ABSTRACT
Research has shown that dual-polarization (dual-pol) data currently available to National Weather Service forecasters could provide important information about changes in a storm’s structure and intensity. Despite these new data being used gradually by forecasters more over time, they are still not used extensively to inform warning decisions because it is unclear how to apply dual-pol radar data to specific warning decisions. To address this knowledge gap, rapid-update (i.e., volumetric update time of 2.3 min or less) radar data of 45 storms in Oklahoma are used to examine one dual-pol signature, known as the differential reflectivity (ZDR) column, to relate this signature to warning decisions. Base data (i.e., ZDR, reflectivity, velocity) are used to relate ZDR columns to storm intensity, radar signatures such as upper-level reflectivity cores, and scientific conceptual models used by forecasters during the warning decision process. Analysis shows that 1) differences exist between the ZDR columns of severe and nonsevere storms, 2) ZDR columns develop and evolve prior to upper-level reflectivity cores, 3) rapid-update radar data provide a more complete picture of ZDR column evolution than traditional-update radar data (i.e., volumetric update time of about 5 min), and 4) ZDR columns provide a clearer and earlier indication of changes in updraft strength compared to reflectivity signatures. These findings suggest that ZDR columns can be used to inform warning decisions, increase warning confidence, and potentially increase warning lead time especially when they are integrated into existing conceptual models about a storm’s updraft and intensity.
Supplemental information related to this paper is available at the Journals Online website: https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-20-0083.s1.
© 2020 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).
