Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Agricultural Advisors as Climate Information Intermediaries: Exploring Differences in Capacity to Communicate Climate

Tonya Haigh * National Drought Mitigation Center, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska

Search for other papers by Tonya Haigh in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Lois Wright Morton Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa

Search for other papers by Lois Wright Morton in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Maria Carmen Lemos University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Search for other papers by Maria Carmen Lemos in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Cody Knutson * National Drought Mitigation Center, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska

Search for other papers by Cody Knutson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Linda Stalker Prokopy Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana

Search for other papers by Linda Stalker Prokopy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Yun Jia Lo University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Search for other papers by Yun Jia Lo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Jim Angel Illinois State Water Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Champaign, Illinois

Search for other papers by Jim Angel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Jan 2015
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-14-00015.1
Page(s):
83–93
Restricted access

Abstract

Although agricultural production faces chronic stress associated with extreme precipitation events, high temperatures, drought, and shifts in climate conditions, adoption of climate information into agricultural decision making has been relatively limited. Agricultural advisors have been shown to play important roles as information intermediaries between scientists and farmers, brokering, translating, and adding value to agronomic and economic information of use in agricultural management decision making. Yet little is known about the readiness of different types of agricultural advisors to use weather and climate information to help their clients manage risk under increasing climate uncertainty. More than 1700 agricultural advisors in four midwestern states (Nebraska, Indiana, Iowa, and Michigan) completed a web-based survey during the spring of 2012 about their use of weather and climate information, public or private sector employment, and roles as information intermediaries in three advising specializations: agronomic, conservation, and financial. Key findings reveal that advisors who specialize in providing agronomic information are positively inclined toward acting as weather and climate information intermediaries, based on influence and willingness to use climate information in providing many types of operational and tactical advice. Advisors who provide conservation advice appear to be considering weather and climate information when providing tactical and strategic land-use advice, but advisors who provide financial advice seem less inclined to act as climate information intermediaries. These findings highlight opportunities to increase the capacity of different types of advisors to enable them to be effective weather and climate information intermediaries.

Corresponding author address: Tonya Haigh, National Drought Mitigation Center, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, 3310 Holdrege Street, Lincoln, NE 68583-0988. E-mail: thaigh2@unl.edu

Abstract

Although agricultural production faces chronic stress associated with extreme precipitation events, high temperatures, drought, and shifts in climate conditions, adoption of climate information into agricultural decision making has been relatively limited. Agricultural advisors have been shown to play important roles as information intermediaries between scientists and farmers, brokering, translating, and adding value to agronomic and economic information of use in agricultural management decision making. Yet little is known about the readiness of different types of agricultural advisors to use weather and climate information to help their clients manage risk under increasing climate uncertainty. More than 1700 agricultural advisors in four midwestern states (Nebraska, Indiana, Iowa, and Michigan) completed a web-based survey during the spring of 2012 about their use of weather and climate information, public or private sector employment, and roles as information intermediaries in three advising specializations: agronomic, conservation, and financial. Key findings reveal that advisors who specialize in providing agronomic information are positively inclined toward acting as weather and climate information intermediaries, based on influence and willingness to use climate information in providing many types of operational and tactical advice. Advisors who provide conservation advice appear to be considering weather and climate information when providing tactical and strategic land-use advice, but advisors who provide financial advice seem less inclined to act as climate information intermediaries. These findings highlight opportunities to increase the capacity of different types of advisors to enable them to be effective weather and climate information intermediaries.

Corresponding author address: Tonya Haigh, National Drought Mitigation Center, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, 3310 Holdrege Street, Lincoln, NE 68583-0988. E-mail: thaigh2@unl.edu
Save
Cover Weather, Climate, and Society
Weather, Climate, and Society

  • ASA, 2011: Memorandum of understanding between the American Society of Agronomy and the United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service. ASA–USDA-NRCS Agreement A-3A75-11-168, 8 pp. [Available online at https://www.certifiedcropadviser.org/files/certifications/2011-cca-cpag-mou.pdf.]

  • ASA, 2013: Certified Crop Advisor overview. American Society of Agronomy Rep., 1 p. [Available online at https://www.certifiedcropadviser.org/files/certifiedcropadviser/cca-overview-one-page.pdf.]

  • Bessant, J., and Rush H. , 1995: Building bridges for innovation: The role of consultants in technology transfer. Res. Policy, 24, 97–114, doi:10.1016/0048-7333(93)00751-E.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Boehlje, M., 1998: Information and technology transfer in agriculture: The role of the public and private sectors. Privatization of Information and Agricultural Industrialization, S. Wolf, Ed., CRC Press, 4–23.

  • Breuer, N. E., Fraisse C. W. , and Cabrera V. E. , 2010: The Cooperative Extension Service as a boundary organization for diffusion of climate forecasts: A 5-year study. J. Ext., 48 (4), 1–5.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Briggeman, B. C., Gunderson M. A. , and Gloy B. A. , 2009: The financial health of agricultural lenders. Amer. J. Agric. Econ., 91, 1406–1413, doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01356.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Buizer, J., Jacobs K. , and Cash D. , 2010: Making short-term climate forecasts useful: Linking science and action. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., doi:10.1073/pnas.0900518107.

  • Cash, D. W., 2001: In order to aid in diffusing useful and practical information: Agricultural extension and boundary organizations. Sci. Technol. Human Values, 26, 431–453, doi:10.1177/016224390102600403.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Changnon, S. A., 2004: Changing uses of climate predictions in agriculture: Implications for prediction research, providers, and users. Wea. Forecasting, 19, 606–613, doi:10.1175/1520-0434(2004)019<0606:CUOCPI>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Czaja, S. J., Charness N. , Fisk A. D. , Hertzog C. , Nair S. N. , Rogers W. A. , and Sharit J. , 2006: Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychol. Aging, 21, 333–352, doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Goddard, L., and Coauthors, 2010: Providing seasonal-to-interannual climate information for risk management and decision-making. Proc. Environ. Sci., 1, 81–101, doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2010.09.007.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Harrison, M., 2005: The development of seasonal and inter-annual climate forecasting. Climatic Change, 70, 201–220, doi:10.1007/s10584-005-5947-7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Harwood, J., Heifner R. , Coble K. , Perry J. , and Somwaru A. , 1999: Managing risk in farming: Concepts, research, and analysis. U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service Agricultural Economic Rep. 774, 125 pp.

  • Hollinger, S. E., 1991: Incorporating weather and climate data into crop management systems. Midwest Climate Center Climate Agriculture and Drought Research Rep. 91-01, 24 pp.

  • Hollinger, S. E., 2009: Meteorological forecasting for agricultural production. Systems Analysis and Modeling in Food and Agriculture, Vol. 1, K. C. Ting et al., Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems, 397–409.

  • Horst, M., Kuttschreuter M. , and Gutteling J. M. , 2007: Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in the Netherlands. Comput. Human Behav., 23, 1838–1852, doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.11.003.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Howells, J., 2006: Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Res. Policy, 35, 715–728, doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Just, D. R., Wolf S. , and Zilberman D. , 2003: Principles of risk management service relations in agriculture. Agric. Syst., 75 (2–3), 199–213, doi:10.1016/S0308-521X(02)00065-3.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Keeney, D., and Vorley W. T. , 1998: Can privatization of information meet the goals of a sustainable agriculture? Privatization of Information and Agricultural Industrialization, S. Wolf, Ed., CRC Press, 39–50.

  • Lee, J., and Cho J. , 2005: Consumers use of information intermediaries and the impact on their information search behavior in the financial market. J. Consum. Aff., 39, 95–120, doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2005.00005.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lemos, M. C., and Rood R. , 2010: Climate projections and their impact on policy and practice. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Climate Change, 1, 670–682, doi:10.1002/wcc.71.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lemos, M. C., Kirchhoff C. , and Ramparasad V. , 2012: Narrowing the climate information usability gap. Nat. Climate Change, 2, 789–794, doi:10.1038/nclimate1614.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lemos, M. C., Lo Y. J. , Kirchhoff C. , and Haigh T. , 2014: Crop advisors as climate information brokers: Building the capacity of US farmers to adapt to climate change. Climate Risk Manage., 4–5, 32–42, doi:10.1016/j.crm.2014.08.001.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • March, J. G., 1994: Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen. Simon and Schuster, 290 pp.

  • Mase, A. S., and Prokopy L. S. , 2014: Unrealized potential: A review of perceptions and use of weather and climate information in agricultural decision making. Wea. Climate Soc., 6, 47–61, doi:10.1175/WCAS-D-12-00062.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Meinke, H., and Stone R. C. , 2005: Seasonal and inter-annual climate forecasting: The new tool for increasing preparedness to climate variability and change in agricultural planning and operations. Climatic Change, 70 (1–2), 221–253, doi:10.1007/s10584-005-5948-6.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Melillo, J. M., Richmond T. C. , and Yohe F. W. , Eds., 2014: Highlights of climate change impacts in the United States: The third National Climate Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program Rep., 148 pp.

  • Morris, M. G., and Venkatesh V. , 2000: Age differences in technology adoption decisions: Implications for a changing work force. Pers. Psychol., 53, 375–403, doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00206.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Moss, R. H., and Coauthors, 2013: Hell and high water: Practice-relevant adaptation science. Science, 342, 696–698, doi:10.1126/science.1239569.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nelson, R. R., and Phelps E. S. , 1966: Investment in humans, technological diffusion and economics growth. Amer. Econ. Rev., 56, 69–75.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • O’Connor, R. E., Yarnal B. , Dow K. , Jocoy C. L. , and Carbonne G. J. , 2005: Feeling at risk matters: Water managers and the decision to use forecasts. Risk Anal., 25, 1265–1275, doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00675.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Prokopy, L. S., Floress K. , Klotthor-Weinkauf D. , and Baumgart-Getz A. , 2008: Determinants of agricultural BMP adoption: evidence from the literature. J. Soil Water Conserv., 63, 300–311, doi:10.2489/jswc.63.5.300.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Prokopy, L. S., and Coauthors, 2013: Agricultural advisors: A receptive audience for weather and climate information? Wea. Climate Soc., 5, 162–167, doi:10.1175/WCAS-D-12-00036.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Pryor, S. C., 2013: Climate Change in the Midwest: Impacts, Risks, Vulnerability, and Adaptation. Indiana University Press, 266 pp.

  • Rayner, S., Lach D. , and Ingram H. , 2005: Weather forecasts are for wimps: Why water resource managers do not use climate forecasts. Climatic Change, 69, 197–227, doi:10.1007/s10584-005-3148-z.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Salin, V., Thurow A. P. , Smith K. R. , and Elmer N. , 1998: Exploring the market for agricultural economics information: Views of private sector analysts. Rev. Agric. Econ., 20, 114–124, doi:10.2307/1349537.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Samy, M. M., Swanson B. E. , and Sofranko A. , 2003: Structural change in agriculture: Privatization of information and the role of extension. Proc. 19th Annual Conf. AIAEE, Raleigh, NC, AIAEE, 579–588.

  • USDA-NIFA, cited 2013: Extension. [Available online at http://www.csrees.usda.gov/qlinks/extension.html.]

  • USDA-NRCS, cited 2013: Natural Resources Conservation Service. [Available online at http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/national/people/partners/.]

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris M. G. , Davis G. B. , and Davis F. D. , 2003: User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Manage. Inf. Syst. Quart., 27, 425–478.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Walthall, C. L., and Coauthors, 2012: Climate change and agriculture in the United States: Effects and adaptation. USDA Tech. Bull. 1935, 186 pp.

  • Weber, E. U., 2006: Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet). Climatic Change, 77 (1–2), 103–120, doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9060-3.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wolf, S., 1995: Cropping systems and conservation policy: The roles of agrichemical dealers and independent crop consultants. J. Soil Water Conserv., 50, 263–270.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wolf, S., 1998: Privatization of crop production information service markets. Privatization of Information and Agricultural Industrialization, S. Wolf, Ed., CRC Press, 151–182.

  • Wolf, S., Just D. , and Zilberman D. , 2001: Between data and decisions: The organization of agricultural economic information systems. Res. Policy, 30, 121–141, doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00096-7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Womack, R., 2002: Information intermediaries and optimal information distribution. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res., 24, 129–155, doi:10.1016/S0740-8188(02)00109-3.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zebiak, S., and Cane M. A. , 1987: A model El Niño/Southern Oscillation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 115, 2262–2278, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1987)115<2262:AMENO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1481 518 32
PDF Downloads 646 173 16