• Aberson, S. D., 1998: Five-day tropical cyclone track forecasts in the North Atlantic basin. Wea. Forecasting, 13, 10051015, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1998)013<1005:FDTCTF>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Aberson, S. D., and C. R. Sampson, 2003: On the predictability of tropical cyclone tracks in the Northwest Pacific basin. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 14911497, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131<1491:OTPOTC>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Banzon, V., T. M. Smith, M. Steele, B. Huang, and H. M. Zhang, 2020: Improved estimation of proxy sea surface temperature in the Arctic. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 37, 341349, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-19-0177.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barnes, S. L., 1964: A technique for maximizing details in numerical weather map analysis. J. Appl. Meteor., 3, 396409, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1964)003<0396:ATFMDI>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bister, M., and K. A. Emanuel, 2002: Low frequency variability of tropical cyclone potential intensity. 1. Interannual to interdecadal variability. J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4801, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000776.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cangialosi, J. P., 2021: National Hurricane Center forecast verification report: 2020 hurricane season. NOAA/NHC, 77 pp., https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/verification/pdfs/Verification_2020.pdf.

  • Cummings, J. A., 2005 : Operational multivariate ocean data a similation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 3583–3604, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.05.105.

  • DeMaria, M., 2009: A simplified dynamical system for tropical cyclone intensity prediction. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 6882, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2513.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DeMaria, M., 2010: Tropical cyclone intensity change predictability estimates using a statistical-dynamical model. 29th Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, Tucson, AZ, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 9C.5, https://ams.confex.com/ams/29Hurricanes/techprogram/paper_167916.htm.

  • DeMaria, M., 2021 : A new framework for statistical-dynamical tropical cyclone intensity forecast models. 34th Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, Online, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 8C.4, https://ams.confex.com/ams/34HURR/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/373073.

  • DeMaria, M., and J. M. Gross, 2003 : Evolution of tropical cyclone forecast models. Hurricane! Coping with Disaster: Progress and Challenges Since Galveston, 1900, R. Simpson et al., Eds., 1st ed. Amer. Geophys. Union, 103–126.

  • DeMaria, M., M. Mainelli, L. K. Shay, J. A. Knaff, and J. Kaplan, 2005: Further improvements in the Statistical Hurricane Intensity Prediction Scheme (SHIPS). Wea. Forecasting, 20, 531543, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF862.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DeMaria, M., J. A. Knaff, and J. Kaplan, 2006: On the decay of tropical cyclone winds crossing narrow landmasses. J. Appl. Meteor., 45, 491499, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2351.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DeMaria, M., J. L. Franklin, M. J. Onderlinde, and J. Kaplan, 2021: Operational forecasting of tropical cyclone rapid intensification at the National Hurricane Center. Atmosphere, 12, 683, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12060683.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dong, K., and C. J. Neumann, 1986: The relationship between tropical cyclone motion and environmental geostrophic flows. Mon. Wea. Rev., 114, 115122, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1986)114<0115:TRBTCM>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dunion, J., J. Kaplan, and A. Schumacher, 2019: Improvement to the Tropical Cyclone Genesis Index (TCGI). Final Rep. NOAA Joint Hurricane Testbed, NA15OAR4590201, 16 pp., https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/jht/15-17reports/Dunion_201_Schumacher_202_progress_reportFINAL_rev030619.pdf.

  • Franklin, J. L., and M. DeMaria, 1992: The impact of omega dropwindsonde observations on barotropic hurricane track forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 120, 381391, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1992)120<0381:TIOODO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Halperin, D. J., R. E. Hart, H. E. Fuelberg, and J. H. Cossuth, 2017: The development and evaluation of a statistical-dynamical tropical cyclone genesis guidance tool. Wea. Forecasting, 32, 2746, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-16-0072.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harris, L., X. Chen, W. M. Putman, L. Zhou, and J. Chen, 2021 : A scientific description of the GFDL finite-volume cubed-sphere dynamical core. NOAA Tech. Memo. OAR GFDL, 2021-001, 109 pp., https://doi.org/10.25923/6nhs-5897.

  • Holland, G. J., 1983: Tropical cyclone motion: Environmental interaction plus a beta effect. J. Atmos. Sci., 40, 328342, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1983)040<0328:TCMEIP>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jarvinen, B. R., and C. J. Neumann, 1979: Statistical forecasts of tropical cyclone intensity. NOAA Tech. Memo NWS NHC-10, 22 pp.

  • Kaplan, J., and M. DeMaria, 1995: A simple empirical model for predicting the decay of tropical cyclone winds after landfall. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 34, 24992512, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<2499:ASEMFP>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaplan, J., and M. DeMaria, 2001: On the decay of tropical cyclone winds after landfall in the New England area. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 40, 280286, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<0280:OTDOTC>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Klein, P. M., P. A. Harr, and R. L. Elsberry, 2000: Extratropical transition of western North Pacific tropical cyclones: An overview and conceptual model of the transformation stage. Wea. Forecasting, 15, 373395, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2000)015<0373:ETOWNP>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Knaff, J. A., M. DeMaria, C. R. Sampson, and J. M. Gross, 2003: Statistical, 5-day tropical cyclone intensity forecasts derived from climatology and persistence. Wea. Forecasting, 18, 8092, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2003)018<0080:SDTCIF>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Knaff, J. A., C. R. Sampson, and G. Chirokova, 2017: A global statistical-dynamical tropical cyclone wind radii forecast scheme. Wea. Forecasting, 32, 629644, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-16-0168.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Landsea, C. W., and J. L. Franklin, 2013: Atlantic hurricane database uncertainty and presentation of a new database format. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 35763592, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-12-00254.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lin, J., K. Emanuel, and J. L. Vigh, 2020: Forecasts of hurricanes using large-ensemble outputs. Wea. Forecasting, 35, 17131731, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-19-0255.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mainelli, M., M. DeMaria, L. K. Shay, and G. Goni, 2008: Application of oceanic heat content estimation to operational forecasting of recent Atlantic category-5 hurricanes. Wea. Forecasting, 23, 316, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007WAF2006111.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marks, D. G., 1992 : The beta and advection model for hurricane track forecasting. NOAA Tech. Memo. NWS NMC 70, 89 pp., https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/7184.

  • Neumann, C. J., 1972 : An alternate to the HURRAN (Hurricane Analog) tropical cyclone forecast system. NOAA Tech. Memo. NWS SR-62, 24 pp., https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/3605.

  • Reynolds, R. W., and T. M. Smith, 1994: Improved global sea surface temperature analyses using optimum interpolation. J. Climate, 7, 929948, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1994)007<0929:IGSSTA>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sampson, C. R., and A. J. Schrader, 2000: The Automated Tropical Cyclone Forecasting System (version 3.2). Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 81, 12311240, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081<1231:TATCFS>2.3.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sardeshmukh, P. D., and B. I. Hoskins, 1984: Spatial smoothing on the sphere. Mon. Wea. Rev., 112, 25242529, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1984)112<2524:SSOTS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shan, K., and X. Yu, 2020: A simple trajectory model for climatological study of tropical cyclones. J. Climate, 33, 77777786, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0285.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Simon, A., A. B. Penny, M. DeMaria, J. L. Franklin, R. J. Pasch, E. N. Rappaport, and D. A. Zelinsky, 2018: A description of the real-time HFIP Corrected Consensus Approach (HCCA) for tropical cyclone track and intensity guidance. Wea. Forecasting, 33, 3757, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-17-0068.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Su, H., L. Wu, J. H. Jiang, R. Pai, A. Lui, A. J. Zhai, P. Tavallali, and M. DeMaria, 2020: Applying satellite observations of tropical cyclone internal structures to rapid intensification forecast with machine learning . Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL089102, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089102.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tallapragada, V., L. Bernardet, M. K. Biswas, S. Gopalakrishnan, Y. Kwon, Q. Liu, and X. Zhang, 2014: Hurricane Weather Research and Forecasting (HWRF) model: 2013 scientific documentation. HWRF Development Testbed Center Tech. Rep., 99 pp.

  • Velden, C. S., and L. M. Leslie, 1991: The basic relationship between tropical cyclone intensity and the depth of the environmental steering layer in the Australian region. Wea. Forecasting, 6, 244253, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1991)006<0244:TBRBTC>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xu, W., K. Balaguru, A. August, N. Lalo, N. Hodas, M. DeMaria, and D. Judi, 2021: Deep learning experiments for tropical cyclone intensity forecasts. Wea. Forecasting, 36, 14531470, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-20-0104.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 660 660 8
Full Text Views 225 225 3
PDF Downloads 247 247 3

The National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Model Guidance Suite

Mark DeMariaaCIRA/Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

Search for other papers by Mark DeMaria in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
James L. FranklinbSystems Research Group, NOAA/National Hurricane Center, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by James L. Franklin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Rachel ZelinskycNOAA/National Hurricane Center, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Rachel Zelinsky in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
David A. ZelinskycNOAA/National Hurricane Center, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by David A. Zelinsky in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Matthew J. OnderlindecNOAA/National Hurricane Center, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Matthew J. Onderlinde in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
John A. KnaffdNESDIS/STAR, Fort Collins, Colorado

Search for other papers by John A. Knaff in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Stephanie N. StevensoncNOAA/National Hurricane Center, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Stephanie N. Stevenson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
John KaplaneNOAA/AOML/Hurricane Research Division, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by John Kaplan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Kate D. MusgraveaCIRA/Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

Search for other papers by Kate D. Musgrave in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Galina ChirokovaaCIRA/Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

Search for other papers by Galina Chirokova in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Charles R. SampsonfNaval Research Laboratory, Monterey, California

Search for other papers by Charles R. Sampson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The National Hurricane Center (NHC) uses a variety of guidance models for its operational tropical cyclone track, intensity, and wind structure forecasts, and as baselines for the evaluation of forecast skill. A set of the simpler models, collectively known as the NHC guidance suite, is maintained by NHC. The models comprising the guidance suite are briefly described and evaluated, with details provided for those that have not been documented previously. Decay-SHIFOR is a modified version of the Statistical Hurricane Intensity Forecast (SHIFOR) model that includes decay over land; this modification improves the SHIFOR forecasts through about 96 h. T-CLIPER, a climatology and persistence model that predicts track and intensity using a trajectory approach, has error characteristics similar to those of CLIPER and D-SHIFOR but can be run to any forecast length. The Trajectory and Beta model (TAB), another trajectory track model, applies a gridpoint spatial filter to smooth winds from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Global Forecast System (GFS) model. TAB model errors were 10%–15% lower than those of the Beta and Advection model (BAM), the model it replaced in 2017. Optimizing TAB’s vertical weights shows that the lower troposphere’s environmental flow provides a better match to observed tropical cyclone motion than does the upper troposphere’s, and that the optimal steering layer is shallower for higher-latitude and weaker tropical cyclones. The advantages and disadvantages of the D-SHIFOR, T-CLIPER, and TAB models relative to their earlier counterparts are discussed.

Significance Statement

This paper provides a comprehensive summary and evaluation of a set of simpler forecast models used as guidance for NHC’s operational tropical cyclone forecasts, and as baselines for the evaluation of forecast skill; these include newer techniques that extend forecasts to 7 days and beyond.

© 2022 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Mark DeMaria, Mark.DeMaria@colostate.edu

Abstract

The National Hurricane Center (NHC) uses a variety of guidance models for its operational tropical cyclone track, intensity, and wind structure forecasts, and as baselines for the evaluation of forecast skill. A set of the simpler models, collectively known as the NHC guidance suite, is maintained by NHC. The models comprising the guidance suite are briefly described and evaluated, with details provided for those that have not been documented previously. Decay-SHIFOR is a modified version of the Statistical Hurricane Intensity Forecast (SHIFOR) model that includes decay over land; this modification improves the SHIFOR forecasts through about 96 h. T-CLIPER, a climatology and persistence model that predicts track and intensity using a trajectory approach, has error characteristics similar to those of CLIPER and D-SHIFOR but can be run to any forecast length. The Trajectory and Beta model (TAB), another trajectory track model, applies a gridpoint spatial filter to smooth winds from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Global Forecast System (GFS) model. TAB model errors were 10%–15% lower than those of the Beta and Advection model (BAM), the model it replaced in 2017. Optimizing TAB’s vertical weights shows that the lower troposphere’s environmental flow provides a better match to observed tropical cyclone motion than does the upper troposphere’s, and that the optimal steering layer is shallower for higher-latitude and weaker tropical cyclones. The advantages and disadvantages of the D-SHIFOR, T-CLIPER, and TAB models relative to their earlier counterparts are discussed.

Significance Statement

This paper provides a comprehensive summary and evaluation of a set of simpler forecast models used as guidance for NHC’s operational tropical cyclone forecasts, and as baselines for the evaluation of forecast skill; these include newer techniques that extend forecasts to 7 days and beyond.

© 2022 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Mark DeMaria, Mark.DeMaria@colostate.edu
Save