Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Exploring the Usefulness of Downscaling Free Forecasts from the Warn-on-Forecast System

William J. S. Miller aCooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma
bNOAA/OAR/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by William J. S. Miller in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Corey K. Potvin bNOAA/OAR/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma
cSchool of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Corey K. Potvin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Montgomery L. Flora aCooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma
bNOAA/OAR/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Montgomery L. Flora in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Burkely T. Gallo aCooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma
dNOAA/NCEP/Storm Prediction Center, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Burkely T. Gallo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Louis J. Wicker bNOAA/OAR/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Louis J. Wicker in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Thomas A. Jones bNOAA/OAR/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma
aCooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Thomas A. Jones in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Patrick S. Skinner bNOAA/OAR/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma
aCooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Patrick S. Skinner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Brian C. Matilla bNOAA/OAR/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma
aCooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Brian C. Matilla in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Kent H. Knopfmeier bNOAA/OAR/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma
aCooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Kent H. Knopfmeier in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Online Publication:
01 Feb 2022
Print Publication:
01 Feb 2022
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-21-0079.1
Page(s):
181–203
Restricted access

Abstract

The National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL) Warn-on-Forecast System (WoFS) is an experimental real-time rapidly updating convection-allowing ensemble that provides probabilistic short-term thunderstorm forecasts. This study evaluates the impacts of reducing the forecast model horizontal grid spacing Δx from 3 to 1.5 km on the WoFS deterministic and probabilistic forecast skill, using 11 case days selected from the 2020 NOAA Hazardous Weather Testbed (HWT) Spring Forecasting Experiment (SFE). Verification methods include (i) subjective forecaster impressions; (ii) a deterministic object-based technique that identifies forecast reflectivity and rotation track storm objects as contiguous local maxima in the composite reflectivity and updraft helicity fields, respectively, and matches them to observed storm objects; and (iii) a recently developed algorithm that matches observed mesocyclones to mesocyclone probability swath objects constructed from the full ensemble of rotation track objects. Reducing Δx fails to systematically improve deterministic skill in forecasting reflectivity object occurrence, as measured by critical success index (CSIDET), a metric that incorporates both probability of detection (PODDET) and false alarm ratio (FARDET). However, compared to the Δx = 3 km configuration, the Δx = 1.5 km WoFS shows improved midlevel mesocyclone detection, as evidenced by its statistically significant (i) higher CSIDET for deterministic midlevel rotation track objects and (ii) higher normalized area under the performance diagram curve (NAUPDC) score for probability swath objects. Comparison between Δx = 3 km and Δx = 1.5 km reflectivity object properties reveals that the latter have 30% stronger mean updraft speeds, 17% stronger median 80-m winds, 67% larger median hail diameter, and 28% higher median near-storm-maximum 0–3-km storm-relative helicity.

© 2022 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: William Miller, wmiller1@umd.edu

Abstract

The National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL) Warn-on-Forecast System (WoFS) is an experimental real-time rapidly updating convection-allowing ensemble that provides probabilistic short-term thunderstorm forecasts. This study evaluates the impacts of reducing the forecast model horizontal grid spacing Δx from 3 to 1.5 km on the WoFS deterministic and probabilistic forecast skill, using 11 case days selected from the 2020 NOAA Hazardous Weather Testbed (HWT) Spring Forecasting Experiment (SFE). Verification methods include (i) subjective forecaster impressions; (ii) a deterministic object-based technique that identifies forecast reflectivity and rotation track storm objects as contiguous local maxima in the composite reflectivity and updraft helicity fields, respectively, and matches them to observed storm objects; and (iii) a recently developed algorithm that matches observed mesocyclones to mesocyclone probability swath objects constructed from the full ensemble of rotation track objects. Reducing Δx fails to systematically improve deterministic skill in forecasting reflectivity object occurrence, as measured by critical success index (CSIDET), a metric that incorporates both probability of detection (PODDET) and false alarm ratio (FARDET). However, compared to the Δx = 3 km configuration, the Δx = 1.5 km WoFS shows improved midlevel mesocyclone detection, as evidenced by its statistically significant (i) higher CSIDET for deterministic midlevel rotation track objects and (ii) higher normalized area under the performance diagram curve (NAUPDC) score for probability swath objects. Comparison between Δx = 3 km and Δx = 1.5 km reflectivity object properties reveals that the latter have 30% stronger mean updraft speeds, 17% stronger median 80-m winds, 67% larger median hail diameter, and 28% higher median near-storm-maximum 0–3-km storm-relative helicity.

© 2022 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: William Miller, wmiller1@umd.edu
Save
Cover Weather and Forecasting
Weather and Forecasting

  • Adams-Selin, R. D., and C. L. Ziegler, 2016: Forecasting hail using a one-dimensional hail growth model within WRF. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 4919–4939, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0027.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Adams-Selin, R. D., A. J. Clark, C. J. Melick, S. R. Dembek, I. L. Jirak, and C. L. Ziegler, 2019: Evolution of WRF-HAILCAST during the 2014–16 NOAA/Hazardous Weather Testbed Spring Forecasting Experiments. Wea. Forecasting, 34, 61–79, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-18-0024.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Adlerman, E. J., and K. K. Droegemeier, 2002: The sensitivity of numerically simulated cyclic mesocyclogenesis to variations in model physical and computational parameters. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 2671–2691, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<2671:TSONSC>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Boyd, K., V. S. Costa, J. Davis, and C. D. Page, 2012: Unachievable region in precision-recall space and its effect on empirical evaluation. Proc. 29th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning (ICML’12), Edinburgh Scotland, Pattern Analysis, Statistical Modelling and Computational Learning (PASCAL), IBMR, NSF, Microsoft Research, Facebook, 1619–1626.

  • Bröcker, J., and L. A. Smith, 2007: Increasing the reliability of reliability diagrams. Wea. Forecasting, 22, 651–661, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF993.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Brooks, H. E., and J. Correia Jr., 2018: Long-term performance metrics for National Weather Service tornado warnings. Wea. Forecasting, 33, 1501–1511, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-18-0120.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bryan, G. H., and H. Morrison, 2012: Sensitivity of a simulated squall line to horizontal resolution and parameterization of microphysics. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 202–225, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00046.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bryan, G. H., J. C. Wyngaard, and J. M. Fritsch, 2003: Resolution requirements for the simulation of deep moist convection. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 2394–2416, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131<2394:RRFTSO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Clark, A. J., and Coauthors, 2012: An overview of the 2010 Hazardous Weather Testbed Experimental Forecast Program Spring Experiment. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 93, 55–74, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00040.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Clark, A. J., and Coauthors, 2021: A real-time, virtual spring forecasting experiment to advance severe weather prediction. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 102, E814–E816, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0268.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Davis, C. A., B. G. Brown, and R. G. Bullock, 2006a: Object-based verification of precipitation forecasts. Part I: Methodology and application to mesoscale rain areas. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 1772–1784, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3145.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Davis, C. A., B. G. Brown, and R. G. Bullock, 2006b: Object-based verification of precipitation forecasts. Part II: Application to convective rain systems. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 1785–1795, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3146.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Davis, J., and M. Goadrich, 2006: The relationship between Precision-Recall and ROC curves. Proc. 23rd Int. Conf. on Machine Learning (ICML’06), Pittsburgh, PA, ICML, 233–240, https://doi.org/10.1145/1143844.1143874.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • Done, J., C. A. Davis, and M. Weisman, 2004: The next generation of NWP: Explicit forecasts of convection using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. Atmos. Sci. Lett., 5, 110–117, https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.72.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dowell, D., and Coauthors, 2016: Development of a High-Resolution Rapid Refresh Ensemble (HRRRE) for severe weather forecasting. 28th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Portland, OR, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 8B.2, https://ams.confex.com/ams/28SLS/webprogram/Paper301555.html.

  • Ebert, E. E., 2001: Ability of a poor man’s ensemble to predict the probability and distribution of precipitation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 2461–2480, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<2461:AOAPMS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Flora, M. L., P. S. Skinner, C. K. Potvin, A. E. Reinhart, T. A. Jones, N. Yussouf, and K. H. Knopfmeier, 2019: Object-based verification of short-term, storm-scale probabilistic mesocyclone guidance from an experimental Warn-on-Forecast system. Wea. Forecasting, 34, 1721–1739, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-19-0094.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Flora, M. L., C. K. Potvin, P. S. Skinner, S. Handler, and A. McGovern, 2021: Using machine learning to generate storm-scale probabilistic guidance of severe weather hazards in the Warn-on-Forecast System. Mon. Wea. Rev., 49, 1535–1557, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-20-0194.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gallo, B. T., and Coauthors, 2017: Breaking new ground in severe weather prediction: The 2015 NOAA/Hazardous Weather Testbed Spring Forecasting Experiment. Wea. Forecasting, 32, 1541–1568, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-16-0178.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hong, S., Y. Noh, and J. Dudhia, 2006: A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 2318–2341, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3199.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Houtekamer, P. L., and F. Zhang, 2016: Review of the ensemble Kalman filter for atmospheric data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 4489–4532, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0440.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Janjić, Z. I., 2002: Nonsingular implementation of the Mellor–Yamada level 2.5 scheme in the NCEP Meso model. NCEP Office Note 437, 61 pp., http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/officenotes/newernotes/on437.pdf.

  • Jones, T. A., K. Knopfmeier, D. Wheatley, G. Creager, P. Minnis, and R. Palikonda, 2016: Storm-scale data assimilation and ensemble forecasting with the NSSL experimental Warn-on-Forecast System. Part II: Combined radar and satellite data experiments. Wea. Forecasting, 31, 297–327, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-15-0107.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jones, T. A., P. S. Skinner, N. Yussouf, K. Knopfmeier, A. Reinhart, and D. Dowell, 2019: Forecasting high-impact weather in landfalling tropical cyclones using a Warn-on-Forecast system. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 100, 1405–1417, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0203.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jones, T. A., and Coauthors, 2020: Assimilation of the GOES-16 radiances and retrievals into the Warn-on-Forecast System. Mon. Wea. Rev., 148, 1829–1859, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-19-0379.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kain, J. S., and Coauthors, 2008: Some practical considerations regarding horizontal resolution in the first generation of operational convection-allowing NWP. Wea. Forecasting, 23, 931–952, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF2007106.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lampert, T. A., and P. Gançarski, 2014: The bane of skew. Mach. Learn., 97, 5–32, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-013-5432-x.

  • Lawson, J. R., C. K. Potvin, P. S. Skinner, and A. E. Reinhart, 2021: The vice and virtue of increased horizontal resolution in ensemble forecasts of tornadic thunderstorms in low-CAPE, high-shear environments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 149, 921–944, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-20-0281.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mansell, E. R., C. L. Ziegler, and E. C. Bruning, 2010: Simulated electrification of a small thunderstorm with two-moment bulk microphysics. J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 171–194, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS2965.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Markowski, P., and Y. Richardson, 2010: Mesoscale Meteorology in Midlatitudes. Wiley-Blackwell, 430 pp.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • Mashiko, W., 2016a: A numerical study of the 6 May 2012 Tsukuba City supercell tornado. Part I: Vorticity sources of low-level and midlevel mesocyclones. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 1069–1092, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0123.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mashiko, W., 2016b: A numerical study of the 6 May 2012 Tsukuba City supercell tornado. Part II: Mechanisms of tornadogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 3077–3098, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0122.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mellor, G. L., and T. Yamada, 1982: Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems. Rev. Geophys., 20, 851–875, https://doi.org/10.1029/RG020i004p00851.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Miller, M. L., V. Lakshmanan, and T. M. Smith, 2013: An automated method for depicting mesocyclone paths and intensities. Wea. Forecasting, 28, 570–585, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-12-00065.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nakanishi, M., and H. Niino, 2004: An improved Mellor–Yamada level-3 model with condensation physics: Its design and verification. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 112, 1–31, https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BOUN.0000020164.04146.98.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nakanishi, M., and H. Niino, 2006: An improved Mellor–Yamada level-3 model: Its numerical stability and application to a regional prediction of advection fog. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 119, 397–407, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-005-9030-8.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • NOAA/NCEI 2021: NOAA/National Centers for Environmental Information database. NOAA/NCEI, accessed 15 May 2021, https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/.

  • Noda, A., and H. Niino, 2003: Critical grid size for simulating convective storms: A case study of the Del City supercell storm. Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1844, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017498.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Peters, J. M., C. J. Nowotarski, and H. Morrison, 2019: The role of vertical wind shear in modulating maximum supercell updraft velocities. J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 3169–3189, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-19-0096.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Peters, J. M., C. J. Nowotarski, and G. L. Mullendore, 2020: Are supercells resistant to entrainment because of their rotation. J. Atmos. Sci., 77, 1475–1495, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-19-0316.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Potvin, C. K., and M. L. Flora, 2015: Sensitivity of idealized supercell simulations to horizontal grid spacing: Implications for Warn-on-Forecast. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 2998–3024, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-14-00416.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Potvin, C. K., E. M. Murillo, M. L. Flora, and D. M. Wheatley, 2017: Sensitivity of supercell simulations to initial-condition resolution. J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 5–26, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0098.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Potvin, C. K., and Coauthors, 2020: Assessing systematic impacts of PBL schemes on storm evolution in the NOAA Warn-on-Forecast System. Mon. Wea. Rev., 148, 2567–2590, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-19-0389.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Roberts, B., M. Xue, A. D. Schenkman, and D. T. Dawson II, 2016: The role of surface drag in tornadogenesis within an idealized supercell simulation. J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 3371–3395, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0332.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Roebber, P. J., 2009: Visualizing multiple measures of forecast quality. Wea. Forecasting, 24, 601–608, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008WAF2222159.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Saito, T., and M. Rehmsmeier, 2015: The Precision-Recall plot is more informative than the ROC plot when evaluating binary classifiers on imbalanced datasets. PLOS ONE, 10, e0118432, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118432.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schoen, J. M., and W. S. Ashley, 2011: A climatology of fatal convective wind events by storm type. Wea. Forecasting, 26, 109–121, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010WAF2222428.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schwartz, C. S., and R. A. Sobash, 2017: Generating probabilistic forecasts from convection-allowing ensembles using neighborhood approaches: A review and recommendations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 145, 3397–3418, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0400.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Scott, D. W., 1992: Multivariate Density Estimation: Theory, Practice, and Visualization. John Wiley and Sons, 360 pp.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • Shin, H. H., and S.-Y. Hong, 2015: Representation of the subgrid-scale turbulent transport in convective boundary layers at gray-zone resolutions. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 250–271, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-14-00116.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Skamarock, W. C., and Coauthors, 2008: A description of the Advanced Research WRF version 3. NCAR Tech Note NCAR/TN-475+STR, 113 pp., https://doi.org/10.5065/D68S4MVH.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • Skinner, P. S., and Coauthors, 2018: Object-based verification of a prototype Warn-on-Forecast system. Wea. Forecasting, 33, 1225–1250, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-18-0020.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Smirnova, T. G., J. M. Brown, S. G. Benjamin, and J. S. Kenyon, 2016: Modifications to the Rapid Update Cycle Land Surface Model (RUC LSM) available in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 1851–1865, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0198.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Smith, T. M., and Coauthors, 2016: Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor (MRMS) severe weather and aviation products: Initial operating capabilities. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 97, 1617–1630, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00173.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Stensrud, D. J., and Coauthors, 2009: Convective-scale Warn-on-Forecast system: A vision for 2020. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 90, 1487–1500, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2795.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Stensrud, D. J., and Coauthors, 2013: Progress and challenges with Warn-on-Forecast. Atmos. Res., 123, 2–16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.04.004.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Thompson, R. L., R. Edwards, J. A. Hart, K. L. Elmore, and P. Markowski, 2003: Close proximity soundings within supercell environments obtained from the Rapid Update Cycle. Wea. Forecasting, 18, 1243–1261, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2003)018<1243:CPSWSE>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Trapp, R. J., G. J. Stumpf, and K. L. Manross, 2005: A reassessment of the percentage of tornadic mesocyclones. Wea. Forecasting, 20, 680–687, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF864.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Van der Walt, S., J. L. Schonberger, J. Nunez-Iglesias, F. Boulogne, J. D. Warner, N. Yager, E. Gouillart, and T. Yu, 2014: Scikit-image: Image processing in Python. PeerJ, 2, e453, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.453.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Verrelle, A., D. Ricard, and C. Lac, 2015: Sensitivity of high-resolution idealized simulations of thunderstorms to horizontal resolution and turbulence parameterization. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 141, 433–448, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2363.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Weisman, M. L., W. C. Skamarock, and J. B. Klemp, 1997: The resolution dependence of explicitly modeled convective systems. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125, 527–548, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1997)125<0527:TRDOEM>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Weisman, M. L., C. A. Davis, W. Wang, K. W. Manning, and J. B. Klemp, 2008: Experiences with 0-36-h convective forecasts with the WRF-ARW model. Wea. Forecasting, 23, 407–437, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007WAF2007005.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wheatley, D. M., K. H. Knopfmeier, T. A. Jones, and G. J. Creager, 2015: Storm-scale data assimilation and ensemble forecasting with the NSSL Experimental Warn-on-Forecast System. Part I: Radar data experiments. Wea. Forecasting, 30, 1795–1817, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-15-0043.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wilks, D. S., 2011: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences. 3rd ed. International Geophysics Series, Vol. 100, Academic Press, 704 pp.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • Wyngaard, J. C., 2004: Toward numerical modeling in the “terra incognita.” J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1816–1826, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<1816:TNMITT>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Yokota, S., H. Niino, H. Seko, M. Kunii, and H. Yamauchi, 2018: Important factors for tornadogenesis as revealed by high-resolution ensemble forecasts of the Tsukuba supercell tornado of 6 May 2012 in Japan. Mon. Wea. Rev., 146, 1109–1132, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-17-0254.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Yussouf, N., and K. H. Knopfmeier, 2019: Application of the Warn-on-Forecast system for flash flood producing heavy convective rainfall events. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 145, 2385–2403, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3568.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Yussouf, N., T. A. Jones, and P. S. Skinner, 2020: Probabilistic high‐impact rainfall forecasts from landfalling tropical cyclones using Warn‐on‐Forecast system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 2050–2065, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3779.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 675 47 0
Full Text Views 421 219 18
PDF Downloads 371 158 12