Assessing NOAA Rip-Current Hazard Likelihood Predictions: Comparison with Lifeguard Observations and Parameterizations of Bathymetric and Transient Rip-Current Types

Audrey Casper aGeorge Washington University, Washington, D.C.

Search for other papers by Audrey Casper in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0290-0710
,
Emma S. Nuss bDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by Emma S. Nuss in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Christine M. Baker bDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
cDepartment of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Christine M. Baker in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Melissa Moulton bDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
eApplied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
fClimate and Global Dynamics Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Melissa Moulton in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Gregory Dusek dCenter for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services, NOAA/National Ocean Service, Silver Spring, Maryland

Search for other papers by Gregory Dusek in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Rip currents, fast offshore-directed flows, are the leading cause of death and rescues on surf beaches worldwide. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) seeks to minimize this threat by providing rip-current hazard likelihood forecasts based on environmental conditions from the Nearshore Wave Prediction System. Rip currents come in several types, including bathymetric rip currents that form when waves break on sandbars interspersed with channels and transient rip currents that form when there are breaking waves coming from multiple directions. The NOAA model was developed and tested in an area where bathymetric rip currents may be the most prevalent type of rip current. Therefore, model performance in regions where other types of rip currents (e.g., transient rip currents) may be more ubiquitous remains unknown. To investigate the efficacy of the NOAA model guidance in the context of different rip-current types, we compared modeled rip-current probabilities with physical-based parameterizations of bathymetric and transient rip-current speeds. We also compared these probabilities to lifeguard observations of bathymetric and transient rip currents from Salt Creek Beach, California, in summer and fall 2021. We found that the NOAA model skillfully predicts a wide range of hazardous parameterized bathymetric speeds but generally underpredicts hazardous transient rip-current speeds and the hazardous rip currents observed at Salt Creek Beach. Our results demonstrate how wave parameters, including directional spread, may serve as environmental indicators of rip-current hazard. By evaluating factors that influence the skill of modeled rip-current predictions, we strive toward improved rip-current hazard forecasting.

Significance Statement

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how well the NOAA rip-current hazard model predicts different rip-current types. Accurate forecasting of rip currents is important because rip currents are the leading cause of death and rescues at surf beaches worldwide. By comparing the performance of the NOAA model to parameterized rip-current speed and lifeguard observations of rip-current strength, we highlighted the model’s decreased ability to predict hazardous transient rip currents compared to hazardous bathymetric rip currents. Because bathymetric and transient rip currents are driven by different environmental conditions, an improved hazard model must be sensitive to these different conditions to predict a greater range of hazardous rip currents.

© 2024 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Melissa Moulton, mmoulton@uw.edu

Abstract

Rip currents, fast offshore-directed flows, are the leading cause of death and rescues on surf beaches worldwide. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) seeks to minimize this threat by providing rip-current hazard likelihood forecasts based on environmental conditions from the Nearshore Wave Prediction System. Rip currents come in several types, including bathymetric rip currents that form when waves break on sandbars interspersed with channels and transient rip currents that form when there are breaking waves coming from multiple directions. The NOAA model was developed and tested in an area where bathymetric rip currents may be the most prevalent type of rip current. Therefore, model performance in regions where other types of rip currents (e.g., transient rip currents) may be more ubiquitous remains unknown. To investigate the efficacy of the NOAA model guidance in the context of different rip-current types, we compared modeled rip-current probabilities with physical-based parameterizations of bathymetric and transient rip-current speeds. We also compared these probabilities to lifeguard observations of bathymetric and transient rip currents from Salt Creek Beach, California, in summer and fall 2021. We found that the NOAA model skillfully predicts a wide range of hazardous parameterized bathymetric speeds but generally underpredicts hazardous transient rip-current speeds and the hazardous rip currents observed at Salt Creek Beach. Our results demonstrate how wave parameters, including directional spread, may serve as environmental indicators of rip-current hazard. By evaluating factors that influence the skill of modeled rip-current predictions, we strive toward improved rip-current hazard forecasting.

Significance Statement

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how well the NOAA rip-current hazard model predicts different rip-current types. Accurate forecasting of rip currents is important because rip currents are the leading cause of death and rescues at surf beaches worldwide. By comparing the performance of the NOAA model to parameterized rip-current speed and lifeguard observations of rip-current strength, we highlighted the model’s decreased ability to predict hazardous transient rip currents compared to hazardous bathymetric rip currents. Because bathymetric and transient rip currents are driven by different environmental conditions, an improved hazard model must be sensitive to these different conditions to predict a greater range of hazardous rip currents.

© 2024 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Melissa Moulton, mmoulton@uw.edu
Save
  • Arun Kumar, S. V. V., and K. V. S. R. Prasad, 2014: Rip current-related fatalities in India: A new predictive risk scale for forecasting rip currents. Nat. Hazards, 70, 313335, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0812-x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Booij, N., L. H. Holthuijsen, and R. C. Ris, 1996: The “swan” wave model for shallow water. Coastal Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers, 668–676.

  • Brander, R., and T. Scott, 2018: Science of the rip current hazard. The Science of Beach Lifeguarding, CRC Press, 67–85.

  • Brewster, B. C., R. E. Gould, and R. W. Brander, 2019: Estimations of rip current rescues and drowning in the United States. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 389397, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-389-2019.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brighton, B., S. Sherker, R. Brander, M. Thompson, and A. Bradstreet, 2013: Rip current related drowning deaths and rescues in Australia 2004–2011. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 10691075, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1069-2013.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • California Beaches, 2023: Salt Creek Beach. https://www.californiabeaches.com/beach/salt-creek-beach/.

  • California Best Beaches, 2023: Salt Creek Beach directions. http://www.californiasbestbeaches.com/salt/salt_directions.html.

  • Castelle, B., and G. Masselink, 2023: Morphodynamics of wave-dominated beaches. Cambridge Prisms: Coastal Futures, 1, e1, https://doi.org/10.1017/cft.2022.2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Castelle, B., T. Scott, R. W. Brander, and R. J. McCarroll, 2016: Rip current types, circulation and hazard. Earth Sci. Rev., 163, 121, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.09.008.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Churma, M., P. Santos, A. Van de Westhuysen, G. Dusek, J. Kuhn, and J.-S. Im, 2022: NOAA probabilistic rip current forecast model. Accessed 2 March 2023, https://training.weather.gov/fdtd/training/rip_current_forecast_model/presentation_html5.html.

  • Clark, D. B., S. Elgar, and B. Raubenheimer, 2012: Vorticity generation by short-crested wave breaking. Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L24604, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL054034.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dalrymple, R. A., J. H. MacMahan, A. J. H. M. Reniers, and V. Nelko, 2011: Rip Currents. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 43, 551581, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-122109-160733.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • de Silva, A., I. Mori, G. Dusek, J. Davis, and A. Pang, 2021: Automated rip current detection with region based convolutional neural networks. Coastal Eng., 166, 103859, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2021.103859.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • de Silva, A., M. Zhao, D. Stewart, F. Hasan, G. Dusek, J. Davis, and A. Pang, 2023: Ripviz: Finding rip currents by learning pathline behavior. arXiv, 2302.12983v1, https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2023.3243834.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • de Swart, R. L., F. Ribas, G. Simarro, J. Guillén, and D. Calvete, 2021: The role of bathymetry and directional wave conditions on observed crescentic bar dynamics. Earth Surf. Processes Landforms, 46, 32523270, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5233.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dusek, G., and H. Seim, 2013a: A probabilistic rip current forecast model. J. Coastal Res., 29, 909925, https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-12-00118.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dusek, G., and H. Seim, 2013b: Rip current intensity estimates from lifeguard observations. J. Coastal Res., 29, 505518, https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-12-00117.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dusek, G., and Coauthors, 2014: Coupling a rip current forecast model to the nearshore wave prediction system. 12th Symp. on the Coastal Environment, Atlanta, GA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 3.2, https://ams.confex.com/ams/94Annual/webprogram/Paper238859.html.

  • Elgar, S., and B. Raubenheimer, 2020: Field evidence of inverse energy cascades in the surfzone. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 50, 23152321, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-19-0327.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fallon, K. M., and M. Ford, 2022: Development of a mid-Atlantic surf hazards awareness and research coordination: Collaborating to improve the forecasting, understanding, and prevention of surf hazards. OCEANS 2022, Hampton Roads, VA, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS47191.2022.9977273.

  • Gensini, V. A., and W. S. Ashley, 2010: An examination of rip current fatalities in the United States. Nat. Hazards, 54, 159175, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9458-0.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gibbs, A., A. van der Westhuysen, P. Santos, and R. Padilla, 2013: Nearshore wave prediction system: Enhancing marine forecasting capabilities during high impact events. 38th NWA Annual Meeting, Charleston, SC, National Weather Association North Charleston, 1–13, https://www.weather.gov/media/mfl/research/Session_XV_Gibbs_Alex_Nearshore.pdf.

  • Hally-Rosendahl, K., F. Feddersen, D. B. Clark, and R. T. Guza, 2015: Surfzone to inner-shelf exchange estimated from dye tracer balances. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 120, 62896308, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC010844.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Herbers, T. H. C., S. Elgar, and R. T. Guza, 1999: Directional spreading of waves in the nearshore. J. Geophys. Res., 104, 76837693, https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JC900092.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Holman, R., and M. C. Haller, 2013: Remote sensing of the nearshore. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 5, 95113, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-121211-172408.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Houser, C., S. Trimble, R. Brander, B. C. Brewster, G. Dusek, D. Jones, and J. Kuhn, 2017: Public perceptions of a rip current hazard education program: “Break the grip of the rip!”. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 10031024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1003-2017.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Houser, C., J. Lehner, N. Cherry, and P. Wernette, 2019: Machine learning analysis of lifeguard flag decisions and recorded rescues. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 25412549, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2541-2019.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Isaacson, M. S. Q., and S. Sinha, 1986: Directional wave effects on large offshore structures. J. Waterw. Port Coastal Ocean Eng., 112, 482497, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1986)112:4(482).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Johnson, D., and C. Pattiaratchi, 2004: Transient rip currents and nearshore circulation on a swell-dominated beach. J. Geophys. Res., 109, C02026, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC001798.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Johnson, D., and C. Pattiaratchi, 2006: Boussinesq modelling of transient rip currents. Coastal Eng., 53, 419439, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2005.11.005.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kumar, N., and F. Feddersen, 2017: A new offshore transport mechanism for shoreline-released tracer induced by transient rip currents and stratification. Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 28432851, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072611.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Longuet-Higgins, M. S., 1957: The statistical analysis of a random, moving surface. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc., A249, 321387, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1957.0002.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MacMahan, J., and Coauthors, 2010: Mean Lagrangian flow behavior on an open coast rip-channeled beach: A new perspective. Mar. Geol., 268, 115, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2009.09.011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MacMahan, J. H., E. B. Thornton, T. P. Stanton, and A. J. H. M. Reniers, 2005: RIPEX: Observations of a rip current system. Mar. Geol., 218, 113134, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2005.03.019.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MacMahan, J. H., E. B. Thornton, and A. J. H. M. Reniers, 2006: Rip current review. Coastal Eng., 53, 191208, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2005.10.009.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Morgan, S. G., A. L. Shanks, J. H. MacMahan, A. J. H. M. Reniers, and F. Feddersen, 2018: Planktonic subsidies to surf-zone and intertidal communities. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 10, 345369, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060514.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moulton, M., G. Dusek, S. Elgar, and B. Raubenheimer, 2017a: Comparison of rip current hazard likelihood forecasts with observed rip current speeds. Wea. Forecasting, 32, 16591666, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-17-0076.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moulton, M., S. Elgar, B. Raubenheimer, J. C. Warner, and N. Kumar, 2017b: Rip currents and alongshore flows in single channels dredged in the surf zone. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 122, 37993816, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012222.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moulton, M., S. Suanda, J. Garwood, N. Kumar, M. Fewings, and J. Pringle, 2022: Nearshore-exchange toolbox. Zenodo, accessed 23 August 2023, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6816226.

  • Moulton, M., S. H. Suanda, J. C. Garwood, N. Kumar, M. R. Fewings, and J. M. Pringle, 2023: Exchange of plankton, pollutants, and particles across the nearshore region. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 15, 167202, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-032122-115057.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Murray, T., N. Cartwright, and R. Tomlinson, 2013: Video-imaging of transient rip currents on the Gold Coast open beaches. J. Coastal Res., 65, 18091814, https://doi.org/10.2112/SI65-306.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • National Weather Service, 2021: NOAA upgrades nearshore wave prediction system. NOAA, https://www.weather.gov/news/212901-nwps.

  • NWS Environmental Modeling Center, 2023: NWPS nearshore wave prediction system. NOAA accessed 2 March 2023, https://polar.ncep.noaa.gov/nwps/viewer.shtml.

  • Peregrine, D. H., 1998: Surf zone currents. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn., 10, 295309, https://doi.org/10.1007/s001620050065.

  • Raubenheimer, B., R. T. Guza, and S. Elgar, 1996: Wave transformation across the inner surf zone. J. Geophys. Res., 101, 25 58925 597, https://doi.org/10.1029/96JC02433.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sallenger, A. H., Jr., and R. A. Holman, 1985: Wave energy saturation on a natural beach of variable slope. J. Geophys. Res., 90, 11 93911 944, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC090iC06p11939.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Short, A. D., and R. W. Brander, 1999: Regional variations in rip density. J. Coastal Res., 15, 813822.

  • Sonu, C. J., 1972: Field observation of nearshore circulation and meandering currents. J. Geophys. Res., 77, 32323247, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC077i018p03232.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Spydell, M., and F. Feddersen, 2009: Lagrangian drifter dispersion in the surf zone: Directionally spread, normally incident waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 39, 809830, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JPO3892.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Suanda, S. H., and F. Feddersen, 2015: A self-similar scaling for cross-shelf exchange driven by transient rip currents. Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 54275434, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063944.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thornton, E. B., and R. T. Guza, 1982: Energy saturation and phase speeds measured on a natural beach. J. Geophys. Res., 87, 94999508, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC087iC12p09499.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2002: CEM: Coastal engineering manual. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, https://app.knovel.com/kn/resources/kpCEM0000P/toc.

  • van der Westhuysen, A., R. Padilla-Hernandez, P. Santos, A. Gibbs, D. Gaer, T. Nicolini, E.-M. Devaliere, and H. L. Tolman, 2013: Development and validation of the nearshore wave prediction system. 11th Symp. on the Coastal Environment, Austin, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 4.5, https://ams.confex.com/ams/93Annual/webprogram/Paper222877.html.

  • Voulgaris, G., N. Kumar, and J. C. Warner, 2011: Methodology for prediction of rip currents using a three-dimensional numerical, coupled, wave current model. Rip Currents: Beach Safety, Physical Oceanography, and Wave Modeling, S. Leatherman and J. Fletemeyer, Eds., CRC Press, 87–105.

  • Wagner, M., 2021: NOAA unveils rip current prediction model. Coastal Review, https://coastalreview.org/2021/02/noaa-unveils-rip-current-prediction-model/.

  • Wilson, G. W., H. T. Özkan-Haller, and R. A. Holman, 2013: Quantifying the length-scale dependence of surf zone advection. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 118, 23932407, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20190.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wright, L. D., and A. D. Short, 1984: Morphodynamic variability of surf zones and beaches: A synthesis. Mar. Geol., 56, 93118, https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-3227(84)90008-2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wright, L. D., R. T. Guza, and A. D. Short, 1982: Dynamics of a high-energy dissipative surf zone. Mar. Geol., 45, 4162, https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-3227(82)90179-7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2187 1824 102
Full Text Views 1101 1033 7
PDF Downloads 315 232 7