Real-Time Prediction of the Lake Breeze on the Western Shore of Lake Michigan

Paul J. Roebber Atmospheric Sciences Group, Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Search for other papers by Paul J. Roebber in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Mark G. Gehring Atmospheric Sciences Group, Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Search for other papers by Mark G. Gehring in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

A forecast verification study of the occurrence and inland penetration of the lake breeze on the western shore of Lake Michigan was conducted. A real-time version of The Pennsylvania State University–National Center for Atmospheric Research fifth-generation Mesoscale Model (MM5) with 5-km grid spacing was evaluated for a set of 71 (68) dates at 12–24-h (36–48-h) forecast range from summer 1998 and spring 1999. Contingency measures showed skill in predicting lake-breeze development at both day 1 and day 2 [Kuipers skill score (KSS) of 0.80 and 0.74, respectively]. These skill levels exceeded capabilities demonstrated by a simple lake-breeze index computed for the identical set of cases and also surpassed the published performance of the operational 29-km Eta Model for another site. Skill in the prediction of the inland penetration of the lake breeze (relative to a baseline defined by the sample average distance of the lake-breeze front from the shoreline) peaked at 2100 UTC at both day 1 and day 2 (KSS of 0.28 and 0.22, respectively) but fell thereafter due to a westward forecast bias. The origins of this bias are tied in part to errors in the static model specification of the lake surface temperature, resulting from both errors in initialization and the observed diurnal cycle. Skill is also constrained by the sensitivity of the lake breeze to the prevailing synoptic flow; modest errors in forecasts of coast-normal winds can lead to substantial errors in the forecast position of the lake-breeze front by 0000 UTC. It is suggested that future research should focus on coupling a meteorological model to a dynamic lake model, improved initialization of lake water temperatures, and further refinements of the planetary boundary layer physics to improve near-surface winds. Such a model may be needed to allow reliable extension of forecasts out to timescales beyond 48 h.

* Current affiliation: National Weather Service, Elko, Nevada.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Paul J. Roebber, Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee, P.O. Box 413, Milwaukee, WI 53201.

Abstract

A forecast verification study of the occurrence and inland penetration of the lake breeze on the western shore of Lake Michigan was conducted. A real-time version of The Pennsylvania State University–National Center for Atmospheric Research fifth-generation Mesoscale Model (MM5) with 5-km grid spacing was evaluated for a set of 71 (68) dates at 12–24-h (36–48-h) forecast range from summer 1998 and spring 1999. Contingency measures showed skill in predicting lake-breeze development at both day 1 and day 2 [Kuipers skill score (KSS) of 0.80 and 0.74, respectively]. These skill levels exceeded capabilities demonstrated by a simple lake-breeze index computed for the identical set of cases and also surpassed the published performance of the operational 29-km Eta Model for another site. Skill in the prediction of the inland penetration of the lake breeze (relative to a baseline defined by the sample average distance of the lake-breeze front from the shoreline) peaked at 2100 UTC at both day 1 and day 2 (KSS of 0.28 and 0.22, respectively) but fell thereafter due to a westward forecast bias. The origins of this bias are tied in part to errors in the static model specification of the lake surface temperature, resulting from both errors in initialization and the observed diurnal cycle. Skill is also constrained by the sensitivity of the lake breeze to the prevailing synoptic flow; modest errors in forecasts of coast-normal winds can lead to substantial errors in the forecast position of the lake-breeze front by 0000 UTC. It is suggested that future research should focus on coupling a meteorological model to a dynamic lake model, improved initialization of lake water temperatures, and further refinements of the planetary boundary layer physics to improve near-surface winds. Such a model may be needed to allow reliable extension of forecasts out to timescales beyond 48 h.

* Current affiliation: National Weather Service, Elko, Nevada.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Paul J. Roebber, Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee, P.O. Box 413, Milwaukee, WI 53201.

Save
  • Atkins, N. T., and R. M. Wakimoto, 1997: Influence of the synoptic-scale flow on sea breezes observed during CaPE. Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 2112–2130.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Biggs, W. G., and M. E. Graves, 1962: A lake breeze index. J. Appl. Meteor.,1, 474–480.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Caplan, P., J. Derber, W. Gemmill, S.-Y. Hong, H.-L. Pan, and D. Parrish, 1997: Changes to the 1995 NCEP operational medium-range forecast model analysis–forecast system. Wea. Forecasting,12, 581–594.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Carpenter, K. M., 1979: An experimental forecast using a nonhydrostatic mesoscale model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,105, 629–655.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Dudhia, J., 1989: Numerical study of convection observed during the Winter Monsoon Experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model. J. Atmos. Sci.,46, 3077–3107.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • ——, 1996: A multi-layer soil temperature model for MM5. Preprints, Sixth Annual PSU/NCAR Mesoscale Model Users’ Workshop, Boulder CO, National Center for Atmospheric Research, 49–50.

  • Dye, T. S., P. T. Roberts, and M. E. Korc, 1995: Observations of transport processes for ozone and ozone precursors during the 1991 Lake Michigan ozone study. J. Appl. Meteor.,34, 1877–1889.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Keen, C. S., and W. A. Lyons, 1978: Lake/land breeze circulations on the western shore of Lake Michigan. J. Appl. Meteor.,17, 1843–1855.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Kessler, R. C., D. Eppel, R. A. Pielke, and J. McQueen, 1985: A numerical study of the effects of a large sandbar upon sea breeze development. Arch. Meteor. Geophys. Biokimatol.,34, 3–26.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, Y., D. Zhang, and M. K. Yau, 1997: A multiscale numerical study of Hurricane Andrew (1992). Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 3073–3093.

  • Lyons, W. A., 1972: The climatology and prediction of the Chicago lake breeze. J. Appl. Meteor.,11, 1259–1270.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • ——, and H. S. Cole, 1976: Photochemical oxidant transport: Mesoscale lake breeze and synoptic-scale aspects. J. Appl. Meteor.,15, 733–743.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • ——, C. J. Tremback and R. A. Pielke, 1995: Applications of the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS) to provide input to photochemical grid models for the Lake Michigan Ozone Study (LMOS). J. Appl. Meteor.,34, 1762–1786.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Manobianco, J., and P. A. Nutter, 1999: Evaluation of the 29-km Eta Model. Part II: Subjective verification over Florida. Wea. Forecasting,14, 18–37.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Mass, C. F., and Y.-H. Kuo, 1998: Regional real-time numerical weather prediction: Current status and future potential. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,79, 253–263.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Meesters, A. G. C. A., H. F. Vugts, A. J. van Delden, and F. Cannemeijer, 1989: Diurnal variation of the surface wind in a tidal area. Beitr. Phys. Atmos.,62, 258–264.

  • Milford, J. R., and J. E. Simpson, 1972: A shearline investigation with an instrumented glider. Weather,27, 462–464.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Mortimer, C. H., 1971a: Large-scale oscillatory motions and seasonal temperature changes in Lake Michigan and Lake Ontario. University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee Center for Great Lakes Studies Special Rep. 12, Part I, 111 pp. [Available from Great Lakes Water Institute, University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee, 600 East Greenfield Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53204.].

  • ——, 1971b: Large-scale oscillatory motions and seasonal temperature changes in Lake Michigan and Lake Ontario. University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee Center for Great Lake Studies Special Rep. 12, Part II, 106 pp. [Available from Great Lakes Water Institute, University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee, 600 East Greenfield Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53204.].

  • Niino, H., 1987: On the linear theory of land and sea breeze circulation. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan,65, 901–921.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Persson, P. O. G., and T. T. Warner, 1991: Model generation of spurious gravity waves due to inconsistency of the vertical and horizontal resolution. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 917–935.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Purdom, J. F. W., 1976: Some uses of high-resolution GOES imagery in the mesoscale forecasting of convection and its behavior. Mon. Wea. Rev.,104, 1474–1483.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Reisner, J., R. M. Rasmussen, and R. T. Bruintjes, 1998: Explicit forecasting of supercooled liquid water in winter storms using the MM5 mesoscale model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,125B, 1071–1108.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Rieble, D. D., J. E. Simpson, and P. F. Linden, 1993: The sea breeze and gravity current frontogenesis. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,119, 1–16.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Schwab, D. J., G. A. Leshkevich, and G. C. Muhr, 1999: Automated mapping of surface water temperature in the Great Lakes. J. Great Lakes Res.,25, 468–481.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Segal, M., and R. W. Arritt, 1992: Nonclassical mesoscale circulations caused by surface sensible heat-flux gradients. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,73, 1593–1604.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • ——, C. Anderson, R. W. Arritt, R. M. Rabin, and D. W. Martin, 1999: Some observations of the clearing of cumulus clouds downwind from snow-covered areas. Mon. Wea. Rev.,127, 1687–1692.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Shafran, P. C., N. Seaman, and G. Gayno, 2000: Evaluation of numerical predictions of boundary layer structure during the Lake Michigan ozone study. J. Appl. Meteor.,39, 412–426.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Simpson, J. E., 1994: Sea Breeze and Local Wind. Cambridge University Press, 234 pp.

  • Warner, T. T., R. A. Peterson, and R. E. Treadon, 1997: A tutorial on lateral boundary conditions as a basic and potentially serious limitation to regional numerical weather prediction. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,78, 2599–2617.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Wilks, D. S., 1995: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences:An Introduction. Academic Press, 500 pp.

  • Yan, B., and R. Huang, 1988: A numerical study of the land and river breezes over Chongqing on the Yangtse River. Chin. J. Atmos. Sci.,13, 159–170.

  • Zhang, D. L., and R. A. Anthes, 1982: A high-resolution model of the planetary boundary layer—Sensitivity tests and comparisons with SESAME-79 data. J. Appl. Meteor.,21, 1594–1609.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • ——, H. R. Chang, N. L. Seaman, T. T. Warner, and J. M. Fritsch, 1986: A two-way interactive nesting procedure with variable terrain resolution. Mon. Wea. Rev.,114, 1330–1339.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 390 161 33
PDF Downloads 142 47 0