A Tornado Watch Scale to Improve Public Response

Jonathan B. Mason University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama

Search for other papers by Jonathan B. Mason in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Jason C. Senkbeil University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama

Search for other papers by Jason C. Senkbeil in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

A tornado refuge rubric was revised into a six-level, hierarchical Tornado Watch Scale (TWS) from level 0 to level 5 based on the likelihood of high or low-impact tornadic events. Levels correspond to an estimate of the maximum potential tornado intensity for a given day and include refuge/shelter categories of “adequate,” “questionable,” or “inadequate,” which encompass a range of refuge/shelter locations taken from the Enhanced Fujita scale. Ratings are based on a conservative estimate of damage indicators in high winds and the safety of a person taking refuge inside buildings of varying structural design. Audio recordings similar to those used in current NOAA weather radio communications were developed for each TWS intensity level. Recordings representing an existing tornado watch, existing particularly dangerous situation (PDS) tornado watch, and three proposed levels from the TWS were then used in interviews with Alabama residents to determine how changes to the information contained in the watch statements would affect each participant’s tornado safety actions and risk perception. Participants were also questioned about their knowledge and past experience with tornado hazards and their preference between the existing NWS tornado watches and the TWS. Results indicate a strong preference for the TWS when compared to existing products. The TWS was favored for providing additional information, containing descriptions of expected severity, and being easy to understand. The TWS also elicits more adequate safety decisions and more appropriate risk perception when compared to existing products, and these increases in safety were statistically significant.

Supplemental information related to this paper is available at the Journals Online website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-14-00035.s1.

Corresponding author address: Jonathan Mason, Department of Geography, University of Alabama, Box 870322, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487. E-mail: jbmason1@crimson.ua.edu

Abstract

A tornado refuge rubric was revised into a six-level, hierarchical Tornado Watch Scale (TWS) from level 0 to level 5 based on the likelihood of high or low-impact tornadic events. Levels correspond to an estimate of the maximum potential tornado intensity for a given day and include refuge/shelter categories of “adequate,” “questionable,” or “inadequate,” which encompass a range of refuge/shelter locations taken from the Enhanced Fujita scale. Ratings are based on a conservative estimate of damage indicators in high winds and the safety of a person taking refuge inside buildings of varying structural design. Audio recordings similar to those used in current NOAA weather radio communications were developed for each TWS intensity level. Recordings representing an existing tornado watch, existing particularly dangerous situation (PDS) tornado watch, and three proposed levels from the TWS were then used in interviews with Alabama residents to determine how changes to the information contained in the watch statements would affect each participant’s tornado safety actions and risk perception. Participants were also questioned about their knowledge and past experience with tornado hazards and their preference between the existing NWS tornado watches and the TWS. Results indicate a strong preference for the TWS when compared to existing products. The TWS was favored for providing additional information, containing descriptions of expected severity, and being easy to understand. The TWS also elicits more adequate safety decisions and more appropriate risk perception when compared to existing products, and these increases in safety were statistically significant.

Supplemental information related to this paper is available at the Journals Online website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-14-00035.s1.

Corresponding author address: Jonathan Mason, Department of Geography, University of Alabama, Box 870322, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487. E-mail: jbmason1@crimson.ua.edu

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (DOCX 21.99 KB)
Save
  • Balluz, L., Schieve L. , Holmes T. , Kiezak S. , and Lalilay J. , 2000: Predictors for people’s response to a tornado warning: Arkansas, 1 March 1997. Disasters, 24, 7177, doi:10.1111/1467-7717.00132.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barnes, L. R., Gruntfest E. C. , Hayden M. H. , Schultz D. M. , and Benight C. , 2007a: Can close calls help define warning accuracy? Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 88, 1529.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barnes, L. R., Gruntfest E. C. , Hayden M. H. , Schultz D. M. , and Benight C. , 2007b: False alarms and close calls: A conceptual model of warning accuracy. Wea. Forecasting,22, 1140–1147, doi:10.1175/WAF1031.1; Corrigendum, 24, 1452–1454, doi: 10.1175/2009WAF2222300.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bird, D. K., 2009: The use of questionnaires for acquiring information on public perception of natural hazards and risk mitigation—A review of current knowledge and practice. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 9,13071325, doi:10.5194/nhess-9-1307-2009.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Braun, C. C., Sansing L. , Kennedy R. S. , and Silver N. C. , 1994: Signal word and color specifications for product warnings: An isoperformance application. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet.,38,11041108, doi:10.1177/154193129403801707.

  • Brotzge, J., and Erickson S. , 2009: NWS tornado warnings with zero or negative lead times. Wea. Forecasting, 24, 140154, doi:10.1175/2008WAF2007076.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brotzge, J., Erickson S. , and Brooks H. , 2011: A 5-yr climatology of tornado false alarms. Wea. Forecasting, 26, 534544, doi:10.1175/WAF-D-10-05004.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brotzge, J., Nelson S. E. , Thompson R. L. , and Smith B. T. , 2013: Tornado probability of detection and lead time as a function of convective mode and environmental parameters. Wea. Forecasting, 28, 12611276, doi:10.1175/WAF-D-12-00119.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chapanis, A., 1994: Hazards associated with three signal words and four colours on warning signs. Ergonomics, 37, 265275, doi:10.1080/00140139408963644.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coleman, T. A., Knupp K. R. , Spann J. , Elliott J. B. , and Peters B. E. , 2011: The history (and future) of tornado warning dissemination in the United States. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 92, 567582, doi:10.1175/2010BAMS3062.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Erickson, S. A., and Brooks H. , 2006: Lead time and time under tornado warnings: 1986–2004. Preprints, 23rd Conf. on Severe Local Storms, St. Louis, MO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 11.5. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/23SLS/techprogram/paper_115194.htm.]

  • Farley, J. E., 2007: Call-to-action statements in tornado warnings: Do they reflect recent developments in tornado-safety research. Int. J. Mass Emerg. Disasters, 25 (1), 136. [Available online at www.ijmed.org/articles/48/download/.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hammer, B., and Schmidlin T. W. , 2002: Response to warnings during the 3 May 1999 Oklahoma City tornado: Reasons and relative injury rates. Wea. Forecasting, 17, 577, doi:10.1175/1520-0434(2002)017<0577:RTWDTM>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harrison, J., McCoy C. , Bunting-Howarth K. , Sorensen H. , Williams K. , and Ellis C. , 2014: Evaluation of the National Weather Service impact-based warning tool. WISCU-T-14-001, 37 pp. [Available online at http://www.iisgcp.org/glssn/IBW_finalreport.pdf.]

  • Hoekstra, S., Klockow K. , Riley R. , Brotzge J. , Brooks H. , and Erickson S. , 2011: A preliminary look at the social perspective of warn-on-forecast: Preferred tornado warning lead time and the general public’s perceptions of weather risks. Wea. Climate Soc., 3, 128140, doi:10.1175/2011WCAS1076.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kantha, L., 2006: Time to replace the Saffir-Simpson hurricane scale? Eos, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, 87, 3–6, doi:10.1029/2006EO010003.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • League, C. E., Diaz W. , Philips B. , Bass E. J. , Kloesel K. , Gruntfest E. , and Gessner A. , 2010: Emergency manager decision-making and tornado warning communication. Meteor. Appl., 17, 163172, doi:10.1002/met.201.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lindell, M. K., and Perry R. W. , 2012: The Protective Action Decision Model: Theoretical modifications and additional evidence. Risk Anal., 32, 616632, doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mason, J. B., and Senkbeil J. C. , 2014: Implications of the 2011 Tuscaloosa EF4 tornado for shelter and refuge decisions. Nat. Hazards, 74, 1021–1041, doi:10.1007/s11069-014-1230-4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • National Weather Service, cited 2015: SPC products. NOAA/NWS/NCEP/SPC. [Available online at http://www.spc.noaa.gov/misc/about.html.]

  • Patton, M. Q., 1990: Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd ed. Sage Publications, 532 pp.

  • Paul, B. K., Brock V. T. , Csiki S. , and Emerson L. , 2003: Public response to tornado warnings: A comparative study of the May 4, 2003, tornadoes in Kansas, Missouri, and Tennessee. Quick Response Rep. 165, Natural Hazards Research Applications and Information Center, Boulder, CO, 27 pp. [Available online at www.colorado.edu/hazards/research/qr/qr165/qr165.pdf.]

  • Rhodes, C. M., and Senkbeil J. C. , 2014: Factors contributing to tornadogenesis in landfalling Gulf of Mexico tropical cyclones. Meteor. Appl., 21, 940–947, doi:10.1002/met.1437.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ripberger, J. T., Silva C. L. , Jenkins-Smith H. C. , Carlson D. E. , James M. , and Herron K. G. , 2014: False alarms and missed events: The impact and origins of perceived inaccuracy in tornado warning systems. Risk Anal., 35, 44–56, doi:10.1111/risa.12262.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rovai, A. P., Baker J. D. , and Ponton M. K. , 2014: Social Science Research Design and Statistics. 2nd ed. Watertree Press, 630 pp.

  • Ryan, J. P., 1991: Design of Warning Labels and Instructions. Wiley, 201 pp.

  • Schultz, L. A., and Cecil D. J. , 2009: Tropical cyclone tornadoes 1950–2007. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 34713484, doi:10.1175/2009MWR2896.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schumacher, R. S., Lindsey D. T. , Schumacher A. B. , Braun J. , Miller S. D. , and Demuth J. L. , 2010: Multidisciplinary analysis of an unusual tornado: Meteorology climatology and the communication and interpretation of warnings. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 14121429, doi:10.1175/2010WAF2222396.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Senkbeil, J. C., and Sheridan S. C. , 2006: A post landfall hurricane classification system for the United States. J. Coast. Res., 22, 10251034, doi:10.2112/05-0532.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sherman-Morris, K., 2010: Tornado warning dissemination and response at a university campus. Nat. Hazards, 52, 623638, doi:10.1007/s11069-009-9405-0.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Simmons, K. M., and Sutter D. , 2008: Tornado warnings, lead times, and tornado casualties: An empirical investigation. Wea. Forecasting, 23, 246258, doi:10.1175/2007WAF2006027.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Simmons, K. M., and Sutter D. , 2009: False alarms, tornado warnings, and tornado casualties. Wea. Climate Soc., 1, 3853, doi:10.1175/2009WCAS1005.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Simmons, K. M., and Sutter D. , 2011: Economic and Societal Impacts of Tornadoes. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 282 pp, doi:10.1007/978-1-935704-02-7.

  • Smith-Jackson, T. L., and Wogalter M. S. , 2000: Applying cultural ergonomics/human factors to safety information research. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet.,44,6.1506.153, doi:10.1177/154193120004403319.

  • Sorensen, J. H., 2000: Hazard warning systems: Review of 20 years of progress. Nat. Hazards Rev., 1, 119125, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(119).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • U.S. Census Bureau, cited 2014: Alabama Quickfacts from the U.S. Census Bureau. [Available online at http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/01000.html.]

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2986 1239 111
PDF Downloads 1445 148 19