Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

The Discrimination between Tornadic and Nontornadic Supercell Environments: A Forecasting Challenge in the Southern United States

Corey M. Mead NOAA/National Weather Service Office, Midland, Texas

Search for other papers by Corey M. Mead in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Sep 1997
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1997)012<0379:TDBTAN>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
379–387
Restricted access

Abstract

Recent results from storm-scale modeling experiments have suggested that the strength of the 3–7-km storm-relative wind plays a very important role in determining whether or not a storm that already exhibits midlevel updraft rotation will, in fact, develop a persistent low-level mesocyclone, a feature commonly observed prior to tornadogenesis. This concept and others are applied to a total of 73 southern U.S. proximity soundings that have been compiled over a 36-yr period, 1960–95, in an attempt to discriminate between tornadic and nontornadic supercell environments. Of the 73 proximity soundings, 45 were classified as southern plains tornadic and 28 were southern plains nontornadic.

The results of this study suggest that strength of the 2–9-km storm-relative wind, when used in combination with some measure of thermodynamic instability, or even the energy–helicity index, has proven to be a good indicator of whether or not an environment is supportive of tornadic supercells. Also, the magnitude of the 0–6-km wind shear was observed to be significantly higher in the tornadic soundings in comparison to the nontornadic cases.

Corresponding author address: Corey M. Mead, National Weather Service, 234 Weather Service Drive, Jackson, MS 39042.

Email: Corey.mead@noaa.gov

Abstract

Recent results from storm-scale modeling experiments have suggested that the strength of the 3–7-km storm-relative wind plays a very important role in determining whether or not a storm that already exhibits midlevel updraft rotation will, in fact, develop a persistent low-level mesocyclone, a feature commonly observed prior to tornadogenesis. This concept and others are applied to a total of 73 southern U.S. proximity soundings that have been compiled over a 36-yr period, 1960–95, in an attempt to discriminate between tornadic and nontornadic supercell environments. Of the 73 proximity soundings, 45 were classified as southern plains tornadic and 28 were southern plains nontornadic.

The results of this study suggest that strength of the 2–9-km storm-relative wind, when used in combination with some measure of thermodynamic instability, or even the energy–helicity index, has proven to be a good indicator of whether or not an environment is supportive of tornadic supercells. Also, the magnitude of the 0–6-km wind shear was observed to be significantly higher in the tornadic soundings in comparison to the nontornadic cases.

Corresponding author address: Corey M. Mead, National Weather Service, 234 Weather Service Drive, Jackson, MS 39042.

Email: Corey.mead@noaa.gov

Save
Cover Weather and Forecasting
Weather and Forecasting

  • Bluestein, H. B., and C. R. Parks, 1983: A synoptic and photographic climatology of low-precipitation severe thunderstorms in the southern plains. Mon. Wea. Rev.,111, 2034–2046.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • Brooks, H. E., C. A. Doswell III, and R. Davies-Jones, 1993: Environmental helicity and the maintenance and evolution of low-level mesocyclones. The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction and Hazards, Geophys Monogr., No. 79, Amer. Geophys. Union, 97–104.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • ——, ——, and R. B. Wilhelmson, 1994a: The role of midtropospheric winds in the evolution and maintenance of low-level mesocyclones. Mon. Wea. Rev.,122, 126–136.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • ——, ——, and J. Cooper, 1994b: Environments of tornadic and nontornadic mesocyclones. Wea. Forecasting,9, 606–618.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • Davies, J. M., 1993: Hourly helicity, instability, and EHI in forecasting supercell tornadoes. Preprints, 17th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Saint Louis, MO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 107–111.

  • ——, and R. H. Johns, 1993: Some wind and instability parameters associated with strong and violent tornadoes. Part 1: Wind shear and helicity. The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction and Hazards, Geophys. Monogr., No. 79, Amer. Geophys. Union, 573–582.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • Davies-Jones, R., 1984: Streamwise vorticity: The origin of updraft rotation in supercell storms. J. Atmos. Sci.,41, 2991–3006.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • ——, and H. E. Brooks, 1993: Mesocyclogenesis from a theoretical perspective. The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction and Hazards, Geophys. Monogr., No. 79, Amer. Geophys. Union, 105–114.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • ——, D. Burgess, and M. Foster, 1990: Test of helicity as a tornado forecast parameter. Preprints, 16th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Kananaskis Park, AB, Canada, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 588–592.

  • Fujita, T. T., and A. D. Pearson, 1973: Results of FPP classification of 1971 and 1972 tornadoes. Preprints, Eighth Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Denver, CO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 142–145.

  • Grazulis, T. P., 1990: Significant Tornadoes 1880–1989. Vol. II, A Chronology of Events, Environmental Films, 685 pp.

  • Hart, J. A., and W. D. Korotky, 1991: The SHARP workstation user’s manual—v1.50. A skewt/hodograph analysis and research program for the IBM and compatible PC. NOAA/NWS Forecast Office, Charleston, WV, 62 pp.

  • Johns, R. H., and C. A. Doswell III, 1992: Severe local storms forecasting. Wea. Forecasting,7, 588–612.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • ——, J. M. Davies, and P. W. Leftwich, 1990: An examination of the relationship of the 0–2 km AGL “positive” wind shear to potential buoyant energy in strong and violent tornado situations. Preprints, 16th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Kananaskis Park, AB, Canada, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 593–598.

  • Klemp, J. B., 1987: Dynamics of tornadic thunderstorms. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.,19, 369–402.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • ——, R. B. Wilhelmson, and P. S. Ray, 1981: Observed and numerically simulated structure of a mature supercell thunderstorm. J. Atmos. Sci.,38, 1558–1580.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • Lilly, D. K., 1986: The structure, energetics, and propagation of rotating convective storms. Part II: Helicity and storm stabilization. J. Atmos. Sci.,43, 126–140.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • McNulty, R. P., 1995: Severe and convective weather: A central region forecasting challenge. Wea. Forecasting,10, 187–202.

  • Mead, C. M., 1995: The relationship between convective available potential energy, storm-relative helicity, and the development of tornadic thunderstorms in the northern plains. NWS Southern Region Tech. Attachment, 7 pp.

  • Moller, A. R., C. A. Doswell III, M. P. Foster, and G. R. Woodall, 1994: The operational recognition of supercell thunderstorm environments and storm structures. Wea. Forecasting,9, 327–347.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • National Climatic Data Center, 1960–93: Storm Data. Vols. 2–35. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

  • ——, 1992: Radiosonde Data of North America 1946–1995. NCDC, CD-ROM.

  • Rotunno, R., and J. B. Klemp, 1982: The influence of the shear-induced pressure gradient on thunderstorm motion. Mon. Wea. Rev.,110, 136–151.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • ——, and ——, 1985: On the rotation and propagation of simulated supercell thunderstorms. J. Atmos. Sci.,42, 271–292.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • Turcotte, V., and D. Vigneux, 1987: Severe thunderstorm and hail forecasting using derived parameters from standard RAOBS data. Preprints, Second Workshop on Operational Meteorology, Halifax, NS, Canada, Atmosphere and Environmental Service/Canadian Meteorology and Oceanography Society, 142–153.

  • Weisman, M. L., 1996: On the use of vertical wind shear versus helicity in interpreting supercell dynamics. Preprints, 18th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, San Francisco, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 200–204.

  • ——, and J. B. Klemp, 1982: The dependence of numerically simulated convective storms on vertical wind shear and buoyancy. Mon. Wea. Rev.,110, 504–520.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • ——, and ——, 1984: The structure and classification of numerically simulated convective storms in directionally varying wind shears. Mon. Wea. Rev.,112, 2479–2498.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • ——, and ——, 1986: Characteristics of isolated convective storms. Mesoscale Meteorology and Forecasting, P. S. Ray, Ed., Amer. Meteor. Soc., 331–358.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 207 43 1
PDF Downloads 106 32 1