Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Evolution of the U.S. Tornado Database: 1954–2003

Stephanie M. Verbout School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Stephanie M. Verbout in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Harold E. Brooks NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Harold E. Brooks in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Lance M. Leslie School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Lance M. Leslie in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
David M. Schultz NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory, and Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by David M. Schultz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Feb 2006
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF910.1
Page(s):
86–93
Restricted access

Abstract

Over the last 50 yr, the number of tornadoes reported in the United States has doubled from about 600 per year in the 1950s to around 1200 in the 2000s. This doubling is likely not related to meteorological causes alone. To account for this increase a simple least squares linear regression was fitted to the annual number of tornado reports. A “big tornado day” is a single day when numerous tornadoes and/or many tornadoes exceeding a specified intensity threshold were reported anywhere in the country. By defining a big tornado day without considering the spatial distribution of the tornadoes, a big tornado day differs from previous definitions of outbreaks. To address the increase in the number of reports, the number of reports is compared to the expected number of reports in a year based on linear regression. In addition, the F1 and greater Fujita-scale record was used in determining a big tornado day because the F1 and greater series was more stationary over time as opposed to the F2 and greater series. Thresholds were applied to the data to determine the number and intensities of the tornadoes needed to be considered a big tornado day. Possible threshold values included fractions of the annual expected value associated with the linear regression and fixed numbers for the intensity criterion. Threshold values of 1.5% of the expected annual total number of tornadoes and/or at least 8 F1 and greater tornadoes identified about 18.1 big tornado days per year. Higher thresholds such as 2.5% and/or at least 15 F1 and greater tornadoes showed similar characteristics, yet identified approximately 6.2 big tornado days per year. Finally, probability distribution curves generated using kernel density estimation revealed that big tornado days were more likely to occur slightly earlier in the year and have a narrower distribution than any given tornado day.

Corresponding author address: Stephanie M. Verbout, School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, 100 East Boyd St., Room 1326, Norman, OK 73019. Email: Stephanie.Nordin@ou.edu

Abstract

Over the last 50 yr, the number of tornadoes reported in the United States has doubled from about 600 per year in the 1950s to around 1200 in the 2000s. This doubling is likely not related to meteorological causes alone. To account for this increase a simple least squares linear regression was fitted to the annual number of tornado reports. A “big tornado day” is a single day when numerous tornadoes and/or many tornadoes exceeding a specified intensity threshold were reported anywhere in the country. By defining a big tornado day without considering the spatial distribution of the tornadoes, a big tornado day differs from previous definitions of outbreaks. To address the increase in the number of reports, the number of reports is compared to the expected number of reports in a year based on linear regression. In addition, the F1 and greater Fujita-scale record was used in determining a big tornado day because the F1 and greater series was more stationary over time as opposed to the F2 and greater series. Thresholds were applied to the data to determine the number and intensities of the tornadoes needed to be considered a big tornado day. Possible threshold values included fractions of the annual expected value associated with the linear regression and fixed numbers for the intensity criterion. Threshold values of 1.5% of the expected annual total number of tornadoes and/or at least 8 F1 and greater tornadoes identified about 18.1 big tornado days per year. Higher thresholds such as 2.5% and/or at least 15 F1 and greater tornadoes showed similar characteristics, yet identified approximately 6.2 big tornado days per year. Finally, probability distribution curves generated using kernel density estimation revealed that big tornado days were more likely to occur slightly earlier in the year and have a narrower distribution than any given tornado day.

Corresponding author address: Stephanie M. Verbout, School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, 100 East Boyd St., Room 1326, Norman, OK 73019. Email: Stephanie.Nordin@ou.edu

Save
Cover Weather and Forecasting
Weather and Forecasting

  • Brooks, H. E., and Doswell C. A. III, 2001: Some aspects of the international climatology of tornadoes by damage classification. Atmos. Res., 56 , 191–201.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Brooks, H. E., and Craven J. P. , 2002: A database of proximity soundings for significant severe thunderstorms, 1957–1993. Preprints, 21st Conf. on Severe Local Storms, San Antonio, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 639–642.

  • Brooks, H. E., and Doswell C. A. III, 2002: Deaths in the 3 May 1999 Oklahoma City tornado from a historical perspective. Wea. Forecasting, 17 , 354–361.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Brooks, H. E., Doswell C. A. III, and Kay M. P. , 2003: Climatological estimates of local daily tornado probability for the United States. Wea. Forecasting, 18 , 626–640.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bruening, S. L., Kay M. P. , and Brooks H. E. , 2002: A new perspective on the climatology of tornadoes in the United States. Preprints, 16th Conf. on Probability and Statistics, Orlando, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., J96–J103.

  • Doswell C. A. III, , 1985: The operational meteorology of convective weather. Vol. II: Storm scale analysis. NOAA Tech. Memo. ERL ESG-15, 112 pp.

  • Doswell C. A. III, , and Burgess D. W. , 1988: On some issues of United States tornado climatology. Mon. Wea. Rev., 116 , 495–501.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dotzek, N., Grieser J. , and Brooks H. E. , 2003: Statistical modeling of tornado intensity distributions. Atmos. Res., 67–68 , 163–187.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Feuerstein, B., Dotzek N. , and Grieser J. , 2005: Assessing a tornado climatology from global tornado intensity distributions. J. Climate, 18 , 585–596.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Fujita, T. T., Bradbury D. L. , and van Thullenar C. F. , 1970: Palm Sunday tornadoes of April 11, 1965. Mon. Wea. Rev., 98 , 29–69.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Galway, J. G., 1975: Relationship of tornado deaths to severe weather watch areas. Mon. Wea. Rev., 103 , 737–741.

  • Galway, J. G., 1977: Some climatological aspects of tornado outbreaks. Mon. Wea. Rev., 105 , 477–484.

  • Grazulis, T. P., 1993: Significant Tornadoes, 1680–1991. Environmental Films, 1326 pp.

  • Grazulis, T. P., Schaefer J. T. , and Abbey R. F. Jr., 1993: Advances in tornado climatology, hazards, and risk assessment since Tornado Symposium II. The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction, and Hazard, Geophys. Monogr., No. 79, Amer. Geophys. Union, 409–426.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • Hagemeyer, B. C., 1997: Peninsular Florida tornado outbreaks. Wea. Forecasting, 12 , 399–427.

  • Hoxit, L. R., and Chappell C. F. , 1975: Tornado outbreak of April 3–4, 1974: Synoptic analysis. NOAA Tech. Rep. ERL 338-APCL 37, 48 pp.

  • Locatelli, J. D., Stoelinga M. T. , and Hobbs P. V. , 2002: A new look at the Super Outbreak of tornadoes on 3–4 April 1974. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130 , 1633–1651.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Marshall, T. P., 2002: Tornado damage survey at Moore, Oklahoma. Wea. Forecasting, 17 , 582–598.

  • McCarthy, D. W., 2003: NWS tornado surveys and the impact on the national tornado database. Preprints, First Symp. on F-scale and Severe Weather Damage Assessment, Long Beach, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM, 3.2.

  • Pautz, M. E., 1969: Severe local storms occurrences, 1955–1967. ESSA Tech. Memo. WBTM FCST12, Washington, DC, 77 pp.

  • Reynolds, G. W., 1971: Complication in estimating the magnitudes of tornado forces from damage analysis. Preprints, Eighth Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Kansas City, MO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 179–182.

  • Schaefer, J. T., Kelly D. L. , and Abbey R. F. Jr., 1986: A minimum assumption tornado-hazard probability model. J. Climate Appl. Meteor, 25 , 1934–1945.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 4087 1222 240
PDF Downloads 2100 420 47