• Andra, D. L., E. M. Quoetone, and W. F. Bunting, 2002: Warning decision-making: The relative roles of conceptual models, technology, strategy, and forecaster expertise on 3 May 1999. Wea. Forecasting, 17, 559566, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2002)017<0559:WDMTRR>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boettcher, J., and E. Bentley, 2022: WSR-88D sidelobe contamination: From a conceptual model to diagnostic strategies for improving NWS warning performance. Wea. Forecasting, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-21-0155.1, in press.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bowden, K. A., and P. L. Heinselman, 2016: A qualitative analysis of NWS forecasters’ use of phased-array radar data during severe hail and wind events. Wea. Forecasting, 31, 4355, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-15-0089.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bowden, K. A., P. L. Heinselman, D. M. Kingfield, and R. P. Thomas, 2015: Impacts of phased-array radar data on forecaster performance during severe hail and wind events. Wea. Forecasting, 30, 389404, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-14-00101.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brotzge, J., and W. Donner, 2013: The tornado warning process. A review of current research, challenges, and opportunities. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 94, 17151733, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00147.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brown, R. A., and J. M. Lewis, 2005: Path to NEXRAD: Doppler radar development at the National Severe Storms Laboratory. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 86, 14591470, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-86-10-1459.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Browning, K., 1964: Airflow and precipitation trajectories within severe local storms which travel to the right of the winds. J. Atmos. Sci., 21, 624639, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1964)021<0634:AAPTWS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Crum, T. D., and R. L. Alberty, 1993: The WSR-88D and the WSR-88D operational support facility. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 74, 16691687, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1993)074<1669:TWATWO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Doswell, C. A., III, and D. W. Burgess, 1993: Tornadoes and tornadic storms: A review of conceptual models. The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction, and Hazards, Geophys. Monogr., Vol. 79, Amer. Geophys. Union, 161172.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FAA, 2019: Fact sheet—Spectrum Efficient National Surveillance Radar (SENSR). Department of Transportation, accessed 29 March 2022, www.faa.gov/news/fact_sheets/news_story.cfm?newsId=22634.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heinselman, P. L., D. S. LaDue, and H. Lazrus, 2012: Exploring impacts of rapid-scan radar data on NWS warning decisions. Wea. Forecasting, 27, 10311044, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-11-00145.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heinselman, P. L., D. S. LaDue, D. M. Kingfield, and R. Hoffman, 2015: Tornado warning decisions using phased-array radar data. Wea. Forecasting, 30, 5778, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-14-00042.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoffman, R. R., D. S. Ladue, H. M. Mogil, P. J. Roebber, and J. G. Trafton, 2017: Minding the Weather, How Expert Forecasters Think. MIT Press, 502 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hunter, R., P. Ward, J. Gore, P. Turner, R. Hoffman, A. Leggatt, and G. Conway, 2017: Developing adaptive expertise: A synthesis of literature and implications for training. 13th Int. Conf. on Naturalistic Decision Making, Bath, United Kingdom, University of Bath, 92 pp., http://50years.bath.ac.uk/story/event/international-conference-on-naturalistic-decision-making/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ice, R., O. Boydstun, W. D. Zittel, R. Hall, G. Cate, R. Rhoton, R. Maceman, and B. Walker, 2011: Sensitivity of operational weather radars. 27th Conf. on Interactive Information Processing Systems, Seattle, WA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 370, https://ams.confex.com/ams/91Annual/webprogram/Paper183654.html.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Klein, G., B. Moon, and R. R. Hoffman, 2006: Making sense of sensemaking 1: Alternative perspectives. IEEE Intell. Syst., 21, 7073, https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2006.75.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lemon, L. R., and C. A. Doswell III, 1979: Severe thunderstorm evolution and mesocyclone structure as related to tornadogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 107, 11841197, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1979)107<1184:STEAMS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nai, F., J. Boettcher, C. Curtis, D. Schvartzman, and S. Torres, 2020a: The impact of elevation sidelobe contamination on radar data quality for operational interpretation. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 59, 707724, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-19-0092.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nai, F., J. Boettcher, D. Schvartzman, C. Curtis, and S. Torres, 2020b: SENSR data quality simulations final report. NOAA/NSSL and OU CIMMS Rep., 168 pp., https://nssl.noaa.gov/publications/mpar_reports/SENSR%20Data%20Quality%20Simulation%20Final%20Report.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NOAA, 2015: NOAA/National Weather Service Radar Functional Requirements. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 58 pp., www.roc.noaa.gov/WSR88D/PublicDocs/NOAA_Radar_Functional_Requirements_Final_Sept%202015.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NOAA, 2020: Weather radar follow-on plan: Research and risk reduction to inform acquisition decisions. NOAA Rep., 21 pp.

  • Piltz, S. F., and D. W. Burgess, 2009: The impacts of thunderstorm geometry and WSR-88D beam characteristics on diagnosing supercell tornadoes. 34th Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Williamsburg, VA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., P6.18, https://ams.confex.com/ams/34Radar/techprogram/paper_155944.htm.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Radar Operations Center, 2010: Operational assessment of pre-deployment WSR-88D dual polarization data. Tech. Rep., 59 pp., https://www.roc.noaa.gov/WSR88D/PublicDocs/AppsDocs/OpsAssessment28Dec2010.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Radar Operations Center, 2019: WSR-88D Service Life Extension Program (SLEP). Accessed 15 February 2021, https://www.roc.noaa.gov/WSR88D/Engineering/NEXRADTechInfo.aspx.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Saxion, D., and R. Ice, 2012: New science for the WSR-88D: Status of the dual-polarization upgrade. 28th Conf. on Interactive Information Processing Systems (IIPS), New Orleans, LA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 5, https://ams.confex.com/ams/92Annual/webprogram/Paper197645.html.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schuur, T., P. Heinselman, and K. Scharfenberg, 2003: Overview of the Joint Polarization Experiment (JPOLE). NOAA/NSSL Rep., 38 pp., https://www.nssl.noaa.gov/publications/wsr88d_reports/JPOLE_Overview_Report.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schvartzman, D., and C. D. Curtis, 2019: Signal Processing and Radar Characteristic (SPARC) simulator: A flexible dual-polarization weather-radar signal simulation framework based on preexisting radar-variable data. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens., 12, 135150, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2018.2885614.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schvartzman, D., and S. M. Torres, 2019: Design of practical pulse compression waveforms for polarimetric phased array radar. 39th Int. Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Nara, Japan, 15A-02, https://cscenter.co.jp/icrm2019/program/data/abstracts/Session15A-02_2.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Torres, S., and C. Curtis, 2007: Initial implementation of super-resolution data on the NEXRAD network. 23rd Int. Conf. on Interactive Information and Processing Systems for Meteorology, Oceanography, and Hydrology, San Antonio, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 5B.10, https://ams.confex.com/ams/87ANNUAL/techprogram/paper_116240.htm.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Torres, S., P. Heinselman, and K. Bowden, 2014: Understanding forecasters’ needs to improve radar observations using adaptive scanning. 30th Conf. on Environmental Information Processing Technologies, Atlanta, GA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 6.4, https://ams.confex.com/ams/94Annual/webprogram/Paper231266.html.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Torres, S. M., C. D. Curtis, and D. Schvartzman, 2017: Requirement-driven design of pulse compression waveforms for weather radars. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 34, 13511369, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-16-0231.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Uccellini, L. W., and J. E. Ten Hoeve, 2019: Evolving the National Weather Service to build a weather-ready nation. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 100, 19231942, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0159.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weber, M., and Coauthors, 2021: Towards the next generation operational meteorological radar. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 102, E1357E1383, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0067.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilson, K. A., P. L. Heinselman, C. M. Kuster, D. M. Kingfield, and Z. Kang, 2017: Forecaster performance and workload: Does radar update time matter? Wea. Forecasting, 32, 253274, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-16-0157.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 823 385 13
Full Text Views 139 90 6
PDF Downloads 157 93 7

A Multidisciplinary Method to Support the Evolution of NWS Weather Radar Technology

Jami BoettcheraCooperative Institute for Severe and High-Impact Weather Research and Operations, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma
bNOAA/OAR/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Jami Boettcher in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sebastián TorresaCooperative Institute for Severe and High-Impact Weather Research and Operations, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma
bNOAA/OAR/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Sebastián Torres in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Feng NaiaCooperative Institute for Severe and High-Impact Weather Research and Operations, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma
bNOAA/OAR/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Feng Nai in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Christopher CurtisaCooperative Institute for Severe and High-Impact Weather Research and Operations, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma
bNOAA/OAR/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Christopher Curtis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
David SchvartzmancAdvanced Radar Research Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma
dSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by David Schvartzman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The highly successful fleet of Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) radars is approaching its end of service, and research efforts are under way to inform a decision toward a possible WSR-88D replacement. A methodology to link radar design characteristics to impacts on how radar data are used to diagnose hazardous weather was developed through a unique partnership between radar-engineering innovations in radar simulations and National Weather Service (NWS) radar data interpretation expertise. Deep commitment to two-way learning across disciplines resulted in a methodology that is both efficient and highly relevant to the NWS hazardous weather warning program. The methodology presented in this paper is a model for revealing complex trade-offs between weather radar characteristics and their resultant impact on NWS data interpretation for threat identification. This qualitative methodology is presented in the context of a broader proof-of-concept study from which it was developed. Adapted for further research, it can support the crucial role of deriving quantitative radar design criteria that balance the trade-offs among radar capabilities, cost, and impact to users. That is, the proposed methodology supports the evaluation of candidates for a potential WSR-88D replacement and any necessary major system upgrades in the interim.

Significance Statement

Defining the requirements for an operational weather radar system is ideally achieved with clearly identified trade-offs among cost, radar design characteristics, and impacts on user data interpretation. This work is an advancement of the historic evolution of weather radar development to support the U.S. National Weather Service (NWS) mission, based on collaboration among researchers, radar engineers, and NWS forecasters. The methodology presented here is an adaptable tool for revealing these essential, but complex trade-offs, providing a roadmap for further studies toward the next-generation NWS weather radar fleet.

© 2022 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Jami Boettcher, jami.b.boettcher@noaa.gov

Abstract

The highly successful fleet of Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) radars is approaching its end of service, and research efforts are under way to inform a decision toward a possible WSR-88D replacement. A methodology to link radar design characteristics to impacts on how radar data are used to diagnose hazardous weather was developed through a unique partnership between radar-engineering innovations in radar simulations and National Weather Service (NWS) radar data interpretation expertise. Deep commitment to two-way learning across disciplines resulted in a methodology that is both efficient and highly relevant to the NWS hazardous weather warning program. The methodology presented in this paper is a model for revealing complex trade-offs between weather radar characteristics and their resultant impact on NWS data interpretation for threat identification. This qualitative methodology is presented in the context of a broader proof-of-concept study from which it was developed. Adapted for further research, it can support the crucial role of deriving quantitative radar design criteria that balance the trade-offs among radar capabilities, cost, and impact to users. That is, the proposed methodology supports the evaluation of candidates for a potential WSR-88D replacement and any necessary major system upgrades in the interim.

Significance Statement

Defining the requirements for an operational weather radar system is ideally achieved with clearly identified trade-offs among cost, radar design characteristics, and impacts on user data interpretation. This work is an advancement of the historic evolution of weather radar development to support the U.S. National Weather Service (NWS) mission, based on collaboration among researchers, radar engineers, and NWS forecasters. The methodology presented here is an adaptable tool for revealing these essential, but complex trade-offs, providing a roadmap for further studies toward the next-generation NWS weather radar fleet.

© 2022 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Jami Boettcher, jami.b.boettcher@noaa.gov
Save