A Probabilistic Tropical Cyclone Track Forecast Scheme Based on the Selective Consensus of Ensemble Prediction Systems

Xiping Zhang Shanghai Typhoon Institute, China Meteorological Administration, Shanghai, China

Search for other papers by Xiping Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Hui Yu Shanghai Typhoon Institute, China Meteorological Administration, Shanghai, China

Search for other papers by Hui Yu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Selective consensus and a grand ensemble based on an ensemble prediction system (EPS) have been found to be effective in improving deterministic tropical cyclone (TC) track forecasts, while little attention has been paid to quantitative applications of the forecast uncertainty information provided by EPSs. In this paper the forecast uncertainty information is evaluated for two operational EPSs and their grand ensemble. Then, a probabilistic TC track forecast scheme is proposed based on the selective consensus of the two EPSs; this scheme is composed of member picking, mean track shifting, and probability ellipses. The operational EPSs are from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF-EPS) and the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP-GEFS). Evaluation exhibits that the hit ratios of ECMWF-EPS are above 80% for the 70% probability ellipses at all lead times until 120 h and are used in the proposed scheme. The other components of the proposed scheme are about picking potentially good EPS members. A picking ratio of 1/2 is found to be the best choice, and the member-picking technique is used for the grand ensemble but only for lead times out to 48 h. For lead times longer than 48 h, all of the grand ensemble members are used in obtaining the mean track. The effectiveness of the proposed scheme shows a 10% improvement in the mean track forecast errors over the grand ensemble and a 4.5% improvement in the hit ratio of 70% probability ellipses over the ECMWF-EPS at 24 h, demonstrating its good potential to be applied in operations.

© 2017 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author address: Xiping Zhang, zhangxp@typhoon.org.cn

Abstract

Selective consensus and a grand ensemble based on an ensemble prediction system (EPS) have been found to be effective in improving deterministic tropical cyclone (TC) track forecasts, while little attention has been paid to quantitative applications of the forecast uncertainty information provided by EPSs. In this paper the forecast uncertainty information is evaluated for two operational EPSs and their grand ensemble. Then, a probabilistic TC track forecast scheme is proposed based on the selective consensus of the two EPSs; this scheme is composed of member picking, mean track shifting, and probability ellipses. The operational EPSs are from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF-EPS) and the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP-GEFS). Evaluation exhibits that the hit ratios of ECMWF-EPS are above 80% for the 70% probability ellipses at all lead times until 120 h and are used in the proposed scheme. The other components of the proposed scheme are about picking potentially good EPS members. A picking ratio of 1/2 is found to be the best choice, and the member-picking technique is used for the grand ensemble but only for lead times out to 48 h. For lead times longer than 48 h, all of the grand ensemble members are used in obtaining the mean track. The effectiveness of the proposed scheme shows a 10% improvement in the mean track forecast errors over the grand ensemble and a 4.5% improvement in the hit ratio of 70% probability ellipses over the ECMWF-EPS at 24 h, demonstrating its good potential to be applied in operations.

© 2017 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author address: Xiping Zhang, zhangxp@typhoon.org.cn
Save
  • Du, Y. G., L. B. Qi, and X. G. Cao, 2016: Selective ensemble-mean technique for tropical cyclone track forecast by using time-lagged ensemble and multi-centre ensemble in the western North Pacific. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 24522462, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2838.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dupont, T., M. Plu, P. Caroff, and G. Faure, 2011: Verification of ensemble-based uncertainty circles around tropical cyclone track forecasts. Wea. Forecasting, 26, 664676, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-11-00007.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goerss, J. S., 2007: Prediction of consensus tropical cyclone track forecast error. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 19851993, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3390.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goerss, J. S., C. R. Sampson, and J. M. Gross, 2004: A history of western North Pacific tropical cyclone track forecast skill. Wea. Forecasting, 19, 633638, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2004)019<0633:AHOWNP>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hamill, T. M., J. S. Whitaker, M. Fiorino, and S. G. Benjamin, 2011: Global ensemble predictions of 2009’s tropical cyclones initialized with an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 668688, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010MWR3456.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hamill, T. M., M. J. Brennan, B. Brown, M. DeMaria, E. N. Rappaport, and Z. Toth, 2012: NOAA’s future ensemble-based hurricane forecast products. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 93, 209220, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011BAMS3106.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • He, C. F., X. F. Zhi, Q. L. You, B. Song, and K. Fraedrich, 2015: Multi-model ensemble forecasts of tropical cyclones in 2010 and 2011 based on the Kalman filter method. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 127, 467479, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-015-0377-1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jolliffe, I. T., and D. B. Stephenson, 2003: Forecast Verification: A Practitioner’s Guide in Atmospheric Science. John Wiley and Sons, 157 pp.

  • Krishnamurti, T. N., C. M. Kishtawal, Z. Zhang, T. LaRow, D. Bachiochi, E. Williford, S. Gadgil, and S. Surendran, 2000: Multimodel ensemble forecasts for weather and seasonal climate. J. Climate, 13, 41964216, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<4196:MEFFWA>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Krishnamurti, T. N., S. Pattnaik, M. K. Biswas, E. Bensman, M. Kramer, N. Surgi, and T. V. Kumar, 2010: Hurricane forecasts with a mesoscale suite of models. Tellus, 62A, 633646, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2010.00469.x.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kunitsugu, M., 2012: Tropical cyclone information provided by the RSMC Tokyo-Typhoon Center. Trop. Cyclone Res. Rev., 1, 5159, https://doi.org/10.6057/2012TCRR01.06.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lei, X. T., and H. Yu, 2015: The progress of WMO Typhoon Landfall Forecast Demonstration Project (in Chinese). Adv. Meteor. Sci. Technol., 2, 1823.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lorenz, E. N., 1995: The Essence of Chaos. University of Washington Press, 227 pp.

  • Majumdar, S. J., and P. M. Finocchio, 2010: On the ability of global ensemble prediction systems to predict tropical cyclone track probabilities. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 659680, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009WAF2222327.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pedlosky, J., 1987: Geophysical Fluid Dynamics. 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, 710 pp.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Qi, L. B., H. Yu, and P. Y. Chen, 2014: Selective ensemble-mean technique for tropical cyclone track forecast by using ensemble prediction systems. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 140, 805813, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2196.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Qian, Q. F., C. A. Zhang, S. Z. Gao, L. Zhang, and L. Dong, 2014: The real-time correction technology research for typhoon ensemble track forecast (in Chinese). J. Trop. Meteor., 30, 905910.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sampson, C. R., J. S. Goerss, and A. J. Schrader, 2005: A consensus track forecast for Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclones. Aust. Meteor. Mag., 54, 115119.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Song, J. J., Y. Wang, and L. G. Wu, 2010: Trend discrepancies among three best track data sets of western North Pacific tropical cyclones. J. Geophys. Res., 115, D12128, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013058.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, C. X., 2014: Ensemble prediction of Typhoon Muifa’s track and intensity (in Chinese). J. Trop. Oceanogr., 33 (6), 4860.

  • Weigel, A. P., M. A. Liniger, and C. Appenzeller, 2008: Can multi-model combination really enhance the prediction skill of probabilistic ensemble forecasts? Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 134, 241260, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.210.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Whitaker, J. S., and A. F. Loughe, 1998: The relationship between ensemble spread and ensemble mean skill. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126, 32923302, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<3292:TRBESA>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WMO, 2015: TIGGE Cyclone Exchange. World Meteorological Organization, https://www.ecmwf.int/en/research/projects/tigge.

  • Xu, Q. Z., and S. Lu, 2004: Probability and Mathematical Statistics (in Chinese). Higher Education Press, 72 pp.

  • Yamaguchi, M., R. Sakai, M. Kyoda, T. Komori, and T. Kadowaki, 2009: Typhoon ensemble prediction system developed at the Japan Meteorological Agency. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 25922604, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR2697.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yamaguchi, M., T. Nakazawa, and S. Hoshino, 2012: On the relative benefits of a multi-centre grand ensemble for tropical cyclone track prediction in the western North Pacific. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 138, 20192029, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.1937.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ying, M., W. Zhang, H. Yu, X. Q. Lu, J. X. Feng, Y. X. Fan, Y. T. Zhu, and D. Q. Chen, 2014: An overview of the China Meteorological Administration tropical cyclone database. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 31, 287301, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00119.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yu, H., and Coauthors, 2012: Operational tropical cyclone forecast verification practice in the western North Pacific region. Trop. Cyclone Res. Rev., 1, 361372, https://doi.org/10.6057/2012TCRR03.06.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, H. B., X. F. Zhi, J. Chen, Y. N. Wang, and Y. Wang, 2015: Study of the modification of multi-model ensemble schemes for tropical cyclone forecasts. J. Trop. Meteor., 21, 389, http://www.cnki.net/kcms/doi/10.16555/j.1006-8775.2015.04.007.html.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, L., and X. F. Zhi, 2015: Multimodel consensus forecasting of low temperature and icy weather over central and southern China in early 2008. J. Trop. Meteor., 21, 6775, http://www.cnki.net/kcms/doi/10.16555/j.1006-8775.2015.01.007.html.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, X. P., and Q. Zhao, 2016: Dynamics of Rossby dipole with effect of scalar nonlinearity. Commun. Nonlinear Sci., 32, 137144, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2015.08.017.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, X. P., G. M. Chen, H. Yu, and Z. H. Zeng, 2015: Verification of ensemble track forecasts of tropical cyclones during 2014. Trop. Cyclone Res. Rev., 4 (2), 7987, https://doi.org/10.6057/2015TCRR02.04.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhi, X. F., H. X. Qi, Y. Q. Bai, and C. Z. Lin, 2012: A comparison of three kinds of multimodel ensemble forecast techniques based on the TIGGE data. Acta Meteor. Sin., 26, 4151, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-012-0104-5.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2594 1603 56
PDF Downloads 933 159 10