NWP Grid Editing at the Met Office

E. B. Carroll Operations Centre, Met Office, Exeter, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by E. B. Carroll in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
T. D. Hewson Operations Centre, Met Office, Exeter, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by T. D. Hewson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Over the past few years the way in which central forecast guidance is disseminated by forecasters in the Met Office headquarters has been changing, with an increasing reliance on modification of variables’ output from NWP models. The editing of grids of forecast data at the Met Office Operations Centre in Exeter is described, and two case studies are presented. Results of verification of modified versus raw fields are shown, presenting the concept of “lead time gain” as a unifying measure of relative forecast accuracy. At all lead times net lead time gain outweighs time spent considering and effecting modifications.

Corresponding author address: Edward B. Carroll, Operations Centre, Met Office, FitzRoy Rd., Exeter EX1 3PB, United Kingdom. Email: edward.carroll@metoffice.gov.uk

Abstract

Over the past few years the way in which central forecast guidance is disseminated by forecasters in the Met Office headquarters has been changing, with an increasing reliance on modification of variables’ output from NWP models. The editing of grids of forecast data at the Met Office Operations Centre in Exeter is described, and two case studies are presented. Results of verification of modified versus raw fields are shown, presenting the concept of “lead time gain” as a unifying measure of relative forecast accuracy. At all lead times net lead time gain outweighs time spent considering and effecting modifications.

Corresponding author address: Edward B. Carroll, Operations Centre, Met Office, FitzRoy Rd., Exeter EX1 3PB, United Kingdom. Email: edward.carroll@metoffice.gov.uk

Save
  • Carroll, E. B., 1997: A technique for consistent alteration of NWP output fields. Meteor. Appl., 4 , 171178.

  • Cullen, M. J. P., 1993: The Unified Forecast/Climate Model. Meteor. Mag., 122 , 8194.

  • Cullen, M. J. P., Davies T. , Mawson M. H. , James J. A. , Coulter S. C. , and Malcolm A. , 1997: An overview of numerical methods for the next generation UK NWP and climate model. Numerical Methods in Atmospheric and Ocean Modelling, The Andre J. Robert Memorial Volume, C. A. Lin, R. Laprise, and H. Ritchie Eds., Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographical Society, 425–444.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ebert, E. E., and McBride J. L. , 2000: Verification of precipitation in weather systems: Determination of systematic errors. J. Hydrol., 239 , 179202.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hewson, T. D., 2004: The value of field modifications in forecasting. Forecasting Research Tech. Rep. 437, Met Office, 18 pp. [Available online at http://www.metoffice.com/research/nwp/publications/papers/technical_reports/2004/FRTR437/FRTR437.pdf.].

  • Jolliffe, I. T., and Stephenson D. B. , 2003: Forecast Verification: A Practitioner’s Guide in Atmospheric Science. John Wiley and Sons, 240 pp.

  • Young, M. V., and Carroll E. B. , 2002: Use of medium-range ensembles at the Met Office. Part 2. Applications for medium-range forecasting. Meteor. Appl., 9 , 273288.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 443 113 9
PDF Downloads 169 40 0