GPCE-AX: An Anisotropic Extension to the Goerss Predicted Consensus Error in Tropical Cyclone Track Forecasts

James A. Hansen Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, California

Search for other papers by James A. Hansen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
James S. Goerss Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, California

Search for other papers by James S. Goerss in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Charles Sampson Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, California

Search for other papers by Charles Sampson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

A method to predict an anisotropic expected forecast error distribution for consensus forecasts of tropical cyclone (TC) tracks is presented. The method builds upon the Goerss predicted consensus error (GPCE), which predicts the isotropic radius of the 70% isopleth of expected TC track error. Consensus TC track forecasts are computed as the mean of a collection of TC track forecasts from different models and are basin dependent. A novel aspect of GPCE is that it uses not only the uncertainty in the collection of constituent models to predict expected error, but also other features of the predicted storm, including initial intensity, forecast intensity, and storm speed. The new method, called GPCE along–across (GPCE-AX), takes a similar approach but separates the predicted error into across-track and along-track components. GPCE-AX has been applied to consensus TC track forecasts in the Atlantic (CONU/TVCN, where CONU is consensus version U and TVCN is the track variable consensus) and in the western North Pacific (consensus version W, CONW). The results for both basins indicate that GPCE-AX either outperforms or is equal in quality to GPCE in terms of reliability (the fraction of time verification is bound by the 70% uncertainty isopleths) and sharpness (the area bound by the 70% isopleths). GPCE-AX has been implemented at both the National Hurricane Center and at the Joint Typhoon Warning Center for real-time testing and evaluation.

Corresponding author address: James A. Hansen, Naval Research Laboratory, 7 Grace Hopper Ave., MS 2, Monterey, CA 93943. E-mail: jim.hansen@nlrmry.navy.mil

Abstract

A method to predict an anisotropic expected forecast error distribution for consensus forecasts of tropical cyclone (TC) tracks is presented. The method builds upon the Goerss predicted consensus error (GPCE), which predicts the isotropic radius of the 70% isopleth of expected TC track error. Consensus TC track forecasts are computed as the mean of a collection of TC track forecasts from different models and are basin dependent. A novel aspect of GPCE is that it uses not only the uncertainty in the collection of constituent models to predict expected error, but also other features of the predicted storm, including initial intensity, forecast intensity, and storm speed. The new method, called GPCE along–across (GPCE-AX), takes a similar approach but separates the predicted error into across-track and along-track components. GPCE-AX has been applied to consensus TC track forecasts in the Atlantic (CONU/TVCN, where CONU is consensus version U and TVCN is the track variable consensus) and in the western North Pacific (consensus version W, CONW). The results for both basins indicate that GPCE-AX either outperforms or is equal in quality to GPCE in terms of reliability (the fraction of time verification is bound by the 70% uncertainty isopleths) and sharpness (the area bound by the 70% isopleths). GPCE-AX has been implemented at both the National Hurricane Center and at the Joint Typhoon Warning Center for real-time testing and evaluation.

Corresponding author address: James A. Hansen, Naval Research Laboratory, 7 Grace Hopper Ave., MS 2, Monterey, CA 93943. E-mail: jim.hansen@nlrmry.navy.mil
Save
  • DeMaria, M., Knaff J. A. , Knabb R. , Lauer C. , Sampson C. R. , and DeMaria R. T. , 2009: A new method for estimating tropical cyclone wind speed probabilities. Wea. Forecasting, 24, 15731591.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Franklin, J., 2009: 2008 National Hurricane Center forecast verification report. NOAA/NHC Rep., 71 pp. [Available online at http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/verification/pdfs/Verification_2008.pdf.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gneiting, T., Balabdaoui F. , and Raftery A. E. , 2007: Probabilistic forecasts, calibration and sharpness. J. Roy. Stat. Soc., 69B, 243268.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goerss, J., 2000: Tropical cyclone track forecasts using an ensemble of dynamical models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, 11871193.

  • Goerss, J., 2007: Prediction of consensus tropical cyclone track forecast error. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 19851993.

  • Goerss, J., Sampson C. , and Gross J. , 2004: A history of western North Pacific tropical cyclone track forecast skill. Wea. Forecasting, 19, 633638.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Murphy, A. H., and Winkler R. L. , 1987: A general framework for forecast verification. Mon. Wea. Rev., 115, 13301338.

  • Sampson, C. R., and Schrader A. J. , 2000: The Automated Tropical Cyclone Forecasting System (version 3.2). Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 81, 31483158.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sampson, C. R., Goerss J. , and Schrader A. , 2005: A consensus track forecast for Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclones. Aust. Meteor. Mag., 54, 115119.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 512 286 112
PDF Downloads 193 54 6