Impact of UAS Global Hawk Dropsonde Data on Tropical and Extratropical Cyclone Forecasts in 2016

A. C. Kren Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies, University of Miami, and NOAA/Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory/Hurricane Research Division, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by A. C. Kren in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
L. Cucurull NOAA/Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory/Hurricane Research Division, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by L. Cucurull in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
H. Wang National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by H. Wang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

A preliminary investigation into the impact of dropsonde observations from the Global Hawk (GH) on tropical and extratropical forecasts is performed using the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS). Experiments are performed during high-impact weather events that were sampled as part of the NOAA Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Sensing Hazards with Operational Unmanned Technology (SHOUT) field campaigns in 2016: 1) three extratropical systems in February 2016 and 2) Hurricanes Matthew and Nicole in the western Atlantic. For these events, the benefits of GH observations under a satellite data gap scenario are also investigated. It is found that the assimilation of GH dropsondes reduces the track error for both Matthew and Nicole; the improvements are as high as 20% beyond 60 h. Additionally, the localized dropsondes reduce global forecast track error for four tropical cyclones by up to 9%. Results are mixed under a satellite gap scenario, where only Hurricane Matthew is improved from assimilated dropsondes. The improved storm track is attributed to a better representation of the steering flow and atmospheric midlevel pattern. For all cases, dropsondes reduce the root-mean-square error in temperature, relative humidity, wind, and sea level pressure by 3%–8% out to 96 h. Additional benefits from GH dropsondes are obtained for precipitation, with higher skill scores over the southeastern United States versus control forecasts of up to 8%, as well as for low-level parameters important for severe weather prediction. The findings from this study are preliminary and, therefore, more cases are needed for statistical significance.

© 2018 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: A. C. Kren, andrew.kren@noaa.gov

Abstract

A preliminary investigation into the impact of dropsonde observations from the Global Hawk (GH) on tropical and extratropical forecasts is performed using the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS). Experiments are performed during high-impact weather events that were sampled as part of the NOAA Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Sensing Hazards with Operational Unmanned Technology (SHOUT) field campaigns in 2016: 1) three extratropical systems in February 2016 and 2) Hurricanes Matthew and Nicole in the western Atlantic. For these events, the benefits of GH observations under a satellite data gap scenario are also investigated. It is found that the assimilation of GH dropsondes reduces the track error for both Matthew and Nicole; the improvements are as high as 20% beyond 60 h. Additionally, the localized dropsondes reduce global forecast track error for four tropical cyclones by up to 9%. Results are mixed under a satellite gap scenario, where only Hurricane Matthew is improved from assimilated dropsondes. The improved storm track is attributed to a better representation of the steering flow and atmospheric midlevel pattern. For all cases, dropsondes reduce the root-mean-square error in temperature, relative humidity, wind, and sea level pressure by 3%–8% out to 96 h. Additional benefits from GH dropsondes are obtained for precipitation, with higher skill scores over the southeastern United States versus control forecasts of up to 8%, as well as for low-level parameters important for severe weather prediction. The findings from this study are preliminary and, therefore, more cases are needed for statistical significance.

© 2018 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: A. C. Kren, andrew.kren@noaa.gov
Save
  • Aberson, S. D., 2011: The impact of dropwindsonde data from the THORPEX Pacific Area Regional Campaign and the NOAA hurricane field program on tropical cyclone forecasts in the Global Forecast System. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 26892703, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011MWR3634.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Aksoy, A., S. Lorsolo, T. Vukicevic, K. J. Sellwood, S. D. Aberson, and F. Zhang, 2012: The HWRF Hurricane Ensemble Data Assimilation System (HEDAS) for high-resolution data: The impact of airborne Doppler radar observations in an OSSE. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 18431862, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00212.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bishop, C. H., and Z. Toth, 1999: Ensemble transformation and adaptive observations. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 17481765, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<1748:ETAAO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Black, M., G. A. Wick, and R. E. Hood, 2014: Sensing hazards with operational unmanned technology: NOAA’s multi-year plan to deploy the NASA Global Hawk aircraft for high impact weather. 31st Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, San Diego, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 5A.7, https://ams.confex.com/ams/31Hurr/webprogram/Paper244777.html.

  • Braun, S. A., P. A. Newman, and G. M. Heymsfield, 2016: NASA’s Hurricane and Severe Storm Sentinel (HS3) investigation. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 97, 20852102, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00186.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brown, S. T., B. Lambrigtsen, R. F. Denning, T. Gaier, P. Kangaslahti, B. H. Lim, J. M. Tanabe, and A. B. Tanner, 2011: The high-altitude MMIC sounding radiometer for the Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle: Instrument description and performance. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 49, 32913301, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2125973.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Buizza, R., C. Cardinali, G. Kelly, and J.-N. Thépaut, 2007: The value of observations. II: The value of observations in singular-vector-based target areas. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133, 18171832, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.149.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Christophersen, H., A. Aksoy, J. Dunion, and K. Sellwood, 2017: The impact of NASA Global Hawk unmanned aircraft dropwindsonde observations on tropical cyclone track, intensity, and structure: Case studies. Mon. Wea. Rev., 145, 18171830, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0332.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Christophersen, H., A. Aksoy, J. Dunion, and S. Aberson, 2018a: Composite impact of Global Hawk unmanned aircraft dropwindsondes on tropical cyclone analyses and forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 146, 22972314, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-17-0304.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Christophersen, H., A. Aksoy, J. Dunion, S. Aberson, K. Sellwood, and B. Dahl, 2018b: Impact of Global Hawk dropsondes on tropical cyclone analyses and forecasts. 33rd Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, Ponte Vedra, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 8D.4, https://ams.confex.com/ams/33HURRICANE/webprogram/Paper338855.html.

  • Dole, R. M., and Coauthors, 2018: Advancing science and services during the 2015/16 El Niño: The NOAA El Niño Rapid Response field campaign. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 99, 9751001, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0219.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Earth Observing Laboratory, 1993: NCAR Airborne Vertical Atmospheric Profiling System (AVAPS). Earth Observing Laboratory, UCAR–NCAR, https://doi.org/10.5065/D66W9848.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • ECMWF, 2011: ECMWF’s operational model analysis, starting in 2011. National Center for Atmospheric Research Computational and Information Systems Laboratory Research Data Archive, accessed 22 August 2017, https://doi.org/10.5065/D6ZG6Q9F.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • English, J. M., A. C. Kren, and T. R. Peevey, 2018: Improving winter storm forecasts with Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs). Part 2: Evaluating a satellite gap with idealized and targeted dropsondes. Earth Space Sci., 5, 176196, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EA000350.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hamill, T. M., F. Yang, C. Cardinali, and S. J. Majumdar, 2013: Impact of targeted Winter Storm Reconnaissance dropwindsonde data on midlatitude numerical weather predictions. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 20582065, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-12-00309.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hock, T. F., and J. L. Franklin, 1999: The NCAR GPS dropwindsonde. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 80, 407420, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1999)080<0407:TNGD>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kleist, D., and K. Ide, 2015: An OSSE-based evaluation of hybrid variational–ensemble data assimilation for the NCEP GFS. Part II: 4DEnVar and hybrid variants. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 452470, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00350.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kren, A. C., H. Wang, J. M. English, T. R. Peevey, and L. Cucurull, 2016: Impact of Global Hawk data from the SHOUT-ENRR 2016 field campaign on an atmospheric river in the central North Pacific. First Int. Atmospheric Rivers Conf., La Jolla, CA, Center for Western Weather and Water Extremes, http://cw3e.ucsd.edu/ARconf2016/Program_Presentations/.

  • Langland, R. H., 2005: Issues in targeted observing. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 34093425, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.05.130.

  • Lin, Y., 2011: GCIP/EOP surface: Precipitation NCEP/EMC 4KM Gridded Data (GRIB) Stage IV data: Version 1.0. Earth Observing Laboratory, UCAR–NCAR, accessed 29 November 2016, http://data.eol.ucar.edu/dataset/21.093.

  • Majumdar, S., 2016: A review of targeted observations. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 97, 22872303, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00259.1.

  • Majumdar, S., and Coauthors, 2011: Targeted observations for improving numerical weather prediction: An overview. WWRP/THORPEX Publ. 15, 37 pp., www.wmo.int/pages/prog/arep/wwrp/new/documents/THORPEX_No_15.pdf.

  • Neiman, P. J., F. M. Ralph, G. A. Wick, J. D. Lundquist, and M. D. Dettinger, 2008: Meteorological characteristics and overland precipitation impacts of atmospheric rivers affecting the west coast of North America based on eight years of SSM/I satellite observations. J. Hydrometeor., 9, 2247, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JHM855.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rabier, F., and Coauthors, 2008: An update on THORPEX-related research in data assimilation and observing strategies. Nonlinear Processes Geophys., 15, 8194, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-15-81-2008.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ralph, F. M., and M. D. Dettinger, 2011: Storms, floods, and the science of atmospheric rivers. Eos, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, 92, 265272, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011EO320001.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ralph, F. M., P. J. Neiman, and G. A. Wick, 2004: Satellite and CALJET aircraft observations of atmospheric rivers over the eastern North Pacific Ocean during the winter of 1997/98. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 17211745, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<1721:SACAOO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sela, J., 2009: The implementation of the sigma pressure hybrid coordinate into the GFS. NCEP Office Note 461, 25 pp., http://www.lib.ncep.noaa.gov/ncepofficenotes/files/on461.pdf.

  • Sippel, J. A., K. L. Friedman, and V. Tallapragada, 2018: The impact of Global Hawk dropsondes on NCEP hurricane forecasts. 33rd Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, Ponte Vedra, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 8D.6, https://ams.confex.com/ams/33HURRICANE/webprogram/Paper338883.html.

  • Toth, Z., and Coauthors, 2000: Targeted observations at NCEP: Toward an operational implementation. Preprints, Fourth Symp. on Integrated Observing Systems, Long Beach, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 186–193.

  • Toth, Z., and Coauthors, 2002: Adaptive observations at NCEP: Past, present, and future. Symp. on Observations, Data Assimilation, and Probabilistic Prediction, Orlando, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 7.1, https://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/26036.pdf.

  • Wang, X., and T. Lei, 2014: GSI-based four-dimensional ensemble–variational (4DEnsVar) data assimilation: Formulation and single-resolution experiments with real data for the NCEP Global Forecast System. Mon. Wea. Rev., 142, 33033325, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00303.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wick, G., J. Dunion, and J. Walker, 2018a: Sensing hazards with operational unmanned technology: Impact study of Global Hawk unmanned aircraft system observations for hurricane forecasting, final report. NOAA Tech. Memo. OAR-UAS-002, 92 pp., ftp://ftp1.esrl.noaa.gov/et6/sat/shout/data_impact/TM_SHOUT_Impact_Assessment_FINAL.pdf.

  • Wick, G., T. F. Hock, P. J. Neiman, H. Vömel, M. L. Black, and J. R. Spackman, 2018b: The NCAR–NOAA Global Hawk dropsonde system. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 35, 15851604, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-17-0225.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilks, D. S., 2006: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences. 2nd ed. Academic Press, 627 pp.

  • Zhang, Y., Y. F. Xie, H. L. Wang, D. H. Chen, and Z. Toth, 2016: Ensemble transform sensitivity method for adaptive observations. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 33, 1020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-015-5031-9.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhu, Y., and R. E. Newell, 1998: A proposed algorithm for moisture fluxes from atmospheric rivers. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126, 725735, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<0725:APAFMF>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 978 393 45
PDF Downloads 616 79 7