Validation of Satellite Observations of Storm Damage to Cropland with Digital Photographs

Kevin Gallo NOAA/NESDIS/Center for Satellite Applications and Research, College Park, Maryland

Search for other papers by Kevin Gallo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Philip Schumacher NOAA/NWS Weather Forecast Office, Sioux Falls, South Dakota

Search for other papers by Philip Schumacher in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Josh Boustead NOAA/NWS Weather Forecast Office, Omaha, Nebraska

Search for other papers by Josh Boustead in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Alex Ferguson NOAA/NWS Weather Forecast Office, Amarillo, Texas

Search for other papers by Alex Ferguson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

ABSTRACT

Severe storm events that include hail and wind often cause widespread contiguous swaths of damage; however, their occurrence is typically documented at individual and disjointed locations. Satellite-derived products, such as the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), can provide a more spatially uniform look at the extent of these events, particularly in rural or remote areas. The utility of incorporating satellite-based products into the damage identification and documentation process was assessed through high-resolution ground surveys, which included digital photographs, to classify three levels of cropland damage for three severe hail/wind events occurring in the Great Plains during the summer of 2014. Pre- and postevent NDVI values at the photograph locations were calculated using surface reflectance values from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and grouped by damage severity level. In general, more severe crop damage displayed a lower NDVI in the postevent imagery compared to undamaged crops. Additionally, the difference in the median NDVI between the pre- and postevent images was statistically significant between the damage categories with similar trends observed across the three summertime events. Thus, satellite-derived products should be promoted as a valuable tool for the initial assessment of damage severity and extent to agricultural crops and should be integrated when possible into the current hazard documentation process as a supplement to the currently available point-based observations of storm damage.

Current affiliation: PEMDAS Technologies and Innovations, Alexandria, Virginia.

For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Kevin Gallo, kevin.p.gallo@noaa.gov

ABSTRACT

Severe storm events that include hail and wind often cause widespread contiguous swaths of damage; however, their occurrence is typically documented at individual and disjointed locations. Satellite-derived products, such as the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), can provide a more spatially uniform look at the extent of these events, particularly in rural or remote areas. The utility of incorporating satellite-based products into the damage identification and documentation process was assessed through high-resolution ground surveys, which included digital photographs, to classify three levels of cropland damage for three severe hail/wind events occurring in the Great Plains during the summer of 2014. Pre- and postevent NDVI values at the photograph locations were calculated using surface reflectance values from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and grouped by damage severity level. In general, more severe crop damage displayed a lower NDVI in the postevent imagery compared to undamaged crops. Additionally, the difference in the median NDVI between the pre- and postevent images was statistically significant between the damage categories with similar trends observed across the three summertime events. Thus, satellite-derived products should be promoted as a valuable tool for the initial assessment of damage severity and extent to agricultural crops and should be integrated when possible into the current hazard documentation process as a supplement to the currently available point-based observations of storm damage.

Current affiliation: PEMDAS Technologies and Innovations, Alexandria, Virginia.

For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Kevin Gallo, kevin.p.gallo@noaa.gov
Save
  • AppEEARS, 2018: Application for extracting and exploring analysis ready samples. Accessed 29 January 2018, https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/tools/appeears/.

  • Bell, J. R., and A. L. Molthan, 2016: Evaluation of approaches to identifying hail damage to crop vegetation using satellite imagery. J. Oper. Meteor., 4, 142159, https://doi.org/10.15191/nwajom.2016.0411.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bentley, M. L., T. L. Mote, and P. Thebpanya, 2002: Using Landsat to identify thunderstorm damage in agricultural regions. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 83, 363376, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477-83.3.363.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Blair, S. F., and Coauthors, 2017: High-resolution hail observations: Implications for NWS warning operations. Wea. Forecasting, 32, 11011119, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-16-0203.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Burgess, D., and Coauthors, 2014: 20 May 2013 Moore, Oklahoma, tornado: Damage survey and analysis. Wea. Forecasting, 29, 12291237, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-14-00039.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Changnon, S. A., D. Changnon, and S. D. Hilberg, 2009: Hailstorms across the nation: An atlas about hail and its damages. Illinois State Water Survey Rep., 92 pp.

  • Cintineo, J. L., T. M. Smith, V. Lakshmanan, H. E. Brooks, and K. L. Ortega, 2012: An objective high-resolution hail climatology of the contiguous United States. Wea. Forecasting, 27, 12351248, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-11-00151.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fricker, T., J. B. Elsner, P. Camp, and T. H. Jagger, 2014: Empirical estimates of kinetic energy from some recent U.S. tornadoes. Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 43404346, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060441.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gallo, K., T. Smith, K. Jungbluth, and P. Schumacher, 2012: Hail swaths observed from satellite data and their relation to radar and surface-based observations: A case study from Iowa in 2009. Wea. Forecasting, 27, 796802, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-11-00118.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gowravaram, S., H. Chao, A. L. Molthan, L. A. Schultz, J. R. Bell, P. Tian, and H. Flanagan, 2019: Evaluating the 22 June 2017 South Dakota hail damage using KHawk UAS: Accuracy quantification and cross validation with satellite imagery. Special Symp. on Meteorological Observations and Instrumentation, Phoenix, AZ, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 2.6, https://ams.confex.com/ams/2019Annual/webprogram/Paper351427.html.

  • Jedlovec, G. J., U. Nair, and S. L. Haines, 2006: Detection of storm damage tracks with EOS data. Wea. Forecasting, 21, 249267, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF923.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kingfield, D. M., and K. M. de Beurs, 2017: Landsat identification of tornado damage by land cover and an evaluation of damage recovery in forests. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 56, 965987, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0228.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Klimowski, B. A., M. R. Hjelmfelt, M. J. Bunkers, D. Sedlacek, and L. R. Johnson, 1998: Hailstorm damage observed from the GOES-8 satellite: The 5–6 July 1996 Butte–Meade storm. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126, 831834, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<0831:HDOFTG>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Loveland, T. R., and A. S. Belward, 1997: The IGBP-DIS global 1km land cover data set, DISCover: First results. Int. J. Remote Sens., 18, 32893295, https://doi.org/10.1080/014311697217099.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LPDAAC, 2018: Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center. Accessed 29 January 2018, https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/.

  • Molthan, A. L., J. E. Burks, K. M. McGrath, and F. J. LaFontaine, 2013: Multi-sensor examination of hail damage swaths for near real-time applications and assessment. J. Oper. Meteor., 1, 144156, https://doi.org/10.15191/nwajom.2013.0113.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Molthan, A. L., J. R. Bell, T. A. Cole, and J. E. Burks, 2014: Satellite-based identification of tornado damage tracks from the 27 April 2011 severe weather outbreak. J. Oper. Meteor., 2, 191208, https://doi.org/10.15191/nwajom.2014.0216.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NOAA, 2018a: Summary of natural hazard statistics for 2017 in the United States. Accessed 19 October 2018, http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/hazstats/sum17.pdf.

  • NOAA, 2018b: Natural hazard statistics. Accessed 27 June 2018, http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/hazstats.shtml.

  • NOAA, 2018c: Storm data. Accessed 29 January 2018, https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/IPS/sd/sd.html.

  • NOAA, 2018d: Storm events database. Accessed 29 January 2018, https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/.

  • NOAA, 2018e: Storm data FAQ page. Accessed 19 October 2018, https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/faq.jsp.

  • NOAA, 2018f: NOAA Virtual Lab, MRMS product guides. Accessed 29 January 2018, https://vlab.ncep.noaa.gov/web/wdtd/-/maximum-estimated-size-of-hail-mes-1?selectedFolder=562123.

  • Ortega, K. L., 2018: Evaluating multi-radar, multi-sensor products for surface hail-fall diagnosis. E-J. Severe Storms Meteor., 13 (1), 136.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ortega, K. L., T. M. Smith, K. L. Manross, A. G. Kolodziej, K. A. Scharfenberg, A. Witt, and J. J. Gourley, 2009: The Severe Hazards Analysis and Verification Experiment. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 90, 15191530, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2815.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Parker, M. D., I. C. Ratcliffe, and G. M. Henebry, 2005: The July 2003 Dakota hailswaths: Creation, characteristics, and possible impacts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 12411260, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2914.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rouse, J. W., R. H. Haas, J. A. Schell, and D. W. Deering, 1974: Monitoring Vegetation Systems in the Great Plains with ERTS (Earth Resources Technology Satellite). Proc. Third Earth Resources Technology Satellite Symp., Greenbelt, MD, NASA GSFC, 309–317.

  • SAS, 2017a: SAS/QC 14.3 user’s guide: The CAPABILITY procedure. Accessed 21 June 2018, 373 pp., http://documentation.sas.com/api/docsets/qcug/14.3/content/capability.pdf?locale=en#nameddest=qcug_capability_sect042.

  • SAS, 2017b: SAS/STAT 14.3 user’s guide: The NPAR1WAY procedure. Accessed 2 February 2018, 80 pp., http://documentation.sas.com/api/docsets/statug/14.3/content/npar1way.pdf?locale=en#nameddest=statug_npar1way_overview.

  • Schmit, T. J., P. Griffith, M. M. Gunshor, J. M. Daniels, S. J. Goodman, and W. J. Lebair, 2017: A closer look at the ABI on the GOES-R series. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 98, 681698, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00230.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Segele, Z. T., D. J. Stensrud, I. C. Ratcliffe, and G. M. Henebry, 2005: Influence of a hailstreak on boundary layer evolution. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 942960, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2897.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, T. M., and Coauthors, 2016: Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor (MRMS) severe weather and aviation products: Initial operating capabilities. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 97, 16171630, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00173.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stout, G. E., R. Blackmer, and K. E. Wilk, 1960: Hail studies on Illinois relating to cloud physics. Physics of Precipitation, Geophys. Monogr., Vol. 5, Amer. Geophys. Union, 369–381.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Witt, A., M. D. Eilts, G. J. Stumpf, J. T. Johnson, E. D. Mitchell, and K. W. Thomas, 1998a: An enhanced hail detection algorithm for the WSR-88D. Wea. Forecasting, 13, 286303, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1998)013<0286:AEHDAF>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Witt, A., M. D. Eilts, G. J. Stumpf, E. D. Mitchell, J. T. Johnson, and K. W. Thomas, 1998b: Evaluating the performance of WSR-88D severe storm detection algorithms. Wea. Forecasting, 13, 513518, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1998)013<0513:ETPOWS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yuan, M., M. Dickens-Micozzi, and M. Magsig, 2002: Analysis of tornado damage tracks from the 3 May tornado outbreak using multispectral satellite imagery. Wea. Forecasting, 17, 382398, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2002)017<0382:AOTDTF>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2001 1444 44
PDF Downloads 595 74 8