Investigating the Potential of Using Mixdown Altitudes to Forecast Peak Wind Gusts

Jonathan D. W. Kahl aAtmospheric Sciences, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Search for other papers by Jonathan D. W. Kahl in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Kacper J. Zaprzalka aAtmospheric Sciences, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Search for other papers by Kacper J. Zaprzalka in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Danica S. Brezovar aAtmospheric Sciences, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Search for other papers by Danica S. Brezovar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Victoria A. Lang aAtmospheric Sciences, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Search for other papers by Victoria A. Lang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Brandon R. Selbig aAtmospheric Sciences, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Search for other papers by Brandon R. Selbig in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Austin R. Harris aAtmospheric Sciences, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Search for other papers by Austin R. Harris in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Forecast models based on the gust factor, the ratio of peak gust to sustained wind speed, have shown promise in predicting peak wind gusts in recent years. These models assume that turbulent vertical transport forced by wind flowing over upstream terrain mixes high-momentum air aloft down to the surface. A recently constructed database of hourly peak gusts, together with approximately coincident, nearby upper-air wind observations, is used to identify mixdown altitudes, the altitudes from which peak gusts descend, during different weather scenarios at 16 locations across the United States. Median mixdown altitudes generally ranged from 50 to 450 m AGL with occasional exceptions, particularly for convective gusts and at mountainous locations where terrain effects are likely to amplify gusts. A mixdown model in which surface peak gusts are predicted by obtaining forecast upper-air winds within this altitude interval was developed and tested. Our results suggest that a mixdown model methodology for forecasting peak gusts may be feasible at locations and during weather conditions where terrain-forced turbulent mixing is the principal cause of wind gusts.

© 2024 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Jonathan Kahl, kahl@uwm.edu

Abstract

Forecast models based on the gust factor, the ratio of peak gust to sustained wind speed, have shown promise in predicting peak wind gusts in recent years. These models assume that turbulent vertical transport forced by wind flowing over upstream terrain mixes high-momentum air aloft down to the surface. A recently constructed database of hourly peak gusts, together with approximately coincident, nearby upper-air wind observations, is used to identify mixdown altitudes, the altitudes from which peak gusts descend, during different weather scenarios at 16 locations across the United States. Median mixdown altitudes generally ranged from 50 to 450 m AGL with occasional exceptions, particularly for convective gusts and at mountainous locations where terrain effects are likely to amplify gusts. A mixdown model in which surface peak gusts are predicted by obtaining forecast upper-air winds within this altitude interval was developed and tested. Our results suggest that a mixdown model methodology for forecasting peak gusts may be feasible at locations and during weather conditions where terrain-forced turbulent mixing is the principal cause of wind gusts.

© 2024 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Jonathan Kahl, kahl@uwm.edu
Save
  • Al-Jowder, F. A. R., 2023: Influence of strong wind gust on transient stability of power system with FSWTGs. 57th Int. Universities Power Engineering Conf. (UPEC), Istanbul, Turkey, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1109/UPEC55022.2022.9917699.

  • ASOS User’s Guide, 1998: Automated surface observing system. 74 pp., https://www.weather.gov/media/asos/aum-toc.pdf.

  • Baran, S., and S. Lerch, 2018: Combining predictive distributions for the statistical post-processing of ensemble forecasts. Int. J. Forecasting, 34, 477496, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2018.01.005.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brasseur, O., 2001: Development and application of a physical approach to estimating wind gusts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 525, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129%3C0005:DAAOAP%3E2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brothers, M. D., and C. L. Hammer, 2023: Random forest approach for improving nonconvective high wind forecasting across southeast Wyoming. Wea. Forecasting, 38, 4767, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-21-0215.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Calderon-Sanchez, J., J. Martinez-Carrascal, and L. M. González, 2022: Computational scaling of SPH simulations for violent sloshing problems in aircraft fuel tanks (in Chinese). Acta Mech. Sin., 39, 722051, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-022-22051-x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, J., M. J. Chajes, and H. W. Shenton III, 2023: Impact of wind load characteristics on computed bridge stay-cable forces used for bridge health monitoring. J. Bridge Eng., 28, 04023007, https://doi.org/10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-5832.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coburn, J., J. Arnheim, and S. C. Pryor, 2022: Short-term forecasting of wind gusts at airports across CONUS using machine learning. Earth Space Sci., 9, e2022EA002486, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EA002486.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Durre, I., R. S. Vose, and D. B. Wuertz, 2006: Overview of the integrated global radiosonde archive. J. Climate, 19, 5368, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3594.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Durre, I., X. Yin, R. S. Vose, S. Applequist, and J. Arnfield, 2018: Enhancing the data coverage in the integrated global radiosonde archive. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 35, 17531770, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-17-0223.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fovell, R., and Y. Cao, 2014: Wind and gust forecasting in complex terrain. 15th WRF Users’ Workshop, Boulder, CO, NCAR, 5A.2, http://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/workshops/WS2014/ppts/5A.2.pdf.

  • Fovell, R. G., and A. Gallagher, 2020: Boundary layer and surface verification of the high-resolution rapid refresh, version 3. Wea. Forecasting, 35, 22552278, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-20-0101.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fovell, R. G., and A. Gallagher, 2022: An evaluation of surface wind and gust forecasts from the high-resolution rapid refresh model. Wea. Forecasting, 37, 10491068, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-21-0176.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gentile, E. S., and S. L. Gray, 2023: Attribution of observed extreme marine wind speeds and associated hazards to midlatitude cyclone conveyor belt jets near the British Isles. Int. J. Climatol., 43, 27352753, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7999.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gutiérrez, A., C. Porrini, and R. G. Fovell, 2020: Combination of wind gust models in convective events. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 199, 104118, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104118.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harper, B. A., J. D. Kepert, and J. D. Ginger, 2010: Guidelines for converting between various wind averaging periods in tropical cyclone conditions. World Meteorological Organization Tech. Doc. WMO/TD-1555, 62 pp., https://www.systemsengineeringaustralia.com.au/download/WMO_TC_Wind_Averaging_27_Aug_2010.pdf.

  • Harris, A. R., and J. D. W. Kahl, 2017: Gust factors: Meteorologically stratified climatology, data artifacts, and utility in forecasting peak gusts. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 56, 31513166, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0133.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hu, H., B. Huang, K. Dai, and H. Qu, 2022: Establishment of wind gust estimation equation in Bohai Sea. Front. Earth Sci., 10, 920048, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.920048.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hu, W., F. Letson, R. J. Barthelmie, and S. C. Prior, 2018: Wind gust characterization at wind turbine relevant heights in moderately complex terrain. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 57, 14591476, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-18-0040.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hughes, W., Q. Lu, Z. Ding, and W. Zhang, 2023: Modeling tree damages and infrastructure disruptions under strong winds for community resilience assessment. ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst., 9A, 04022057, https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-956.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • James, R. P., and P. M. Markowski, 2010: A numerical investigation of the effects of dry air aloft on deep convection. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 140161, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR3018.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kahl, J. D. W., 2020: Forecasting peak wind gusts using meteorologically stratified gust factors and MOS guidance. Wea. Forecasting, 35, 11291143, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-20-0045.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kahl, J. D. W., and H. L. Chapman, 2018: Atmospheric stability characterization using the Pasquill method: A critical evaluation. Atmos. Environ., 187, 196209, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.05.058.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kahl, J. D. W., B. R. Selbig, and A. R. Harris, 2021: Meteorologically stratified gust factors for forecasting peak wind gusts across the United States. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 102, E1665E1671, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0013.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kašpar, M., and M. Müller, 2007: Diagnostic analyses of convective events—The effect of propagating gust fronts. Atmos. Res., 83, 140151, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2005.08.003.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lang, V. A., T. J. Turner, B. R. Selbig, A. R. Harris, and J. D. W. Kahl, 2022: Predicting peak wind gusts during specific weather types with the meteorologically stratified gust factor model. Wea. Forecasting, 37, 14351446, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-21-0201.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, G., T. Li, X. Zhu, S. Wang, and J. Tang, 2023: Projection of gust wind over China under RCP8.5 scenario within CORDEX-EA-II project. Int. J. Climatol., 43, 32103224, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.8025.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lu, Z., Y. Han, Y. Liu, S. Liu, Y. Tang, Z. Liu, and J. Wei, 2022: An improvement of Wind Gust Estimate (WGE) method for squall lines. Geomatics Nat. Hazards Risk, 13, 9931013, https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2022.2064773.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Masters, F. J., P. J. Vickery, P. Bacon, and E. N. Rappaport, 2010: Toward objective, standardized intensity estimates from surface wind speed observations. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 91, 16651682, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010BAMS2942.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mendenhall, W., D. D. Wackerly, and R. L. Schaeffer, 1990: Mathematical Statistics with Applications. 4th ed. PWS-Kent Publishing, 818 pp.

  • Mohamed, A., G. K. Taylor, and S. P. Windsor, 2022: Opportunistic soaring by birds suggests new opportunities for atmospheric energy harvesting by flying robots. J. Roy. Soc. Interface, 19, 20220671, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2022.0671.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Monahan, A. H., T. Rees, Y. He, and N. McFarlane, 2015: Multiple regimes of wind, stratification, and turbulence in the stable boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci., 72, 31783198, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0311.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Monti, F., G. Sammuri, F. Montillo, O. Duriez, and A. Sforzi, 2023: Against the flow: Unexpected migration movements over the open sea by inexperienced ospreys. Eur. J. Wildl. Res., 69, 16, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-023-01641-x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Naess, A., P. H. Clausen, and R. Sandvik, 2000: Gust factors for locations downstream of steep mountain ridges. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 87, 131146, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(00)00033-7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NOAA, 1998: Automated Surface Observing System (ASOS) user’s guide. NOAA Tech. Doc., 72 pp., http://www.nws.noaa.gov/asos/aum-toc.pdf.

  • Quinet, A., and J. Neméghaire, 1991: Gust Forecasting (in French). Vol. A. Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium Publication, 57 pp.

  • Schulz, B., and S. Lerch, 2022: Machine learning methods for postprocessing ensemble forecasts of wind gusts: A systematic comparison. Mon. Wea. Rev., 150, 235257, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-21-0150.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Seidel, D. J., Y. Zhang, A. Beljaars, J.-C. Golaz, A. R. Jacobson, and B. Medeiros, 2012: Climatology of the planetary boundary layer over the continental United States and Europe. J. Geophys. Res., 117, D17106, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018143.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shao, S., L. Wang, Q. Zhao, and H. Chen, 2023: Trajectory tracking control based on prescribed performance and fractional-order state observer for unmanned helicopters with unmeasurable states. Authorea, 167364522.28863916v1,https://doi.org/10.22541/au.167364522.28863916/v1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sharan, M., T. V. B. P. S. Rama Krishna, and J. Panda, 2005: Relations among stability parameters in the stable surface layer: Golder curves revisited. Atmos. Environ., 39, 56195623, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.05.034.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sherburn, K. D., M. J. Bunkers, and A. J. Mose, 2021: Radar-based comparison of thunderstorm outflow boundary speeds versus peak wind gusts from automated stations. Wea. Forecasting, 36, 13871403, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-20-0221.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sheridan, P., 2011: Review of techniques and research for gust forecasting and parameterisation. UKMO Forecasting Research Tech. Rep. 570, 19 pp., https://digital.nmla.metoffice.gov.uk/download/file/IO_d66fb62a-ae25-4c7c-9224-43235904e773.

  • Sheridan, P., 2018: Current gust forecasting techniques, developments, and challenges. Adv. Sci. Res., 15, 159172, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-15-159-2018.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sherlock, R. H., 1952: Variation of wind velocity and gusts with height. Proc. Amer. Soc. Civ. Eng., 78, 124; 79, 120.

  • Stull, R. B., 1988: An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 666 pp.

  • Teoh, Y. E., A. Alipour, and A. Cancelli, 2019: Probabilistic performance assessment of power distribution infrastructure under wind events. Eng. Struct., 197, 109199, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.05.041.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ullah, J., T. Lutz, L. Klug, R. Radespiel, J. Wild, and R. Heinrich, 2023: Approach for aerodynamic gust load alleviation by means of spanwise-segmented flaps. J. Aircr., 60, 835856, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C037086.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Valta, H., I. Lehtonen, T. K. Laurila, A. Venäläinen, M. Laapas, and H. Gregow, 2019: Communicating the amount of windstorm induced forest damage by the maximum wind gust speed in Finland. Adv. Sci. Res., 16, 3137, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-16-31-2019.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vujec, I., and I. Odak Plenković, 2023: Kalman filter sensitivity tests for the NWP and analog-based forecasts post-processing. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 135, 1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-022-00939-w.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Walz, M. A., M. G. Donat, and G. C. Leckebusch, 2018: Large-scale drivers and seasonal predictability of extreme wind speeds over the North Atlantic and Europe. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 123, 11 51811 535, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD027958.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, J., and G. A. Kopp, 2023: Gust effect factors for regions of separated flow around rigid low-, mid-, and high-rise buildings. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 232, 105254, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2022.105254.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, K., X. Lyu, J. Huang, M. Luo, and F. Xu, 2023: Influence of topography and the underlying surface of the Bohai Sea on wind and gust forecasts. Earth Space Sci., 10, e2022EA002705, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EA002705.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Welker, C., O. Martius, P. Stucki, D. Bresch, S. Dierer, and S. Brönnimann, 2016: Modelling economic losses of historic and present-day high-impact winter windstorms in Switzerland. Tellus, 68A, 29546, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v68.29546.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wieringa, J., 1973: Gust factors over open water and built-up country. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 3, 424441, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01034986.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xiao, H., Y. Wang, Y. Zheng, Y. Zheng, X. Zhuang, H. Wang, and M. Gao, 2023: Convective-gust nowcasting based on radar reflectivity and a deep learning algorithm. Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 36113628, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3611-2023.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yang, T.-H., and C.-C. Tsai, 2019: Using numerical weather model outputs to forecast wind gusts during typhoons. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 188, 247259, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.03.003.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, X., L. He, G. Ma, and Q. Ma, 2023: Mechanism of mooring line breakage and shutdown opportunity analysis of a semi-submersible offshore wind turbine in extreme operating gust. Ocean Eng., 268, 113399, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113399.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 10076 10076 248
Full Text Views 99 99 17
PDF Downloads 136 136 21