Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Surface Fronts, Troughs, and Baroclinic Zones in the Great Lakes Region

Melissa Payer Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York

Search for other papers by Melissa Payer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Neil F. Laird Department of Geoscience, Hobart and William Smith Colleges, Geneva, New York

Search for other papers by Neil F. Laird in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Richard J. Maliawco Jr. Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois

Search for other papers by Richard J. Maliawco Jr. in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Eric G. Hoffman Department of Atmospheric Science and Chemistry, Plymouth State University, Plymouth, New Hampshire

Search for other papers by Eric G. Hoffman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Aug 2011
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-10-05018.1
Page(s):
555–563
Restricted access

Abstract

The temporal frequency and spatial distributions of fronts and troughs in the Great Lakes region from a 6-yr period (January 2000–December 2005) are presented. Frontal frequencies indicated that cold fronts were the most common, followed by stationary, warm, and occluded fronts, in that order. The variation in the annual frequency of all front types was small throughout the period. Troughs were present more frequently than any front type and exhibited greater variability of annual frequency. An investigation of the relation of fronts and troughs to surface baroclinic zones found that approximately 54% of analyzed fronts were associated with a moderate potential temperature gradient of at least 3.5°C (100 km)−1. Nearly 10% of all fronts were associated with a strong baroclinic zone having a potential temperature gradient of at least 7.0°C (100 km)−1. Moderate or strong baroclinic zones were associated with about 34% of the analyzed troughs in the Great Lakes region and this relationship was further examined for three different trough classifications (i.e., synoptic, subsynoptic, and mesoscale). This study is one of very few to present the climatological variability of surface fronts of all types across a region and the results provide useful insights into the current operational determination of analyzed surface fronts and troughs by quantifying their association with surface baroclinic zones in the Great Lakes region.

Corresponding author address: Neil F. Laird, Dept. of Geoscience, Hobart and William Smith Colleges, 300 Pulteney St., Geneva, NY 14456. E-mail: laird@hws.edu

Abstract

The temporal frequency and spatial distributions of fronts and troughs in the Great Lakes region from a 6-yr period (January 2000–December 2005) are presented. Frontal frequencies indicated that cold fronts were the most common, followed by stationary, warm, and occluded fronts, in that order. The variation in the annual frequency of all front types was small throughout the period. Troughs were present more frequently than any front type and exhibited greater variability of annual frequency. An investigation of the relation of fronts and troughs to surface baroclinic zones found that approximately 54% of analyzed fronts were associated with a moderate potential temperature gradient of at least 3.5°C (100 km)−1. Nearly 10% of all fronts were associated with a strong baroclinic zone having a potential temperature gradient of at least 7.0°C (100 km)−1. Moderate or strong baroclinic zones were associated with about 34% of the analyzed troughs in the Great Lakes region and this relationship was further examined for three different trough classifications (i.e., synoptic, subsynoptic, and mesoscale). This study is one of very few to present the climatological variability of surface fronts of all types across a region and the results provide useful insights into the current operational determination of analyzed surface fronts and troughs by quantifying their association with surface baroclinic zones in the Great Lakes region.

Corresponding author address: Neil F. Laird, Dept. of Geoscience, Hobart and William Smith Colleges, 300 Pulteney St., Geneva, NY 14456. E-mail: laird@hws.edu
Save
Cover Weather and Forecasting
Weather and Forecasting

  • Appel, K. W., Riordan A. J. , and Holley T. A. , 2005: An objective climatology of Carolina coastal fronts. Wea. Forecasting, 20, 439–455.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chiang, I., 1961: An analysis of selected synoptic elements of the climatology of Illinois for the period 1945–1959. M.S. thesis, Dept. of Geography, Southern Illinois University, 45 pp.

  • Cousins, D. A., 2006: A wintertime frontal climatology of the Great Lakes. M.S. thesis, Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, 106 pp.

  • Grover, E. K., and Sousounis P. J. , 2002: The influence of large-scale flow on fall precipitation systems in the Great Lakes Basin. J. Climate, 15, 1943–1956.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hoffman, E. G., 2008: Surface potential temperature as analysis and forecasting tool. Synoptic–Dynamic Meteorology and Weather Analysis and Forecasting: A Tribute to Fred Sanders, Meteor. Monogr., No. 55, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 163–181.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Morgan, G. M., Brunkow D. G. , and Beebe R. C. , 1975: Climatology of surface fronts. Illinois State Water Survey Circular ISWS-75-CIR122, 46 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • NWS, 2006: Unified surface analysis manual. National Weather Service Analysis Centers, 34 pp. [Available online at http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/sfc/UASfcManualVersion1.pdf.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Petterssen, S., and Calabrese P. A. , 1959: On some weather influences due to warming of the air by the Great Lakes in winter. J. Meteor., 16, 646–652.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sanders, F., 1999: A proposed method of surface map analysis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 127, 945–955.

  • Sanders, F., 2005: Real front or baroclinic trough? Wea. Forecasting, 20, 647–651.

  • Sanders, F., and Doswell C. A. III, 1995: A case for detailed surface analysis. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 76, 505–521.

  • Sanders, F., and Hoffman E. G. , 2002: A climatology of surface baroclinic zones. Wea. Forecasting, 17, 774–782.

  • Schultz, D. M., 2004: Cold fronts with and without prefrontal wind shifts in the central United States. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 2040–2053.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Shafer, J. C., and Steenburgh W. J. , 2008: Climatology of strong intermountain cold fronts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 784–807.

  • Sousounis, P. J., 1997: Lake-aggregate mesoscale disturbances. Part III: Description of a mesoscale aggregate vortex. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125, 1111–1134.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Uccellini, L. W., Corfidi S. F. , Junker N. W. , Kocin P. J. , and Olson D. A. , 1992: Report on the surface analysis workshop at the National Meteorological Center 25–28 March 1991. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 73, 459–471.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 911 577 27
PDF Downloads 289 93 3