decision-making are mixed. The present study therefore investigated how mock PHI-enhanced WEA360 messages might influence people’s risk perception and protective action decision-making. Analysis of qualitative data gathered from a combination of questionnaire and focus group interview methods conducted in collaboration with 31 community members in Denver, Colorado, indicated that inclusion of PHI forecast graphics within WEA360 messages elicited high levels of understanding and message believability but did not consistently lead to appropriate precautionary intent. Because warning response is a complex social phenomenon, PHI may not significantly improve protective action decision-making if PHI forecast graphics are eventually presented to consumers via the Wireless Emergency Alerts system. Factors that PHI stakeholders should consider before the adoption of PHI-enhanced WEA360 messages for consumers are discussed.

Significance Statement

This study examines how consumers respond to and talk about mock WEA360 messages for tornadoes that contain embedded PHI forecast graphics. As NWS considers moving to a probabilistic warning paradigm, stakeholders will need to determine how PHI forecast graphics might be communicated directly to consumers, if at all. Our findings suggest that combining WEA360 messages with PHI forecast graphics creates challenges and complexities related to consumers’ assessment of personal risk and protective action decision-making. Overall, the study suggests that any future PHI-enhanced WEA360 messages provided directly to consumers, if at all, must avoid discrepancies (even subtle) between the level of risk represented by the PHI forecast graphic and the protective action guidance included in the text of the messages.

© 2023 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Hamilton Bean, hamilton.bean@ucdenver.edu
Save
  • Aguirre, B. E., D. Wenger, and G. Vigo, 1998: A test of the emergent norm theory of collective behavior. Sociol. Forum, 13, 301320, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022145900928.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bartolucci, A., C. Casareale, and J. Drury, 2021: Cooperative and competitive behaviour among passengers during the Costa Concordia disaster. Saf. Sci., 134, 105055, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105055.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bean, H., 2019: Mobile Technology and the Transformation of Public Alert and Warning. Praeger, 240 pp.

  • Bean, H., B. Liu, S. Madden, D. Mileti, J. Sutton, and M. Wood, 2014: Comprehensive testing of imminent threat public messages for mobile devices. National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, 206 pp., https://www.dhs.gov/publication/wea-comprehensive-testing-imminent-threat-public-messages-mobile-devices-updated.

  • Bean, H., J. Sutton, B. F. Liu, S. Madden, M. M. Wood, and D. S. Mileti, 2015: The study of mobile public warning messages: A research review and agenda. Rev. Comm., 15, 6080, https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2015.1014402.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bean, H., B. F. Liu, S. Madden, J. Sutton, M. Wood, and D. Mileti, 2016: Disaster warnings in your pocket: A qualitative study of how audiences interpret wireless emergency alerts. J. Contingencies Crisis Manage., 24, 136147, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12108.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bean, H., N. Grevstad, A. Meyer, and A. Koutsoukos, 2022: Exploring whether wireless emergency alerts can help impede the spread of Covid-19. J. Contingencies Crisis Manage., 30, 185203, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12376.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cain, L., E. Herovic, and K. Wombacher, 2021: “You are here”: Assessing the inclusion of maps in a campus emergency alert system. J. Contingencies Crisis Manage., 29, 332340, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12358.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Casteel, M. A., 2016: Communicating increased risk: An empirical investigation of the National Weather Service’s impact-based warnings. Wea. Climate Soc., 8, 219232, https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-15-0044.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Childs, S. J., J. Demuth, R. Morss, K. Ash, S. Joslyn, C. Savelli, and C. Qin, 2021: Evaluating probabilistic tornado warning graphics: Unprimed interpretations of and responses motivated by four designs. 16th Symp. on Societal Applications: Policy, Research and Practice/Ninth Symp. on Building a Weather-Ready Nation, Online, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 12.7, https://ams.confex.com/ams/101ANNUAL/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/381424.

  • Dallo, I., M. Stauffacher, and M. Marti, 2022: Actionable and understandable? Evidence-based recommendations for the design of (multi-)hazard warning messages. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 74, 102917, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102917.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Demuth, J. L., R. E. Morss, K. D. Ash, S. Savelli, S. Joslyn, and C. Qin, 2020: The impact of color-coded probabilistic tornado warnings on risk perceptions and responses, Part II: Interviews. 15th Symp. on Societal Applications: Policy, Research and Practice, Boston, MA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 3A.6, https://ams.confex.com/ams/2020Annual/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/370426.

  • Demuth, J. L., J. Vickery, H. Lazrus, J. Henderson, R. E. Morss, and K. D. Ash, 2022: Rethinking warning compliance and complacency by examining how people manage risk and vulnerability during real-world tornado threats. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 103, E1553E1572, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0072.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ding, Q., and B. Millet, 2020: Visualizing uncertainty in weather forecasts. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet., 64, 10641068, https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181320641255.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Doermann, J. L., E. D. Kuligowski, and J. Milke, 2020: From social science research to engineering practice: Development of a short message creation tool for wildfire emergencies. Fire Technol., 57, 815837, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-020-01008-7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Drabek, T. E., and D. A. McEntire, 2003: Emergent phenomena and the sociology of disaster: Lessons, trends and opportunities from the research literature. Disaster Prev. Manage., 12, 97112, https://doi.org/10.1108/09653560310474214.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ericsson, K. A., and H. A. Simon, 1993: Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. MIT Press, 443 pp.

  • FCC, 2023: Wireless Emergency Alerts. Amendments to Part 11 of the Commission’s Rules Regarding the Emergency Alert System. Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking—PS Docket Nos. 15-91 and 15-94, 83 pp., https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-23-30A1.pdf.

  • Gillespie, K. L., D. S. LaDue, and C. D. Karstens, 2022: Tornado warning decision making with the probabilistic hazard information tool. National Weather Center Research Experience for Undergraduates, 10 pp., http://www.caps.ou.edu/reu/reu21/finalpapers/Gillespie_FinalPaper.pdf.

  • Jauernic, S. T., and M. S. Van Den Broeke, 2016: Perceptions of tornadoes, tornado risk, and tornado safety actions and their effects on warning response among Nebraska undergraduates. Nat. Hazards, 80, 329350, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1970-9.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jon, I., S. K. Huang, and M. K. Lindell, 2018: Perceptions and reactions to tornado warning polygons: Would a gradient polygon be useful? Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 30, 132144, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.035.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Joslyn, S., S. Savelli, C. Qin, J. Demuth, R. Morss, and K. D. Ash, 2020: The impact of color-coded probabilistic tornado warnings on risk perceptions and responses, Part I: Experiment. 15th Symp. on Societal Applications: Policy, Research and Practice, Boston, MA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 3A.5, https://ams.confex.com/ams/2020Annual/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/370402.

  • Kim, J., A. A. Seate, B. F. Liu, D. Hawblitzel, and T. Funk, 2022: To warn or not to warn: Factors influencing National Weather Service warning meteorologists’ tornado warning decisions. Wea. Climate Soc., 14, 697708, https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-20-0115.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kuligowski, E. D., and J. Doermann, 2018: A review of public response to short message alerts under imminent threat. NIST Tech. Note 1982, 39 pp., https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/TechnicalNotes/NIST.TN.1982.pdf.

  • LaForce, S., and D. Bright, 2021a: Are we there yet? The developing state of mobile access equity. Assistive Technol., 31, 628636, https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2021.1926372.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LaForce, S., and D. Bright, 2021b: Evaluating the impact of WEA 2.0 regulations on WEA message content accessibility. J. Emerg. Manage. Disaster Commun., 2, 239257, https://doi.org/10.1142/S2689980921500135.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lambropoulos, D., M. Yousefvand, and N. Mandayam, 2021: Tale of seven alerts: Enhancing Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEAs) to reduce cellular network usage during disasters. arXiv, 2102.00589v1, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.00589.

  • Lee, M., and M. You, 2021: Effects of COVID-19 emergency alert text messages on practicing preventive behaviors: Cross-sectional web-based survey in South Korea. J. Med. Internet Res., 23, e24165, https://doi.org/10.2196/24165.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lindell, M. K., and T. C. Earle, 1983: How close is close enough: Public perceptions of the risks of industrial facilities. Risk Anal., 3, 245253, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1983.tb01393.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lindell, M. K., and R. W. Perry, 2012: The protective action decision model: Theoretical modifications and additional evidence. Risk Anal., 32, 616632, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lindell, M. K., S. Arlikatti, and S. K. Huang, 2019: Immediate behavioral response to the June 17, 2013 flash floods in Uttarakhand, North India. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 34, 129146, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.11.011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lindell, M. K., C. Chen, and M. J. Shaw, 2022: Modeling hurricane evacuation warnings: Effects of message content and timing on risk perception and response. National Hurricane Conf., Orlando, FL, National Hurricane Conference, https://www.hurricanemeeting.com/download/Hurricane-Hazard-Perception-and-Risk-Communications-4.12.2022.pdf.

  • Ling, R., and B. Oppegaard, 2021: THIS IS NOT A DRILL: Mobile telephony, information verification, and expressive communication during Hawaii’s false missile alert. Soc. Media Soc., 7 (1), 112, https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305121999661

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, B. F., M. M. Wood, M. Egnoto, H. Bean, J. Sutton, D. Mileti, and S. Madden, 2017: Is a picture worth a thousand words? The effects of maps and warning messages on how publics respond to disaster information. Public Relat. Rev., 43, 493506, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.04.004.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McBride, S. K., and Coauthors, 2021: Evidence-based guidelines for protective actions and earthquake early warning systems. Geophysics, 87, 179, https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2021-0222.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mileti, D. S., 2018: PrepTalks: Modernizing public warning messaging. FEMA, https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/videos/159069.

  • Mileti, D. S., and J. H. Sorensen, 1990: Communication of emergency public warnings: A social science perspective and state-of-the-art assessment. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Rep. ORNL-6609, 162 pp., https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6137387-communication-emergency-public-warnings-social-science-perspective-state-art-assessment.

  • Mileti, D. S., and L. Peek, 2000: The social psychology of public response to warnings of a nuclear power plant accident. J. Hazard. Mater., 75, 181194, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(00)00179-5.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miran, S. M., C. Ling, J. J. James, A. Gerard, and L. Rothfusz, 2017a: User perception and interpretation of tornado probabilistic hazard information: Comparison of four graphical designs. Appl. Ergon., 65, 277285, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.06.016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miran, S. M., C. Ling, J. J. James, A. Gerard, and L. Rothfusz, 2017b: Effective method to convey threat information for tornado: Probabilistic hazard information vs. deterministic hazard information. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet., 61, 292296, https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601554.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miran, S. M., C. Ling, A. Gerard, and L. Rothfusz, 2018: The effect of providing probabilistic information about a tornado threat on people’s protective actions. Nat. Hazards, 94, 743758, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3418-5.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miran, S. M., C. Ling, A. Gerard, and L. Rothfusz, 2019: Effect of providing the uncertainty information about a tornado occurrence on the weather recipients’ cognition and protective action: Probabilistic hazard information versus deterministic warnings. Risk Anal., 39, 15331545, https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13289.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miran, S. M., C. Ling, and J. J. James, 2020: People’s thresholds of decision-making against a tornado threat using dynamic probabilistic hazard information. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 42, 101345, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101345.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miran, S. M., C. Ling, and S. Datta, 2021: Bayesian hierarchical modeling of people’s decision-making during an extreme weather event. Jpn. J. Stat. Data Sci., 4, 411425, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42081-021-00114-2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Morss, R. E., C. L. Cuite, J. L. Demuth, W. K. Hallman, and R. L. Shwom, 2018: Is storm surge scary? The influence of hazard, impact, and fear-based messages and individual differences on responses to hurricane risks in the USA. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 30, 4458, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.023.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2018: Emergency Alert and Warning Systems: Current Knowledge and Future Research Directions. National Academies Press, 128 pp., https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24935/emergency-alert-and-warning-systems-current-knowledge-and-future-research.

  • National Severe Storms Laboratory, 2020: FACETs: Forecasting a Continuum of Environmental Threats. NOAA, https://www.nssl.noaa.gov/projects/facets/.

  • Obermeier, H. B., K. L. Berry, K. E. Klockow-McClain, A. Campbell, C. Carithers, A. Gerard, and J. E. Trujillo-Falcón, 2022: The creation of a research television studio to test probabilistic hazard information with broadcast meteorologists in NOAA’s Hazardous Weather Testbed. Wea. Climate Soc., 14, 949963, https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-21-0171.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • O’Connor, C., and H. Joffe, 2020: Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. Int. J. Qual. Methods, 19, 119 , https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Phillips, N., and C. Hardy, 2002: Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction. Sage, 97 pp.

  • Ripberger, J. T., C. L. Silva, H. C. Jenkins-Smith, J. Allan, M. Krocak, W. Wehde, and S. Ernst, 2020: Exploring community differences in tornado warning reception, comprehension, and response across the United States. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 101, E936E948, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0064.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sellnow, T. L., and M. W. Seeger, 2021: Theorizing Crisis Communication. John Wiley and Sons, 368 pp.

  • Shivers-Williams, C. A., and K. E. Klockow-McClain, 2020: Geographic scale and probabilistic forecasts: A trade-off for protective decisions? Nat. Hazards, 105, 22832306, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04400-2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shivers-Williams, C. A., K. E. Klockow, and K. Berry, 2021: Communicating uncertainty: A public perspective on probabilistic forecast products. 16th Symp. on Societal Applications: Policy, Research and Practice, Online, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 1.4, https://ams.confex.com/ams/101ANNUAL/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/378869.

  • Smith, K. R., S. Grant, and R. E. Thomas, 2022: Testing the public’s response to receiving severe flood warnings using simulated cell broadcast. Nat. Hazards, 112, 16111631, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05241-x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, L., and T. Horner, 2021: Tornadoes in Denver: The Denver convergence-vorticity zone (DCVZ) and Denver cyclone. Highpoint Weather, https://medium.com/14ers-forecast/tornadoes-in-denver-the-denver-convergence-vorticity-zone-dcvz-and-denver-cyclone-c57dc0468df6.

  • Strauss, A., and J. M. Corbin, 1997: Grounded Theory in Practice. Sage, 288 pp.

  • Stumpf, G. J., and A. E. Gerard, 2021: National Weather Service severe weather warnings as threats-in-motion. Wea. Forecasting, 36, 627643, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-20-0159.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sutton, J., and C. Woods, 2016: Tsunami warning message interpretation and sense making: Focus group insights. Wea. Climate Soc., 8, 389398, https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-15-0067.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sutton, J., and E. D. Kuligowski, 2019: Alerts and warnings on short messaging channels: Guidance from an expert panel process. Nat. Hazards Rev., 20, 2, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000324.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sutton, J., and L. M. Fischer, 2020: Understanding visual risk communication messages: An analysis of visual attention allocation and think aloud responses to tornado graphics. Wea. Climate Soc., 13, 173188, https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-20-0042.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sutton, J., L. M. Fischer, and M. M. Wood, 2021: Tornado warning guidance and graphics: Implications of the inclusion of protective action information on perceptions and efficacy. Wea. Climate Soc., 13, 10031014, https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-21-0097.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Takenouchi, K., C. Nakanishi, K. Yamori, M. Sawada, K. Takeuchi, and H. Fujiwara, 2017: Collaborative Community Weather Information for meteorological disasters: A case study of Nakajima SchoFol District, Ise. J. Intergr. Disaster Risk Manage., 7 (2), 124, https://doi.org/10.5595/idrim.2017.0200.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tracy, S. J., 2019: Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. John Wiley and Sons, 368 pp.

  • Trujillo-Falcón, J. E., O. Bermúdez, K. Negrón-Hernández, J. Lipski, E. Leitman, and K. Berry, 2021: Hazardous weather communication en Español: Challenges, current resources, and future practices. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 102, E765E773, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0249.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Trujillo-Falcón, J. E., J. Reedy, K. E. Klockow-McClain, K. L. Berry, G. J. Stumpf, A. V. Bates, and J. G. LaDue, 2022: Creating a communication framework for FACETs: How probabilistic hazard information affected warning operations in NOAA’s hazardous weather testbed. Wea. Climate Soc., 14, 881892, https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-21-0136.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Walters, J. E., L. R. Mason, and K. N. Ellis, 2019: Examining patterns of intended response to tornado warnings among residents of Tennessee, United States, through a latent class analysis approach. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 34, 375386, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.12.007.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Walters, J. E., L. R. Mason, K. Ellis, and B. Winchester, 2020: Staying safe in a tornado: A qualitative inquiry into public knowledge, access, and response to tornado warnings. Wea. Forecasting, 35, 6781, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-19-0090.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wehde, W., J. T. Ripberger, H. Jenkins-Smith, B. A. Jones, J. N. Allan, and C. L. Silva, 2021: Public willingness to pay for continuous and probabilistic hazard information. Nat. Hazards Rev., 22, 04021004, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000444.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wood, M. M., D. S. Mileti, H. Bean, B. F. Liu, J. Sutton, and S. Madden, 2018: Milling and public warnings. Environ. Behav., 50, 535566, https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517709561.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2236 2040 20
Full Text Views 284 247 6
PDF Downloads 268 234 6