Application of Ensemble Sensitivity for Hurricane Track Forecast Sensitivity and Flight Planning

Ryan D. Torn Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York

Search for other papers by Ryan D. Torn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4067-6684
,
Michael J. Brennan NOAA/NWS/National Hurricane Center, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Michael J. Brennan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Jason P. Dunion Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
NOAA/OAR/Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Jason P. Dunion in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The forecast motion of tropical cyclones (TCs) critically depends on the evolution of the layer-averaged steering flow, which is associated with features proximate and remote to the TC. Given this, it is of interest to objectively identify the locations and aspects of the steering flow that will have the biggest impact on subsequent TC track forecasts, which in turn could be used to identify where to take supplemental observations, such as from aircraft, or extra rawinsondes. This paper describes the application of the ensemble-based sensitivity method to evaluate the sensitivity of TC track forecasts, which was used for synoptic surveillance flight planning for 55 potential missions during the 2019–21 seasons. TC track sensitivity can be calculated from either operational ECMWF or GEFS ensemble output (following the GEFS upgrade to version 12). Several automated methods are developed and described that provide sensitivity guidance that is useful and can be quickly interpreted, including a time-integrated track metric, and defining the steering wind within a coordinate framework along the axis of greatest position variability or vorticity. For the majority of cases, the sensitivity to the steering wind is maximized within 500 km of the TC center, particularly in the vicinity of nearby weaknesses in the subtropical ridge, with comparatively less sensitivity to upstream midlatitude features.

Significance Statement

Tropical cyclone motion is primarily influenced by the steering flow, which is determined by the evolution of various atmospheric features, and can be characterized by large uncertainties due to the lack of observations and/or low predictability. This study describes an ensemble-based method of predicting where uncertainties in the steering flow have the largest impact on subsequent tropical cyclone forecasts, which can be used to identify locations where additional aircraft observations may benefit the forecast. Over a 3-yr period, tropical cyclone track forecasts were found to be most sensitive to the steering flow within 500 km of the center of the tropical cyclone, with some additional sensitivity to weaknesses in the subtropical ridge, which allows the TC to move poleward. Future work will expand this methodology toward computing sensitivity for tropical cyclone hazard forecasts.

© 2025 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Ryan D. Torn, rtorn@albany.edu

Abstract

The forecast motion of tropical cyclones (TCs) critically depends on the evolution of the layer-averaged steering flow, which is associated with features proximate and remote to the TC. Given this, it is of interest to objectively identify the locations and aspects of the steering flow that will have the biggest impact on subsequent TC track forecasts, which in turn could be used to identify where to take supplemental observations, such as from aircraft, or extra rawinsondes. This paper describes the application of the ensemble-based sensitivity method to evaluate the sensitivity of TC track forecasts, which was used for synoptic surveillance flight planning for 55 potential missions during the 2019–21 seasons. TC track sensitivity can be calculated from either operational ECMWF or GEFS ensemble output (following the GEFS upgrade to version 12). Several automated methods are developed and described that provide sensitivity guidance that is useful and can be quickly interpreted, including a time-integrated track metric, and defining the steering wind within a coordinate framework along the axis of greatest position variability or vorticity. For the majority of cases, the sensitivity to the steering wind is maximized within 500 km of the TC center, particularly in the vicinity of nearby weaknesses in the subtropical ridge, with comparatively less sensitivity to upstream midlatitude features.

Significance Statement

Tropical cyclone motion is primarily influenced by the steering flow, which is determined by the evolution of various atmospheric features, and can be characterized by large uncertainties due to the lack of observations and/or low predictability. This study describes an ensemble-based method of predicting where uncertainties in the steering flow have the largest impact on subsequent tropical cyclone forecasts, which can be used to identify locations where additional aircraft observations may benefit the forecast. Over a 3-yr period, tropical cyclone track forecasts were found to be most sensitive to the steering flow within 500 km of the center of the tropical cyclone, with some additional sensitivity to weaknesses in the subtropical ridge, which allows the TC to move poleward. Future work will expand this methodology toward computing sensitivity for tropical cyclone hazard forecasts.

© 2025 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Ryan D. Torn, rtorn@albany.edu
Save
  • Aberson, S. D., 2003: Targeted observations to improve operational tropical cyclone track forecast guidance. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 16131628, https://doi.org/10.1175//2550.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Aberson, S. D., and M. DeMaria, 1994: Verification of a nested barotropic hurricane track forecast model (VICBAR). Mon. Wea. Rev., 122, 28042815, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122%3C2804:VOANBH%3E2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ancell, B., and G. J. Hakim, 2007: Comparing adjoint- and ensemble-sensitivity analysis with applications to observation targeting. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 41174134, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007MWR1904.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Archambault, H. M., L. F. Bosart, D. Keyser, and J. M. Cordeira, 2013: A climatological analysis of the extratropical flow response to recurving western North Pacific tropical cyclones. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 23252346, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-12-00257.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Avila, L. A., S. R. Stewart, R. Berg, and A. B. Hagen, 2020: Tropical cyclone report: Hurricane Dorian (AL052019), 27 August–7 September 2019. NOAA/NHC Tech. Rep., 74 pp., https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL052019_Dorian.pdf.

  • Bassill, N. P., 2014: Accuracy of early GFS and ECMWF Sandy (2012) track forecasts: Evidence for a dependence on cumulus parameterization. Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 32743281, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059839.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Blake, E., R. Berg, and A. Hagen, 2021: Tropical cyclone report: Hurricane Zeta (AL282020), 24–29 October 2020. NOAA/NHC Tech. Rep., 56 pp., https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL282020_Zeta.pdf.

  • Chan, J. C. L., and W. M. Gray, 1982: Tropical cyclone movement and surrounding flow relationships. Mon. Wea. Rev., 110, 13541374, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1982)110%3C1354:TCMASF%3E2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, J.-H., M. S. Peng, C. A. Reynolds, and C.-C. Wu, 2009: Interpretation of tropical cyclone forecast sensitivity from the singular vector perspective. J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 33833400, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS3063.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dong, K., and C. J. Neumann, 1986: The relationship between tropical cyclone motion and environmental geostrophic flows. Mon. Wea. Rev., 114, 115122, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1986)114<0115:TRBTCM>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Galarneau, T. J., Jr., and C. A. Davis, 2013: Diagnosing forecast errors in tropical cyclone motion. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 405430, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-12-00071.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • George, J. E., and W. M. Gray, 1976: Tropical cyclone motion and surrounding parameter relationships. J. Appl. Meteor., 15, 12521264, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1976)015%3C1252:TCMASP%3E2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gombos, D., R. N. Hoffman, and J. A. Hansen, 2012: Ensemble statistics for diagnosing dynamics: Tropical cyclone track forecast sensitivities revealed by ensemble regression. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 26472669, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00002.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grams, C. M., S. C. Jones, C. A. Davis, P. A. Harr, and M. Weissmann, 2013: The impact of Typhoon Jangmi (2008) on the midlatitude flow. Part I: Upper-level ridgebuilding and modification of the jet. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 139, 21482164, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2091.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hamill, T. M., J. S. Whitaker, M. Fiorino, and S. J. Benjamin, 2011: Global ensemble predictions of 2009’s tropical cyclones initialized with an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 668688, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010MWR3456.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Holland, G. J., 1983: Tropical cyclone motion: Environmental interaction plus a beta effect. J. Atmos. Sci., 40, 328342, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1983)040<0328:TCMEIP>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoover, B. T., C. S. Velden, and S. J. Majumdar, 2013: Physical mechanisms underlying selected adaptive sampling techniques for tropical cyclones. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 40084027, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-12-00269.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ito, K., and C.-C. Wu, 2013: Typhoon-position-oriented sensitivity analysis. Part I: Theory and verification. J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 25252546, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0301.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Komaromi, W. A., S. J. Majumdar, and E. D. Rappin, 2011: Diagnosing initial condition sensitivity of Typhoon Sinlaku (2008) and Hurricane Ike (2008). Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 32243242, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-10-05018.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Landsea, C. W., and J. P. Cangialosi, 2018: Have we reached the limits of predictability for tropical cyclone track forecasting? Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 99, 22372243, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0136.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Magnusson, L., J. D. Doyle, W. A. Komaromi, R. D. Torn, C. K. Tang, J. C. L. Chan, M. Yamaguchi, and F. Zhang, 2019: Advances in understanding difficult cases of tropical cyclone track forecasts. Trop. Cyclone Res. Rev., 8, 109122, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcrr.2019.10.001.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Majumdar, S. J., 2016: A review of targeted observations. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 97, 22872303, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00259.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Majumdar, S. J., S. D. Aberson, C. H. Bishop, R. Buizza, M. S. Peng, and C. A. Reynolds, 2006: A comparison of adaptive observing guidance for Atlantic tropical cyclones. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 23542372, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3193.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Majumdar, S. J., S.-G. Chen, and C.-C. Wu, 2011: Characteristics of Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter adaptive sampling guidance for tropical cyclones. Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc., 137, 503520, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.746.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Munsell, E. B., and F. Zhang, 2014: Prediction and uncertainty of Hurricane Sandy (2012) explored through a real-time cloud-permitting ensemble analysis and forecast system assimilating airborne Doppler radar observations. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 6, 3858, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013MS000297.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nystrom, R. G., F. Zhang, E. B. Munsell, S. A. Braun, J. A. Sippel, Y. Weng, and K. Emanuel, 2018: Predictability and dynamics of Hurricane Joaquin (2015) explored through convection-permitting ensemble sensitivity experiments. J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 401424, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0137.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pasch, R. J., R. Berg, D. P. Roberts, and P. P. Papin, 2021: Tropical cyclone report: Hurricane Laura (AL132020), 20–29 August 2020. NOAA/NHC Tech. Rep., 75 pp., https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL132020_Laura.pdf.

  • Pasch, R. J., R. Berg, and A. B. Hagen, 2022: Tropical cyclone report: Hurricane Henri (AL082021), 15–23 August 2021. NOAA/NHC Tech. Rep., 42 pp., https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL082021_Henri.pdf.

  • Peng, M. S., and C. A. Reynolds, 2006: Sensitivity of tropical cyclone forecasts as revealed by singular vectors. J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 25082528, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3777.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rappaport, E. N., and Coauthors, 2009: Advances and challenges at the National Hurricane Center. Wea. Forecasting, 24, 395419, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008WAF2222128.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sippel, J. A., S. D. Ditchek, K. Ryan, and C. W. Landsea, 2024: The G-IV inner circumnavigation: A story of successful organic interactions between research and operations at NOAA. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 105, E218E232, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-23-0084.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Torn, R. D., and G. J. Hakim, 2008: Ensemble-based sensitivity analysis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 663677, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007MWR2132.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Torn, R. D., and D. Cook, 2013: The role of vortex and environment errors in genesis forecasts of Hurricanes Danielle and Karl (2010). Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 232251, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-12-00086.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Torn, R. D., and G. S. Romine, 2015: Sensitivity of central Oklahoma convection forecasts to upstream potential vorticity anomalies during two strongly forced cases during MPEX. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 40644087, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0085.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Torn, R. D., J. S. Whitaker, P. Pegion, T. M. Hamill, and G. J. Hakim, 2015: Diagnosis of the source of GFS medium-range track errors in Hurricane Sandy (2012). Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 132152, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-14-00086.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Torn, R. D., T. J. Elless, P. P. Papin, and C. A. Davis, 2018: Tropical cyclone track sensitivity in deformation steering flow. Mon. Wea. Rev., 146, 31833201, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0153.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Velden, C. S., and L. M. Leslie, 1991: The basic relationship between tropical cyclone intensity and the depth of the environmental steering layer in the Australian region. Wea. Forecasting, 6, 244253, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1991)006<0244:TBRBTC>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wick, G. A., and Coauthors, 2020: NOAA’s Sensing Hazards with Operational Unmanned Technology (SHOUT) experiment observations and forecast impacts. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 101, E968E987, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0257.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wu, C.-C., T.-S. Huang, and K.-H. Chou, 2004: Potential vorticity diagnosis of the key factors affecting the motion of Typhoon Sinlaku (2002). Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 20842093, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<2084:PVDOTK>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wu, C.-C., J.-H. Chen, P.-H. Lin, and K.-H. Chou, 2007: Targeted observations of tropical cyclone movement based on the adjoint-derived sensitivity steering vector. J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 26112626, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3974.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wu, C.-C., and Coauthors, 2009: Intercomparison of targeted observation guidance for tropical cyclones in the northwestern Pacific. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 24712492, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR2762.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 89 89 19
Full Text Views 238 238 225
PDF Downloads 167 167 155