Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Vulnerability beyond Stereotypes: Context and Agency in Hurricane Risk Communication

Heather Lazrus National Center for Atmospheric Research,* Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Heather Lazrus in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Betty H. Morrow Florida International University, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Betty H. Morrow in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Rebecca E. Morss National Center for Atmospheric Research,* Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Rebecca E. Morss in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Jeffrey K. Lazo National Center for Atmospheric Research,* Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Jeffrey K. Lazo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Apr 2012
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-12-00015.1
Page(s):
103–109
Restricted access

Abstract

Risk communication may accentuate or alleviate the vulnerability of people who have particular difficulties responding to the threat of hazards such as hurricanes. The process of risk communication involves how hazard information is received, understood, and responded to by individuals and groups. Thus, risk communication and vulnerability interact through peoples' knowledge, attitudes, and practices. This study explores risk communication with several groups that may be at particular risk of hurricane impacts: older adults, newer residents, and persons with disabilities. Focus groups conducted in Miami, Florida, examined how members of these groups express their own vulnerability or agency in terms of receiving, interpreting, and responding to hurricane risk information. Findings indicate that people's interactions with risk information are deeply contextual and are facilitated by their individual agency to cope with their vulnerabilities.

The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation.

Corresponding author address: Heather Lazrus, NCAR, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307. E-mail: hlazrus@ucar.edu

Abstract

Risk communication may accentuate or alleviate the vulnerability of people who have particular difficulties responding to the threat of hazards such as hurricanes. The process of risk communication involves how hazard information is received, understood, and responded to by individuals and groups. Thus, risk communication and vulnerability interact through peoples' knowledge, attitudes, and practices. This study explores risk communication with several groups that may be at particular risk of hurricane impacts: older adults, newer residents, and persons with disabilities. Focus groups conducted in Miami, Florida, examined how members of these groups express their own vulnerability or agency in terms of receiving, interpreting, and responding to hurricane risk information. Findings indicate that people's interactions with risk information are deeply contextual and are facilitated by their individual agency to cope with their vulnerabilities.

The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation.

Corresponding author address: Heather Lazrus, NCAR, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307. E-mail: hlazrus@ucar.edu
Save
Cover Weather, Climate, and Society
Weather, Climate, and Society

  • Adger, W. N., 2006: Vulnerability. Global Environ. Change, 16, 268–281.

  • Barnett, J., and Breakwell G. M. , 2001: Risk perception and experience: Hazard personality profiles and individual differences. Risk Anal., 21, 171–178.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bernard, H. R., 2002: Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 3rd ed. Altamira Press, 800 pp.

  • Bohle, H. G., Downing T. E. , and Watts M. J. , 1994: Climate change and social vulnerability: The sociology and geography of food insecurity. Global Environ. Change, 4, 37–48.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bostrom, A., 2008: Lead is like mercury: Risk comparisons, analogies and mental models. J. Risk Res., 11, 99–117.

  • Conradson, D., 2005: Focus groups. Methods in Human Geography: A Guide for Students Doing a Research Project, R. Flowerdew and D. Martin, Eds., Longman, 128–143.

  • Cutter, S. L., Boruff B. J. , and Shirley W. L. , 2003: Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Sci. Quart., 84, 242–261.

  • Demuth, J. L., Morss R. E. , Morrow B. H. , and Lazo J. K. , 2012: Creation and communication of hurricane risk information. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., in press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dow, K., 1992: Exploring differences in our common future(s): The meaning of vulnerability to global environmental change. Geoforum, 23, 417–436.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Emrich, C. T., and Cutter S. L. , 2011: Social vulnerability to climate-sensitive hazards in the southern United States. Wea. Climate Soc., 3, 193–208.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gladwin, C. H., Gladwin H. , and Peacock W. G. , 2001: Modeling hurricane evacuation decisions with ethnographic methods. Int. J. Mass Emerg. Disasters, 19, 117–143.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hewitt, K., 1983: Interpretations of Calamity. Allen & Unwin, 304 pp.

  • Johnson, B. B., 2005: Testing and expanding a model of cognitive processing of risk information. Risk Anal., 25, 631–650.

  • Kamberelis, G., and Dimitriadis G. , 2008: Focus groups: Strategic articulations of pedagogy, politics, and inquiry. Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials, 3rd ed. N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, Eds., Sage, 375–402.

  • King, D., and MacGregor C. , 2000: Using social indicators to measure community vulnerability to natural hazards. Aust. J. Emerg. Manage., 15, 52–57.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Krueger, R. A., 1994: Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 2nd ed. Sage, 272 pp.

  • Laska, S., and Morrow B. H. , 2006: Social vulnerabilities and Hurricane Katrina: An unnatural disaster in New Orleans. Mar. Technol. Soc. J., 40, 16–26.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Malmstadt, J., Scheitlin K. , and Elsner J. , 2009: Florida hurricanes and damage costs. Southeast. Geogr., 49, 108–131.

  • Morgan, D. L., 1997: Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Sage, 80 pp.

  • Morrow, B. H., 1999: Identifying and mapping community vulnerability. Disasters, 23, 1–18.

  • Morss, R. E., and Hayden M. H. , 2010: Storms surge and “certain death”: Interviews with Texas coastal residents following Hurricane Ike. Wea. Climate Soc., 2, 174–189.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Morss, R. E., Wilhelmi O. V. , Meehl G. A. , and Dilling L. , 2011: Improving societal outcomes of extreme weather in a changing climate: An integrated perspective. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 36, 1–25.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Oliver-Smith, A., 2003: Theorizing vulnerability in a globalized world: A political ecological perspective. Mapping Vulnerability: Disasters, Development and People, G. Bankoff, G. Frerk, and D. Hilhorst, Eds., Earthscan, 10–24.

  • Peacock, W. G., Morrow B. H. , and Gladwin H. , 1997: Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity Gender and the Sociology of Disasters. Routledge, 304 pp.

  • Perilla, J. L., Norris F. H. , and Lavizzo E. A. , 2002: Ethnicity, culture, and disaster response: Identifying and explaining ethnic differences in PTSD six months after Hurricane Andrew. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol., 21, 20–45.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Phillips, B. D., and Morrow B. H. , 2007: Social science research needs: Focus on vulnerable populations, forecasting, and warnings. Nat. Hazards Rev., 8, 61–69.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Roberto, J. R., Goodall C. E. , and Witte K. , 2010: Raising the alarm and calming fears: Perceived threat and efficacy during risk and crisis. Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication, R. Heath and D. O'Hair, Eds., Routledge, 287–303.

  • Sherman-Morris, K., 2005: Tornadoes, television and trust—A closer look at the influence of the local weathercaster during severe weather. Environ. Hazards, 6, 201–210.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Smit, B., and Wandel J. , 2006: Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environ. Change, 16, 282–292.

  • Taylor, K., Priest S. , Fussell Sisco H. , Banning S. , and Campbell K. , 2009: Reading Hurricane Katrina: Information sources and decision-making in response to a natural disaster. Soc. Epistemol., 23, 361–380.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Willoughby, H. E., Rappaport E. N. , and Marks F. D. , 2007: Hurricane forecasting: The state of the art. Nat. Hazards Rev., 8, 45–49.

  • Wisner, B., Blaikie P. , Cannon T. , and Davis I. , 2004: At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disasters. 2nd ed. Routledge, 496 pp.

  • World Health Organization, cited 2012: Health topics: Disabilities. [Available online at http://www.who.int/topics/disabilities/en/.]

  • Zandbergen, P. A., 2009: Exposure of US counties to Atlantic tropical storms and hurricanes, 1851-2003. Nat. Hazards, 48, 83–99.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1682 680 140
PDF Downloads 1005 282 30