Verification of Road Surface Temperature Forecasts Assimilating Data from Mobile Sensors

Virve Karsisto Finnish Meteorological Institute, and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Virve Karsisto in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Lauri Lovén University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

Search for other papers by Lauri Lovén in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

ABSTRACT

The advances in communication technologies have made it possible to gather road condition information from moving vehicles in real time. However, data quality must be assessed and its effects on the road weather forecasts analyzed before using the new data as input in forecasting systems. Road surface temperature forecasts assimilating mobile observations in the initialization were verified in this study. In addition to using measured values directly, different statistical corrections were applied to the mobile observations before using them in the road weather model. The verification results are compared to a control run without surface temperature measurements and to a control run that utilized interpolated values from surrounding road weather stations. Simulations were done for the period 12 October 2017–30 April 2018 for stationary road weather station points in southern Finland. Road surface temperature observations from the stations were used in the forecast verification. According to the results, the mobile observations improved the accuracy of road surface temperature forecasts when compared to the first control run. The statistical correction methods had a positive effect on forecast accuracy during the winter, but the effect varied during spring when the daily temperature variation was strong. In the winter season, the forecasts based on the interpolated road surface temperature values and the forecasts utilizing mobile observations with statistical correction had comparable accuracy. However, the tested area has high road weather station density and not much elevation variation, so results might have been different in more varying terrain.

© 2019 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Virve Karsisto, virve.karsisto@fmi.fi

ABSTRACT

The advances in communication technologies have made it possible to gather road condition information from moving vehicles in real time. However, data quality must be assessed and its effects on the road weather forecasts analyzed before using the new data as input in forecasting systems. Road surface temperature forecasts assimilating mobile observations in the initialization were verified in this study. In addition to using measured values directly, different statistical corrections were applied to the mobile observations before using them in the road weather model. The verification results are compared to a control run without surface temperature measurements and to a control run that utilized interpolated values from surrounding road weather stations. Simulations were done for the period 12 October 2017–30 April 2018 for stationary road weather station points in southern Finland. Road surface temperature observations from the stations were used in the forecast verification. According to the results, the mobile observations improved the accuracy of road surface temperature forecasts when compared to the first control run. The statistical correction methods had a positive effect on forecast accuracy during the winter, but the effect varied during spring when the daily temperature variation was strong. In the winter season, the forecasts based on the interpolated road surface temperature values and the forecasts utilizing mobile observations with statistical correction had comparable accuracy. However, the tested area has high road weather station density and not much elevation variation, so results might have been different in more varying terrain.

© 2019 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Virve Karsisto, virve.karsisto@fmi.fi
Save
  • Aalto, J., P. Pirinen, J. Heikkinen, and A. Venäläinen, 2013: Spatial interpolation of monthly climate data for Finland: Comparing the performance of kriging and generalized additive models. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 112, 99111, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-012-0716-9.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Allegretti, M., and S. Bertoldo, 2014: Cars as a diffuse network of road-environment monitoring nodes. Wireless Sensor Network, 6, 184191, https://doi.org/10.4236/wsn.2014.69018.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bengtsson, L., and Coauthors, 2017: The HARMONIE–AROME model configuration in the ALADIN–HIRLAM NWP system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 145, 19191935, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0417.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bogren, J., T. Gustavsson, M. Karlsson, and U. Postgård, 2000: The impact of screening on road surface temperature. Meteor. Appl., 7, 97104, https://doi.org/10.1017/S135048270000150X.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brutsaert, W., 1984: Evaporation into the Atmosphere: Theory, History, and Applications. D. Reidel Publishing Company, 299 pp.

  • Chapman, L., and J. E. Thornes, 2006: A geomatics-based road surface temperature prediction model. Sci. Total Environ., 360, 6880, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.08.025.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cressie, N., 1993: Statistics for Spatial Data. John Wiley & Sons, 900 pp.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Crevier, L. P., and Y. Delage, 2001: A new model for road-condition forecasting in Canada. J. Appl. Meteor., 40, 20262037, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<2026:MANMFR>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Efron, B., and R. J. Tibshirani, 1993: An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, 436 pp.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Gustavsson, T., 1999: Thermal mapping—A technique for road climatological studies. Meteor. Appl., 6, 385394, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1350482799001334.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Haavasoja, T., J. Nylander, and P. Nylander, 2012: Experiences of Mobile Road Condition Monitoring. 16th Int. Road Weather Conf. (SIRWEC), Helsinki, Finland, SIRWEC, http://www.teconer.fi/downloads/SIRWEC_2012_Experiences%20of%20Mobile%20RCM_ID14.pdf.

  • Hogan, R. J., and I. B. Mason, 2011: Deterministic forecasts of binary events. Forecast Verification: A Practitioner’s Guide in Atmospheric Science, 2nd ed. I. T. Jolliffe and D. B. Stephenson, Eds., John Wiley and Sons, 31–59, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119960003.ch3.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Kangas, M., M. Heikinheimo, and M. Hippi, 2015: RoadSurf—A modelling system for predicting road weather and road surface conditions. Meteor. Appl., 22, 544533, https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1486.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Karsisto V., 2018: Road surface temperature forecast study HKI-TKU 0708. Zenodo.org, accessed 25 September 2018, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1434636.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Karsisto V., P. Nurmi, M. Kangas, M. Hippi, C. Fortelius, S. Niemelä, and H. Järvinen, 2016: Improving road weather model forecasts by adjusting the radiation input. Meteor. Appl., 23, 503513, https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1574.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Karsisto V., S. Tijm, and P. Nurmi, 2017: Comparing the performance of two road weather models in the Netherlands. Wea. Forecasting, 32, 9911006, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-16-0158.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lovén, L., V. Karsisto, H. Järvinen, M. J. Sillanpää, T. Leppänen, E. Peltonen, S. Pirttikangas, and J. Riekki, 2019: Mobile road weather sensor calibration by sensor fusion and linear mixed models. PLoS ONE, 14, e0211702 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211702.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Patankar, S. V., 1980: Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow. McGraw-Hill, 197 pp.

  • Petty, K. R., and W. P. Mahoney, 2007: Weather applications and products enabled through vehicle infrastructure integration (VII). U.S Department of Transportation, 124 pp.

  • Riede, H., A. Bouras, Z. Paschalidi, J. W. Acevedo-Valenciaa, T. Kratzsch, and J. Nachtigall, 2018: Flowkar: Using high-resolution data from vehicle sensors to improve operational weather products. 19th Conf. of Standing International Road Weather Commission (SIRWEC), Smolenice, Slovakia, SIRWEC, 95–96.

  • Robinson, G. K., 1991: That BLUP is a good think: The estimation of random effects. Stat. Sci., 6, 1551, https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177011926.

  • Shao, J., P. J. Lister, G. D. Hart, and H. B. Pearson, 1996: Thermal mapping: Reliability and repeatability. Meteor. Appl., 3, 325330, https://doi.org/10.1002/met.5060030405.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shao, J., J. C. Swanson, R. Patterson, P. J. Lister, and A. N. McDonald, 1997: Variation of winter road surface temperature due to topography and application of thermal mapping. Meteor. Appl., 4, 131137, https://doi.org/10.1017/S135048279700042X.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sukuvaara, T., K. Mäenpää, S. Kantomaa, D. Stepanova, M. Hippi, and V. Karsisto, 2018: Intelligent traffic enabled advanced road weather infrastructures in Arctic conditions. European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2018, Vol. 20, EGU2018-95, Vienna, Austria, European Geosciences Union, https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2018/EGU2018-95.pdf.

  • Thornes, J. E., 1991: Thermal mapping and road-weather information systems for highway engineers. Highway Meteorology, A. H. Perry and L. J. Symons, Eds., E & FN Spon, 39–67.

  • Vaisala, 2001: Vaisala Road/runway surface and depth sensor DRS511. Tech. Note, 2 pp., https://www.vaisala.com/sites/default/files/documents/WEA-RDS-G-DRS511%20Datasheet.pdf.

  • West, B. T., K. B. Welch, and A. T. Galecki, 2007: Linear Mixed Models: A Practical Guide Using Statistical Software. Chapman & Hall/CRC, 374 pp., https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3167.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 791 209 12
PDF Downloads 646 163 12