A Features-Based Assessment of the Evolution of Warm Season Precipitation Forecasts from the HRRR Model over Three Years of Development

Janice L. Bytheway Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

Search for other papers by Janice L. Bytheway in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Christian D. Kummerow Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

Search for other papers by Christian D. Kummerow in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Curtis Alexander NOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory/Global Systems Division, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Curtis Alexander in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The High Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model has been the National Weather Service’s (NWS) operational rapid update model since 2014. The HRRR has undergone continual development, including updates to the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model core, the data assimilation system, and the various physics packages in order to better represent atmospheric processes, with updated operational versions of the model being implemented approximately every spring. Given the model’s intent for use in convective precipitation forecasting, it is of interest to examine how forecasts of warm season precipitation have changed as a result of the continued model upgrades. A features-based assessment is performed on the first 6 h of HRRR quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPFs) from the 2013, 2014, and 2015 versions of the model over the U.S. central plains in an effort to understand how specific aspects of QPF performance have evolved as a result of continued model development. Significant bias changes were found with respect to precipitation intensity. Model upgrades that increased boundary layer stability and reduced the strength of the latent heating perturbations in the data assimilation were found to reduce southward biases in convective initiation, reduce the tendency for the model to overestimate heavy rainfall, and improve the representation of convective initiation.

Current affiliation: Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Boulder, Colorado.

© 2017 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Janice L. Bytheway, janice.bytheway@noaa.gov

Abstract

The High Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model has been the National Weather Service’s (NWS) operational rapid update model since 2014. The HRRR has undergone continual development, including updates to the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model core, the data assimilation system, and the various physics packages in order to better represent atmospheric processes, with updated operational versions of the model being implemented approximately every spring. Given the model’s intent for use in convective precipitation forecasting, it is of interest to examine how forecasts of warm season precipitation have changed as a result of the continued model upgrades. A features-based assessment is performed on the first 6 h of HRRR quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPFs) from the 2013, 2014, and 2015 versions of the model over the U.S. central plains in an effort to understand how specific aspects of QPF performance have evolved as a result of continued model development. Significant bias changes were found with respect to precipitation intensity. Model upgrades that increased boundary layer stability and reduced the strength of the latent heating perturbations in the data assimilation were found to reduce southward biases in convective initiation, reduce the tendency for the model to overestimate heavy rainfall, and improve the representation of convective initiation.

Current affiliation: Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Boulder, Colorado.

© 2017 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Janice L. Bytheway, janice.bytheway@noaa.gov
Save
  • Benjamin, S., and Coauthors, 2013: Data assimilation and model updates in the 2013 Rapid Refresh (RAP) and High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) analysis and forecast systems. NCEP/EMC Meeting, Washington, DC, NCEP/EMC/Model Evaluation Group, http://ruc.noaa.gov/pdf/NCEP_HRRR_RAPv2_6jun2013-Benj-noglob.pdf.

  • Benjamin, S., and Coauthors, 2016: A North American hour assimilation and model forecast cycle: The Rapid Refresh. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 16691694, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-15-0242.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bytheway, J. L., and C. D. Kummerow, 2015: Toward an object-based assessment of high- resolution forecasts of long-lived convective precipitation in the central US. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 7, 12481264, doi:10.1002/2015MS000497.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cai, H. and R. E. Dumais Jr., 2015: Object-based evaluation of a numerical weather prediction model’s performance through forecast storm characteristic analysis. Wea. Forecasting, 30, 14511468, doi:10:1175/WAF-D-15-0008.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davis, C., B. G. Brown, and R. Bullock, 2006: Object-based verification of precipitation forecasts. Part I: Methodology and application to mesoscale rain areas. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 17721784, doi:10.1175/MWR3145.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davis, C., B. G. Brown, R. Bullock, and J. Halley-Gotway, 2009: The Method for Object- Based Diagnostic Evaluation (MODE) applied to numerical forecasts from the 2005 NSSL/SPC Spring Program. Wea. Forecasting, 24, 12521267, doi:10.1175/2009WAF2222241.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ESRL, 2015: High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR). Earth System Research Laboratory, https://rapidrefresh.noaa.gov/hrrr/.

  • Lin, Y., and K. Mitchell, 2005: The NCEP Stage II/IV hourly precipitation analyses: Development and applications. 19th Conf. on Hydrology, San Diego, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., P1.2, https://ams.confex.com/ams/Annual2005/techprogram/paper_83847.htm.

  • Nelson, B. R., O. P. Prat, D.-J. Seo, and E. Habib, 2016: Assessment and implications of NCEP Stage IV quantitative precipitation estimates for product intercomparisons. Wea. Forecasting, 31, 371394, doi:10.1175/WAF-D-14-00112.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Prat, O. P., and B. R. Nelson, 2015: Evaluation of precipitation estimates over CONUS derived from satellite, radar, and rain gauge data sets at daily to annual scales (2002–2012). Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 20372056, doi:10.5194/hess-19-2037-2015.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smalley, M., T. L’Ecuyer, M. Lebsock, and J. Haynes, 2014: A comparison of precipitation occurrence from the NCEP Stage IV QPE product and the CloudSat cloud profiling radar. J. Hydrometeor., 15, 444458, doi:10.1175/JHM-D-13-048.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thompson, G., and T. Eidhammer, 2014: A study of aerosol impacts on clouds and precipitation development in a large winter cyclone. J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 36363658, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-13-0305.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thompson, G., P. R. Field, R. M. Rasmussen, and W. D. Hall, 2008: Explicit forecasts of winter precipitation using an improved bulk microphysics scheme. Part II: Implementation of a new snow parameterization. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 50955115, doi:10.1175/2008MWR2387.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1184 484 32
PDF Downloads 395 102 10