Improving Afternoon Thunderstorm Prediction over Taiwan through 3DVar-Based Radar and Surface Data Assimilation

I-Han Chen Central Weather Bureau, Taipei, Taiwan
Meteorologisches Institute, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany

Search for other papers by I-Han Chen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jing-Shan Hong Central Weather Bureau, Taipei, Taiwan

Search for other papers by Jing-Shan Hong in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ya-Ting Tsai Central Weather Bureau, Taipei, Taiwan

Search for other papers by Ya-Ting Tsai in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Chin-Tzu Fong Central Weather Bureau, Taipei, Taiwan

Search for other papers by Chin-Tzu Fong in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Recently, the Central Weather Bureau of Taiwan developed a WRF- and WRF data assimilation (WRFDA)-based convective-scale data assimilation system to increase model predictability toward high-impact weather. In this study, we focus on afternoon thunderstorm (AT) prediction and investigate the following questions: 1) Is the designation of a rapid update cycle strategy with a blending scheme effective? 2) Can surface data assimilation contribute positively to AT prediction under the complex geography of Taiwan island? 3) What is the relative importance between radar and surface observation to AT prediction? 4) Can we increase the AT forecast lead time in the morning through data assimilation? Consecutive ATs from 30 June to 8 July 2017 are investigated. Five experiments, each having 240 continuous cycles, are designed. Results show that employing continuous cycles with a blending scheme mitigates model spinup compared with downscaled forecasts. Although there are few radar echoes before AT initiation, assimilating radar observations is still crucial since it largely corrects model errors in cycles. However, assimilating surface observations is more important compared with radar in terms of extending forecast lead time in the morning. Either radar or surface observations contribute positively, and assimilating both has the highest QPF score. Assimilating surface observations systematically improves surface wind and temperature predictions based on 240 cases. A case study demonstrates that the model can capture the AT initiation and development by assimilating surface and radar observations. Its cold pool and outflow boundary prediction are also improved. In this case, the assimilation of surface wind and water vapor in the morning contributes more compared with temperature and pressure.

© 2020 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Jing-Shan Hong, rfs14@cwb.gov.tw

Abstract

Recently, the Central Weather Bureau of Taiwan developed a WRF- and WRF data assimilation (WRFDA)-based convective-scale data assimilation system to increase model predictability toward high-impact weather. In this study, we focus on afternoon thunderstorm (AT) prediction and investigate the following questions: 1) Is the designation of a rapid update cycle strategy with a blending scheme effective? 2) Can surface data assimilation contribute positively to AT prediction under the complex geography of Taiwan island? 3) What is the relative importance between radar and surface observation to AT prediction? 4) Can we increase the AT forecast lead time in the morning through data assimilation? Consecutive ATs from 30 June to 8 July 2017 are investigated. Five experiments, each having 240 continuous cycles, are designed. Results show that employing continuous cycles with a blending scheme mitigates model spinup compared with downscaled forecasts. Although there are few radar echoes before AT initiation, assimilating radar observations is still crucial since it largely corrects model errors in cycles. However, assimilating surface observations is more important compared with radar in terms of extending forecast lead time in the morning. Either radar or surface observations contribute positively, and assimilating both has the highest QPF score. Assimilating surface observations systematically improves surface wind and temperature predictions based on 240 cases. A case study demonstrates that the model can capture the AT initiation and development by assimilating surface and radar observations. Its cold pool and outflow boundary prediction are also improved. In this case, the assimilation of surface wind and water vapor in the morning contributes more compared with temperature and pressure.

© 2020 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Jing-Shan Hong, rfs14@cwb.gov.tw
Save
  • Askelson, M. A., J.-P. Aubagnac, and J. M. Straka, 2000: An adaptation of the Barnes filter applied to the objective analysis of radar data. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, 30503082, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<3050:AAOTBF>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barker, D., W. Huang, Y.-R. Guo, A. J. Bourgeois, and Q. N. Xiao, 2004: A three-dimensional variational data assimilation system for MM5: Implementation and initial results. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 897914, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<0897:ATVDAS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barker, D., and Coauthors, 2012: The Weather Research and Forecasting Model’s Community Variational/Ensemble Data Assimilation System: WRFDA. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 93, 831843, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00167.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Benjamin, S. G., and Coauthors, 2004: An hourly assimilation–forecast cycle: The RUC. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 495518, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<0495:AHACTR>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chang, H.-L., B. G. Brown, P.-S. Chu, Y.-C. Liou, and W.-H. Wang, 2017: Nowcast guidance of afternoon convection initiation for Taiwan. Wea. Forecasting, 32, 18011817, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-16-0224.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chang, P.-L., P.-F. Lin, B. J.-D. Jou, and J. Zhang, 2009: An application of reflectivity climatology in constructing radar hybrid scans over complex terrain. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 26, 13151327, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1162.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, C.-S., Y.-L. Chen, C.-L. Liu, P.-L. Lin, and W.-C. Chen, 2007: Statistics of heavy rainfall occurrences in Taiwan. Wea. Forecasting, 22, 9811002, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF1033.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, M., and X.-Y. Huang, 2006: Digital filter initialization for MM5. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 12221236, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3117.1.

  • Chen, T.-C., M.-C. Yen, J.-D. Tsay, C.-C. Liao, and E. S. Takle, 2014: Impact of afternoon thunderstorms on the land–sea breeze in the Taipei basin during summer: An experiment. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 53, 17141738, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-098.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, T.-C., J.-D. Tsay, and E. S. Takle, 2016: A forecast advisory for afternoon thunderstorm occurrence in the Taipei basin during summer developed from diagnostic analysis. Wea. Forecasting, 31, 531552, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-15-0082.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, Y.-L., and J. Li, 1995: Characteristics of surface airflow and pressure patterns over the island of Taiwan during TAMEX. Mon. Wea. Rev., 123, 695716, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1995)123<0695:COSAAP>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davies, T., 2016: Dynamical downscaling and variable resolution in limited-area models. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 209222, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2913.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Deng, X., and R. Stull, 2007: Assimilating surface weather observations from complex terrain into a high-resolution numerical weather prediction model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 10371054, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3332.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gao, J., and D. J. Stensrud, 2012: Assimilation of reflectivity data in a convective-scale, cycled 3DVAR framework with hydrometeor classification. J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 10541065, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-0162.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ha, J.-H., and D.-K. Lee, 2012: Effect of length scale tuning of background error in WRF-3DVAR system on assimilation of high-resolution surface data for heavy rainfall simulation. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 29, 11421158, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-012-1183-z.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hirt, M., G. C. Craig, S. A. K. Schäfer, J. Savre, and R. Heinze, 2020: Cold-pool-driven convective initiation: Using causal graph analysis to determine what convection-permitting models are missing. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 22052227, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3788.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoekstra, S., K. Klockow, R. Riley, J. Brotzge, H. Brooks, and S. Erickson, 2011: A preliminary look at the social perspective of warn-on-forecast: Preferred tornado warning lead time and the general public’s perceptions of weather risks. Wea. Climate Soc., 3, 128140, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011WCAS1076.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hong, S.-Y., Y. Noh, and J. Dudhia, 2006: A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 23182341, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3199.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hsiao, L.-F., D.-S. Chen, Y.-H. Kuo, Y.-R. Guo, T.-C. Yeh, J.-S. Hong, C.-T. Fong, and C.-S. Lee, 2012: Application of WRF 3DVAR to operational typhoon prediction in Taiwan: Impact of outer loop and partial cycling approaches. Wea. Forecasting 27, 12491263, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-11-00131.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hsiao, L.-F., and Coauthors, 2015: Blending of global and regional analyses with a spatial filter: Application to typhoon prediction over the western North Pacific Ocean. Wea. Forecasting, 30, 754770, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-14-00047.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Iacono, M. J., J. S. Delamere, E. J. Mlawer, M. W. Shephard, S. A. Clough, and W. D. Collins, 2008: Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D13103, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009944.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Johnson, R. H., and J. F. Bresch, 1991: Diagnosed characteristics of precipitation systems over Taiwan during the May–June 1987 TAMEX. Mon. Wea. Rev., 119, 25402557, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1991)119<2540:DCOPSO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jou, B. J.-D., 1994: Mountain-originated mesoscale precipitation system in northern Taiwan: A case study 21 June 1991. Terr. Atmos. Oceanic Sci., 5, 169, https://doi.org/10.3319/TAO.1994.5.2.169(TAMEX).

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kain, J. S., 2004: The Kain–Fritsch convective parameterization: An update. J. Appl. Meteor., 43, 170181, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2004)043<0170:TKCPAU>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lin, P.-F., P.-L. Chang, B. J.-D. Jou, J. W. Wilson, and R. D. Roberts, 2011: Warm season afternoon thunderstorm characteristics under weak synoptic-scale forcing over Taiwan island. Wea. Forecasting, 26, 4460, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010WAF2222386.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lorenc, A. C., 2003: The potential of the ensemble Kalman filter for NWP—A comparison with 4D-Var. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 129, 31833203, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.02.132.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miao, J.-E., and M.-J. Yang, 2020: A modeling study of the severe afternoon thunderstorm event at Taipei on 14 June 2015: The roles of sea breeze, microphysics, and terrain. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 98, 129152, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2020-008.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Michalakes, J., J. Dudhia, D. Gill, T. Henderson, J. Klemp, W. Skamarock, and W. Wang, 2004: The Weather Research and Forecast Model: Software architecture and performance. Proc. 11th ECMWF Workshop on the Use of High Performance Computing in Meteorology, Reading, United Kingdom, ECMWF, 25–29.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Miyoshi, T., and M. Kunii, 2011: The local ensemble transform Kalman filter with the Weather Research and Forecasting model: Experiments with real observations. Pure Appl. Geophys., 169, 321333, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-011-0373-4.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Parrish, D. F., and J. C. Derber, 1992: The National Meteorological Center’s spectral statistical-interpolation analysis system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 120, 17471763, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1992)120<1747:TNMCSS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Peters, K., C. Hohenegger, and D. Klocke, 2019: Different representation of mesoscale convective systems in convection-permitting and convection-parameterizing NWP models and its implications for large-scale forecast evolution. Atmosphere, 10, 503, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10090503.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pu, Z., H. Zhang, and J. Anderson, 2013: Ensemble Kalman filter assimilation of near-surface observations over complex terrain: Comparison with 3DVAR for short-range forecasts. Tellus, 65A, 19620, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v65i0.19620.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roberts, N. M., and H. W. Lean, 2008: Scale-selective verification of rainfall accumulations from high-resolution forecasts of convective events. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 7897, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007MWR2123.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rotunno, R., J. B. Klemp, and M. L. Weisman, 1988: A theory for strong, long-lived squall lines. J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 463485, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1988)045<0463:ATFSLL>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sokol, Z., and P. Zacharov, 2012: Nowcasting of precipitation by an NWP model using assimilation of extrapolated radar reflectivity. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 138, 10721082, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.970.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stensrud, D. J., and Coauthors, 2009: Convective-scale warn-on-forecast system: A vision for 2020. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 90, 14871500, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2795.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sun, J., 2005: Initialization and numerical forecasting of a supercell storm observed during STEPS. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 793813, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2887.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sun, J., and N. A. Crook, 1998: Dynamical and microphysical retrieval from Doppler radar observations using a cloud model and its adjoint. Part II: Retrieval experiments of an observed Florida convective storm. J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 835852, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055<0835:DAMRFD>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sun, J., M. Chen, and Y. Wang, 2010: A frequent-updating analysis system based on radar, surface, and mesoscale model data for the Beijing 2008 forecast demonstration project. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 17151735, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010WAF2222336.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sun, J., S. B. Trier, Q. Xiao, M. L. Weisman, H. Wang, Z. Ying, M. Xu, and Y. Zhang, 2012: Sensitivity of 0–12-h warm-season precipitation forecasts over the central United States to model initialization. Wea. Forecasting, 27, 832855, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-11-00075.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sun, J., H. Wang, W. Tong, Y. Zhang, C.-Y. Lin, and D. Xu, 2016: Comparison of the impacts of momentum control variables on high-resolution variational data assimilation and precipitation forecasting. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 149169, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-14-00205.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sun, J., Y. Zhang, J. Ban, J.-S. Hong, and C.-Y. Lin, 2020: Impact of combined assimilation of radar and rainfall data on short-term heavy rainfall prediction: A case study. Mon. Wea. Rev., 148, 22112232, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-19-0337.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tao, W.-K., J. Simpson, and M. McCumber, 1989: An ice-water saturation adjustment. Mon. Wea. Rev., 117, 231235, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<0231:AIWSA>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tao, W.-K., D. Wu, S. Lang, J. Chern, C. Peters-Lidard, A. Fridlind, and T. Matsui, 2016: High-resolution NU-WRF simulations of a deep convective-precipitation system during MC3E: Further improvements and comparisons between Goddard microphysics schemes and observations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 121, 12781305, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023986.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tewari, M., and Coauthors, 2004: Implementation and verification of the unified Noah land surface model in the WRF model. 20th Conf. on Weather Analysis and Forecasting/16th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Seattle, WA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 14.2a, https://ams.confex.com/ams/84Annual/techprogram/paper_69061.htm.

  • Tong, W., G. Li, J. Sun, X. Tang, and Y. Zhang, 2016: Design strategies of an hourly update 3DVAR data assimilation system for improved convective forecasting. Wea. Forecasting, 31, 16731695, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-16-0041.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tsai, C.-C., S.-C. Yang, and Y.-C. Liou, 2014: Improving quantitative precipitation nowcasting with a local ensemble transform Kalman filter radar data assimilation system: Observing system simulation experiments. Tellus, 66A, 21804, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v66.21804.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, H., J. Sun, S. Fan, and X.-Y. Huang, 2013: Indirect assimilation of radar reflectivity with WRF 3D-Var and its impact on prediction of four summertime convective events. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 52, 889902, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-12-0120.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wu, W.-S., R. J. Purser, and D. F. Parrish, 2002: Three-dimensional variational analysis with spatially inhomogeneous covariances. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 29052916, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<2905:TDVAWS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yang X., 2005: Analysis blending using a spatial filter in grid-point model coupling. HIRLAM Newsletter, No. 48, 49–55, http://www.hirlam.org/index.php/hirlam-documentation/doc_view/517-hirlam-newsletter-no-48-article10-yang.

  • Zhang, J., and Coauthors, 2009: High-resolution QPE system for Taiwan. Data Assimilation for Atmospheric, Oceanic and Hydrologic Applications, S. K. Park and L. Xu, Eds., Springer-Verlag, 147–162.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 323 0 0
Full Text Views 2155 1276 424
PDF Downloads 1113 234 7