Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Precipitation Forecasting Using Doppler Radar Data, a Cloud Model with Adjoint, and the Weather Research and Forecasting Model: Real Case Studies during SoWMEX in Taiwan

Sheng-Lun Tai Department of Atmospheric Sciences, National Central University, Jhongli City, Taiwan

Search for other papers by Sheng-Lun Tai in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Yu-Chieng Liou Department of Atmospheric Sciences, National Central University, Jhongli City, Taiwan

Search for other papers by Yu-Chieng Liou in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Juanzhen Sun National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Juanzhen Sun in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Shao-Fan Chang Department of Atmospheric Sciences, National Central University, Jhongli City, Taiwan

Search for other papers by Shao-Fan Chang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Min-Chao Kuo Department of Atmospheric Sciences, National Central University, Jhongli City, Taiwan

Search for other papers by Min-Chao Kuo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Dec 2011
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-11-00019.1
Page(s):
975–992
Restricted access

Abstract

The quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) capability of the Variational Doppler Radar Analysis System (VDRAS) is investigated in the Taiwan area, where the complex topography and surrounding oceans pose great challenges to accurate rainfall prediction. Two real cases observed during intensive operation periods (IOPs) 4 and 8 of the 2008 Southwest Monsoon Experiment (SoWMEX) are selected for this study. Experiments are first carried out to explore the sensitivity of the retrieved fields and model forecasts with respect to different background fields. All results after assimilation of the Doppler radar data indicate that the principal kinematic and thermodynamic features recovered by the VDRAS four-dimensional variational data assimilation (4DVAR) technique are rather reasonable. Starting from a background field generated by blending ground-based in situ measurements (radiosonde and surface mesonet station) and reanalysis data over the oceans, VDRAS is capable of capturing the evolution of the major precipitation systems after 2 h of simulation. The model QPF capability is generally comparable to or better than that obtained using only in situ observations or reanalysis data to prepare the background fields. In a second set of experiments, it is proposed to merge the VDRAS analysis field with the Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF), and let the latter continue with the following model integration. The results indicate that through this combination, the performance of the model QPF can be further improved. The accuracy of the predicted 2-h accumulated rainfall turns out to be significantly higher than that generated by using VDRAS or WRF alone. This can be attributed to the assimilation of meso- and convective-scale information, embedded in the radar data, into VDRAS, and to better treatment of the topographic effects by the WRF simulation. The results illustrated in this study demonstrate a feasible extension for the application of VDRAS in other regions with similar geographic conditions and observational limitations.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Yu-Chieng Liou, Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences, National Central University, 320, Jhongli City, Taiwan. E-mail: tyliou@atm.ncu.edu.tw

Abstract

The quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) capability of the Variational Doppler Radar Analysis System (VDRAS) is investigated in the Taiwan area, where the complex topography and surrounding oceans pose great challenges to accurate rainfall prediction. Two real cases observed during intensive operation periods (IOPs) 4 and 8 of the 2008 Southwest Monsoon Experiment (SoWMEX) are selected for this study. Experiments are first carried out to explore the sensitivity of the retrieved fields and model forecasts with respect to different background fields. All results after assimilation of the Doppler radar data indicate that the principal kinematic and thermodynamic features recovered by the VDRAS four-dimensional variational data assimilation (4DVAR) technique are rather reasonable. Starting from a background field generated by blending ground-based in situ measurements (radiosonde and surface mesonet station) and reanalysis data over the oceans, VDRAS is capable of capturing the evolution of the major precipitation systems after 2 h of simulation. The model QPF capability is generally comparable to or better than that obtained using only in situ observations or reanalysis data to prepare the background fields. In a second set of experiments, it is proposed to merge the VDRAS analysis field with the Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF), and let the latter continue with the following model integration. The results indicate that through this combination, the performance of the model QPF can be further improved. The accuracy of the predicted 2-h accumulated rainfall turns out to be significantly higher than that generated by using VDRAS or WRF alone. This can be attributed to the assimilation of meso- and convective-scale information, embedded in the radar data, into VDRAS, and to better treatment of the topographic effects by the WRF simulation. The results illustrated in this study demonstrate a feasible extension for the application of VDRAS in other regions with similar geographic conditions and observational limitations.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Yu-Chieng Liou, Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences, National Central University, 320, Jhongli City, Taiwan. E-mail: tyliou@atm.ncu.edu.tw
Save
Cover Weather and Forecasting
Weather and Forecasting

  • Brewster, K. A., 2003: Phase-correction data assimilation and application to storm-scale numerical weather prediction. Part I: Method description and simulation testing. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 480–492.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chien, F.-C., and Kuo Y.-H. , 2006: Topographic effects on a wintertime cold front in Taiwan. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 3297–3315.

  • Chien, F.-C., Kuo Y.-H. , and Yang M.-J. , 2002: Precipitation forecast of MM5 in the Taiwan area during the 1998 mei-yu season. Wea. Forecasting, 17, 739–754.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chung, K.-S., Zawadzki I. , Yau M. K. , and Fillion L. , 2009: Short-term forecasting of a midlatitude convective storm by the assimilation of single–Doppler radar observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 4115–4135.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Clark, A. J., Gallus W. A. Jr., Xue M. , and Kong F. , 2009: A comparison of precipitation forecast skill between small convective-allowing and large convection-parameterizing ensembles. Wea. Forecasting, 24, 1121–1140.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Crook, N. A., 1994: Numerical simulations initialized with radar-derived winds. Part I: Simulated data experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 122, 1189–1203.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Crook, N. A., and Tuttle J. D. , 1994: Numerical simulations initialized with radar-derived winds. Part II: Forecasts of three gust-front cases. Mon. Wea. Rev., 122, 1204–1217.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Crook, N. A., and Sun J. , 2002: Assimilating radar, surface, and profiler data for the Sydney 2000 Forecast Demonstration Project. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 19, 888–898.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gal-Chen, T., 1978: A method for the initialization of the anelastic equations: Implications for matching models with observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 106, 587–606.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gao, J., Brewster K. , and Xue M. , 2006: A comparison of the radar ray path equations and approximations for use in radar data assimilation. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 23, 190–198.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hong, J.-S., 2003: Evaluation of the high-resolution model forecasts over the Taiwan area during GIMEX. Wea. Forecasting, 18, 836–846.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hu, M., Xue M. , Gao J. , and Brewster K. , 2006a: 3DVAR and cloud analysis with WSR-88D level-II data for the prediction of the Fort Worth, Texas, tornadic thunderstorms. Part I: Cloud analysis and its impact. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 675–698.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hu, M., Xue M. , Gao J. , and Brewster K. , 2006b: 3DVAR and cloud analysis with WSR-88D level-II data for the prediction of the Fort Worth, Texas, tornadic thunderstorms. Part II: Impact of radial velocity analysis via 3DVAR. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 699–721.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jung, Y., Zhang G. , and Xue M. , 2008a: Assimilation of simulated polarimetric radar data for a convective storm using the ensemble Kalman filter. Part I: Observation operators for reflectivity and polarimetric variables. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 2228–2245.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jung, Y., Xue M. , Zhang G. , and Straka J. M. , 2008b: Assimilation of simulated polarimetric radar data for a convective storm using the ensemble Kalman filter. Part II: Impact of polarimetric data on storm analysis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 2246–2260.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kain, J. S., and Coauthors, 2010: Assessing advances in the assimilation of radar data and other mesoscale observations within a collaborative forecasting-research environment. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 1510–1521.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kessler, E., 1969: On the Distribution and Continuity of Water Substance in Atmospheric Circulation. Meteor. Monogr., No. 32, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 84 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Koizumi, K., Ishikawa Y. , and Tsuyuki T. , 2005: Assimilation of precipitation data to the JMA mesocale model with a four-dimensional variational method and its impact on precipitation forecasts. SOLA, 1, 45–48.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kong, F., and Coauthors, 2009: A real-time storm-scale ensemble forecast system: 2009 spring experiment. Preprints, 23nd Conf. on Weather Analysis and Forecasting/19th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Omaha, NE, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 16A.3. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/154118.pdf.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lee, W.-C., Jou B. J.-D. , Chen C. R. , and Moore J. A. , 2009: Overview of SoWMEX/TiMREX. Preprints, 34th Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Williamsburg, VA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 9B.2. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/156254.pdf.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lin, Y., Ray P. , and Johnson K. , 1993: Initialization of a modeled convective storm using Doppler radar–derived fields. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, 2757–2775.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lin, Y.-L., Farley R. D. , and Orville H. D. , 1983: Bulk parameterization of the snow field in a cloud model. J. Appl. Meteor., 22, 1065–1092.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nakamura, H., Koizumi K. , and Mannoji N. , 2004: Data assimilation of GPS precipitable water vapor into the JMA mesoscale numerical weather prediction model and its impact on rainfall forecasts. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 82B, 441–452.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rogers, E., Black T. L. , Deaver D. G. , DiMego G. J. , Zhao Q. , Baldwin M. , Junker N. W. , and Lin Y. , 1996: Changes to the operational “early” Eta analysis/forecast system at the National Centers for Environmental Prediction. Wea. Forecasting, 11, 391–412.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Saito, K., and Coauthors, 2006: The operational JMA nonhydrostatic mesoscale model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 1266–1298.

  • Schaefer, J. T., 1990: The critical success index as an indicator of warning skill. Wea. Forecasting, 5, 570–575.

  • Snyder, C., and Zhang F. , 2003: Assimilation of simulated Doppler radar observations with an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 1663–1677.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sun, J., 2005: Initialization and numerical forecasting of a supercell storm observed during STEPS. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 793–813.

  • Sun, J., and Crook N. A. , 1997: Dynamic and microphysical retrieval from Doppler radar observations using a cloud model and its adjoint. Part I: Model development and simulated data experiments. J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 1642–1661.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sun, J., and Crook N. A. , 2001: Real-time low-level wind and temperature analysis using single WSR-88D data. Wea. Forecasting, 16, 117–132.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sun, J., and Zhang Y. , 2008: Analysis and prediction of a squall line observed during IHOP using multiple WSR-88D observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 2364–2388.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sun, J., Chen M. , and Wang Y. , 2010: A frequent-updating analysis system based on radar, surface, and mesocale model data for the Beijing 2008 Forecast Demonstration Project. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 1715–1735.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Tong, M., and Xue M. , 2005: Ensemble Kalman filter assimilation of Doppler radar data with a compressible nonhydrostatic model: OSS experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 1789–1807.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Warner, T., Brandes E. A. , Sun J. , Yates D. N. , and Mueller C. K. , 2000: Prediction of a flash flood in complex terrain. Part I: A comparison of rainfall estimates from radar, and very short range rainfall simulations from a dynamic model and an automated algorithmic system. J. Appl. Meteor., 39, 797–814.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Warner, T., and Coauthors, 2007: The Pentagon shield field program—Toward critical infrastructure protection. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 88, 167–176.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Weygandt, S. S., Shapiro A. , and Droegemeier K. K. , 2002: Retrieval of model initial fields from single-Doppler observations of a supercell thunderstorm. Part II: Thermodynamic retrieval and numerical prediction. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 454–476.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Xiao, Q., and Sun J. , 2007: Multiple radar data assimilation and short-range QPF of a squall line observed during IHOP_2002. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 3381–3404.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Xiao, Q., Kuo Y.-H. , Sun J. , Lee W.-C. , Lim E. , Guo Y. , and Barker D. M. , 2005: Assimilation of Doppler radar observations with a regional 3DVAR system: Impact of Doppler velocities on forecasts of a heavy rainfall case. J. Appl. Meteor., 44, 768–788.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Xue, M., Tong M. , and Droegemeier K. K. , 2006: An OSSE framework based on the ensemble square root Kalman filter for evaluating impact of data from radar networks on thunderstorm analysis and forecast. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 23, 46–66.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Yang, M.-J., Jou B. J.-D. , Wang S.-C. , Hong J.-S. , Lin P.-L. , Teng J.-H. , and Lin H.-C. , 2004: Ensemble prediction of rainfall during the 2000-2002 Mei-yu seasons: Evaluation over the Taiwan area. J. Geophys. Res., 109, D18203, doi:10.1029/2003JD004368.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Yang, M.-J., Zhang D.-L. , and Huang H.-L. , 2008: A modeling study of Typhoon Nari (2001) at landfall. Part I: Topographic effects. J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 3095–3115.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhao, Q., Cook J. , Xu Q. , and Harasti P. R. , 2006: Using radar wind observations to improve mesoscale numerical weather prediction. Wea. Forecasting, 21, 502–522.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 505 155 4
PDF Downloads 303 77 1