Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

The Optimal Bulk Wind Differential Depth and the Utility of the Upper-Tropospheric Storm-Relative Flow for Forecasting Supercells

Adam L. Houston Department of Geosciences, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska

Search for other papers by Adam L. Houston in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Richard L. Thompson Storm Prediction Center, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Richard L. Thompson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Roger Edwards Storm Prediction Center, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Roger Edwards in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Oct 2008
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/2008WAF2007007.1
Page(s):
825–837
Restricted access

Abstract

An analysis of 4 yr of Rapid Update Cycle-2 (RUC-2) derived soundings in proximity to radar-observed supercells and nonsupercells is conducted in an effort to answer two questions: 1) over what depth is the fixed-layer bulk wind differential (BWD; the vector difference between the wind velocity at a given level and the wind velocity at the surface) the best discriminator between supercell and nonsupercell environments and 2) does the upper-tropospheric storm-relative flow (UTSRF) discriminate between the environments of supercells and nonsupercells? Previous climatologies of sounding-based supercell forecast parameters have documented the ability of the 0–6-km BWD in delineating supercell from nonsupercell environments. However, a systematic examination of a wide range of layers has never been documented. The UTSRF has previously been tested as a parameter for discriminating between supercell and nonsupercell environments and there is some evidence that supercells may be sensitive to the UTSRF. However, this sensitivity may be a consequence of the correlation between UTSRF and the surface to midtropospheric BWD. Accurately assessing the ability of the UTSRF to distinguish between supercell and nonsupercell environments requires controlling for the surface to midtropospheric BWD.

It is shown that the bulk wind differential within the 0–5-km layer delineates best between supercell and nonsupercell environments. Analysis of the UTSRF demonstrates that even when not controlling for the BWD, the UTSRF has limited reliability in forecasting supercells. The lack of merit in using the UTSRF to forecast supercells is particularly evident when it is isolated from the BWD. Because the UTSRF and BWD are not independent, controlling for the BWD when examining the UTSRF reveals that the UTSRF is not a fundamental parameter that can be used to distinguish supercell from nonsupercell environments. Therefore, this work demonstrates that the UTSRF is an unreliable metric for forecasting supercell events.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Adam L. Houston, Dept. of Geosciences, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, 214 Bessey Hall, Lincoln, NE 68588. Email: ahouston@unl.edu

Abstract

An analysis of 4 yr of Rapid Update Cycle-2 (RUC-2) derived soundings in proximity to radar-observed supercells and nonsupercells is conducted in an effort to answer two questions: 1) over what depth is the fixed-layer bulk wind differential (BWD; the vector difference between the wind velocity at a given level and the wind velocity at the surface) the best discriminator between supercell and nonsupercell environments and 2) does the upper-tropospheric storm-relative flow (UTSRF) discriminate between the environments of supercells and nonsupercells? Previous climatologies of sounding-based supercell forecast parameters have documented the ability of the 0–6-km BWD in delineating supercell from nonsupercell environments. However, a systematic examination of a wide range of layers has never been documented. The UTSRF has previously been tested as a parameter for discriminating between supercell and nonsupercell environments and there is some evidence that supercells may be sensitive to the UTSRF. However, this sensitivity may be a consequence of the correlation between UTSRF and the surface to midtropospheric BWD. Accurately assessing the ability of the UTSRF to distinguish between supercell and nonsupercell environments requires controlling for the surface to midtropospheric BWD.

It is shown that the bulk wind differential within the 0–5-km layer delineates best between supercell and nonsupercell environments. Analysis of the UTSRF demonstrates that even when not controlling for the BWD, the UTSRF has limited reliability in forecasting supercells. The lack of merit in using the UTSRF to forecast supercells is particularly evident when it is isolated from the BWD. Because the UTSRF and BWD are not independent, controlling for the BWD when examining the UTSRF reveals that the UTSRF is not a fundamental parameter that can be used to distinguish supercell from nonsupercell environments. Therefore, this work demonstrates that the UTSRF is an unreliable metric for forecasting supercell events.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Adam L. Houston, Dept. of Geosciences, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, 214 Bessey Hall, Lincoln, NE 68588. Email: ahouston@unl.edu

Save
Cover Weather and Forecasting
Weather and Forecasting

  • Benjamin, S. G., and Coauthors, 2004: An hourly assimilation cycle: The RUC. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132 , 495–518.

  • Bunkers, M. J., Klimowski B. A. , Zeitler J. W. , Thompson R. L. , and Weisman M. L. , 2000: Predicting supercell motion using a new hodograph technique. Wea. Forecasting, 15 , 61–79.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Craven, J. P., Brooks H. E. , and Hart J. A. , 2002: Baseline climatology of sounding derived parameters associated with deep, moist convection. Preprints, 21st Conf. on Severe Local Storms, San Antonio, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 643–646.

  • Droegemeier, K. K., Lazarus S. M. , and Davies-Jones R. P. , 1993: The influence of helicity on numerically simulated convective storms. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121 , 2005–2029.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Fawbush, E. J., and Miller R. C. , 1952: A mean sounding representative of the tornadic airmass environment. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 33 , 303–307.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Fawbush, E. J., and Miller R. C. , 1954: The types of airmasses in which North American tornadoes form. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 35 , 154–165.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Fawbush, E. J., Miller R. C. , and Starrett L. G. , 1957: Severe local storms and mid-tropospheric flow patterns. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 38 , 115–123.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Markowski, P. M., Hannon C. , Frame J. , Lancaster E. , Pietrycha A. , Edwards R. , and Thompson R. L. , 2003: Characteristics of vertical wind profiles near supercells obtained from the Rapid Update Cycle. Wea. Forecasting, 18 , 1262–1272.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Marwitz, J. D., 1972: The structure and motion of severe hailstorms. Part I: Supercell storms. J. Appl. Meteor., 11 , 166–179.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McCaul E. W. Jr., , 1991: Buoyancy and shear characteristics of hurricane tornado environments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 119 , 1954–1978.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Moncrieff, M. W., and Green J. S. A. , 1972: The propagation and transfer properties of steady convective overturning in shear. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 98 , 336–352.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ramsay, H. A., and Doswell C. A. III, 2005: A sensitivity study of hodograph-based methods for estimating supercell motion. Wea. Forecasting, 20 , 954–970.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rasmussen, E. N., and Wilhelmson R. B. , 1983: Relationship between storm characteristics and 1200 GMT hodographs, low-level shear, and stability. Preprints, 13th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Tulsa, OK, Amer. Meteor. Soc., J5–J8.

  • Rasmussen, E. N., and Blanchard D. O. , 1998: A baseline climatology of sounding-derived supercell and tornado forecast parameters. Wea. Forecasting, 13 , 1148–1164.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Thompson, R. L., Edwards R. , Hart J. A. , Elmore K. L. , and Markowski P. M. , 2003: Close proximity soundings within supercell environments obtained from the Rapid Update Cycle. Wea. Forecasting, 18 , 1243–1261.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Thompson, R. L., Mead C. M. , and Edwards R. , 2007: Effective storm-relative helicity and bulk shear in supercell thunderstorm environments. Wea. Forecasting, 22 , 102–115.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Weisman, M. L., and Klemp J. B. , 1982: The dependence of numerically simulated convective storms on vertical wind shear and buoyancy. Mon. Wea. Rev., 110 , 504–520.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Weisman, M. L., and Klemp J. B. , 1984: The structure and classification of numerically simulated convective storms in directionally varying wind shears. Mon. Wea. Rev., 112 , 2479–2498.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Weisman, M. L., and Klemp J. B. , 1986: Characteristics of isolated convective storms. Mesoscale Meteorology and Forecasting, P. Ray, Ed., Amer. Meteor. Soc., 331–358.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 419 138 9
PDF Downloads 399 204 10