Drought Adaptation and Climate Change Beliefs among Working Ranchers in Montana

Laurie Yung Department of Society and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana

Search for other papers by Laurie Yung in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Nicky Phear Department of Society and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana

Search for other papers by Nicky Phear in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Alayna DuPont McKenzie River Trust, Eugene, Oregon

Search for other papers by Alayna DuPont in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jess Montag Bureau of Land Management, Cheyenne, Wyoming

Search for other papers by Jess Montag in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Daniel Murphy Department of Anthropology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio

Search for other papers by Daniel Murphy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Agricultural producers may be particularly vulnerable to climate impacts, such as drought. To better understand how ranchers respond to ongoing drought and the relationship between climate change beliefs and drought adaptation, in-depth interviews with working ranchers were conducted. Ranchers described drought conditions as unprecedented and detailed the interacting impacts of drought and nonclimatic stressors. They viewed adaptation as critical and employed a wide range of responses to drought, but lack of financial resources, risks associated with change, local social norms, and optimism about future moisture created barriers to change. Most ranchers attributed drought to natural cycles and were skeptical about anthropogenic climate change. Many ranchers likened current drought conditions to past droughts, concluding that conditions would return to “normal.” A belief in natural cycles provided a sense of hope for some ranchers but felt immutable to others, reducing their sense of agency and efficacy. Taken together, climate skepticism, optimism about future conditions, lack of financial resources, and a limited sense of agency might be reducing investments in long-term adaptation. However, the relationship between climate change beliefs and adaptation action was not entirely clear, since the handful of ranchers adapting in anticipation of long-term drought were skeptical or uncertain about anthropogenic climate change. Further, most ranchers characterized adaptation as an individual endeavor and resisted government involvement in drought adaptation. In the context of climate skepticism and antigovernment sentiment, strategies to scale up adaptation efforts beyond the household will only succeed to the extent that they build on local norms and ideologies.

Corresponding author address: Laurie Yung, Department of Society and Conservation, College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, MT 59812. E-mail: laurie.yung@umontana.edu

Abstract

Agricultural producers may be particularly vulnerable to climate impacts, such as drought. To better understand how ranchers respond to ongoing drought and the relationship between climate change beliefs and drought adaptation, in-depth interviews with working ranchers were conducted. Ranchers described drought conditions as unprecedented and detailed the interacting impacts of drought and nonclimatic stressors. They viewed adaptation as critical and employed a wide range of responses to drought, but lack of financial resources, risks associated with change, local social norms, and optimism about future moisture created barriers to change. Most ranchers attributed drought to natural cycles and were skeptical about anthropogenic climate change. Many ranchers likened current drought conditions to past droughts, concluding that conditions would return to “normal.” A belief in natural cycles provided a sense of hope for some ranchers but felt immutable to others, reducing their sense of agency and efficacy. Taken together, climate skepticism, optimism about future conditions, lack of financial resources, and a limited sense of agency might be reducing investments in long-term adaptation. However, the relationship between climate change beliefs and adaptation action was not entirely clear, since the handful of ranchers adapting in anticipation of long-term drought were skeptical or uncertain about anthropogenic climate change. Further, most ranchers characterized adaptation as an individual endeavor and resisted government involvement in drought adaptation. In the context of climate skepticism and antigovernment sentiment, strategies to scale up adaptation efforts beyond the household will only succeed to the extent that they build on local norms and ideologies.

Corresponding author address: Laurie Yung, Department of Society and Conservation, College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, MT 59812. E-mail: laurie.yung@umontana.edu
Save
  • Adger, W. N., 2003: Social capital, collective action and adaptation to climate change. Econ. Geogr., 79, 387404, doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2003.tb00220.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Adger, W. N., and Coauthors, 2009: Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Climatic Change, 93, 335354, doi:10.1007/s10584-008-9520-z.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Adger, W. N., Barnett J. , Brown K. , Marshall N. , and O’Brien K. , 2012: Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation. Nat. Climate Change, 3, 112117, doi:10.1038/nclimate1666.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brandenburg, A. M., and Carroll M. S. , 1995: Your place or mine? The effect of place creation on environmental values and landscape meanings. Soc. Nat. Resour., 8, 381398, doi:10.1080/08941929509380931.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Burawoy, M., 1998: The extended case method. Sociol. Theory, 16, 433, doi:10.1111/0735-2751.00040.

  • Chambers, J. C., and Pellant M. , 2008: Climate change impacts on northwestern and intermountain United States rangelands. Rangelands, 30, 2933, doi:10.2111/1551-501X(2008)30[29:CCIONA]2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cooney, C., 2010: The perception factor: Climate change gets personal. Environ. Health Perspect., 118, A484A489, doi:10.1289/ehp.118-a484.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Crane, T., and Coauthors, 2010: Forecast skill and farmers’ skills: Seasonal climate forecasts and agricultural risk management in the southeastern United States. Wea. Climate Soc., 2, 4459, doi:10.1175/2009WCAS1006.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gallup, 2015: Gallup poll social series: Environment. Gallup News Service, 5 pp. [Available online at http://www.gallup.com/file/poll/182111/150325EnviroWorries.pdf.]

  • Hall, C., and Wreford A. , 2012: Adaptation to climate change: The attitudes of stakeholders in the livestock industry. Mitigation Adapt. Strategies Global Change, 17, 207222, doi:10.1007/s11027-011-9321-y.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hallegatte, S., 2009: Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change. Global Environ. Change, 19, 240247, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.12.003.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hamilton, W. T., 2003: Drought: Managing for and during the bad years. Ranch Management: Integrating Cattle, Wildlife, and Range, C. A. Forgason, F. C. Bryant, and P. C. Genho, Eds., King Ranch Institute, 133–152.

  • Head, L., Atchison J. , Gates A. , and Muir P. , 2011: A fine-grained study of the experience of drought, risk and climate change among Australian wheat farming households. Ann. Assoc. Amer. Geogr., 101, 10891108, doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.579533.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hines, J. M., Hungerford H. R. , and Tomera A. N. , 1987: Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behaviour: A meta-analysis. J. Environ. Educ., 18 (2), 118, doi:10.1080/00958964.1987.9943482.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hobson, K., and Niemeyer S. , 2013: “What sceptics believe”: The effects of information and deliberation on climate change scepticism. Public Understanding Sci., 22, 396412, doi:10.1177/0963662511430459.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hulme, M., Barrow E. M. , Arnell N. W. , Harrison P. A. , Johns T. C. , and Downing T. E. , 1999: Relative impacts of human-induced climate change and natural climate variability. Nature, 397, 688691, doi:10.1038/17789.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huntsinger, L., and Oviedo J. L. , 2014: Ecosystem services are social–ecological services in a traditional pastoral system: The case of California’s Mediterranean rangelands. Ecol. Soc., 19, 8, doi:10.5751/ES-06143-190108.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Joyce, L. A., Briske D. D. , Brown J. R. , Polley H. W. , McCarl B. A. , and Bailey D. R. , 2013: Climate change and North American rangelands: Assessment of mitigation and adaptation strategies. Rangeland Ecol. Manage., 66, 512528, doi:10.2111/REM-D-12-00142.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Julius, S. H., and West J. W. , Eds., 2008: Preliminary review of adaptation options for climate-sensitive ecosystems and resources. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 910 pp.

  • Kahan, D. M., Wittlin M. , Peters E. , Slovic P. , Ouellette L. L. , Braman D. , and Mandel G. N. , 2011: The tragedy of the risk-perception commons: Culture conflict, rationality conflict, and climate change. Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper 2011-26, Cultural Cognition Project Working Paper No. 89, Yale Law and Economics Research Paper 435, Yale Law School Public Law Working Paper 230, 31 pp.

  • Kandlikar, K., and Risbey J. , 2000: Agricultural impacts of climate change: If adaptation is the answer, what is the question? Climatic Change, 45, 529539, doi:10.1023/A:1005546716266.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leichenko, R. M., and O’Brien K. L. , 2002: The dynamics of rural vulnerability to global change: The case of southern Africa. Mitigation Adapt. Strategies Global Change, 7, 118, doi:10.1023/A:1015860421954.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leichenko, R. M., and O’Brien K. L. , 2008: Global Environmental Change and Globalization: Double Exposures. Oxford University Press, 192 pp.

  • Lemos, M. C., 2007: Drought, governance, and adaptive capacity in North East Brazil: A case study of Ceará. UNDP Human Development Rep. 2007/2008 Occasional Paper, 16 pp.

  • Lempert, R. J., Groves D. G. , Popper S. W. , and Bankes S. C. , 2006: A general, analytic method for generating robust strategies and narrative scenarios. Manage. Sci., 52, 514528, doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0472.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, A., Smith W. J. Jr., and Safi A. S. , 2014: Rancher and farmer perceptions of climate change in Nevada, USA. Climatic Change, 122, 313327, doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0979-x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Maczko, K., and Coauthors, 2011: Rangeland ecosystem goods and services: Values and evaluation of opportunities for ranchers and land managers. Rangelands, 33, 3036, doi:10.2111/1551-501X-33.5.30.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McCright, A. M., and Dunlap R. E. , 2011: The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s view of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociol. Quart., 52, 155194, doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McCright, A. M., Dunlap R. E. , and Xiao C. , 2014: The impacts of temperature anomalies and political orientation on perceived winter warming. Nat. Climate Change, 4, 10771081, doi:10.1038/nclimate2443.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McDougald, N. K., Frost W. E. , and Phillips R. L. , 2001: Livestock management during drought. Rangeland Management Series ANR Publ. 8034, University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 6 pp.

  • McLeman, R., Mayo D. , Strebeck E. , and Smit B. , 2008: Drought adaptation in rural eastern Oklahoma in the 1930s: Lessons for climate change adaptation research. Mitigation Adapt. Strategies Global Change, 13, 379400, doi:10.1007/s11027-007-9118-1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miller, M., Anderson M. , Francis C. A. , Kruger C. , Barford C. , Park J. , and McCown B. , 2013: Critical research needs for successful food systems adaptation to climate change. J. Agric. Food Syst. Community Dev., 3 (4), 161175, doi:10.5304/jafscd.2013.034.016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Milne, M., Stenekes N. , and Russell J. , 2008: Climate Risk and Industry Adaptation. Australian Bureau of Rural Sciences, 108 pp.

  • Morgan, J. A., Derner J. D. , Milchunas D. G. , and Pendall E. , 2008: Management implications of global change for Great Plains rangelands. Rangelands, 30, 1822, doi:10.2111/1551-501X(2008)30[18:MIOGCF]2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moser, S. C., and Ekstrom J. A. , 2010: A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 22 02622 031, doi:10.1073/pnas.1007887107.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nelson, D. R., Adger W. N. , and Brown K. , 2007: Adaptation to environmental change: Contributions of a resilience framework. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 32, 395419, doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Netting, R., 1993: Smallholders, householders. The Environment in Anthropology: A Reader in Ecology, Culture, and Sustainable Living, N. Haenn and R. R. Wilk, Eds., New York University Press, 10–14.

  • Nickerson, C., Ebel R. , Borchers A. , and Carriazo F. , 2011: Major uses of land in the United States, 2007. Economic Research Service Publ. EIB-89, 57 pp. [Available online at http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/188404/eib89_2_.pdf.]

  • Oliver-Smith, A., 1996: Anthropological research on hazards and disasters. Annu. Rev. Anthropol., 25, 303328, doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.303.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Patterson, M. E., and Williams D. R. , 2002: Collecting and Analyzing Qualitative Data: Hermeneutic Principles, Methods, and Case Examples. Advances in Tourism Applications, Vol. 9, Sagamore Publishing, 127 pp.

  • Pederson, G. T., Gray S. T. , Woodhouse C. A. , Fagre D. B. , Littell J. S. , Watson E. , Luckman B. H. , and Graumlich L. J. , 2011: The unusual nature of recent snowpack declines in the North American Cordillera. Science, 333, 332335, doi:10.1126/science.1201570.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Raymond, C. M., and Robinson G. M. , 2013: Factors affecting rural landholders’ adaptation to climate change: Insights from formal institutions and communities of practice. Global Environ. Change, 23, 103114, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.11.004.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reid, S., Smit B. , Caldwell W. , and Belliveau S. , 2007: Vulnerability and adaptation to climate risks in Ontario agriculture. Mitigation Adapt. Strategies Global Change, 12, 609637, doi:10.1007/s11027-006-9051-8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Saleh Safi, A. S., Smith W. J. Jr., and Liu Z. , 2012: Rural Nevada and climate change: Vulnerability, beliefs, and risk perception. Risk Anal., 32, 10411059, doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01836.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sayre, N. F., Carlisle L. , Huntsinger L. , Fisher G. , and Shattuck A. , 2012: The role of rangelands in diversified farming systems: Innovations, obstacles, and opportunities in the USA. Ecol. Soc., 17 (4), 43, doi:10.5751/ES-04790-170443.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scheffer, M., Westely F. , Brock W. A. , and Holmgren M. , 2002: Dynamic interaction of societies and ecosystems—Linking theories from ecology, economy and sociology. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, L. H. Gunderson and C. Holling, Eds., Island Press, 195–240.

  • Schneider, S. H., Easterling W. E. , and Mearns L. O. , 2000: Adaptation: Sensitivity to natural variability, agent assumptions, and dynamic climate changes. Climatic Change, 45, 203221, doi:10.1023/A:1005657421149.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smit, B., and Skinner M. , 2002: Adaptation options in agriculture to climate change: A typology. Mitigation Adapt. Strategies Global Change, 7, 85114, doi:10.1023/A:1015862228270.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Strauss, A., and Corbin J. , 1990: Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. 2nd ed. Sage Publications, 272 pp.

  • Thornton, T. F., and Manasfi N. , 2010: Adaptation—Genuine and spurious: Demystifying adaptation processes in relation to climate change. Environ. Soc.: Adv. Res., 1, 132155, doi:10.3167/ares.2010.010107.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wall, E., and Marzall K. , 2006: Adaptive capacity for climate change in Canadian rural communities. Local Environ., 11, 373397, doi:10.1080/13549830600785506.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • White, K. S., and Coauthors, 2001: Technical summary. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. McCarthy et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, 19–73.

  • Whitson, R. E., 1975: Ranch decision-making under uncertainty—An illustration. J. Range Manage., 28, 267270, doi:10.2307/3897772.

  • Wyborn, C., Yung L. , Murphy D. , and Williams D. R. , 2015: Situating adaptation: How governance challenges and perceptions of uncertainty influence adaptation in the Rocky Mountains. Reg. Environ. Change, 15, 669682, doi:10.1007/s10113-014-0663-3.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhao, M., and Running S. , 2010: Drought-induced reduction in global terrestrial net primary production from 2000 through 2009. Science, 329, 940943, doi:10.1126/science.1192666.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1515 643 55
PDF Downloads 843 216 24