The Influence of Wildfire Smoke on Cloud Microphysics during the September 2020 Pacific Northwest Wildfires

Robert Conrick aDepartment of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by Robert Conrick in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Clifford F. Mass aDepartment of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by Clifford F. Mass in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Joseph P. Boomgard-Zagrodnik bWashington State University, Pullman, Washington

Search for other papers by Joseph P. Boomgard-Zagrodnik in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
David Ovens aDepartment of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by David Ovens in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

During late summer 2020, large wildfires over the Pacific Northwest produced dense smoke that impacted the region for an extended period. During this period of poor air quality, persistent low-level cloud coverage was poorly forecast by operational numerical weather prediction models, which dissipated clouds too quickly or produced insufficient cloud coverage extent. This deficiency raises questions about the influence of wildfire smoke on low-level clouds in the marine environment of the Pacific Northwest. This paper investigates the effects of wildfire smoke on the properties of low-level clouds, including their formation, microphysical properties, and dissipation. A case study from 12 to 14 September 2020 is used as a testbed to evaluate the impact of wildfire smoke on such clouds. Observations from satellites and surface observing sites, coupled with mesoscale model simulations, are applied to understand the influence of wildfire smoke during this event. Results indicate that the presence of thick smoke over Washington led to decreased temperatures in the lower troposphere, which enhanced low-level cloud coverage, with smoke particles altering the microphysical structure of clouds to favor high concentrations of small droplets. Thermodynamic changes due to smoke are found to be the primary driver of enhanced cloud lifetime during these events, with microphysical changes to clouds as a secondary contributing factor. However, both the thermodynamic and microphysical effects are necessary to produce a realistic simulation.

© 2021 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Robert Conrick, rconrick@uw.edu

Abstract

During late summer 2020, large wildfires over the Pacific Northwest produced dense smoke that impacted the region for an extended period. During this period of poor air quality, persistent low-level cloud coverage was poorly forecast by operational numerical weather prediction models, which dissipated clouds too quickly or produced insufficient cloud coverage extent. This deficiency raises questions about the influence of wildfire smoke on low-level clouds in the marine environment of the Pacific Northwest. This paper investigates the effects of wildfire smoke on the properties of low-level clouds, including their formation, microphysical properties, and dissipation. A case study from 12 to 14 September 2020 is used as a testbed to evaluate the impact of wildfire smoke on such clouds. Observations from satellites and surface observing sites, coupled with mesoscale model simulations, are applied to understand the influence of wildfire smoke during this event. Results indicate that the presence of thick smoke over Washington led to decreased temperatures in the lower troposphere, which enhanced low-level cloud coverage, with smoke particles altering the microphysical structure of clouds to favor high concentrations of small droplets. Thermodynamic changes due to smoke are found to be the primary driver of enhanced cloud lifetime during these events, with microphysical changes to clouds as a secondary contributing factor. However, both the thermodynamic and microphysical effects are necessary to produce a realistic simulation.

© 2021 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Robert Conrick, rconrick@uw.edu
Save
  • Achtemeier, G. L., 2002: “Super-Fog”—A combination of smoke and water vapor that produces zero visibility over roadways. 12th Joint Conf. on the Applications of Air Pollution Meteorology with A&WMA, Norfolk, VA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 20–24.

  • Ackerman, A. S., O. B. Toon, J. P. Taylor, D. W. Johnson, P. V. Hobbs, and R. J. Ferek, 2000: Effects of aerosols on cloud albedo: Evaluation of Twomey’s parameterization of cloud susceptibility using measurements of ship tracks. J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 26842695, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<2684:EOAOCA>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ahmadov, R., and Coauthors, 2017: Using VIIRS fire radiative power data to simulate biomass burning emissions, plume rise and smoke transport in a real-time air quality modeling system. 2017 IEEE Int. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp. (IGARSS), Fort Worth, TX, IEEE, https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2017.8127581.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Albrecht, B., 1989: Aerosols, cloud microphysics, and fractional cloudiness. Science, 245, 12271230, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.245.4923.1227.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Beck, J., and Coauthors, 2020: An evaluation of a hybrid, terrain-following vertical coordinate in the WRF-based RAP and HRRR models. Wea. Forecasting, 35, 10811096, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-19-0146.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Benjamin, S. G., and Coauthors, 2016: A North American hourly assimilation and model forecast cycle: The Rapid Refresh. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 16691694, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0242.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Blaylock B., J. Horel, and S. Liston, 2017: Cloud archiving and data mining of high resolution rapid refresh model output. Comput. Geosci., 109, 4350.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Christensen, M. W., W. Jones, and P. Stier, 2020: Aerosols enhance cloud lifetime and brightness along the stratus-to-cumulus transition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 17 59117 598, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921231117.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coakley, J. A., Jr., R. L. Bernstein, and P. A. Durkee, 1987: Effect of ship-stack effluents on cloud reflectivity. Science, 237, 10201022, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.237.4818.1020.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collins, J., A. N. Williams, C. H. Paxton, R. J. Davis, and N. M. Petro, 2009: Geographical, meteorological, and climatological conditions surrounding the 2008 Interstate-4 disaster in Florida. Pap. Appl. Geogr. Conf., 32, 153162.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Costantino, L., and F.-M. Bréon, 2013: Aerosol indirect effect on warm clouds over South-East Atlantic, from co-located MODIS and CALIPSO observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 6988, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-69-2013.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • David, A. T., J. E. Asarian, and F. K. Lake, 2018: Wildfire smoke cools summer river and stream water temperatures. Water Resour. Res., 54, 72737290, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022964.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ding, A. J., and Coauthors, 2016: Enhanced haze pollution by black carbon in megacities in China. Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 28732879, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL067745.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Duthon, P., M. Colomb, and F. Bernardin, 2020: Fog classification by their droplet size distributions: Application to the characterization of Cerema’s platform. Atmosphere, 11, 596, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11060596.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eck, T., B. Holben, I. Slutsker, A. Setzer, 1998: Measurements of irradiance attenuation and estimation of aerosol single scattering albedo for biomass burning aerosols in Amazonia. J. Geophys. Res., 103, 31 86531 878, https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD00399.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eldridge, R. G., 1961: A few fog drop-size distributions. J. Meteor., 18, 671676, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1961)018<0671:AFFDSD>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fovell, R. G., and A. Gallagher, 2020: Boundary layer and surface verification of the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh, version 3. Wea. Forecasting, 35, 22552278, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-20-0101.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Geiß, A., and Coauthors, 2017: Mixing layer height as an indicator for urban air quality? Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 29692988, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2969-2017.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gomez, S. L., and Coauthors, 2018: Southwestern U.S. biomass burning smoke hygroscopicity: The role of plant phenology, chemical composition, and combustion properties. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 123, 54165432, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD028162.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hobbs, P. V., and Coauthors, 2000: Emissions from ships with respect to their effects on clouds. J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 25702590, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<2570:EFSWRT>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hong, S. Y., Y. Noh, and J. Dudhia, 2006: A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 23182341, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3199.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Iacono, M. J., J. S. Delamere, E. J. Mlawer, M. W. Shephard, S. A. Clough, and W. D. Collins, 2008: Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D13103, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009944.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kim, J., C. Yun, C. K. Kim, Y. Kang, H. Kim, S. Lee, and S. Kim, 2017: Evaluation of WRF model-derived direct irradiance for solar thermal resource assessment over South Korea. AIP Conf. Proc., 1850, 140013, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4984521.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Klemp, J. B., 2011: A terrain-following coordinate with smoothed coordinate surfaces. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 21632169, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-10-05046.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Li, Z., and Coauthors, 2017: Aerosol and boundary-layer interactions and impact on air quality. Natl. Sci. Rev., 4, 810833, https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwx117.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, J. C., and Coauthors, 2016: Particulate air pollution from wildfires in the western US under climate change. Climatic Change, 138, 655666, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1762-6.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lohmann, U., 2006: Aerosol effects on clouds and climate. Space Sci. Rev., 125, 129137, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-006-9051-8.

  • Mansell, E. R., C. L. Ziegler, and E. C. Bruning, 2010: Simulated electrification of a small thunderstorm with two-moment bulk microphysics. J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 171194, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS2965.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McMeeking, G. R., S. M. Kreidenweis, C. M. Carrico, T. Lee, J. L. Collett Jr., and W. C. Malm, 2005: Observations of smoke-influenced aerosol during the Yosemite Aerosol Characterization Study: Size distributions and chemical composition. J. Geophys. Res., 110, D09206, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005389.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Niu, S., D.Y. Liu, C. S. Lu, J. J. Lu, and J. Yang, 2012: Summary of a 4-year fog field study in northern Nanjing. Part 2: Fog microphysics. Pure Appl. Geophys., 169, 11371155.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Oreopoulos, L., and S. Platnick, 2008: Radiative susceptibility of cloudy atmospheres to droplet number perturbations: 2. Global analysis from MODIS. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D14S21, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009655.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Petäjä, T., and Coauthors, 2016: Enhanced air pollution via aerosol-boundary layer feedback in China. Sci. Rep., 6, 18998, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18998.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Petters, M. D., C. Carrico, S. M. Kreidenweis, A. J. Prenni, P. J. DeMott, J. L. Collett Jr., and H. Moosmüller, 2009: Cloud condensation nucleation activity of biomass burning aerosol. J. Geophys. Res., 114, 22 20522 221, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012353.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Radke, L. F., J. H. Lyons, P. V. Hobbs, D. A. Hegg, D. V. Sandberg, and D. E. Ward, 1990: Airborne monitoring and smoke characterization of prescribed fires on forest lands in western Washington and Oregon. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Forest Service Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-251, 81 pp., https://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/pnw_gtr251.pdf.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Rienecker, M. M., and Coauthors, 2008: The GEOS-5 data assimilation system—Documentation of versions 5.0.1, 5.1.0, and 5.2.0. NASA Tech. Rep. Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation, Vol. 27, 92 pp.

  • Rissler, J., and Coauthors, 2006: Size distribution and hygroscopic properties of aerosol particles from dry-season biomass burning in Amazonia. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 471–491, https://doi.org/10.5194/ACP-6-471-2006.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Robock, A., 1988: Enhancement of surface cooling due to forest fire smoke. Science, 242, 911913.

  • Robock, A., 1991: Surface cooling due to forest fire smoke. J. Geophys. Res., 96, 20 86920 878, https://doi.org/10.1029/91JD02043.

  • Ruiz-Arias, J. A., C. Arbizu-Barrena, F. J. Santos-Alamillos, J. Tovar-Pescador, and D. Pozo-Vázquez, 2016: Assessing the surface solar radiation budget in the WRF Model: A spatiotemporal analysis of the bias and its causes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 703711, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0262.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sena, E. T., A. McComiskey, and G. Feingold, 2016: A long-term study of aerosol–cloud interactions and their radiative effect at the Southern Great Plains using ground-based measurements. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11 30111 318, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11301-2016.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Skamarock, W. C., and Coauthors, 2008: A description of the Advanced Research WRF version 3. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-475+STR, 113 pp., https://doi.org/10.5065/D68S4MVH.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Stone, R. S., J. A. Augustine, E. G. Dutton, N. T. O’Neill, and A. Saha, 2011: Empirical determinations of the longwave and shortwave radiative forcing efficiencies of wildfire smoke. J. Geophys. Res., 116, D12207, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015471.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Su, T., and Coauthors, 2020: The significant impact of aerosol vertical structure on lower atmosphere stability and its critical role in aerosol–planetary boundary layer (PBL) interactions. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 37133724, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3713-2020.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Swistak, G., 2019: Aerosol particle statistics during wildfire events and their impact on air quality in Reno, NV. M.S. thesis, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Nevada-Reno, 37 pp.

  • Thompson, G., and T. Eidhammer, 2014: A study of aerosol impacts on clouds and precipitation development in a large winter cyclone. J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 36363658, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0305.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Treffeisen, R., and Coauthors, 2007: Arctic smoke—Aerosol characteristics during a record smoke event in the European Arctic and its radiative impact. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 30353053, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3035-2007.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Twomey, S., 1974: Pollution and the planetary albedo. Atmos. Environ., 8 (12), 12511256.

  • Twomey, S., 1977: The influence of pollution on the shortwave albedo of clouds. J. Atmos. Sci., 34, 11491152, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1977)034<1149:TIOPOT>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, Y., A. Khalizov, M. Levy, and R. Zhang, 2013: New directions: Light absorbing aerosols and their atmospheric impacts. Atmos. Environ., 81, 713715, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.09.034.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, Y., and Coauthors, 2018: Characterization of aerosol hygroscopicity, mixing state, and CCN activity at a suburban site in the central North China Plain. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11 73911 752, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11739-2018.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, Z., and Coauthors, 2010: Modeling study of aerosol indirect effects on global climate with an AGCM. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 27, 10641077, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-010-9120-5.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Warner, J., and S. Twomey, 1967: The production of cloud nuclei by cane fires and the effect on cloud droplet concentration. J. Atmos. Sci., 24, 704706, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1967)024<0704:TPOCNB>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 463 0 0
Full Text Views 468 230 30
PDF Downloads 522 252 24