Aircraft Icing Study Using Integrated Observations and Model Data

Faisal Boudala Observation Based Research Section, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Search for other papers by Faisal Boudala in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
George A. Isaac Weather Impacts Consulting Incorporated, Barrie, Ontario, Canada

Search for other papers by George A. Isaac in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Di Wu Observation Based Research Section, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Search for other papers by Di Wu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Light (LGT) to moderate (MOD) aircraft icing (AI) is frequently reported at Cold Lake, Alberta, but forecasting AI has been a big challenge. The purpose of this study is to investigate and understand the weather conditions associated with AI based on observations in order to improve the icing forecast. To achieve this goal, Environment and Climate Change Canada in cooperation with the Department of National Defence deployed a number of ground-based instruments that include a microwave radiometer, a ceilometer, disdrometers, and conventional present weather sensors at the Cold Lake airport (CYOD). A number of pilot reports (PIREPs) of icing at Cold Lake during the 2016/17 winter period and associated observation data are examined. Most of the AI events were LGT (76%) followed by MOD (20%) and occurred during landing and takeoff at relatively warm temperatures. Two AI intensity algorithms have been tested based on an ice accumulation rate (IAR) assuming a cylindrical shape moving with airspeed υa of 60 and 89.4 m s−1, and the Canadian numerical weather prediction model forecasts. It was found that the algorithms IAR2 with υa = 89.4 m s−1 and IAR1 with υa = 60 m s−1 underestimated (overestimated) the LGT (MOD) icing events, respectively. The algorithm IAR2 with υa = 60 m s−1 appeared to be more suitable for forecasting LGT icing. Over all, the hit rate score was 0.33 for the 1200 UTC model run and 0.6 for 0000 UTC run for both algorithms, but based on the individual icing intensity scores, the IAR2 did better than IAR1 for forecasting LGT icing events.

© 2019 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Dr. Faisal Boudala, faisal.boudala@canada.ca

Abstract

Light (LGT) to moderate (MOD) aircraft icing (AI) is frequently reported at Cold Lake, Alberta, but forecasting AI has been a big challenge. The purpose of this study is to investigate and understand the weather conditions associated with AI based on observations in order to improve the icing forecast. To achieve this goal, Environment and Climate Change Canada in cooperation with the Department of National Defence deployed a number of ground-based instruments that include a microwave radiometer, a ceilometer, disdrometers, and conventional present weather sensors at the Cold Lake airport (CYOD). A number of pilot reports (PIREPs) of icing at Cold Lake during the 2016/17 winter period and associated observation data are examined. Most of the AI events were LGT (76%) followed by MOD (20%) and occurred during landing and takeoff at relatively warm temperatures. Two AI intensity algorithms have been tested based on an ice accumulation rate (IAR) assuming a cylindrical shape moving with airspeed υa of 60 and 89.4 m s−1, and the Canadian numerical weather prediction model forecasts. It was found that the algorithms IAR2 with υa = 89.4 m s−1 and IAR1 with υa = 60 m s−1 underestimated (overestimated) the LGT (MOD) icing events, respectively. The algorithm IAR2 with υa = 60 m s−1 appeared to be more suitable for forecasting LGT icing. Over all, the hit rate score was 0.33 for the 1200 UTC model run and 0.6 for 0000 UTC run for both algorithms, but based on the individual icing intensity scores, the IAR2 did better than IAR1 for forecasting LGT icing events.

© 2019 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Dr. Faisal Boudala, faisal.boudala@canada.ca
Save
  • Baumgardner, D., G. Kok, W. Dawson, D. O’Connor, and R. Newton, 2002: A new ground based precipitation spectrometer: The Meteorological Particle Sensor (MPS). 11th Conference on Cloud Physics, Ogden, Utah, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 8.6, https://ams.confex.com/ams/11AR11CP/webprogram/Paper41834.html.

  • Bélair, S., J. Mailhot, C. Girard, and P. Vaillancourt, 2005: Boundary-layer and shallow cumulus clouds in a medium-range forecast of a large-scale weather system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 19381960, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2958.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bernstein, B. C., F. McDonough, M. Politovich, B. G. Brown, T. P. Ratvasky, D. R. Miller, C. Wolff, and G. M. Cunning, 2005: Current icing potential: Algorithm description and comparison with aircraft observations. J. Appl. Meteor., 44, 969986, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2246.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boudala, F. S., G. A. Isaac, R. Crawford, and J. Reid, 2012: Parameterization of runway visual range as a function of visibility: application in numerical weather prediction models. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 29, 177191, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-11-00021.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boudala, F. S., G. A. Isaac, R. Rasmussen, S. G. Cober, and B. Scott, 2014: Comparisons of snowfall measurements in complex terrain made during the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver. Pure Appl. Geophys., 171, 113127, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-012-0610-5.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boudala, F. S., G. A. Isaac, P. Filman, R. Crawford, and D. Hudak, 2017: Performance of emerging technologies for measuring solid and liquid precipitation in cold climate as compared to the traditional manual gauges. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 34, 167184, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-16-0088.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bringi, V., M. Thurai, and D. Baumgardner, 2018: Raindrop fall velocities from an optical array probe and 2-D video disdrometer. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 13771384, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1377-2018.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cober, S., and G. Isaac, 2012: Characteristics of aircraft icing environments with supercooled large drops for application to commercial aircraft certification. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 51, 265284, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-11-022.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cober, S. G., G. A. Isaac, and J. W. Strapp, 2001: Characterizations of aircraft icing environments that include supercooled large drops. J. Appl. Meteor., 40, 19842002, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<1984:COAIET>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cober, S., B. Bernstein, R. Jeck, E. Hill, G. Isaac, J. Riley, and A. Shah, 2009: Data and analysis for the development of an engineering standard for supercooled large drop conditions. FAA Tech. Rep. DOT/FAA/AR-09/10, 89 pp., http://www.tc.faa.gov/its/worldpac/techrpt/ar0910.pdf.

  • DMT, 2009: Data analysis user guide—Chapter 1: Single particle light scattering. DOC-0222, Rev A, Droplet Measurement Technologies, 44 pp., http://www.dropletmeasurement.com/sites/default/files/ManualsGuides/Data%20Analysis%20Guide/DOC-0222%20Rev%20A%20Data%20Analysis%20Guide%20Ch%201.pdf.

  • Ebell, K., U. Lohnert, S. Crewell, and D. D. Turner, 2010: 2010: On characterizing the error in a remotely sensed liquid water content profile. Atmos. Res., 98, 5768, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.06.002.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Finstad, J. K., E. P. Lozowski, and E. M. Gates, 1988: A computational investigation of water droplets trajectories. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 5, 160171, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1988)005<0160:ACIOWD>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Guan, H., S. G. Cober, G. A. Isaac, A. Tremblay, and A. Méthot, 2002: Comparison of three cloud forecast schemes with in situ aircraft measurements. Wea. Forecasting, 17, 12261235, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2002)017<1226:COTCFS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Isaac, G. A., and Coauthors, 2005: First results from the Alliance Icing Research Study II. AIAA 43rd Aerospace Science Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, AIAA, 2005-0252, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2005-252.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Jeck, R. K., 2001: A history and interpretation of aircraft icing intensity definitions and FAA rules for operating in icing conditions. FAA Rep. DOT/FAA/AR-01/91, FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center, 43 pp., http://www.tc.faa.gov/its/worldpac/techrpt/ar01-91.pdf.

  • Knollenberg, R., 1970: The optical array: An alternative to scattering or extinction for airborne particle size determination. J. Appl. Meteor., 9, 86103, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1970)009<0086:TOAAAT>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Loffler-Mang, M., and J. Joss, 2000: An optical disdrometer for measuring size and velocity of hydrometeors. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 17, 130139, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2000)017<0130:AODFMS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Loffler-Mang, M., and U. B. Lahak, 2001: Estimation of the equivalent radar reflectivity factor from measured snow size spectra. J. Appl. Meteor., 40, 843849, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<0843:EOTERR>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mailhot, J., and S. Bélair, 2002: An examination of a unified cloudiness-turbulence scheme with various types of cloudy boundary layers. Preprints, 15th Conf. on Boundary Layer and Turbulence, Wageningen, Netherlands, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 215–218.

  • Mazin, I. P., A. V. Korolev, A. Heymsfield, G. A. Isaac, and S. G. Cober, 2001: Thermodynamics of icing cylinder for measurements of liquid water content in supercooled clouds. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 18, 543558, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018<0543:TOICFM>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Milbrandt, J. A., and M. K. Yau, 2005a: A multimoment bulk microphysics parameterization. Part I: Analysis of the role of the spectral shape parameter. J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 30513064, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3534.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Milbrandt, J. A., and M. K. Yau, 2005b: A multimoment bulk microphysics parameterization. Part II: A proposed three-moment closure and scheme description. J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 30653081, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3535.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Milbrandt, J. A., S. Bélair, M. Faucher, M. Vallée, M. L. Carrera, and A. Glazer, 2016: The Pan-Canadian High Resolution (2.5 km) Deterministic Prediction System. Wea. Forecasting, 31, 17911816, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-16-0035.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Newton, D. W., 1978: An integrated approach to the problem of aircraft icing. J. Aircr., 15, 374380, https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58372.

  • Pek, J., A. C. M. Wong, and O. C. Y. Wong, 2017: Confidence intervals for the mean of non-normal distribution: Transform or not to transform. Open J. Stat., 7, 405421, https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2017.73029.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Politovich, M. K., 2009: Predicting inflight aircraft icing intensity a surrogate for severity. FAA Tech Doc., 21 pp., https://www.aviationweather.gov/static/adds/docs/icing/How_to_properly_use_an_Icing_Forecast.pdf.

  • Solheim, F., J. Godwin, E. Westwater, Y. Han, S. Keihm, K. Marsh, and R. Ware, 1998: Radiometric profiling of temperature, water vapor, and liquid water using various inversion methods. Radio Sci., 33, 393404, https://doi.org/10.1029/97RS03656.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Spiegel, J. K., P. Zieger, N. Bukowiecki, E. Hammer, E. Weingartner, and W. Eugster, 2012: Evaluating the capabilities and uncertainties of droplet measurements for the fog droplet spectrometer (FM-100). Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 22372260, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-2237-2012.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stanski, H. R., L. J. Wilson, and W. R. Burrows, 1989: Survey of common verification methods in meteorology. World Weather Watch Tech. Rep. 8, WMO/TD-358, 114 pp.

  • Thompson, G., M. K. Politovich, and R. M. Rasmussen, 2017: A numerical weather model’s ability to predict characteristics of aircraft icing environment. Wea. Forecasting, 32, 207221, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-16-0125.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thompson, J. K., 1956: All-weather flight concern of the pilot and weather forecaster. Aeronaut. Eng. Rev., 15, 66.

  • Thurai, M., P. Gatlin, V. N. Bringi, W. Petersen, P. Kennedy, B. Notaros, and L. Carey, 2017: Toward completing the raindrops size spectrum: Case studies involving 2D-video disdrometer, droplet spectrometer, and polarmetric radar measurements. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 56, 877896, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0304.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Turner, D. D., S. A. Clough, J. C. Liljegren, E. E. Clothiaux, K. E. Cady-Pereira, and K. L. Gaustad, 2007: Retrieving liquid water path and perceptible water vapor from the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) microwave radiometers. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 45, 36803690, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2007.903703.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ware, R., D. Cimini, E. Campos, G. Giuliani, S. Albers, M. Nelson, S. E. Koch, P. Joe, and S. Cober, 2013: Thermodynamic and liquid profiling during the 2010 Winter Olympics. Atmos. Res., 132–133, 278290, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.05.019.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 770 139 5
PDF Downloads 904 152 10