Considerations for Phased-Array Radar Data Use within the National Weather Service

Katie A. Wilson School of Meteorology, and Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Katie A. Wilson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Pamela L. Heinselman NOAA/OAR/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Pamela L. Heinselman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Charles M. Kuster Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Charles M. Kuster in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Thirty National Weather Service forecasters worked with 1-, 2-, and 5-min phased-array radar (PAR) volumetric updates for a variety of weather events during the 2015 Phased Array Radar Innovative Sensing Experiment. Exposure to each of these temporal resolutions during simulated warning operations meant that these forecasters could provide valuable feedback on how rapidly updating PAR data impacted their warning decision processes. To capture this feedback, forecasters participated in one of six focus groups. A series of open-ended questions guided focus group discussions, and forecasters were encouraged to share their experiences and opinions from the experiment. Transcriptions of focus group discussions were thematically analyzed, and themes belonging to one of two groups were identified: 1) forecasters’ use of rapidly updating PAR data during the experiment and 2) how forecasters envision rapidly updating PAR data being integrated into warning operations. Findings from this thematic analysis are presented in this paper, and to illustrate these findings from the forecasters’ perspectives, dialogue that captures the essence of their discussions is shared. The identified themes provide motivation to integrate rapidly updating radar data into warning operations and highlight important factors that need to be addressed for the successful integration of these data.

© 2017 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Katie Wilson, katie.wilson@noaa.gov

Abstract

Thirty National Weather Service forecasters worked with 1-, 2-, and 5-min phased-array radar (PAR) volumetric updates for a variety of weather events during the 2015 Phased Array Radar Innovative Sensing Experiment. Exposure to each of these temporal resolutions during simulated warning operations meant that these forecasters could provide valuable feedback on how rapidly updating PAR data impacted their warning decision processes. To capture this feedback, forecasters participated in one of six focus groups. A series of open-ended questions guided focus group discussions, and forecasters were encouraged to share their experiences and opinions from the experiment. Transcriptions of focus group discussions were thematically analyzed, and themes belonging to one of two groups were identified: 1) forecasters’ use of rapidly updating PAR data during the experiment and 2) how forecasters envision rapidly updating PAR data being integrated into warning operations. Findings from this thematic analysis are presented in this paper, and to illustrate these findings from the forecasters’ perspectives, dialogue that captures the essence of their discussions is shared. The identified themes provide motivation to integrate rapidly updating radar data into warning operations and highlight important factors that need to be addressed for the successful integration of these data.

© 2017 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Katie Wilson, katie.wilson@noaa.gov
Save
  • Bowden, K. A., and P. L. Heinselman, 2016: A qualitative analysis of NWS forecasters’ use of phased-array radar data during severe hail and wind events. Wea. Forecasting, 31, 4355, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-15-0089.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bowden, K. A., P. L. Heinselman, D. M. Kingfield, and R. P. Thomas, 2015: Impacts of phased-array radar data on forecaster performance during severe hail and wind events. Wea. Forecasting, 30, 389404, doi:10.1175/WAF-D-14-00101.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cameron, J., 2010: Focusing on the focus group. Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography, I. Hay, Ed., 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, 152–172.

  • Chrisman, J. N., 2014: The continuing evolution of dynamic scanning. NEXRAD Now, No. 23, NOAA/NWS/Radar Operations Center, Norman, OK, 8–13.

  • Clarke, V., V. Braun, and N. Hayfield, 2015: Thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods, J. A. Smith, Ed., SAGE Publications, 222–248.

  • Heinselman, P. L., D. S. LaDue, and H. Lazrus, 2012: Exploring impacts of rapid-scan radar data on NWS warning decisions. Wea. Forecasting, 27, 10311044, doi:10.1175/WAF-D-11-00145.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heinselman, P. L., D. S. LaDue, D. M. Kingfield, and R. Hoffman, 2015: Tornado warning decisions using phased-array radar data. Wea. Forecasting, 30, 5778, doi:10.1175/WAF-D-14-00042.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Krueger, R. A., and M. A. Casey, 2015: Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 5th ed. SAGE Publications, 280 pp.

  • LaDue, D. S., P. L. Heinselman, and J. F. Newman, 2010: Strengths and limitations of current radar systems for two stakeholder groups in the southern plains. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 91, 899910, doi:10.1175/2009BAMS2830.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lazar, J., J. H. Feng, and H. Hochheiser, 2010: Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. John Wiley and Sons, 426 pp.

  • Wilson, K. A., P. L. Heinselman, C. M. Kuster, and D. M. Kingfield, 2017: Forecaster performance and workload: Does radar update time matter? Wea. Forecasting, 32, 253274, doi:10.1175/WAF-D-16-0157.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 860 364 36
PDF Downloads 364 96 9