Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Operations of the National Weather Service Spaceflight Meteorology Group

Frank C. Brody Spaceflight Meteorology Group, Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas

Search for other papers by Frank C. Brody in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Richard A. Lafosse Spaceflight Meteorology Group, Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas

Search for other papers by Richard A. Lafosse in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Dan G. Bellue Spaceflight Meteorology Group, Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas

Search for other papers by Dan G. Bellue in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Timothy D. Oram United Space Alliance, Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas

Search for other papers by Timothy D. Oram in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Sep 1997
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1997)012<0526:OOTNWS>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
526–544
Restricted access

Abstract

Weather is a significant aspect of most space shuttle launches and landings. The National Weather Service Spaceflight Meteorology Group (SMG) at Johnson Space Center (JSC) in Houston, Texas, provides weather forecasts and advice to support space shuttle operations. SMG has been an integral part of the flight control team in the Mission Control Center at JSC since 1962. Space shuttle weather support is quite complex and specialized, especially compared to more traditional weather forecast operations. SMG forecasts are compared to shuttle weather flight rules to advise the flight director on launch and landing decisions. Perhaps the most critical aspect of SMG’s weather support is the “90-min forecast” issued prior to landing, supporting the Mission Control Center’s “go” or “no-go” deorbit burn decision. Once the deorbit burn has occurred, the shuttle must land at the designated landing site at the designated time. SMG’s forecast must be precise, accurate, and clearly communicated.

Meteorological data acquisition and display is critical for analysis and forecasting, and for briefing the flight control team. Primary systems used are the Meteorological Interactive Data and Display System and the Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler Principal User Processor.

This article describes SMG functions, operations, data acquisition and display systems, and shuttle launch and landing weather forecast scenarios.

Corresponding author address: Frank C. Brody, Spaceflight Meteorology Group, Johnson Space Center, Mail Code ZS8, Houston, TX 77058.

Email: frank.brody@jsc.nasa.gov

Abstract

Weather is a significant aspect of most space shuttle launches and landings. The National Weather Service Spaceflight Meteorology Group (SMG) at Johnson Space Center (JSC) in Houston, Texas, provides weather forecasts and advice to support space shuttle operations. SMG has been an integral part of the flight control team in the Mission Control Center at JSC since 1962. Space shuttle weather support is quite complex and specialized, especially compared to more traditional weather forecast operations. SMG forecasts are compared to shuttle weather flight rules to advise the flight director on launch and landing decisions. Perhaps the most critical aspect of SMG’s weather support is the “90-min forecast” issued prior to landing, supporting the Mission Control Center’s “go” or “no-go” deorbit burn decision. Once the deorbit burn has occurred, the shuttle must land at the designated landing site at the designated time. SMG’s forecast must be precise, accurate, and clearly communicated.

Meteorological data acquisition and display is critical for analysis and forecasting, and for briefing the flight control team. Primary systems used are the Meteorological Interactive Data and Display System and the Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler Principal User Processor.

This article describes SMG functions, operations, data acquisition and display systems, and shuttle launch and landing weather forecast scenarios.

Corresponding author address: Frank C. Brody, Spaceflight Meteorology Group, Johnson Space Center, Mail Code ZS8, Houston, TX 77058.

Email: frank.brody@jsc.nasa.gov

Save
Cover Weather and Forecasting
Weather and Forecasting

  • Austin, G. L., A. Kilambi, A. Bellon, N. Leoutsarakos, A. Hausner, L. Trueman, and M. Ivanich, 1986: Rapid II: An operational, highspeed interactive analysis and display system for intensity radar data processing. Preprints, Joint Sessions 23d Conf. on Radar Meteorology and Conf. on Cloud Physics, Snowmass, CO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 79–82.

  • Bellue, D. G., 1993: Spaceflight Meteorology Group evolution of the daily simulation forecast verification effort. Preprints, Fifth Int. Conf. on Aviation Weather Systems, Atlanta, GA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 372–375.

  • ——, and T. W. Garner, 1995: Nowcasting for shuttle weather support during the STS-59 mission. Preprints, Conf. on Aviation Weather Systems, Dallas, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 286–291.

  • ——, and J. S. Tongue, 1995: Use of the WSR-88D for space shuttle weather support during the STS-57 and STS-51 missions. Natl. Wea. Dig.,19(3), 16–25.

  • ——, K. B. Batson, and T. D. Oram, 1996: Forecasting upper winds for the space shuttle. Preprints, 12th Int. Conf. on Interactive Information and Processing Systems for Meteorology, Oceanography, and Hydrology, Atlanta, GA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 256–260.

  • Boyd, B. F., W. P. Roeder, J. B. Lorens, D. S. Hazen, and J. W. Weems, 1995: Weather support to pre-launch operations at the Eastern Range and Kennedy Space Center. Preprints, Sixth Conf. on Aviation Weather Systems, Dallas, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 135–140.

  • Brody, F. C., 1993: Operations of the Spaceflight Meteorology Group. Preprints, 13th Conf. on Weather Analysis and Forecasting, Vienna, VA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 189–193.

  • Crum, T. D., and R. L. Alberty, 1993: The WSR-88D and the WSR-88D operational support facility. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,74, 1669–1687.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • Ellrod, G. P., 1995: Advances in the detection and analysis of fog at night using GOES multispectral infrared imagery. Wea. Forecasting,10, 606–619.

  • Ernst, J. A., and F. J. Merceret, 1995: The Applied Meteorology Unit: A tri-agency applications development facility supporting the space shuttle. Preprints, Sixth Conf. on Aviation Weather Systems, Dallas, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 266–269.

  • Hafele, G. M., and D. J. Haller, 1991: Tools used to forecast weather at TAL sites during STS-41. Preprints, Seventh Int. Conf. on Interactive Information and Processing Systems for Meteorology, Oceanography, and Hydrology, New Orleans, LA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 36–41.

  • ——, and T. W. Garner, 1993: Planned use of a meteorological meso-network to assist forecasting the weather conditions at Edwards Air Force Base for space shuttle landings. Preprints, Fifth Int. Conf. on Aviation Weather Systems, Atlanta, GA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 35–39.

  • Heckman, S. T., M. W. Maier, W. P. Roeder, J. B. Lorens, and B. F. Boyd, 1995: The operational use of a boundary layer profiler network at the Eastern Range and Kennedy Space Center. Preprints, 27th Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Vail, CO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 346–348.

  • Hermes, L. G., 1993: Chaff observations with WSR-88D: Examples and operational impacts. Preprints, Second NWS National Aviation Weather Workshop, Boulder, CO, National Weather Service, 43–48.

  • Krider, E. P., R. C. Noggle, and M. A. Uman, 1976: A gated, wideband magnetic direction finder for lightning return strokes. J. Appl. Meteor.,15, 301–306.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • Maier, M. W., L. M. Maier, and C. Lennon, 1995: Lightning detection and location systems for spacelift operations. Preprints, Sixth Conf. on Aviation Weather Systems, Dallas, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 292–297.

  • Manobianco, J. T., J. W. Zack, and G. E. Taylor, 1996: Workstation-based real-time mesoscale modeling designed for weather support to operations at the Kennedy Space Center and Cape Canaveral Air Station. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,77, 653–672.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • NASA/JSC, 1997a: NASA Operational Shuttle Flight Rules (NSTS 12820), Final June 6, 1996, PCN-4 May 1, 1997, Vol. A, section 2.1.1-6. NASA/Johnson Space Center, 2-11–2-33. [Available from JSC/DA8, Houston, TX 77058.].

  • ——, 1997b: NASA Space Shuttle Launch Commit Criteria and Background (NSTS 16007), Chapter 4, May 15, 1997; Chapter 5, August 28, 1996. NASA/Kennedy Space Center, 4-1–4-15 and 5-1–5-7. [Available from JSC/AP4, Houston, TX 77058.].

  • Plummer, D. W., 1989: Diagnostic and forecast graphics products at NMC using high frequency model output. Wea. Forecasting,4, 83–89.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • Roeder, W. P., 1995: Operational impacts and identification of chaff on weather radar. Preprints, 27th Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Vail, CO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 373–375.

  • Rotzoll, D. A., S. J. Cunningham, and E. K. Hogan, 1990: Evolution of MIDDS II in JSC space shuttle operations. Preprints, Seventh Int. Conf. on Interactive Information and Processing Systems for Meteorology, Oceanography, and Hydrology, New Orleans, LA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 48–53.

  • Suomi, V. E., R. Fox, S. S. Limaye, and W. L. Smith, 1983: McIDAS III: A modern interactive data access and analysis system. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,22, 766–778.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • Tracton, M. S., and E. Kalnay, 1993: Operational ensemble prediction at the National Meteorological Center: Practical aspects. Wea. Forecasting,8, 379–398.

  • Young, J. T., and R. J. Fox, 1994: Future plans for McIDAS workstations. Preprints, Workshop on Meteorological Operation Systems, Reading, United Kingdom, ECMWF, 240–247.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 311 80 8
PDF Downloads 151 49 5