• Agee, E. M., Snow J. T. , and Clare P. R. , 1976: Multiple vortex features in the tornado cyclone and the occurrence of tornado families. Mon. Wea. Rev., 104 , 552563.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bluestein, H. B., and Pazmany A. L. , 2000: Observations of tornadoes and other convective phenomena with a mobile 3-mm wavelength, Doppler radar: The spring 1999 field experiment. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 81 , 29392951.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bluestein, H. B., Unruh W. P. , LaDue J. G. , Stein H. , and Speheger D. , 1993: Doppler radar wind spectra of supercell tornadoes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121 , 22002221.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bluestein, H. B., Pazmany A. L. , Galloway J. C. , and McIntosh R. E. , 1995: Studies of the substructure of severe convective storms using a mobile 3-mm wavelength Doppler radar. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 76 , 21552169.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brown, R. A., and Wood V. T. , 2000: Enhanced detection of tornadoes on 3 May 1999 using prototype fine-resolution WSR-88D measurements. Preprints, 20th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Orlando, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 40–43.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brown, R. A., Lemon L. R. , and Burgess D. W. , 1978: Tornado detection by pulsed Doppler radar. Mon. Wea. Rev., 106 , 2938.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Burgess, D. W., Donaldson Jr. R. J. , and Desrochers P. R. , 1993: Tornado detection and warning by radar. The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction, and Hazards, Geophys. Monogr., No. 79, Amer. Geophys. Union, 203–221.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Crum, T. D., and Alberty R. L. , 1993: The WSR-88D and the WSR-88D Operational Support Facility. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 74 , 16691687.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Donaldson, R. J. Jr, 1990: Foundations of severe storm detection by radar. Radar in Meteorology, D. Atlas, Ed., Amer. Meteor. Soc., 115–121.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dowell, D. C., Wurman J. , and Wicker L. J. , 2001: Centrifuging of scatterers in tornadoes. Preprints, 30th Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Munich, Germany, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 307–309.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fujita, T. T., 1971: Proposed characterization of tornadoes and hurricanes by area and intensity. SMRP Research Paper 91, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 42 pp. [Available from Wind Engineering Research Center, Box 41023, Lubbock, TX 79409.].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gardner, A., Mehta K. C. , Tanner L. J. , Zhou Z. , Conder M. , Howard R. , Martinez M. S. , and Weinbeck S. , 2000: The tornadoes of Oklahoma City of May 3, 1999. Wind Science and Engineering Research Center Rep., Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 38 pp. [Available from Wind Engineering Research Center, Box 41023, Lubbock, TX 79409.].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Garrett, R. A., and Rockney V. D. , 1962: Tornadoes in northeastern Kansas, May 19, 1960. Mon. Wea. Rev., 90 , 231240.

  • Golden, J. H., and Purcell D. , 1977: Photogrammetric velocities of the Great Bend, Kansas tornado of 30 August 1974: Accelerations and asymmetries. Mon. Wea. Rev., 105 , 485492.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoecker, W. H. Jr, 1960: Wind speed and air flow pattern in the Dallas tornado of April 2, 1957. Mon. Wea. Rev., 88 , 167180.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lemon, L. R., Burgess D. W. , and Hennington L. D. , 1982: A tornado extending to great heights as revealed by Doppler radar. Preprints, 12th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, San Antonio, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 430–432.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lewellen, W. S., 1993: Tornado vortex theory. The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction, and Hazards, Geophys. Monogr., No. 79, Amer. Geophys. Union, 19–39.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Magsig, M. A., and Snow J. T. , 1998: Long-distance debris transport by tornadic thunderstorms. Part I: The 7 May 1995 supercell thunderstorm. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126 , 14301449.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marshall, T. P., 2002: Tornado damage survey at Moore, Oklahoma. Wea. Forecasting, 17 , 582598.

  • McDonald, J. R., 2001: Theodore Fujita: His contribution to tornado knowledge through damage documentation and the Fujita scale. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 82 , 6372.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NSSL, 2000: WATADS (WSR-88D Algorithm Testing and Display System) reference guide for version 10.2. 200 pp. [Available from National Severe Storms Laboratory, 1313 Halley Circle, Norman, OK 73069.].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Oye, R., Mueller C. , and Smith S. , 1995: Software for radar translation, visualization, editing, and interpolation. Preprints, 27th Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Vail, CO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 359–361.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Speheger, D. A., Doswell III C. A. , and Stumpf G. J. , 2002: The tornadoes of 3 May 1999: Event verification in central Oklahoma and related issues. Wea. Forecasting, 17 , 362381.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wicker, L. J., and Wilhelmson R. B. , 1993: Numerical simulation of tornadogenesis within a supercell thunderstorm. The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction, and Hazards, Geophys. Monogr., No. 79, Amer. Geophys. Union, 75–88.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wood, V. T., and Brown R. A. , 1997: Effects of radar sampling on single-Doppler velocity signatures of mesocyclones and tornadoes. Wea. Forecasting, 12 , 928938.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wurman, J., 2002: The multiple-vortex structure of tornado. Wea Forecasting, 17 , 473505.

  • Wurman, J., and Gill S. , 2000: Finescale radar observations of the Dimmit, Texas (2 June 1995), tornado. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128 , 21352164.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wurman, J., Straka J. M. , and Rasmussen E. N. , 1996: Fine-scale Doppler radar observations of tornadoes. Science, 272 , 17741777.

  • Wurman, J., Randall M. , and Zahari A. , 1997: Design and deployment of a portable, pencil-beam, pulsed, 3-cm Doppler radar. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 14 , 15021512.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1608 684 90
PDF Downloads 1260 548 71

Radar Observations of the 3 May 1999 Oklahoma City Tornado

Donald W. BurgessNational Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Donald W. Burgess in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Michael A. MagsigCooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies and NWS Warning Decision Training Branch, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Michael A. Magsig in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Joshua WurmanSchool of Meteorology, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Joshua Wurman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
David C. DowellNational Severe Storms Laboratory and Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by David C. Dowell in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Yvette RichardsonSchool of Meteorology, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Yvette Richardson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The 3 May 1999 Oklahoma City storm is unique from a weather radar perspective because a long-track violent tornado passed within close range of several Doppler radars, because a detailed damage survey was conducted immediately after the event, and because high-quality visual observations of the tornado were available. The tornado passed relatively close (15–60 km) to two fixed-location Doppler radars: the National Weather Service Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) at Twin Lakes (KTLX) and the Radar Operations Center WSR-88D test radar at Norman (KCRI). Two mobile Doppler on Wheels (DOW) radars also observed the tornado at very close range (3–8 km). The data from DOW2 are nearly continuous for a substantial portion of the tornado's life and provide detailed information on the high-resolution velocity field in and around the tornado. These data permit good estimates of tornado rotational velocity and diameter. The data also allow comparison with tornado damage survey estimates of damage/intensity and with visual observations of tornado size. Further, one can compare the high-resolution DOW data to the lower-resolution WSR-88D observations to determine how much tornado information is lost because of the broader beamwidth (longer range) and longer gate length of the WSR-88Ds. Results of the study will be useful in determining how better to interpret future WSR-88D observations of near-range tornadoes, including any possible real-time estimation of tornado intensity and evolution.

Current affiliation: National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Corresponding author address: Donald W. Burgess, National Severe Storms Laboratory, 1313 Halley Circle, Norman, OK 73069. Email: donald.burgess@noaa.gov

Abstract

The 3 May 1999 Oklahoma City storm is unique from a weather radar perspective because a long-track violent tornado passed within close range of several Doppler radars, because a detailed damage survey was conducted immediately after the event, and because high-quality visual observations of the tornado were available. The tornado passed relatively close (15–60 km) to two fixed-location Doppler radars: the National Weather Service Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) at Twin Lakes (KTLX) and the Radar Operations Center WSR-88D test radar at Norman (KCRI). Two mobile Doppler on Wheels (DOW) radars also observed the tornado at very close range (3–8 km). The data from DOW2 are nearly continuous for a substantial portion of the tornado's life and provide detailed information on the high-resolution velocity field in and around the tornado. These data permit good estimates of tornado rotational velocity and diameter. The data also allow comparison with tornado damage survey estimates of damage/intensity and with visual observations of tornado size. Further, one can compare the high-resolution DOW data to the lower-resolution WSR-88D observations to determine how much tornado information is lost because of the broader beamwidth (longer range) and longer gate length of the WSR-88Ds. Results of the study will be useful in determining how better to interpret future WSR-88D observations of near-range tornadoes, including any possible real-time estimation of tornado intensity and evolution.

Current affiliation: National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Corresponding author address: Donald W. Burgess, National Severe Storms Laboratory, 1313 Halley Circle, Norman, OK 73069. Email: donald.burgess@noaa.gov

Save