Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

On the Economic Nature of Crop Production Decisions Using the Oklahoma Mesonet

Kimberly E. Klockow Oklahoma Climatological Survey, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Kimberly E. Klockow in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Renee A. McPherson Oklahoma Climatological Survey, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Renee A. McPherson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Daniel S. Sutter University of Texas Pan-American, Edinburg, Texas

Search for other papers by Daniel S. Sutter in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Jul 2010
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/2010WCAS1034.1
Page(s):
224–236
Restricted access

Abstract

Because of the sensitivity of agricultural production to both short-term weather and long-range climatic patterns, the availability of reliable and relevant meteorological data and climate products can potentially affect the entire production process. This study focuses on the use of information from a dense meteorological network—the Oklahoma Mesonet—and its AgWeather program in support of agricultural production decisions. Production decisions that are particularly dependent on information from the Mesonet are identified. Producers in Oklahoma are influenced by Mesonet data at several levels, including agricultural policy, production choices, and risk management. Additionally, producers use the Mesonet to attain their financial goals, through such measures as cost saving and maximization of quality and quantity, in addition to others. Potential savings from Mesonet data for the state’s agricultural sector are also estimated.

Corresponding author address: Kimberly E. Klockow, Suite 2900, 120 David L. Boren Blvd., Oklahoma Climatological Survey, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73072. Email: kklockow@ou.edu

Abstract

Because of the sensitivity of agricultural production to both short-term weather and long-range climatic patterns, the availability of reliable and relevant meteorological data and climate products can potentially affect the entire production process. This study focuses on the use of information from a dense meteorological network—the Oklahoma Mesonet—and its AgWeather program in support of agricultural production decisions. Production decisions that are particularly dependent on information from the Mesonet are identified. Producers in Oklahoma are influenced by Mesonet data at several levels, including agricultural policy, production choices, and risk management. Additionally, producers use the Mesonet to attain their financial goals, through such measures as cost saving and maximization of quality and quantity, in addition to others. Potential savings from Mesonet data for the state’s agricultural sector are also estimated.

Corresponding author address: Kimberly E. Klockow, Suite 2900, 120 David L. Boren Blvd., Oklahoma Climatological Survey, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73072. Email: kklockow@ou.edu

Save
Cover Weather, Climate, and Society
Weather, Climate, and Society

  • Apfelbeck, J., Huigen M. , Krimly T. , and Sanchez G. C. , 2008: Management decisions on farm-level and their link to weather requirements: A case study for the upper Danube river basin. Preprints, 12th Congress of the European Association of Agricultural Economists, Ghent, Belgium, European Association of Agricultural Economists, 1–3.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Artikov, I., and Coauthors, 2006: Understanding the influence of climate forecasts on farmer decisions as planned behavior. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 45 , 1202–1214.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Batte, M., 1986: Adoption and use of farm information systems. OARDC Special Circular 149, North Central Regional Research Publ. 339, The Ohio State University, 106 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Britt, M. L., Ramirez O. A. , and Carpio C. E. , 2002: Effects of quality considerations and climate/weather information on the management and profitability of cotton production in the Texas high plains. J. Agric. Appl. Econ., 34 , 561–583.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Brock, F. V., Crawford K. C. , Elliott R. L. , Cuperus G. W. , Stadler S. J. , Johnson H. L. , and Eilts M. D. , 1995: The Oklahoma Mesonet: A technical overview. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 12 , 5–19.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Brown, B. G., Katz R. W. , and Murphy A. H. , 1986: On the economic value of seasonal-precipitation forecasts: The fallowing/planning problem. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 67 , 833–841.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Changnon, S. A., 1992: Contents of climate predictions desired by agricultural decision makers. J. Appl. Meteor., 31 , 1488–1491.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Changnon, S. A., 2004: Changing uses of climate predictions in agriculture: Implications for prediction research, providers, and users. Wea. Forecasting, 19 , 606–613.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Changnon, S. A., and Kunkel K. E. , 1999: Rapidly expanding uses of climate data and information in agriculture and water resources: Causes and characteristics of new applications. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 80 , 821–830.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chavas, J. P., 2006: A cost approach to economic analysis under production uncertainty. Preprints, Annual Conf. of the American Agricultural Economics Association, Long Beach, CA, American Agricultural Economics Association, 1–28.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cohen, D. R., and Zilberman D. , 1997: Actual versus stated willingness to pay: A comment. J. Agric. Resour. Econ., 22 , 376–381.

  • Diak, G. R., Anderson M. C. , Bland W. L. , Norman J. M. , Mecikalski J. M. , and Aune R. M. , 1998: Agricultural management decision aids driven by real-time satellite data. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 79 , 1345–1355.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Doye, D., 2005: Case studies of farmers’ use of information systems. Rev. Agric. Econ., 22 , 566–585.

  • Horowitz, J. K., and McConnell K. E. , 2002: A review of WTA/WTP studies. J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 44 , 426–447.

  • Hu, Q., and Coauthors, 2006: Understanding farmers’ forecast use from their beliefs, values, social norms, and perceived obstacles. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 45 , 1190–1201.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kenkel, P. L., and Norris P. E. , 1995: Agricultural producers’ willingness to pay for real-time mesoscale weather information. J. Agric. Resour. Econ., 20 , 356–372.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kenkel, P. L., and Norris P. E. , 1997: Agricultural producers’ willingness to pay for real-time mesoscale weather information: A response. J. Agric. Resour. Econ., 22 , 382–386.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Livezey, R. E., 1990: Variability of skill of long-range forecasts and implications for their use and value. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 71 , 300–309.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McPherson, R. A., and Coauthors, 2007: Statewide monitoring of the mesoscale environment: A technical update on the Oklahoma Mesonet. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 24 , 301–321.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Morgan, M. G., Fischoff B. , Bostrom A. , and Atman C. J. , 2002: Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach. Cambridge University Press, 351 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Murphy, A. H., and Ye Q. , 1990: Optimal decision making and the value of information in a time-dependent version of the cost–loss ratio situation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 118 , 939–949.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Murphy, A. H., Katz R. W. , Winkler R. L. , and Hsu W. R. , 1985: Repetitive decision making and the value of forecasts in the cost–loss ratio situation: A dynamic model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 113 , 801–813.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ritchie, J., and Lewis J. , 2003: Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Sage Publications, 336 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, cited. 2010: Overview. [Available online at http://www.noble.org/About/overview.html].

  • Schmedt, F., cited. 2005: Farm succession planning is critical. AG News and Views, The Noble Foundation. [Available online at http://www.noble.org/Ag/Economics/SuccessionPlanningIsCritical/index.html].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sonka, S. T., Mjelde J. W. , and Dixon B. L. , 1987: Valuing climate forecast information. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 26 , 1080–1091.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sonka, S. T., Changnon S. A. , and Hofing S. , 1988: Assessing climate information use in agribusiness. Part II: Decision experiments to estimate economic value. J. Climate, 1 , 766–774.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Stewart, T. R., Katz R. W. , and Murphy A. H. , 1984: Value of weather information: A descriptive study of the fruit-frost problem. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 65 , 126–137.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistical Service, cited. 2007a: Table 10. Irrigation: 2007 and 2002. The 2007 Census of Agriculture. [Available online at http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2007/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_1_State_Level/Oklahoma/st40_1_009_010.pdf].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistical Service, cited. 2007b: Table 45. Fertilizers and chemicals: 2007 and 2002. The 2007 Census of Agriculture. [Available online at http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2007/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_1_State_Level/Oklahoma/st40_1_044_045.pdf].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistical Service, 2008a: Oklahoma pecan crop up 18 percent from last year. Oklahoma Farm Statistics, Vol. 28, No. 3, 1–4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistical Service, cited. 2008b: Prices received by commodity type by month, US. [Available online at http://www.nass.usda.gov/Charts_and_Maps/Agricultural_Prices/received.asp].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistical Service, cited. 2008c: Prices paid: Indexes by farm type by year, US. [Available online at http://www.nass.usda.gov/Charts_and_Maps/Agricultural_Prices/paid.asp].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wang, E. W., Williams J. R. , and Little B. B. , 2006: Prediction of weather event associated crop yield losses in Kansas. Preprints, Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL, Southern Association of Agricultural Scientists, 2–20.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Weiss, A., and Robb J. G. , 1986: Results and interpretations from a survey on agriculturally related weather information. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 67 , 10–15.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wong, T., 2008: Purposive and snowball sampling in the study of ethnic and mainstream community organizations. Preprints, Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association, San Diego, CA, Western Political Science Association. [Available online at http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p238387_index.html].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 138 0 0
Full Text Views 1034 798 41
PDF Downloads 226 66 8