MM5 Ensemble Mean Forecasts in the Taiwan Area for the 2003 Mei-Yu Season

Fang-Ching Chien Department of Earth Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan

Search for other papers by Fang-Ching Chien in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Yi-Chin Liu Department of Atmospheric Sciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

Search for other papers by Yi-Chin Liu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Ben Jong-Dao Jou Department of Atmospheric Sciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

Search for other papers by Ben Jong-Dao Jou in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

This paper presents an evaluation study of a real-time fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University–NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5) mesoscale ensemble prediction system in the Taiwan area during the 2003 mei-yu season. The ensemble system consists of 16 members that used the same nested domains of 45- and 15-km resolutions, but different model settings of the initial conditions (ICs), the cumulus parameterization scheme (CPS), and the microphysics scheme (MS). Verification of geopotential height, temperature, relative humidity, and winds in the 15-km grid shows that the members using the Kain–Fritsch CPS performed better than those using the Grell CPS, and those using the Central Weather Bureau (CWB) Nonhydrostatic Forecast System (NFS) ICs fared better than those using the CWB Global Forecast System (GFS) ICs. The members applying the mixed-phase MS generally exhibited the smallest errors among the four MSs. Precipitation verification shows that the members using the Grell CPS, in general, had higher equitable threat scores (ETSs) than those using the Kain–Fritsch CPS, that the members with the GFS ICs performed better than with the NFS ICs, and that the mixed-phase and Goddard MSs gave relatively high ETSs in the rainfall simulation. The bias scores show that, overall, all 16 members underforecasted rainfall. Comparisons of the ensemble means show that, on average, an ensemble mean, no matter how many members it contains, can produce better forecasts than an individual member. Among the three possible elements (IC, CPS, and MS) that can be varied to compose an ensemble, the ensemble that contains members with all three elements varying performed the best, while that with two elements varying was second best, and that with only one varying was the worst. Furthermore, the first choice for composing an ensemble is to use perturbed ICs, followed by the perturbed CPS, and then the perturbed MS.

Corresponding author address: Fang-Ching Chien, Dept. of Earth Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, 88, Section4, Ting-Chou Rd., Taipei 116, Taiwan. Email: jfj@ntnu.edu.tw

Abstract

This paper presents an evaluation study of a real-time fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University–NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5) mesoscale ensemble prediction system in the Taiwan area during the 2003 mei-yu season. The ensemble system consists of 16 members that used the same nested domains of 45- and 15-km resolutions, but different model settings of the initial conditions (ICs), the cumulus parameterization scheme (CPS), and the microphysics scheme (MS). Verification of geopotential height, temperature, relative humidity, and winds in the 15-km grid shows that the members using the Kain–Fritsch CPS performed better than those using the Grell CPS, and those using the Central Weather Bureau (CWB) Nonhydrostatic Forecast System (NFS) ICs fared better than those using the CWB Global Forecast System (GFS) ICs. The members applying the mixed-phase MS generally exhibited the smallest errors among the four MSs. Precipitation verification shows that the members using the Grell CPS, in general, had higher equitable threat scores (ETSs) than those using the Kain–Fritsch CPS, that the members with the GFS ICs performed better than with the NFS ICs, and that the mixed-phase and Goddard MSs gave relatively high ETSs in the rainfall simulation. The bias scores show that, overall, all 16 members underforecasted rainfall. Comparisons of the ensemble means show that, on average, an ensemble mean, no matter how many members it contains, can produce better forecasts than an individual member. Among the three possible elements (IC, CPS, and MS) that can be varied to compose an ensemble, the ensemble that contains members with all three elements varying performed the best, while that with two elements varying was second best, and that with only one varying was the worst. Furthermore, the first choice for composing an ensemble is to use perturbed ICs, followed by the perturbed CPS, and then the perturbed MS.

Corresponding author address: Fang-Ching Chien, Dept. of Earth Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, 88, Section4, Ting-Chou Rd., Taipei 116, Taiwan. Email: jfj@ntnu.edu.tw

Save
  • Andersson, E., and Coauthors, 1998: The ECMWF implementation of three-dimensional variational assimilation (3D-Var). III: Experimental results. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 124 , 18311860.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Buizza, R., and Palmer T. N. , 1995: The singular-vector structure of the atmospheric general circulation. J. Atmos. Sci., 52 , 14341456.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, G. T-J., and Liang C-Y. , 1992: A midlevel vortex observed in the Taiwan Area Mesoscale Experiment (TAMEX). J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 70 , 2541.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, Y-L., and Hui N. B-F. , 1990: Analysis of a shallow front during the Taiwan Area Mesoscale Experiment. Mon. Wea. Rev., 118 , 26492667.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chien, F-C., and Jou B. J-D. , 2004: MM5 ensemble mean precipitation forecasts in the Taiwan area for three mei-yu seasons. Wea. Forecasting, 19 , 735750.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chien, F-C., Kuo Y-H. , and Yang M-J. , 2002: Precipitation forecasts of the MM5 in Taiwan area during the 1998 mei-yu season. Wea. Forecasting, 17 , 739754.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Du, J., Mullen S. L. , and Sanders F. , 1997: Short-range ensemble forecasting of quantitative precipitation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125 , 24272459.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ebert, E. E., 2001: Ability of a poor man’s ensemble to predict the probability and distribution of precipitation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129 , 24612480.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Epstein, E. S., 1969: Stochastic dynamic prediction. Tellus, 21 , 739759.

  • Grell, G. A., Dudhia J. , and Stauffer D. R. , 1994: A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-398+STR, 138 pp.

  • Grimit, E. P., and Mass C. F. , 2002: Initial results of a mesoscale short-range ensemble forecasting system over the Pacific Northwest. Wea. Forecasting, 17 , 192205.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hamill, T. M., 1999: Hypothesis tests for evaluating numerical precipitation forecasts. Wea. Forecasting, 14 , 155167.

  • Hong, S-Y., and Pan H-L. , 1996: Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a medium-range forecast model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124 , 23222339.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Houtekamer, P. L., and Mitchell H. L. , 1998: Data assimilation using an ensemble Kalman filter technique. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126 , 796811.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Houtekamer, P. L., Lefaiver L. , Derome J. , Ritchie H. , and Mitchell H. L. , 1996: A system simulation approach to ensemble prediction. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124 , 12251242.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kain, J. S., and Fritsch J. M. , 1992: The role of the convective “trigger function” in numerical forecasts of mesoscale convective systems. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 49 , 93106.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kuo, Y-H., and Chen G. T-J. , 1990: The Taiwan Area Mesoscale Experiment (TAMEX): An overview. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 71 , 488503.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leith, C. E., 1974: Theoretical skill of Monte Carlo forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 102 , 409418.

  • Leou, T-M., and Liou C-S. , 2000: The Central Mountain Range of Taiwan Island in Central Weather Bureau non-hydrostatic limited area model. Preprints, Ninth Conf. on Mountain Meteorology, Aspen, CO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 367–368.

  • Li, J., Chen Y-L. , and Lee W-C. , 1997: Analysis of a heavy rainfall event during TAMEX. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125 , 10601081.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lin, Y-J., Pasken R. W. , and Chang H-W. , 1992: The structure of a subtropical prefrontal convective rainband. Part I: Mesoscale kinematic structure determined from dual-Doppler measurements. Mon. Wea. Rev., 120 , 18161836.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liou, C. S., and Coauthors, 1997: The second-generation Global Forecast System at the Central Weather Bureau in Taiwan. Wea. Forecasting, 12 , 653663.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lorenz, E. N., 1963: Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J. Atmos. Sci., 20 , 130141.

  • Molteni, F., Buizza R. , Palmer T. N. , and Petroliagis T. , 1996: The ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System: Methodology and validation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 122 , 73119.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mullen, S. L., and Baumhefner D. P. , 1988: Sensitivity to numerical simulations of explosive oceanic cyclogenesis to changes in physical parameterizations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 116 , 22892329.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ray, P. S., Robinson A. , and Lin Y. , 1991: Radar analysis of a TAMEX frontal system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 119 , 25192539.

  • Schaefer, J. T., 1990: The critical success index as indicator of warning skill. Wea. Forecasting, 5 , 570575.

  • Stensrud, D. J., and Fritsch J. M. , 1994a: Mesoscale convective systems in weakly forced large-scale environments. Part II: Generation of a mesoscale initial condition. Mon. Wea. Rev., 122 , 20682083.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stensrud, D. J., and Fritsch J. M. , 1994b: Mesoscale convective systems in weakly forced large-scale environments. Part III: Numerical simulations and implications for operational forecasting. Mon. Wea. Rev., 122 , 20842104.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stensrud, D. J., and Yussouf N. , 2003: Short-range ensemble predictions of 2-m temperature and dewpoint temperature over New England. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131 , 25102524.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stensrud, D. J., Brooks H. E. , Du J. , Tracton M. S. , and Rogers E. , 1999: Using ensembles for short-range forecasting. Mon. Wea. Rev., 127 , 433446.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stensrud, D. J., Bao J-W. , and Warner T. T. , 2000: Using initial condition and model physics perturbations in short-range ensemble simulations of mesoscale convective systems. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128 , 20772107.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Toth, Z., and Kalnay E. , 1993: Ensemble forecasting at NMC: The generation of perturbations. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 74 , 23172330.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tracton, S., and Kalnay E. , 1993: Ensemble forecasting at NMC: Operational implementation. Wea. Forecasting, 8 , 379398.

  • Wang, W., and Seaman N. L. , 1997: A comparison study of convective parameterization schemes in a mesoscale model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125 , 252278.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilks, D. S., 1995: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences. Academic Press, 467 pp.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 123 46 2
PDF Downloads 53 11 2