An Analysis of K–12 Climate Change Science Standards in the United States

Breanna C. Beaver aYoungstown State University, Youngstown, Ohio

Search for other papers by Breanna C. Beaver in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8611-3924
,
Shannon L. Navy bKent State University, Kent, Ohio

Search for other papers by Shannon L. Navy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Jennifer L. Heisler bKent State University, Kent, Ohio

Search for other papers by Jennifer L. Heisler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

To produce a climate-literate society willing to take action, students must be educated on the causes, changes, impacts, and solutions of climate change. One way to ensure students are educated on climate change is to have robust science standards. However, little is known about the collective climate change standards in the United States. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to conduct an analysis of the U.S. K–12 science standards to uncover where the climate change standards are located in different grade levels and the extent to which the collective U.S. curriculum covers topics of climate change. This study was a qualitative content analysis of the U.S. K–12 climate change standards. The results show that most U.S. climate change standards are found within the high school grade levels and Earth and space science domains. All U.S. states address topics of climate change within their standards; however, general mentions of climate change were cited most often. Finally, the majority of states address both natural and anthropogenic causes of climate change. Implications for policymakers and educators are included.

© 2024 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Breanna Beaver, bcbeaver@ysu.edu

Abstract

To produce a climate-literate society willing to take action, students must be educated on the causes, changes, impacts, and solutions of climate change. One way to ensure students are educated on climate change is to have robust science standards. However, little is known about the collective climate change standards in the United States. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to conduct an analysis of the U.S. K–12 science standards to uncover where the climate change standards are located in different grade levels and the extent to which the collective U.S. curriculum covers topics of climate change. This study was a qualitative content analysis of the U.S. K–12 climate change standards. The results show that most U.S. climate change standards are found within the high school grade levels and Earth and space science domains. All U.S. states address topics of climate change within their standards; however, general mentions of climate change were cited most often. Finally, the majority of states address both natural and anthropogenic causes of climate change. Implications for policymakers and educators are included.

© 2024 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Breanna Beaver, bcbeaver@ysu.edu
Save
  • Anderson, A., 2012: Climate change education for mitigation and adaptation. J. Educ. Sustainable Dev., 6, 191206, https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408212475199.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boylan, C., 2008: Exploring elementary students’ understanding of energy and climate change. Int. Electron. J. Elem. Educ., 1 (1), 115.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Center for Research on Environmental Decisions, 2009: The psychology of climate change communication: A guide for scientists, journalists, educators, political aides, and the interested public. Center for Research on Environment Decisions Tech. Rep., 54 pp., https://doi.org/10.7916/d8-byzb-0s23.

  • Colston, N. M., and T. A. Ivey, 2015: (un) Doing the next generation science standards: Climate change education actor-networks in Oklahoma. J. Educ. Policy, 30, 773795, https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1011711.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dawson, V., and K. Carson, 2020: Introducing argumentation about climate change socioscientific issues in a disadvantaged school. Res. Sci. Educ., 50, 863883, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9715-x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Egan, P. J., and M. Mullin, 2017: Climate change: US public opinion. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci., 20, 209227, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-022857.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Foss, A. W., and Y. Ko, 2019: Barriers and opportunities for climate change education: The case of Dallas-fort worth in Texas. J. Environ. Educ., 50, 145159, https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2019.1604479.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Foulk, J. A., P. J. Friedrichsen, and T. D. Sadler, 2020: Science in socio-scientific issues: Teaching with a timeline activity. Sci. Teach., 87, 3539, https://doi.org/10.1080/00368555.2020.12293518.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hahn, E. R., 2021: The developmental roots of environmental stewardship: Childhood and the climate change crisis. Curr. Opin. Psychol., 42, 1924, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.01.006.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hannah, A. L., and D. C. Rhubart, 2020: Teacher perceptions of state standards and climate change pedagogy: Opportunities and barriers for implementing consensus-informed instruction on climate change. Climatic Change, 158, 377392, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02590-8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Howard-Jones, P., D. Sands, J. Dillon, and F. Fenton-Jones, 2021: The views of teachers in England on an action-oriented climate change curriculum. Environ. Educ. Res., 27, 16601680, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.1937576.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. IPCC, 151 pp.

  • IPCC, 2022: Summary for policymakers. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, H.-O. Pörtner et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, 3–33, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844.001.

  • Johnson, R., 2012: Climate change education in K–12: Teacher preparation, understanding, needs and concerns. National Earth Science Teachers Association Rep., 17 pp., https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=21747bacf760105606eae8dd3dec8ad3aa412f85.

  • Kahan, D. M., H. Jenkins‐Smith, and D. Braman, 2011: Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. J. Risk Res., 14, 147174, https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.511246.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Khalidi, R., and J. Ramsey, 2020: A comparison of California and Texas secondary science teachers’ perceptions of climate change. Environ. Educ. Res., 27, 669686, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1838447.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leiserowitz, A., 2007: Communicating the risks of global warming: American risk perceptions, affective images, and interpretive communities. Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change, S. C. Moser and L. Dilling Eds., Cambridge University Press, 44–63.

  • Leiserowitz, A., N. Smith, and J. R. Marlon, 2011: American teens’ knowledge of climate change. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication Rep., 63 pp.

  • Liefländer, A. K., and F. X. Bogner, 2014: The effects of children’s age and sex on acquiring pro-environmental attitudes through environmental education. J. Environ. Educ., 45, 105117, https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2013.875511.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McGinnis, J. R., C. McDonald, W. Breslyn, and E. Hestness, 2017: Supporting the inclusion of climate change in U.S. science education curricula by use of learning progressions. Teaching and Learning about Climate Change: A Framework for Educators, D. Shephardson, A. Roychoudury, and A. Hirsch, Eds., Routledge, 135–151.

  • Meehan, C. R., B. L. Levy, and L. Collet‐Gildard, 2018: Global climate change in U.S. high school curricula: Portrayals of the causes, consequences, and potential responses. Sci. Educ., 102, 498528, https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21338.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Monroe, M. C., R. R. Plate, A. Oxarart, A. Bowers, and W. A. Chaves, 2019: Identifying effective climate change education strategies: A systematic review of the research. Environ. Educ. Res., 25, 791812, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1360842.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NASA, 2024: Climate change: How do we know? https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/.

  • NCES, 2017: State education practices (SEP): Compiles and disseminates data on state education practice activities. Accessed 1 August 2023, https://nces.ed.gov/programs/statereform/tab2_5.asp.

  • NCSE & Texas Freedom Network Education Fund, 2020: Making the grade? How state public school science standards address climate change. Tech. Rep., 23 pp., https://climategrades.org/MakingTheGradeReport.pdf.

  • NRC, 2012: A Framework for K–12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. The National Academies Press, 400 pp.

  • New Jersey Department of Education, 2024: Climate change education by grade band. https://www.nj.gov/education/standards/climate/learning/gradeband/.

  • NGSS, 2023: NGSS fact sheet. Accessed 1 August 2023, https://www.nextgenscience.org/resources/ngss-fact-sheet.

  • NGSS Lead States, 2013: Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. The National Academies Press, 532 pp.

  • NSTA, 2021: About the next generation science standards. Accessed 16 January 2021, https://ngss.nsta.org/About.aspx.

  • Roychoudhury, A., D. P. Shepardson, A. Hirsch, D. Niyogi, J. Mehta, and S. Top, 2017: The need to introduce system thinking in teaching climate change. Sci. Educ., 25, 7381.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sadler, T. D., 2011: Situating socio-scientific issues in classrooms as a means of achieving goals of science education. Socio-Scientific Issues in the Classroom, T. Sadler. Ed., Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, Vol. 39, Springer, 1–9.

  • Schreier, M., 2014: Qualitative content analysis. SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, U. Flick, Ed., Sage, 170–183.

  • Stevenson, R. B., J. Nicholls, and H. Whitehouse, 2017: What is climate change education? Curric. Perspect., 37, 6771, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-017-0015-9.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sullivan, S. M. B., T. S. Ledley, S. E. Lynds, and A. U. Gold, 2014: Navigating climate science in the classroom: Teacher preparation, perceptions and practices. J. Geosci. Educ., 62, 550559, https://doi.org/10.5408/12-304.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • USGCRP, 2023: Fifth National Climate Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program Rep., https://doi.org/10.7930/NCA5.2023.

  • White, P. T., K. J. Wolf, J. L. Johnson-Maynard, J. J. Velez, and S. D. Eigenbrode, 2014: Secondary climate change education in the Pacific Northwest. Nat. Sci. Educ., 43, 8593, https://doi.org/10.4195/nse2014.01.0001.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wise, S. B., 2010: Climate change in the classroom: Patterns, motivations, and barriers to instruction among Colorado science teachers. J. Geosci. Educ., 58, 297309, https://doi.org/10.5408/1.3559695.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zangori, L., A. Peel, A. Kinslow, P. Friedrichsen, and T. D. Sadler, 2017: Student development of model‐based reasoning about carbon cycling and climate change in a socio‐scientific issues unit. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 54, 12491273, https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21404.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 799 799 133
Full Text Views 52 52 3
PDF Downloads 64 64 0