Ensemble-Based Storm Surge Forecasting Models

Amin Salighehdar Hanlon Financial Systems Laboratory, Financial Engineering Division, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey

Search for other papers by Amin Salighehdar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ziwen Ye Hanlon Financial Systems Laboratory, Financial Engineering Division, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey

Search for other papers by Ziwen Ye in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Mingzhe Liu Hanlon Financial Systems Laboratory, Financial Engineering Division, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey

Search for other papers by Mingzhe Liu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ionut Florescu Hanlon Financial Systems Laboratory, Financial Engineering Division, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey

Search for other papers by Ionut Florescu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Alan F. Blumberg Davidson Laboratory, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey

Search for other papers by Alan F. Blumberg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Accurate prediction of storm surge is a difficult problem. Most forecast systems produce multiple possible forecasts depending on the variability in weather conditions, possible temperature levels, winds, etc. Ensemble modeling techniques have been developed with the stated purpose of obtaining the best forecast (in some specific sense) from the individual forecasts. In this work a statistical methodology of evaluating the performance of multiple ensemble forecasting models is developed. The methodology is applied to predicting storm surge in the New York Harbor area. Data from three hurricane events collected from multiple locations in the New York Bay area are used. The methodology produces three key findings for the particular test data used. First, it is found that even the simplest possible way of creating an ensemble produces results superior to those of any single forecast. Second, for the data used and the events under study the methodology did not interact with any event at any location studied. Third, based on the methodology results for the data studied selecting the best-performing ensemble models for each specific location may be possible.

© 2017 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Dr. Ionut Florescu, ifloresc@stevens.edu

Abstract

Accurate prediction of storm surge is a difficult problem. Most forecast systems produce multiple possible forecasts depending on the variability in weather conditions, possible temperature levels, winds, etc. Ensemble modeling techniques have been developed with the stated purpose of obtaining the best forecast (in some specific sense) from the individual forecasts. In this work a statistical methodology of evaluating the performance of multiple ensemble forecasting models is developed. The methodology is applied to predicting storm surge in the New York Harbor area. Data from three hurricane events collected from multiple locations in the New York Bay area are used. The methodology produces three key findings for the particular test data used. First, it is found that even the simplest possible way of creating an ensemble produces results superior to those of any single forecast. Second, for the data used and the events under study the methodology did not interact with any event at any location studied. Third, based on the methodology results for the data studied selecting the best-performing ensemble models for each specific location may be possible.

© 2017 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Dr. Ionut Florescu, ifloresc@stevens.edu
Save
  • Avila, L. A., and J. Cangialosi, 2012: Tropical cyclone report—Hurricane Irene (AL092011): August 21–28, 2011. National Hurricane Center, 45 pp., http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL092011_Irene.pdf.

  • Cheng, W. Y., and W. J. Steenburgh, 2007: Strengths and weaknesses of MOS, running-mean bias removal, and Kalman filter techniques for improving model forecasts over the western United States. Wea. Forecasting, 22, 13041318, doi:10.1175/2007WAF2006084.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cheung, K. K., 2001: A review of ensemble forecasting techniques with a focus on tropical cyclone forecasting. Meteor. Appl., 8, 315332, doi:10.1017/S1350482701003073.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CPC, 2012: Background information: The North Atlantic hurricane season. Climate Prediction Center, http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/outlooks/background_information.shtml.

  • Di Liberto, T., B. A. Colle, N. Georgas, A. F. Blumberg, and A. A. Taylor, 2011: Verification of a multimodel storm surge ensemble around New York City and Long Island for the cool season. Wea. Forecasting, 26, 922939, doi:10.1175/WAF-D-10-05055.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Florescu, I., 2014: Probability and Stochastic Processes. John Wiley and Sons, 576 pp.

  • Florescu, I., and C. A. Tudor, 2013: Handbook of Probability. John Wiley and Sons, 472 pp.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Gel, Y. R., 2007: Comparative analysis of the local observation-based (LOB) method and the nonparametric regression-based method for gridded bias correction in mesoscale weather forecasting. Wea. Forecasting, 22, 12431256, doi:10.1175/2007WAF2006046.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Georgas, N., and Coauthors, 2016: The Stevens Flood Advisory System: Operational H3e flood forecasts for the greater New York/New Jersey metropolitan region. Int. J. Saf. Secur. Eng., 6, 648662, doi:10.2495/SAFE-V6-N3-648-662.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Glahn, H. R., and D. A. Lowry, 1972: The use of model output statistics (MOS) in objective weather forecasting. J. Appl. Meteor., 11, 12031211, doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1972)011<1203:TUOMOS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gneiting, T., A. E. Raftery, A. H. Westveld III, and T. Goldman, 2005: Calibrated probabilistic forecasting using ensemble model output statistics and minimum CRPS estimation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 10981118, doi:10.1175/MWR2904.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heemink, A. W., 1986: Storm surge prediction using Kalman filtering. Rijkswaterstaat Tech. Rep., 194 pp., https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:8a7c65f5-f8f5-4033-b796-adaef2eb39a7.

  • Hoeting, J. A., D. Madigan, A. E. Raftery, and C. T. Volinsky, 1999: Bayesian model averaging: A tutorial. Stat. Sci., 14, 382417.

  • Houtekamer, P. L., and H. L. Mitchell, 2001: A sequential ensemble Kalman filter for atmospheric data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 123137, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0123:ASEKFF>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kalman, R. E., 1960: A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. J. Basic Eng., 82, 3545, doi:10.1115/1.3662552.

  • Leutbecher, M., and T. N. Palmer, 2008: Ensemble forecasting. J. Comput. Phys., 227, 35153539, doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2007.02.014.

  • Lewis, J. M., 2005: Roots of ensemble forecasting. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 18651885, doi:10.1175/MWR2949.1.

  • Mass, C. F., D. Ovens, K. Westrick, and B. A. Colle, 2002: Does increasing horizontal resolution produce more skillful forecasts? Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 83, 407430, doi:10.1175/1520-0477(2002)083<0407:DIHRPM>2.3.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McLachlan, G., and T. Krishnan, 2007: The EM Algorithm and Extensions. John Wiley and Sons, 400 pp.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Neter, J., M. H. Kutner, C. J. Nachtsheim, and W. Wasserman, 1996: Applied Linear Statistical Models. 4th ed. Irwin, 720 pp.

  • Ott, E., and Coauthors, 2004: A local ensemble Kalman filter for atmospheric data assimilation. Tellus, 56A, 415428, doi:10.3402/tellusa.v56i5.14462.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pérez, B., and Coauthors, 2012: ENSURF: Multi-model sea level forecast–implementation and validation results for the IBIROOS and western Mediterranean regions. Ocean Sci., 8, 211226, doi:10.5194/os-8-211-2012.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Raftery, A. E., T. Gneiting, F. Balabdaoui, and M. Polakowski, 2005: Using Bayesian model averaging to calibrate forecast ensembles. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 11551174, doi:10.1175/MWR2906.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rice, D., 2013: Hurricane Sandy, drought cost US $100 billion. USA Today, http://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2013/01/24/global-disaster-report-sandy-drought/1862201/.

  • Roulston, M., and L. A. Smith, 2003: Combining dynamical and statistical ensembles. Tellus, 55A, 1630, doi:10.3402/tellusa.v55i1.12082.

  • Sloughter, J. M., T. Gneiting, and A. E. Raftery, 2010: Probabilistic wind speed forecasting using ensembles and Bayesian model averaging. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., 105, 2535, doi:10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08615.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilson, L. J., S. Beauregard, A. E. Raftery, and R. Verret, 2007: Calibrated surface temperature forecasts from the Canadian Ensemble Prediction System using Bayesian model averaging. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 13641385, doi:10.1175/MWR3347.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1826 1281 42
PDF Downloads 386 37 5