Environmental Impacts from Projected Permafrost Thaw in Alaska: Defining Knowledge Gaps, Data Needs, and Research Priorities

Tanya L. Spero a Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC

Search for other papers by Tanya L. Spero in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Nicole L. Briggs b Region 10, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Seattle, WA

Search for other papers by Nicole L. Briggs in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Lauren Boldrick c Region 10, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Anchorage, AK

Search for other papers by Lauren Boldrick in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Thawing permafrost will significantly impact regulatory activities in Alaska that are conducted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to protect human health and the environment. Many of those activities are in vulnerable rural lands predominantly occupied by Alaska Natives. Temperatures in Alaska—the largest and northernmost of the 50 states—are increasing disproportionately relative to the global average and at a markedly higher rate than in any other state in the Nation. Most land and surface waters in Alaska are underlaid by permafrost (or perennially frozen ground), which stabilizes infrastructure, serves community needs, and shapes ecosystems with unique environmental characteristics. The Fourth National Climate Assessment estimated that 16–24% of near-surface Alaskan permafrost could disappear by the end of this century. Permafrost thaw not only compromises critical infrastructure used in daily life (e.g., buildings, roads, and pipelines), but also alters movement of hazardous substances within the surrounding environment. Changes to permafrost characteristics and extent may release contaminants through multiple mechanisms which can pollute air, soil, and water, with unintended consequences to subsistence activities and the livelihood of local communities. This paper summarizes information gathered from semi-formal interviews conducted with EPA regulatory staff during late 2022 to glean the breadth of activities that would be affected by permafrost thaw, tabulate available data sources, and identify data and knowledge gaps. This information can be used to influence monitoring activities and future research that can inform EPA regulatory activities affected by permafrost thaw in Alaska.

© 2025 American Meteorological Society. This is an Author Accepted Manuscript distributed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Tanya Spero, spero.tanya@epa.gov

Abstract

Thawing permafrost will significantly impact regulatory activities in Alaska that are conducted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to protect human health and the environment. Many of those activities are in vulnerable rural lands predominantly occupied by Alaska Natives. Temperatures in Alaska—the largest and northernmost of the 50 states—are increasing disproportionately relative to the global average and at a markedly higher rate than in any other state in the Nation. Most land and surface waters in Alaska are underlaid by permafrost (or perennially frozen ground), which stabilizes infrastructure, serves community needs, and shapes ecosystems with unique environmental characteristics. The Fourth National Climate Assessment estimated that 16–24% of near-surface Alaskan permafrost could disappear by the end of this century. Permafrost thaw not only compromises critical infrastructure used in daily life (e.g., buildings, roads, and pipelines), but also alters movement of hazardous substances within the surrounding environment. Changes to permafrost characteristics and extent may release contaminants through multiple mechanisms which can pollute air, soil, and water, with unintended consequences to subsistence activities and the livelihood of local communities. This paper summarizes information gathered from semi-formal interviews conducted with EPA regulatory staff during late 2022 to glean the breadth of activities that would be affected by permafrost thaw, tabulate available data sources, and identify data and knowledge gaps. This information can be used to influence monitoring activities and future research that can inform EPA regulatory activities affected by permafrost thaw in Alaska.

© 2025 American Meteorological Society. This is an Author Accepted Manuscript distributed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Tanya Spero, spero.tanya@epa.gov
Save