• Ayotte, K. W., Davy R. J. , and Coppin P. A. , 2001: A simple temporal and spatial analysis of flow in complex terrain in the context of wind energy modeling. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 98, 275295.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bélair, S., Mailhot J. , Strapp J. W. , and MacPherson J. I. , 1999: An examination of local versus nonlocal aspects of a TKE-based boundary layer scheme in clear convective conditions. J. Appl. Meteor., 38, 14991518.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bradford, K. T., Carpenter R. L. , and Shaw B. , 2010: Forecasting Southern Plains wind ramp events using the WRF model at 3-km. Preprints, Ninth Annual Student Conf., Atlanta, GA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., S30. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/166661.pdf.]

  • Briggs, W. M., and Ruppert D. , 2004: Assessing the skill of yes/no forecasts for Markov observations. Preprints, 17th Conf. on Probability and Statistics in the Atmospheric Sciences, Seattle, WA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 2.2. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/68436.pdf.]

  • Dalcher, A., Kalnay E. , and Hoffman R. N. , 1988: Medium range lagged average forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 116, 402416.

  • Department of Energy, 2008: 20% wind energy by 2030. Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Rep. DOE/GO-102008-2567, 248 pp.

  • Department of Energy, 2010: Electric power annual 2009. U.S. Energy Information Administration Rep. DOE/EIA-0348, 108 pp.

  • Dudhia, J., 1989: Numerical study of convection observed during the Winter Monsoon Experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model. J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 30773107.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ebert, E. E., 2009: Neighborhood verification: A strategy for rewarding close forecasts. Wea. Forecasting, 24, 14981510.

  • Ek, M. B., Mitchell K. E. , Lin Y. , Grunmann P. , Rogers E. , Gayno G. , and Koren V. , 2003: Implementation of the upgraded Noah land-surface model in the NCEP operational mesoscale Eta Model. J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8851, doi:10.1029/2002JD003296.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ferrier, B. S., Jin Y. , Black T. , Rogers E. , and DiMego G. , 2002: Implementation of a new grid-scale cloud and precipitation scheme in NCEP Eta model. Preprints, 15th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, San Antonio, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 280–283.

  • Francis, N., 2008: Predicting sudden changes in wind power generation. North Amer. Windpower, 5, 5860.

  • Freedman, J., Markus M. , and Penc R. , 2008: Analysis of west Texas wind plant ramp-up and ramp-down events. AWS Truewind LLC Rep. prepared for GE Wind, Albany, NY, 250–278.

  • General Electric Company, 2005: 1.5 MW series wind turbine. GE Energy Rep. A4_BR APPENDIX A 1A- GE OVERVIEW, 4 pp.

  • Greaves, B., Collins J. , Parkes J. , and Tindal A. , 2009: Temporal forecast uncertainty for ramp events. Wind Eng., 33, 309320.

  • Hall, T. J., Thessin R. N. , Bloy G. J. , and Mutchler C. N. , 2010: Analog sky condition forecasting based on a k-nn algorithm. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 14631478.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harrison, M. S. J., Palmer T. N. , Richardson D. S. , and Buizza R. , 1999: Analysis and model dependencies in medium-range ensembles: Two transplant case studies. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 24872516.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoffman, R. N., and Kalnay E. , 1983: Lagged average forecasting, an alternative to Monte Carlo forecasting. Tellus, 35A, 100118.

  • Hong, S.-Y., and Pan H.-L. , 1996: Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a medium-range forecast model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124, 23222339.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hong, S.-Y., Noh Y. , and Dudhia J. , 2006: A new vertical diffusion package with explicit treatment of entrainment processes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 23182341.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Houtekamer, P. L., 1993: Global and local skill forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, 18341846.

  • Hu, X.-M., Nielsen-Gammon J. W. , and Zhang F. , 2010: Evaluation of three planetary boundary layer schemes in the WRF model. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 49, 18311844.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huang, H., and Chalabi Z. S. , 1996: Use of time-series analysis to model and forecast wind speed. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 56, 311322.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Janjić, Z. I., 1990: The step-mountain coordinate: Physical package. Mon. Wea. Rev., 118, 14291443.

  • Janjić, Z. I., 1994: The step-mountain Eta coordinate model: Further developments of the convection, viscous layer, and turbulence closure schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 122, 927945.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kain, J. S., 2004: The Kain–Fritsch convective parameterization: An update. J. Appl. Meteor., 43, 170181.

  • Lu, C., Yuan H. , Schwartz B. , and Benjamin S. , 2007: Short-range forecast using time-lagged ensembles. Wea. Forecasting, 22, 580595.

  • Mlawer, E. J., Taubman S. J. , Brown P. D. , Iacono M. J. , and Clough S. A. , 1997: Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. J. Geophys. Res., 102 (D14), 16 66316 682.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nakanishi, M., and Niino H. , 2009: Development of an improved turbulence closure model for the atmospheric boundary layer. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 87, 905909.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Olson, J. B., and Brown J. M. , 2009: A comparison of two Mellor–Yamada-based PBL schemes in simulating a hybrid barrier jet. Preprints, 23rd Conf. on Weather Analysis and Forecasting/19th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Omaha, NE, Amer. Meteor. Soc., JP1.13. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/154321.pdf.]

  • Pleim, J. E., 2007a: A combined local and nonlocal closure model for the atmospheric boundary layer. Part I: Model description and testing. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 46, 13831395.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pleim, J. E., 2007b: A combined local and nonlocal closure model for the atmospheric boundary layer. Part II: Application and evaluation in a mesoscale meteorological model. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 46, 13961409.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pleim, J. E., and Xiu A. , 1995: Development and testing of a surface flux and planetary boundary layer model for application in mesoscale models. J. Appl. Meteor., 34, 1632.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schreck, S., Lundquist J. , and Shaw W. , 2008: U.S. Department of Energy workshop report: Research needs for wind resource characterization. NREL Rep. TP-500-43521, 107 pp.

  • Shin, H. H., and Hong S. , 2011: Intercomparison of planetary boundary-layer parametrizations in the WRF model for a single day from CASES-99. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 139, 261281.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stensrud, D. J., 2007: Parameterization Schemes: Keys to Understanding Numerical Weather Prediction Models. Cambridge University Press, 459 pp.

  • Stensrud, D. J., Bao J.-W. , and Warner T. T. , 2000: Using initial condition and model physics perturbations in short-range ensemble simulations of mesoscale convective systems. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, 20772107.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stull, R. B., 1988: An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology. Kluwer Academic, 666 pp.

  • Sukoriansky, S., Galperin B. , and Perov V. , 2005: Application of a new spectral theory of stable stratified turbulence to the atmospheric boundary layer over sea ice. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 117, 231257.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Theis, S. E., Hense A. , and Damrath U. , 2005: Probabilistic precipitation forecasts from a deterministic model: A pragmatic approach. Meteor. Appl., 12, 257268.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Walser, A., Lüthi D. , and Schär C. , 2004: Predictability of precipitation in a cloud-resolving model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 560577.

  • Wei, M., Toth Z. , Wobus R. , Zhu Y. , Bishop C. H. , and Wang X. , 2006: Ensemble transform Kalman filter-based ensemble perturbations in an operational global prediction system at NCEP. Tellus, 58A, 2844.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Whitaker, J. S., and Loughe A. F. , 1998: The relationship between ensemble spread and ensemble mean skill. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126, 32923302.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilks, D. S., 2006: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences. 2nd ed. Academic Press, 627 pp.

  • Wood, N., 2000: Wind flow over complex terrain: A historical perspective and the prospect for large-eddy modeling. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 96, 1132.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xiu, A., and Pleim J. E. , 2001: Development of a land surface model. Part I: Application in a mesoscale meteorological model. J. Appl. Meteor., 40, 192209.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zack, J. W., 2007: Optimization of wind power production forecast performance during critical periods for grid management. Windpower 2007, Los Angeles, CA, Amer. Wind Energy Association, 12 pp.

  • Zhang, D.-L., and Zheng W.-Z. , 2004: Diurnal cycles of surface winds and temperatures as simulated by five boundary layer parameterizations. J. Appl. Meteor., 43, 157169.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 29 29 29
PDF Downloads 30 30 30

A WRF Ensemble for Improved Wind Speed Forecasts at Turbine Height

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
  • | 2 Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences, and Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
Restricted access

Abstract

The Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) with 10-km horizontal grid spacing was used to explore improvements in wind speed forecasts at a typical wind turbine hub height (80 m). An ensemble consisting of WRF model simulations with different planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes showed little spread among the individual ensemble members for forecasting wind speed. A second configuration using three random perturbations of the Global Forecast System model produced more spread in the wind speed forecasts, but the ensemble mean possessed a higher mean absolute error (MAE). A third ensemble of different initialization times showed larger model spread, but model MAE was not compromised. In addition, postprocessing techniques such as training of the model for the day 2 forecast based on day 1 results and bias correction based on observed wind direction are examined. Ramp event forecasting was also explored. An event was considered to be a ramp event if the change in wind power was 50% or more of total capacity in either 4 or 2 h or less. This was approximated using a typical wind turbine power curve such that any wind speed increase or decrease of more than 3 m s−1 within the 6–12 m s−1 window (where power production varies greatly) in 4 h or less would be considered a ramp. Model MAE, climatology of ramp events, and causes were examined. All PBL schemes examined predicted fewer ramp events compared to the observations, and model forecasts for ramps in general were poor.

Corresponding author address: Adam J. Deppe, 741 Hawkmount Circle, Apt. B, Chesterfield, MO 63017. E-mail: ajdeppe@gmail.com

Abstract

The Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) with 10-km horizontal grid spacing was used to explore improvements in wind speed forecasts at a typical wind turbine hub height (80 m). An ensemble consisting of WRF model simulations with different planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes showed little spread among the individual ensemble members for forecasting wind speed. A second configuration using three random perturbations of the Global Forecast System model produced more spread in the wind speed forecasts, but the ensemble mean possessed a higher mean absolute error (MAE). A third ensemble of different initialization times showed larger model spread, but model MAE was not compromised. In addition, postprocessing techniques such as training of the model for the day 2 forecast based on day 1 results and bias correction based on observed wind direction are examined. Ramp event forecasting was also explored. An event was considered to be a ramp event if the change in wind power was 50% or more of total capacity in either 4 or 2 h or less. This was approximated using a typical wind turbine power curve such that any wind speed increase or decrease of more than 3 m s−1 within the 6–12 m s−1 window (where power production varies greatly) in 4 h or less would be considered a ramp. Model MAE, climatology of ramp events, and causes were examined. All PBL schemes examined predicted fewer ramp events compared to the observations, and model forecasts for ramps in general were poor.

Corresponding author address: Adam J. Deppe, 741 Hawkmount Circle, Apt. B, Chesterfield, MO 63017. E-mail: ajdeppe@gmail.com
Save