The Application of Synoptic Stratification to Precipitation Forecasting in the Trade Wind Regime

Gregory J. Connor Bureau of Meteorology, Townsville, Queensland, Australia

Search for other papers by Gregory J. Connor in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Frank Woodcock Research and Systems Division, Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for other papers by Frank Woodcock in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

A 1129-day high quality rainfall dataset was collated, from the months of March to November 1993–97, where trade wind flow predominates across the northeast Queensland tropical coast. This dataset was matched with numerical model fields from the Australian regional limited area model. Synoptic precipitation regimes were identified by subjective classification of a major portion of the development data utilizing radar, surface, and upper-air data. With the aid of classification trees, a series of objective sorting criteria were developed to stratify the numerical model dataset into weather regimes prior to the development of a series of predictive equations for rainfall through screening regression. In addition to raw numerical model output, potential predictors with established links to trade wind precipitation were offered to the regression procedure. Rainfall equations were also developed by seasonal stratification of the development data. Further comparison was made with rainfall occurrence output from a synoptically tuned classification tree and other objective and subjective prognostic methods. The relationships established through synoptic and seasonal stratification were tested on a 226-day independent dataset for the verification periods 0–24 and 24–48 h beyond the defining model analysis.

Objective probability of precipitation (PoP) forecasts were produced on a regional and individual city basis. The synoptically stratified PoP forecasts, tuned for measurable rain prediction, showed skill against reference methods and against the subjective Bureau of Meteorology operational forecasts at the 24–48-h projection. At the shorter 0–24-h range, no skill advantage was shown when compared to the Australian Bureau of Meteorology forecasts. For rain events ≥2.5 mm day−1, the synoptically stratified methodology was significantly more skillful than other objective techniques at the 95% confidence interval.

Quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPFs) were developed for application to rainfall prediction across a city rainfall network. The QPFs for objective techniques based on numerical model output displayed skill against climatology. However, only slight skill gains over persistence were obtained for the 0–24-h interval beyond analysis. Higher objective QPF skill gains over persistence were realized for the 24–48-h forecasts.

* Additional affiliation: JCU Physics, James Cook University of North Queensland, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.

Corresponding author address: G. J. Connor, Townsville Meteorological Office, Bureau of Meteorology, RAAF Base Garbutt, Queensland 4814, Australia.

Abstract

A 1129-day high quality rainfall dataset was collated, from the months of March to November 1993–97, where trade wind flow predominates across the northeast Queensland tropical coast. This dataset was matched with numerical model fields from the Australian regional limited area model. Synoptic precipitation regimes were identified by subjective classification of a major portion of the development data utilizing radar, surface, and upper-air data. With the aid of classification trees, a series of objective sorting criteria were developed to stratify the numerical model dataset into weather regimes prior to the development of a series of predictive equations for rainfall through screening regression. In addition to raw numerical model output, potential predictors with established links to trade wind precipitation were offered to the regression procedure. Rainfall equations were also developed by seasonal stratification of the development data. Further comparison was made with rainfall occurrence output from a synoptically tuned classification tree and other objective and subjective prognostic methods. The relationships established through synoptic and seasonal stratification were tested on a 226-day independent dataset for the verification periods 0–24 and 24–48 h beyond the defining model analysis.

Objective probability of precipitation (PoP) forecasts were produced on a regional and individual city basis. The synoptically stratified PoP forecasts, tuned for measurable rain prediction, showed skill against reference methods and against the subjective Bureau of Meteorology operational forecasts at the 24–48-h projection. At the shorter 0–24-h range, no skill advantage was shown when compared to the Australian Bureau of Meteorology forecasts. For rain events ≥2.5 mm day−1, the synoptically stratified methodology was significantly more skillful than other objective techniques at the 95% confidence interval.

Quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPFs) were developed for application to rainfall prediction across a city rainfall network. The QPFs for objective techniques based on numerical model output displayed skill against climatology. However, only slight skill gains over persistence were obtained for the 0–24-h interval beyond analysis. Higher objective QPF skill gains over persistence were realized for the 24–48-h forecasts.

* Additional affiliation: JCU Physics, James Cook University of North Queensland, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.

Corresponding author address: G. J. Connor, Townsville Meteorological Office, Bureau of Meteorology, RAAF Base Garbutt, Queensland 4814, Australia.

Save
  • Austin, G. R., R. M. Rauber, H. T. Ochs III, and L. J. Miller, 1996:Trade-wind clouds and Hawaiian rainbands. Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 2126–2151.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Bernstein, B. C., T. A. Omeron, F. McDonough, and M. K. Politovitch, 1997: The relationship between aircraft icing and synoptic-scale weather conditions. Wea. Forecasting,12, 742–762.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Bourke, W., T. Hart, P. Steinle, R. Seaman, G. Embery, M. Naughton, and L. Rikus, 1995: Evolution of the Bureau of Meteorology’s Global Assimilation and Prediction system. Part 2: Resolution enhancements and case studies. Aust. Meteor. Mag.,44, 19–40.

  • Breiman, L., J. H. Freidman, R. A. Olshen, and C. J. Stone, 1984: Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth, 358 pp.

  • Brier, G. W., 1950: Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Mon. Wea. Rev.,78, 1–3.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Brunet, N., R. Verret, and N. Yacowar, 1988: An objective comparison of model output statistics and “perfect prog” systems in producing numerical weather element forecasts. Wea. Forecasting,3, 273–283.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Burrows, W. R., 1991: Objective guidance for 0–24-hour and 24–48-hour mesoscale forecasts of lake-effect snow using CART. Wea. Forecasting,6, 357–378.

  • ——, M. Benjamin, S. Beauchamp, E. R. Lord, D. McCollor, and B. Thompson, 1995: CART decision tree statistical analysis and prediction of summer season maximum surface ozone for the Vancouver, Montreal, and Atlantic regions of Canada. J. Appl. Meteor.,34, 1848–1862.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Camp, J. P., A. I. Watson, and H. E. Fuelberg, 1998: The diurnal distribution of lightning over north Florida and its relation to the prevailing low-level flow. Wea. Forecasting,13, 729–739.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Carbone, R. E., J. D. Tuttle, W. A. Cooper, V. Grubisic, and W. C. Lee, 1998: Trade wind rainfall near the windward coast of Hawaii. Mon. Wea. Rev.,126, 2847–2863.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Carter, M. M., and J. B. Elsner, 1997: A statistical method for forecasting rainfall over Puerto Rico. Wea. Forecasting,12, 515–525.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Charba, J. P., 1998: The LAMP QPF products. Part I: Model development. Wea. Forecasting,13, 934–965.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Colls, K. E., I. B. Mason, and F. A. Daw, 1981: A forecast verification procedure for public weather forecasts. Aust. Meteor. Mag.,29, 9–23.

  • Connor, G. J., 1999. An exploratory study into synoptic classification techniques for tropical precipitation forecasting. Aust. Meteor. Mag.,48, 241–253.

  • ——, and M. Bonell, 1998: Air mass and dynamic parameters affecting trade wind precipitation on the northeast Queensland tropical coast. Int. J. Climatol.,18, 1357–1372.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Crowe, M. J., S. M. Coakley, and R. G. Emge, 1978: Forecasting dew duration at Pendleton, Oregon, using simple weather observations. J. Appl. Meteor.,17, 1482–1487.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Dahni, R. R., and E. E. Ebert, 1998: Automated objective synoptic typing to characterize errors in NWP model QPFs. Preprints, 12th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Phoenix, AZ, Amer. Meteor. Soc., J31–J34.

  • Doswell, C. A., III, R. Davies-Jones, and D. L. Keller, 1990: On summary measures of skill in rare event forecasting based on contingency tables. Wea. Forecasting,5, 576–585.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Ebert, E. E., and J. L. McBride, 1997: Methods for verifying quantitative precipitation forecasts: Application to the BMRC LAPS model 24-hour precipitation forecasts. BMRC Techniques Development Rep. 2, 87 pp. [Available from Bureau of Meteorology Research Centre, GPO Box 1289K, Melbourne 3001, Australia.].

  • Epstein, E. S., 1969: A scoring system for probability forecasts of ranked categories. J. Appl. Meteor.,8, 985–987.

  • Funk, T. W., 1991: Forecasting techniques utilized by the Forecast Branch of the National Meteorological Center during a major convective rainfall event. Wea. Forecasting,6, 548–564.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Garratt, J. R., and M. Segal, 1988: On the contribution of atmospheric moisture to dew formation. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,53, 201–222.

  • Gaudet, B., and W. R. Cotton, 1998: Statistical characteristics of a real-time precipitation forecasting model. Wea. Forecasting,13, 966–982.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Glahn, H. R., 1985: Yes, precipitation forecasts have improved. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,66, 820–830.

  • ——, and D. L. Jorgensen, 1970: Climatological aspects of the Brier P-score. Mon. Wea. Rev.,98, 136–141.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • ——, and D. A. Lowry, 1972: The use of Model Output Statistics (MOS) in objective weather forecasting. J. Appl. Meteor.,11, 1203–1211.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • ——, A. H. Murphy, L. J. Wilson, and J. S. Jensenius Jr., 1991: Lectures presented at the WMO training workshop on the interpretation of NWP products in terms of local weather phenomena and their verification. World Meteorological Organization, PSMP No. 34, WMO/TD 421, Wageningen, Netherlands.

  • Gray, W. M., and R. W. Jacobson Jr., 1977: Diurnal variation of deep cumulus convection. Mon. Wea. Rev.,105, 1171–1188.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Hanssen, A. W., and W. J. A. Kuipers, 1965: On the relationship between the frequency of rain and various meteorological parameters. K. Ned. Meteor. Inst., Meded. Verhand.,81, 2–15.

  • Hartigan, J. A., and M. A. Wong, 1979: Algorithm AS 136. A K-means clustering algorithm. Appl. Stat.,28, 100–108.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Heideman, K. F., and J. M. Fritsch, 1988: Forcing mechanisms and other characteristics of significant summertime precipitation. Wea. Forecasting,3, 115–130.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Hopkins, L. C., and G. J. Holland, 1997: Australian heavy-rain days and associated east coast cyclones: 1958–92. J. Climate,10, 621–635.

  • Houghton, D. D., and E. A. Rubin, 1990: Precipitation forecast quality of the NMC nested grid model according to synoptic situation:Case study for the upper Midwest. Wea. Forecasting,5, 494–502.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Jolliffe, I. T., and N. Jolliffe, 1997: Assessment of descriptive weather forecasts. Weather,52, 391–396.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Junker, N. W., J. E. Hoke, B. E. Sullivan, K. F. Brill, and F. J. Hughes, 1992: Seasonal and geographic variations in quantitative precipitation prediction by NMC’s Nested-Grid Model and Medium-Range Forecast Model. Wea. Forecasting,7, 410–429.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Keenan, T. D., J. McBride, G. Holland, N. Davidson, and B. Gunn, 1989: Diurnal variations during the Australian Monsoon Experiment (AMEX) Phase II. Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 2535–2552.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Konrad, C. E., II, 1997: Synoptic scale features associated with warm season heavy rainfall over the interior southeastern United States. Wea. Forecasting,12, 557–571.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Landin, M. G., and L. F. Bosart, 1989: The diurnal variation of precipitation in California and Nevada. Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 1801–1816.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Loh, W.-Y., and N. Vanichsetakul, 1988: Tree-structured classification via generalized discriminant analysis (with discussion). J. Amer. Stat. Assoc.,83, 715–728.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • ——, and Y.-S. Shih, 1997: Split selection methods for classification trees. Stat. Sin.,7, 815–840.

  • Lyons, W. F., and M. Bonell, 1992: Daily mesoscale rainfall in the tropical wet/dry climate of the Townsville area, north-eastern Queensland during the 1988–1989 wet season: Synoptic-scale airflow considerations. Int. J. Climatol.,12, 655–84.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Manton, M. J., and M. Bonell, 1993: Climate and rainfall variability in the humid tropics. Hydrology and Water Management in the Humid Tropics—Hydrological Research Issues and Strategies for Water Management, M. Bonell, M. M. Hufschmidt, and J. S. Gladwell, Eds., UNESCO International Hydrology Series, Cambridge University Press, 13–33.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Mills, G. A., and R. S. Seaman, 1990: The BMRC regional data assimilation system. Mon. Wea. Rev.,118, 1217–1237.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • ——, R. G. Tapp, G. F. McNamara, and D. J. Pike, 1986: A generalised Australian Model Output Statistics system. Aust. Meteor. Mag.,34, 57–63.

  • Mote, T. L., D. W. Gamble, S. J. Underwood, and M. L. Bentley, 1997: Synoptic-scale features common to heavy snowstorms in the southeast United States. Wea. Forecasting,12, 5–23.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Murphy, A. H., 1971: A note on the ranked probability score. J. Appl. Meteor.,10, 155–156.

  • ——, 1991: Comments on “Summary measures of skill in rare event forecasting based on contingency tables.” Wea. Forecasting,6, 400–402.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Olsen, D. A., N. W. Junker, and B. Korty, 1995: Evaluation of 33 years of quantitative precipitation forecasting at NMC. Wea. Forecasting,10, 498–511.

  • Paegle, J. N., 1974: Prediction of precipitation probability based on 500-mb flow types. J. Appl. Meteor.,13, 213–220.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Puri, K., G. S. Dietachmayer, G. A. Mills, N. E. Davidson, R. Bowen, and L. W. Logan, 1998: The new BMRC Limited Area Prediction System (LAPS). Aust. Meteor. Mag.,47, 203–223.

  • Reap, R. M., 1994: Analysis and prediction of lightning strike distributions associated with synoptic map types over Florida. Mon. Wea. Rev.,122, 1698–1715.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Roads, J. O., and T. N. Maisel, 1991: Evaluation of the National Meteorological Center’s medium-range forecast model precipitation forecasts. Wea. Forecasting,6, 123–132.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Roebber, P. J., 1998: The regime dependence of degree day forecast technique, skill, and value. Wea. Forecasting,13, 783–794.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • ——, and L. F. Bosart, 1998: The sensitivity of precipitation to circulation details. Part I: An analysis of regional analogs. Mon. Wea. Rev.,126, 437–455.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Saucier, W. J., 1955: Principles of Meteorological Analysis. University of Chicago Press, 438 pp.

  • Seaman, R., W. Burke, P. Steinle, T. Hart, G. Embery, M. Naughton, and L. Rikus, 1995: Evolution of the Bureau of Meteorology’s Global Assimilation and Prediction system. Part 1: analysis and initialization. Aust. Meteor. Mag.,44, 1–18.

  • Sheridan, S. C., J. F. Griffiths, and R. E. Orville, 1997: Warm season cloud-to-ground lightning–precipitation relationships in the south-central United States. Wea. Forecasting,12, 449–458.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Showalter, A. K., 1953: A stability index for thunderstorm forecasting. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,34, 250–252.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Stanski, H. R., L. J. Wilson, and W. R. Burrows, 1990: Survey of common verification methods in meteorology. World Weather Watch Tech. Rep. 8, WMO/TD No. 358, World Meteorological Organization, 114 pp.

  • Stidd, C. K., 1953: Cube-root-normal precipitation distributions. Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union,34, 31–35.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Verret, R., G. Babin, and R. Parent, 1996: A measure of the value added by the manual forecast upon the objective statistical weather element forecasts. Preprints, 13th Conf. on Probability and Statistics in the Atmospheric Sciences, San Francisco, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 198–203.

  • Wallace, J. M., and P. V. Hobbs, 1977: Atmospheric Science: An Introductory Survey. Academic Press, 467 pp.

  • Woodcock, F., 1976: The evaluation of yes/no forecasts for scientific and administrative purposes. Mon. Wea. Rev.,104, 1209–1214.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • ——, 1980: On the use of analogues to improve regression forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev.,108, 292–297.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • ——, and R. R. Dahni, 1998: Derivation of Model Output Statistics coefficients—Version 1.1. AIFS Documentation, 16 pp. [Available from Bureau of Meteorology, GPO Box 1289K, Melbourne 3001, Australia.].

  • Wright, W. J., 1997. Tropical–extratropical cloudbands and Australian rainfall. Int. J. Climatol.,17, 807–829.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 258 63 14
PDF Downloads 89 31 4